Systematic optimization and experimental validation of ternary simulated moving bed chromatography systems

Journal of Chromatography A

Volumn 1356, Issue , 2014, Pages 82-95

  Agrawal, Gaurav ^a   Sreedhar, Balamurali ^a   Kawajiri, Yoshiaki ^a  

^a Georgia Institute of Technology   (United States)

Author keywords

Dynamic optimization; Experimental validation; Simulated moving bed chromatography; Ternary separation

Indexed keywords

BINARY MIXTURES;

DYNAMIC OPTIMIZATION; EXPERIMENTAL VALIDATIONS; MULTICOMPONENT MIXTURE; OPTIMAL OPERATING CONDITIONS; SIMULATED MOVING BED CHROMATOGRAPHY; SIMULTANEOUS OPTIMIZATION; SYSTEMATIC OPTIMIZATION; TERNARY SEPARATIONS;

CHROMATOGRAPHY;

ARTICLE; CHROMATOGRAPHY; GENERALIZED FULL CYCLE SIMULATED MOVING BED SYSTEM; JO PROCESS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROCESS OPTIMIZATION; SEPARATION TECHNIQUE; SIMULATED MOVING BED CHROMATOGRAPHY; SIMULATION; VALIDATION STUDY;

DYNAMIC OPTIMIZATION; EXPERIMENTAL VALIDATION; SIMULATED MOVING BED CHROMATOGRAPHY; TERNARY SEPARATION;

ADSORPTION; ALGORITHMS; CHROMATOGRAPHY, HIGH PRESSURE LIQUID; COMPUTER SIMULATION; LINEAR MODELS;

