Empirical fragility functions based on remote sensing and field data after the 12 January 2010 Haiti earthquake

Earthquake Spectra

Volumn 29, Issue 4, 2013, Pages 1275-1310

  Hancilar, Ufuk ^a   Taucer, Fabio ^a   Corbane, Christina ^a  

^a JOINT RESEARCH CENTRE   (Italy)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANTENNAS; DAMAGE DETECTION; EARTHQUAKES;

AERIAL IMAGES; BUILDING STOCKS; DAMAGE ASSESSMENTS; FIELD CAMPAIGN; FRAGILITY FUNCTION; HAITI EARTHQUAKES; MATERIAL TYPES; URBAN ZONES;

REMOTE SENSING;

AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHY; BUILDING; DYNAMIC RESPONSE; EARTHQUAKE MAGNITUDE; HAITI EARTHQUAKE 2010; NUMERICAL MODEL; REMOTE SENSING; SATELLITE DATA; SATELLITE IMAGERY; STRUCTURAL RESPONSE;

EID: 84904720261     PISSN: 87552930     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1193/121711EQS308M     Document Type: Article

References (81)

1. Allen, T. I., and Wald, D. J., 2007. Topographic slope as a proxy for seismic site conditions (Vs;30) and amplification around the globe, U.S. Geological Survey, Open-File Report 2007-1357, 69 pp.
2. Applied Technology Council (ATC), 1985. Earthquake damage evaluation data for California (ATC-13), Redwood City, CA.
3. Baker, J. W., and Cornell, C. A., 2005. A vector-valued ground motion intensity measure consisting of spectral acceleration and epsilon, Earthquake Engng Struct. Dyn. 34, 1193-1217.
4. Baker, J. W., 2011. Fitting fragility functions to structural analysis data using maximum likelihood method, available at http://www.stanford.edu/ bakerjw/fragility/Baker-%282011%29-fragility-fitting.pdf.
5. Benz, U., Hofman, P., Wilhauck, G., Lingenfelder, I., and Heynen, M., 2004. Multi-resolution, object-oriented fuzzy analysis of remote sensing data for GIS-ready information, ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing 58, 239-258.
6. Booth, E., Saito, K., Spence, R., Madabhushi, G., and Eguchi, R. T., 2011. Validating assessments of seismic damage made from remote sensing, Earthquake Spectra 27, 157-177.
7. Borzi, B., Dell'Acqua, F., Faravelli, M., Gamba, P., Lisini, G., Onida, M., and Polli, D., 2011. Vulnerability study on a large industrial area using satellite remotely sensed images, Bull Earthq Eng 9, 675-690.
8. Braga, F., Dolce, M., and Liberatore, D., 1982. A statistical study on damaged buildings and ensuing review of the MSK-76 scale, in Proceedings of the 7th European Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Athens, Greece.
9. Calvi, G. M., Pinho, R., Magenes, G., Bommer, J. J., Restrepo- Vélez, L. F., and Crowley, H., 2006. Development of seismic vulnerability assessment methodologies over the past 30 years, ISET Journal of Earthquake Technology 43, 75-104.
10. Chiroiu, L., 2005. Damage assessment of the 2003 Bam, Iran, Earthquake using Ikonos imagery, Earthquake Spectra 21, 219-224.
11. Coburn, A., and Spence, R., 2002. Earthquake Protection (Second Edition), John Wiley & Sons Ltd., Chichester, England.
12. Cochran, W. G., 1967. Sampling Techniques, John Wiley & Sons, New York, 74-76.
13. Colombi, M., Borzi, B., Crowley, H., Onida, M., Meroni, F., and Pinho, R., 2008. Deriving vulnerability curves using Italian earthquake damage data, Bull Earthq Eng 6, 485-504.
14. Corbane, C., Carrion, D., Lemoine, G., and Broglia, M., 2011a. Comparison of damage assessment maps derived from very high spatial resolution satellite and airborne imagery produced for the Haiti 2010 earthquake, Earthquake Spectra 27, 199-218.
15. Corbane, C., Saito, K., Dell'Oro, L., Gill, S. P. D., Piard, B. E., Huyck, C. K., Kemper, T., Lemoine, G., Spence, R. J. S., Shankar, R., Senegas, O., Ghesquiere, F., Lallemant, D., Evans, G. B., Gartley, R. A., Toro, J., Ghosh, S., Svekla, W. D., Adams, B. J., and Eguchi, R. T., A comprehensive analysis of building damage in the January 12, 2010 Mw7 Haiti Earthquake using high-resolution satellite and aerial imagery, Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing 77, 997-1009.
16. Eberhard, M. O., Baldridge, S., Marshall, J., Mooney, W., and Rix, G. J., 2010. The MW 7.0 Haiti earthquake of January 12, 2010, USGS/EERI Advance Reconnaissance Team Report, U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 2010-1048, 58 pp., available at http://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2010/1048/.
