|
Volumn 1238, Issue , 2012, Pages 105-113
|
Comparison of various ternary simulated moving bed separation schemes by multi-objective optimization
|
Author keywords
Dynamic optimization; Multi component separation; Nonlinear programming; Simulated moving bed chromatography
|
Indexed keywords
DESORBENT-TO-FEED RATIO;
DYNAMIC OPTIMIZATION;
MULTI OBJECTIVE OPTIMIZATIONS (MOO);
MULTI-COMPONENT SEPARATION;
MULTI-OBJECTIVE OPTIMIZATION PROBLEM;
MULTICOMPONENT MIXTURE;
OPERATING CONDITION;
OPERATING SCHEMES;
SIMULATED MOVING BED;
SIMULATED MOVING BED CHROMATOGRAPHY;
TERNARY SEPARATIONS;
BINARY MIXTURES;
COLUMN CHROMATOGRAPHY;
DISTILLATION COLUMNS;
MULTIOBJECTIVE OPTIMIZATION;
NONLINEAR PROGRAMMING;
PRODUCTIVITY;
SEPARATION;
ANALYTIC METHOD;
ARTICLE;
CHROMATOGRAPHY;
CONTROLLED STUDY;
DESORPTION;
ELUTION;
INTERMETHOD COMPARISON;
MATHEMATICAL COMPUTING;
MATHEMATICAL MODEL;
PHASE SEPARATION;
PHYSICAL PHASE;
PRIORITY JOURNAL;
PROCESS OPTIMIZATION;
SIMULATED MOVING BED CHROMATOGRAPHY;
STRUCTURE ANALYSIS;
CHROMATOGRAPHY, LIQUID;
COMPUTER SIMULATION;
MODELS, THEORETICAL;
|
EID: 84859939581
PISSN: 00219673
EISSN: 18733778
Source Type: Journal
DOI: 10.1016/j.chroma.2012.03.064 Document Type: Article |
Times cited : (35)
|
References (23)
|