EID: 84904734112     PISSN: 00219673     EISSN: 18733778     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.chroma.2014.06.028     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Schmidt-Traub H., Schulte M., Seidel-Morgenstern A. Preparative Chromatography 2012, Wiley-VCH, Weinheim.
2. Guiochon G., Felinger A., Shirazi D.G., Katti A.M. Fundamentals of Preparative and Nonlinear Chromatography 2006, Academic Press, New York.
3. Nicolaos A., Muhr L., Gotteland P., Nicoud R., Bailly M. Application of equilibrium theory to ternary moving bed configurations (four plus four, five plus four, eight and nine zones). I. Linear case. J. Chromatogr. A 2001, 908:71-86.
4. Beste Y., Arlt W. Side-stream simulated moving-bed chromatography for multicomponent separation. Chem. Eng. Technol. 2002, 25:956-962.
5. Kurup A., Hidajat K., Ray A. Comparative study of modified simulated moving bed systems at optimal conditions for the separation of ternary mixtures under nonideal conditions. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2006, 45:3902-3915.
6. Kim J., Zang Y., Wankat P. Single-cascade simulated moving bed systems for the separation of ternary mixtures. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2003, 42:4849-4860.
7. Jermann S., Katsuo S., Mazzotti M. Intermittent simulated moving bed processes for chromatographic three-fraction separation. Org. Process Res. Dev. 2012, 16(2):311-322.
8. T. Masuda, T. Sonobe, F. Matsuda, M. Horie, US Patent 5,198,120 (1993).
9. Mata V., Rodrigues A. Separation of ternary mixtures by pseudo-simulated moving bed chromatography. J. Chromatogr. A 2001, 939:23-40.
10. Lee J.W., Wankat P.C. Design of pseudo-simulated moving bed process with multi-objective optimization for the separation of a ternary mixture: Linear isotherms. J. Chromatogr. A 2010, 1217:3418-3426.
11. Kurup A.S., Hidajat K., Ray A.K. Optimal operation of a pseudo-SMB process for ternary separation under non-ideal conditions. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2006, 51:387-403.
12. Nowak J., Antos D., Seidel-Morgenstern A. Theoretical study of using simulated moving bed chromatography to separate intermediately eluting target compounds. J. Chromatogr. A 2012, 1253:58-70.
13. Agrawal G., Kawajiri Y. Comparison of various ternary simulated moving bed separation schemes by multi-objective optimization. J. Chromatogr. A 2012, 1238:105-113.
14. Bentley J., Kawajiri Y. Prediction-correction method for optimization of simulated moving bed chromatography. AIChE J. 2013, 59:736-746.
15. Bentley J., Sloan C., Kawajiri Y. Simultaneous modeling and optimization of nonlinear simulated moving bed chromatography by the prediction-correction method. J. Chromatogr. A 2013, 1280:51-63.
16. Sreedhar B., Kawajiri Y. Multi-column chromatographic process development using simulated moving bed superstructure and simultaneous optimization - model correction framework. Chem. Eng. Sci. 2014, 116:428-441.
17. Hashimoto K. Kuromato Bunri Kogaku 2005, Baifukan, Tokyo, Japan.
18. Sayama K., Kamada T., Oikawa S., Masuda T. Production of raffinose - a new by-product of the beet sugar-industry. Zuckerind 1992, 117:893-898.
19. Hyoky G., Paananen H., Cotillon M. Presentation of the fast separation technology. Proceedings from the 30th Biennial Meeting of the American Society of Sugar Beet Technologists 1999, 175-185.
20. H. Heikkila, G. Hyoky, J. Kuisma, US Patent 5,127,957 (1992).
21. Kloppenburg E., Gilles E. A new concept for operating simulated moving-bed processes. Chem. Eng. Technol. 1999, 22:813.
22. Zhang Z.Y., Mazzotti M., Morbidelli M. Powerfeed operation of simulated moving bed units: changing flow-rates during the switching interval. J. Chromatogr. A 2003, 1006:87-99.
23. Kawajiri Y., Biegler L.T. Nonlinear programming superstructure for optimal dynamic operations of simulated moving bed processes. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2006, 45:8503-8513.
24. Katsuo S., Mazzotti M. Intermittent simulated moving bed chromatography: 1. Design criteria and cyclic steady-state. J. Chromatogr. A 2010, 1217:1354-1361.
25. Nilchan S., Pantelides C. On the optimisation of periodic adsorption processes. Adsorption 1998, 4:113-147.
26. Kawajiri Y., Biegler L.T. Large scale nonlinear optimization for asymmetric operation and design of Simulated Moving Beds. J. Chromatogr. A 2006, 1133:226-240.
27. Kawajiri Y., Biegler L.T. Optimization strategies for simulated moving bed and PowerFeed processes. AIChE J. 2006, 52:1343-1350.
28. Fourer R., Gay D.M., Kernighan W. AMPL: A Modeling Language for Mathematical Programming 2002, Brooks/Cole Publishing Company, CA.
29. Wachter A., Biegler L. On the implementation of a primal-dual interior point filter line search algorithm for large-scale nonlinear programming. Math. Program. 2006, 106:25.
30. Grosfils V., Levrie C., Kinnaert M., Wouwer A.V. A systematic approach to SMB processes model identification from batch experiments. Chem. Eng. Sci. 2007, 62:3894-3908.
31. Van Deemter J.J., Zuiderweg F.J., Klinkenberg A. Longitudinal diffusion and resistance to mass transfer as causes of nonideality in chromatography. Chem. Eng. Sci. 1956, 5:271-289.
32. Grossmann C., Erdem G., Morari M., Amanullah M., Mazzotti M., Morbidelli M. 'Cycle to cycle' optimizing control of simulated moving beds. AIChE J. 2008, 54(1):194-208.
33. Ozisik N. Finite Difference Methods in Heat Transfer 1994, CRC Press, Inc., Bosa Roca, USA.
34. Migliorini C., Mazzotti M., Morbidelli M. Simulated moving-bed units with extra-column dead volume. AIChE J. 1999, 45(7):1411-1421.
35. Vente J.A., Bosch H., Haan A.B.D., Bussmann P.J.T. Evaluation of sugar sorption isotherm measurement by frontal analysis under industrial processing conditions. J. Chromatogr. A 2005, 1066(1-2):71-79.
36. Ching C., Ho C., Hidajat K., Ruthven D. Experimental study of a simulated counter-current adsorption system-V. comparison of resin and zeolite absorbents for fructose-glucose separation at high concentration. Chem. Eng. Sci. 1987, 42(11):2547-2555.
37. Nowak J., Poplewska I., Antos D., Seidel-Morgenstern A. Adsorption behaviour of sugars versus their activity in single and multicomponent liquid solutions. J. Chromatogr. A 2009, 1216(50):8697-8704.
38. Nowak J., Gedicke K., Antos D., Piatkowski W., Seidel-Morgenstern A. Synergistic effects in competitive adsorption of carbohydrates on an ion-exchange resin. J. Chromatogr. A 2007, 1164(1-2):224-234.
39. Agrawal G., Kawajiri Y. Optimization of ternary simulated moving bed separation by superstructure formulation. Proceedings of Foundations of Computer-Aided Process Operations (FOCAPO) 2012, N.V. Sahinidis, J. Pinto (Eds.).
40. Kawajiri Y., Biegler L.T. Comparison of configurations of a four-column simulated moving bed process by multi-objective optimization. Adsorption 2007, 14(2-3):433-442.