17. Ehrlich, D., Guo, H. D., Molch, K., Ma, J. W., and Pesaresi, M., 2009. Identifying damage caused by the 2008 Wenchuan Earthquake from VHR remote sensing data, Int J Digital Earth 2, 309-326.
18. Erdik, M., and Aydinoglu, N., 2002. Earthquake Performance and Vulnerability of Buildings in Turkey, The World Bank Group Disaster Management Facility Report, 48 pp.
19. Erdik, M., Sesetyan, K., Demircioglu, M. B., Hancilar, U., and Zulfikar, C., 2011. Rapid earthquake loss assessment after damaging earthquakes, Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 31, 247-266.
20. ESRI, Inc., 2010. ArcView, ArcMap 10.0.
21. Fierro, E., and Perry, C., 2010. Preliminary Reconnaissance Report - 12 January 2010 Haiti earthquake, PEER Report 2010, University of California, Berkeley, available at http://supersites.earthobservations.org/Haiti- Reconnaissance.pdf.
22. Gamba, P., and Houshmand, B., 1999. Integration of high resolution multispectral imagery with LIDAR and IfSAR data for urban analysis applications, International Archives of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing 32, 111-117.
23. GEM Foundation, 2012. Global Earthquake Model, available at http://www.globalquakemodel. org.
24. Ghosh, S., Huyck, C. K., Greene, M., Gill, S. P., Bevington, J., Svekla, W., DesRoches, R., and Eguchi, R. T., 2011. Crowdsourcing for rapid damage assessment: The global earth observation catastrophe assessment network (GEO-CAN), Earthquake Spectra 27, 179-198.
25. Giovinazzi, S., and Lagomarsino, S., 2004. A macroseismic method for the vulnerability assessment of buildings, in Proceedings of the 13th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Vancouver, Canada.
26. Gokon, H., Koshimura, S., and Matsuoka, M., 2010. Developing tsunami fragility curves for structural destruction in American Samoa, in Proceedings of the 8th International Workshop on Remote Sensing for Disaster Management, Tokyo.
27. Government of the Republic of Haiti (Haiti PDNA), 2010. Haiti Earthquake Post Disaster Needs Assessment: Assessment of damage, losses, general and sectoral needs, Annex to the Action Plan for National Recovery and Development of Haiti.
28. Group on Earth Observations, 2012a. The Global Earth Observation System of Systems (GEOSS), available at http://www.earthobservations.org/geoss.shtml.
29. Group on Earth Observations, 2012b. Haiti Event Supersite Website, available at http://supersites .earthobservations.org/haiti.php.
30. Grünthal, G. (editor), 1998. European Macroseismic Scale 1998 (EMS-98), in Cahiers du Centre Européen de Géodynamique et de Séismologie, v. 15, Luxembourg.
31. Heintz, J. A., and Poland, C. D., 2001. Correlating measured ground motion with observed damage, Earthquake Spectra 17, Supplement A, Chi-Chi, Taiwan, Earthquake of September 21, 1999: Reconnaissance Report, 110-130.
32. Jaiswal, K., Wald, D., and Porter, K., 2010. A global building inventory for earthquake loss estimation and risk management, Earthquake Spectra 26, 731-748.
33. Jaiswal, K., Wald, D., and D'Ayala, D., 2011. Developing empirical collapse fragility functions for global building types, Earthquake Spectra 27, 775-795.
34. Joint Research Centre (JRC), 2010. Building damage assessment report, Haiti Earthquake 12 January 2010 Joint Damage Assessment, JRC Scientific and Technical Report, Ispra, Italy.
35. Karababa, F. Y., and Pomonis, A., 2011. Damage data analysis and vulnerability estimation following the August 14, 2003 Lefkada Island, Greece, Earthquake, Bull Earthq Eng 9, 1015-1046.
36. King, S. A., Kiremidjian, A. S., Sarabandi, P., and Pachakis, D., 2005. Correlation of Observed Building Performance with Measured Ground Motion, The John A. Blume Earthquake Engineering Center, Stanford University, Report No. 148.
37. Kircher, C. A., Nassar, A. A., Kustu, O., and Holmes, W. T., 1997. Development of building damage functions for earthquake loss estimation, Earthquake Spectra 13, 663-682.
38. Koshimura, S., Oie, T., Yanagisawa, H., and Imamura, F., 2009. Developing fragility curves for tsunami damage estimation using numerical model and post-tsunami data from Banda Aceh, Indonesia, Coast Eng J 51, 243-273.
