Prediction-correction method for optimization of simulated moving bed chromatography

AIChE Journal

Volumn 59, Issue 3, 2013, Pages 736-746

  Bentley, Jason ^a   Kawajiri, Yoshiaki ^a  

^a Georgia Institute of Technology   (United States)

Author keywords

Chromatography; Dynamic optimization; Parameter estimation; Process development; Simulated moving bed

Indexed keywords

DYNAMIC OPTIMIZATION; EXPERIMENTAL DATUM; HIGH PURITY; LINEAR ISOTHERMS; MANUAL TUNING; MODEL MISMATCH; OPERATING CONDITION; OPTIMAL OPERATING CONDITIONS; OPTIMAL PRODUCTIVITY; PREDICTION-CORRECTION; PROCESS DEVELOPMENT; SIMULATED MOVING BED; SIMULATED MOVING BED CHROMATOGRAPHY;

ALGORITHMS; CHROMATOGRAPHY; COLUMN CHROMATOGRAPHY; ISOTHERMS; PARAMETER ESTIMATION;

OPTIMIZATION;

EID: 84874511963     PISSN: 00011541     EISSN: 15475905     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/aic.13856     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Ruthven DM, Ching CB. Counter-current and simulated counter-current adsorption separation processes. Chem Eng Sci. 1989;44:1011-1038.
2. Schmidt-Traub H. Preparative Chromatography. Wienheim:Wiley-VCH, 2005.
3. Guiochon G, Felinger A, Shirazi DG, Katti AM. Fundamentals of Preparative and Nonlinear Chromatography. San Diego:Academic Press, 2006.
4. Mazzotti M, Storti G, Morbidelli M. Optimal operation of simulated moving bed units for nonlinear chromatographic separations. J Chromatogr A. 1997;769:3-24.
5. Lehoucq S, Verheve D, Wouwer AV, Cavoy E. SMB enantioseparation: process development, modeling, and operating conditions. AIChE. 2000;46:247-256.
6. Feist SD, Hasabnis Y, Pynnonen BW, Frank TC. SMB chromatorgaphy design using profile advancement factors, miniplant data, and rate-based process simulation. AIChE. 2009;55:2848-2860.
7. Grosfils V, Levrie C, Kinnaert M, Wouwer AV. A systematic approach to SMB processes model identification from batch experiments. Chem Eng Sci. 2007;62:3894-3908.
8. Grosfils V, Hanus R, Wouwer AV, Kinnaert M. Parametric uncertainties and influence of the dead volume representation in modelling simulated moving bed separation processes. J Chromatogr A. 2010;1217:7359-7371.
9. Küpper A, Wirsching L, Diehl M, Schloder JP, Bock HG, Engell S. Online identification of adsorption isotherm in SMB processes via efficient moving horizon state and parameter estimation. Comput Chem Eng. 2010;34:1969-1983.
10. Klatt KU, Hanisch F, Dunnebier G, Engell S. Model-based optimization and control of chromatographic processes. Comput Chem Eng. 2000;24:1119-1126.
11. Grossmann C, Erdem G, Morari M, Amanullah M, Mazzotti M, Morbidelli M. 'Cycle to cycle' optimizing control of simulated moving beds. AIChE. 2008;54:194-208.
12. Biegler LT, Grossmann IE, Westerberg AW. A note on approximation techniques used for process optimization. Comput Chem Eng. 1985;9:201-206.
13. Migliorini C, Mazzotti M, Morbidelli M. Simulated moving bed units with extra-column dead volume. AIChE. 1999;45:1411-1421.
14. Kawajiri Y, Biegler LT. Optimization strategies for simulated moving bed and PowerFeed processes. AIChE. 2006;52:1343-1350.
15. Schiesser WE. The Numerical Method of Lines: Integration of Partial Differential Equation. San Diego:Academic Press, 1991.
16. Nilchan S, Pantelides CC. On the optimization of periodic adsorption processes. Adsorption. 1998;4:113-147.
17. Model Validation Guide. Process Systems Enterprise Ltd. 2011. Available at: www.psenterprise.com.
18. Li S, Kawajiri Y, Raisch J, Seidel-Morgenstern A. Optimization of startup and shutdown operation of simulated moving bed chormatographic processes. J Chromatogr A. 2011;1218:3876-3889.