Exploitation of semantic methods to cluster pharmacovigilance terms

Journal of Biomedical Semantics

Volumn 5, Issue 1, 2014, Pages

  Dupuch, Marie ^a,b,c   Dupuch, Laëtitia ^d   Hamon, Thierry ^e,f   Grabar, Natalia ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÉ DE LILLE   (France)

^b CENTRE DE RECHERCHE DES CORDELIERS   (France)

^c INSERM   (France)

^d UNIVERSITÉ PAUL SABATIER   (France)

^e CNRS   (France)

^f UNIVERSITÉ PARIS 13   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84904735411     PISSN: None     EISSN: 20411480     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/2041-1480-5-18     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. Brown E, Wood L, Wood S. The medical dictionary for regulatory activities (MedDRA). Drug Saf 1999, 20(2):109-117. 10.2165/00002018-199920020-00002, 10082069.
2. Meyboom R, Lindquist M, Egberts A, Edwards I. Signal selection and follow-up in pharmacovigilance. Drug Saf 2002, 25(6):459-465. 10.2165/00002018-200225060-00011, 12071784.
3. Bate A, Lindquist M, Edwards I, Olsson S, Orre R, Lansner A, De Freitas R. A Bayesian neural network method for adverse drug reaction signal generation. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 1998, 54(4):315-321. 10.1007/s002280050466, 9696956.
4. Fescharek R, Kübler J, Elsasser U, Frank M, Güthlein P. Medical dictionary for regulatory activities (MedDRA): Data retrieval and presentation. Int J Pharm Med 2004, 18(5):259-269.
5. Hauben M, Bate A. Decision support methods for the detection of adverse events in post-marketing data. Drug Discov Today 2009, 14(7-8):343-357.
6. Merrill G. The MedDRA paradox. Proc AMIA Symp 2008, 470-474.
7. Mozzicato P. Standardised MedDRA queries: their role in signal detection. Drug Saf 2007, 30(7):617-619. 10.2165/00002018-200730070-00009, 17604415.
8. Pearson R, Hauben M, Goldsmith D, Gould A, Madigan D, O'Hara D, Reisinger S, Hochberg A. Influence of the MedDRA hierarchy on pharmacovigilance data mining results. Int J Med Inform 2009, 78(12):97-103.
9. CIOMS: Development and Rational Use of Standardised MedDRA Queries (SMQs): Retrieving Adverse Drug Reactions with MedDRA. Tech. rep., CIOMS 2004, CIOMS.
10. Alecu I, Bousquet C, Jaulent M. A case report: using SNOMED CT for grouping Adverse Drug Reactions Terms. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 2008, 8:4-4. 10.1186/1472-6947-8-4, 2259331, 18218084.
11. Stearns M, Price C, Spackman K, Wang A. SNOMED clinical terms: overview of the development process and project status. Proc AMIA Symp 2001, 662-666.
12. NLM UMLS Knowledge Sources Manual 2008, Bethesda: National Library of Medicine, http://Www.nlm.nih.gov/research/umls/, NLM.
13. Jaulent M, Alecu I. Evaluation of an ontological resource for pharmacovigilance. MIE 2009, 522-526. Amsterdam: IOS Press.
14. Bousquet C, Henegar C, Lillo-Le Louet A, Degoulet P, Jaulent M. Implementation of automated signal generation in pharmacovigilance using a knowledge-based approach. Int J Med Inform 2005, 74(7-8):563-571.
15. Iavindrasana J, Bousquet C, Degoulet P, Jaulent M. Clustering WHO-ART terms using semantic distance and machine algorithms. Proc AMIA Symp 2006, 369-373.
16. Grabar N, Hamon T. Exploitation of linguistic indicators for automatic weighting of synonyms induced within three biomedical terminologies. MEDINFO 2010 2010, 1015-1019. Amsterdam: IOS Press.
17. Fellbaum C. A semantic network of english: the mother of all WordNets. Comput Humanit. EuroWordNet: A Multilingual Database with Lexical Semantic Network 1998, 32(2-3):209-220.
18. Rada R, Mili H, Bicknell E, Blettner M. Development and application of a metric on semantic nets. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern 1989, 19:17-30.
19. Wu Z, Palmer M. Verb semantics and lexical selection. Proceedings of 32nd Annual Meeting on Associations for Computational Linguistics 1994, 133-138. Stroudsburg: Associations for Computational Linguistics.
20. Leacock C, Chodorow M. Combining Local Context and WordNet Similarity for Word Sense Identification 1998, Cambridge: MIT Press.
21. Nguyen H, Al-Mubaid H. New ontology-based semantic similarity measure for the biomedical domain. 2006 IEEE International Conference on Granular Computing 2006, 623-628. Atlanta: IEEE.
22. Sussna M. Word sense disambiguation for free-text indexing using a massive semantic network. Proceedings of CIKM'93 1993, 67-74. New York: ACM.
23. Zhong J, Zhu H, Li J, Yu Y. Conceptual graph matching for semantic search. 10th International Conference on Conceptual Structures, ICCS2002. no. 2393 in LNCS 2002, 92-106. Berlin Heidelberg: Springer.