39. Lee, B. J., Chou, T. Y., Hsiao, C. P., Chung, L. K., Huang, P. H., and Wu, Y. B., 2002. The statistics and analysis of building damage on Chi-Chi earthquake, in International Training Programs for Seismic Design of Building Structures, National Centre for Research on Earthquake Engineering, Taipei, Taiwan.
40. Lemoine, G., Corbane, C., Louvrier, C., and Kauffmann, M., 2013. Intercomparison and validation of building damage assessments based on post-Haiti 2010 earthquake imagery using multi-source reference data, Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci. Discuss. 1, 1445-1486.
41. Liel, A. B., and Lynch, K. P., 2012. Vulnerability of reinforced concrete frame buildings and their occupants in the 2009 L'Aquila, Italy, earthquake, Natural Hazards Review 13, 1-16.
42. Marshall, J. D., Lang, A. F., Baldridge, S. M., and Popp, D. R., 2011. Recipe for disaster: Construction methods, materials, and building performance in the January 2010 Haiti earthquake, Earthquake Spectra 27, 323-343.
43. The MathWorks, Inc., 2011. Matlab v7.13.0: The Language of Technical Computing, August 2011.
44. Matsuoka, M., and Yamazaki, F., 2004. Use of satellite SAR intensity imagery for detecting building areas damaged due to earthquakes, Earthquake Spectra 20, 975-994.
45. Matsuoka, M., and Nojima, N., 2010. Building damage estimation by integration of seismic intensity information and satellite L-band SAR imagery, Remote Sensing 2, 2111- 2126.
46. Matsuoka, M., and Yamazaki, F., 2010. Comparative analysis for detecting areas with building damage from several destructive earthquakes using satellite synthetic aperture radar images, J Appl Remote Sens 4, 041867.
47. Medvedev, S., and Sponheuer, W., 1969. MSK Scale of Seismic Intensity, in Proceedings of the 4th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Santiago, Chile.
48. Mitomi, H., Yamazaki, F., and Matsuoka, M., 2000. Automated detection of building damage due to recent earthquakes using aerial television images, in Proceedings of the 21st Asian Conference on Remote Sensing, Taipei, Taiwan.
49. Miura, H., and Midorikawa, S., 2006. Updating GIS building inventory data using highresolution satellite images for earthquake damage assessment: Application to Metro Manila, Philippines, Earthquake Spectra 22, 151-168.
50. Miyakoshi, J., Hayashi, Y., Tamura, K., and Fukuwa, N., 1997. Damage ratio functions of buildings using damage data of the 1995 Hyogoken- Nanbu earthquake, in 7th International Conference on Structural Safety and Reliability (ICOSSAR '97), 1, 349-354, Kyoto, Japan.
51. Musson, R. M., Grünthal, G., and Stucchi, M., 2010. The comparison of macroseismic intensity scales. J Seismol 14, 413-428.
52. Network of European Research Infrastructures for Earthquake Risk Assessment and Mitigation (NERA), 2012. Available at http://www.nera-eu.org.
53. Orsini, G., 1999. A model for buildings' vulnerability assessment using the parameterless scale of seismic intensity (PSI), Earthquake Spectra 15, 463-83.
54. Papanikolaou, A., and Taucer, F., 2004. Review of Non-Engineered Houses in Latin America with Reference to Building Practices and Self-Construction Projects, JRC Scientific and Technical Report, European Commission, Ispra, Italy.
55. Rezaeiana, M., and Gruena, A., 2011. Automatic 3D building extraction from aerial and space images for earthquake risk management, Georisk: Assessment and Management of Risk for Engineered Systems and Geohazards 5, 77-96.
56. Rossetto, T., and Elnashai, A., 2003. Derivation of vulnerability functions for European-type RC structures based on observational data, Eng Struct 25, 1241-1263.
57. Rota, M., Penna, A., and Strobbia, C. L., 2008. Processing Italian damage data to derive typological fragility curves, Soil Dyn Earthquake Eng 28, 933-947.
58. RS-8 2010, 2010. Workshop summary and resolutions, in the 8th International Workshop on Remote Sensing for Disaster Management, Tokyo, Japan. http://mceer.buffalo .edu/publications/workshop/RS-8/00Workshop-Resolutions.pdf (last accessed 15 August 2011).
59. Sabetta, F., Goretti, A., and Lucantoni, A., 1998. Empirical fragility curves from damage surveys and estimated strong ground motion, in Proceedings of 11th European Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Paris.
60. Saito, K., Spence, R. J. S., Going, C., and Markus, M., 2004. Using high-resolution satellite images for post-earthquake building damage assessment: A study following the 26 January 2001 Gujarat Earthquake, Earthquake Spectra 20, 145-169.
61. Spence, R., Coburn, A., and Pomonis, A., 1992. Correlation of ground motion with building damage: the definition of a new damage-based seismic intensity scale, in Proceedings of the 10th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
62. Sarabandi, P., Pachakis, D., King, S. A., and Kiremidjian, A. S., 2004. Empirical fragility functions from recent earthquakes, in Proceedings of the 13th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Vancouver, Canada.
63. Scawthorn, C., Iemura, H., and Yamada, Y., 1981. Seismic damage estimation for low- and midrise buildings in Japan, Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 9, 93-115.
64. Shankar, R., 2010. Accuracy Assessment of Post-Earthquake Building Damage Classification Haiti, M.S. Thesis, University of Copenhagen.
65. Shinozuka, M., Chang, S. E., Eguchi, R. T., Abrams, D. P., Hwang, H. H. M., and Rose, A., 1997. Advances in earthquake loss estimation and application to Memphis, Tennessee, Earthquake Spectra 13, 739-758.
66. Shinozuka, M., Feng, M. Q., Lee, J., and Naganuma, T., 2000. Statistical analysis of fragility curves, Journal of Engineering Mechanics (ASCE) 126, 1224-1231.
67. Singhal, A., and Kiremidjian, A. S., 1996. Method for probabilistic evaluation of seismic structural damage, J of Struct Eng ASCE 122, 1459-1467.
68. Straub, D., and Der Kiureghian, A. S., 2008. Improved seismic fragility modeling from empirical data, Struct Safety 30, 320-336.
69. Suppasri, A., Koshimura, S, and Imamura, F., 2011. Developing tsunami fragility curves based on the satellite remote sensing, the numerical modeling of the 2004 Indian Ocean tsunami in Thailand. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci 11, 173-189.
70. SYNER-G, 2012. Systemic Seismic Vulnerability and Risk Analysis for Buildings, Lifeline Networks, and Infrastructures Safety Gain, EC FP7, available at http://www.vce.at/SYNER-G/.
71. Taucer, F., Corbane, C., and Gerhardinger, A., 2010. Haiti Earthquake of 12 January 2010: Field damage assessment, data collection and analysis, in Proceedings of Sismica 2010 - 8° Congresso de Sismologia e Engenharia Sismica, University of Aveiro, Portugal.
72. The Caribbean Regional Programme of the Global Earthquake Model (GEM): http://www .globalquakemodel.org/what/regions/caribbean-central-america/
73. United Nations Institute for Training and Research (UNITAR), 2010. Haiti Earthquake 2010: Remote Sensing based Building Damage Assessment Data, available at http://www .unitar.org/unosat/haiti-earthquake-2010-remote-sensing-based- building-damage-assessmentdata.
74. U.S. Geological Survey (USGS), 2011. ShakeMap Scientific Background, available at http://earthquake.usgs.gov/earthquakes/eqinthenews/2010/us2010rja6/ (last accessed 21 May 2011).
75. U.S. Geological Survey (USGS), 2010. http://earthquake.usgs.gov/ earthquakes/recenteqsww/Quakes/us2010rja6.php#details.
76. Wald, D. J., Worden, B. C., Quitoriano, V., and Pankow, K. L., 2005. ShakeMap manual: Technical manual, user's guide, and software guide, U.S. Geological Survey Techniques and Methods 2005, Book 12, Section A, Chap. 1, Reston, VA.
77. Wald, D. J., Lin, K. W., and Quitoriano, V., 2008. Quantifying and Qualifying USGS ShakeMap Uncertainty, USGS Open-File Report 2008-1238.
78. Whitman, R. V., Reed, J. W., and Hong, S. T., 1973. Earthquake damage probability matrices, in Proceedings of the 5th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Rome.
79. Wood, H. O., and Neumann, F., 1931. Modified Mercalli Intensity Scale of 1931, Bull of the Seismological Society of America 21, 277-283.
80. Yamaguchi, N., and Yamazaki, F., 2000. Fragility curves for buildings in Japan based on damage surveys after the 1995 Kobe earthquake, in Proceedings of the 12th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Auckland, New Zealand.
81. Yamazaki, F., and Murao, O., 2000. Vulnerability functions for Japanese buildings based on damage data from the 1995 Kobe earthquake, Implication of Recent Earthquakes on Seismic Risk, Series on Innovation and Construction 2, Imperial College Press, London, 91-102.