24. Seco N, Veale T, Hayes J. An intrinsic information content metric for semantic similarity in WordNet. Proceedings of ECAI 2004, the 16th European Conference on Artificial Intelligence 2004, 1089-1090. Amsterdam: IOS Press.
25. Lin D. An information-theoretic definition of similarity. International Conference on Machine Learning 1998, 296-304. San Francisco: Morgan Kaufmann.
26. Jiang J, Conrath D. Semantic similarity based on corpus statistics and lexical taxonomy. Proc. of the International. Conf. on Research in Computational Linguistics 1997, 19-33. Taipei: Academia Sinica.
27. Lord P, Stevens R, Brass A, Goble C. Investigating semantic similarity measures across the Gene Ontology: the relationship between sequence and annotation. Bioinformatics 2003, 19(10):1275-1283. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btg153, 12835272.
28. Warin M, Oxhammar H, Volk M. Enriching an ontology with wordnet based on similarity measures. MEANING-2005 Workshop 2005, 1-6. Trento: MEANING.
29. Dupuch M, Trinquart L, Colombet I, Jaulent MC, Grabar N. Exploitation of semantic similarity for adaptation of existing terminologies within biomedical area. Reuse and Adaptation of Terminologies and Ontologies (Workshop EKAW) 2010, 1-12. Lisbon: EKAW.
30. Pesquita C, Faria D, Falcão A, Lord P, Couto F. Semantic similarity in biomedical ontologies. PLoS Comput Biol 2009, 5(7):e1000443. 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000443, 2712090, 19649320.
31. Petiot D, Burgun A, Le Beux P. Modelisation of a criterion of proximity: application to medical Thesauri. MIE 1996, 149-52. Amsterdam: IOS Press.
32. Tsuruoka Y, Tateishi Y, Kim J, Ohta T, McNaught J, Ananiadou S, Tsujii J. Developing a robust part-of-speech tagger for biomedical text. LNCS. no. 3746 in LNCS. 2005, 3746:382-392.
33. Aubin S, Hamon T. Improving term extraction with terminological resources. FinTAL 2006, no. 4139 in LNAI 2006, 380-387. Berlin Heidelberg: Springer.
34. Kleiber G, Tamba I. L'hyperonymie revisitée: inclusion et hiérarchie. Langages 1990, 98:7-32.
35. Bodenreider O, Burgun A, Rindflesch T. Lexically-suggested hyponymic relations among medical terms and their representation in the UMLS. Terminologie et Intelligence artificielle (TIA) 2001, 11-21. Nancy: URI INIST CNRS.
36. Grabar N, Zweigenbaum P. Lexically-based terminology structuring. Terminology, Volume 10 2004, 23-54. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
37. Jacquemin C. A symbolic and surgical acquisition of terms through variation. Connectionist, Statistical and Symbolic Approaches to Learning for Natural Language Processing 1996, 425-438. Heidelberg: Springer.
38. Partee B. Compositionality. Varieties of Formal Semantics 1984, 281-312. Dordrecht: Foris.
39. Verspoor C, Joslyn C, Papcun G. The Gene Ontology as a source of lexical semantic knowledge for a biological natural language processing application. SIGIR Workshop on Text Analysis And Search for Bioinformatics 2003, 51-56. Toronto: ACM.
40. Ogren P, Cohen K, Acquaah-Mensah G, Eberlein J, Hunter L. The compositional structure of Gene Ontology terms. Pac Symp Biocomput 2004, 214-225.
41. Hamon T, Nazarenko A. Detection of synonymy links between terms: experiment and results. Recent Advances in Computational Terminology 2001, 185-208. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
42. Yuen N, Fram D, Vanderwall D, Almenoff J. Do standardized MedDRA queries add value to safety data mining?. ICPE 2008 2008, 1-2.
43. Nadkarni P, Darer J. Determining correspondences between high-frequency MedDRA concepts and SNOMED: a case study. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 2010, 10:66-66. 10.1186/1472-6947-10-66, 2988705, 21029418.
44. Mougin F, Dupuch M, Grabar N. Improving the mapping between MedDRA and SNOMED CT. Proceedings of the 13th Conference on Artificial intelligence in Medicine. no 6747 in LNAI 2011, 220-224. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag.
45. Declerck G, Bousquet C, Jaulent M. Automatic generation of MedDRA terms groupings using an ontology. MIE 2012, 73-77. Amsterdam: IOS Press.
46. Dupuch M, Dupuch L, Hamon T, Grabar N. Semantic distance and terminology structuring methods for the detection of semantically close terms. Proceedings of the 2012 Workshop on Biomedical Natural Language Processing (BioNLP'12) 2012, 109-117. Stroudsburg: ACL.
47. Cruse DA. Lexical Semantics 1986, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
48. Bezdek J. Pattern Recognition with Fuzzy Objective Function Algoritms 1981, New York: Plenum Press.
49. Joslyn C, Mniszewski S, Fulmer A, Heaton G. The gene ontology categorizer. Bioinformatics 2004, 20(Suppl 1):i169-i177. 10.1093/bioinformatics/bth921, 15262796.
50. Von Luxburg U. A tutorial on spectral clustering. Stat Comput 2007, 17(4):395-416.