Comparison of damage assessment maps derived from very high spatial resolution satellite and aerial imagery produced for the Haiti 2010 earthquake

Earthquake Spectra

Volumn 27, Issue SUPPL. 1, 2011, Pages

  Corbane, Christina ^a   Carrion, Daniela ^a   Lemoine, Guido ^a   Broglia, Marco ^a  

^a JOINT RESEARCH CENTRE   (Italy)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHY; ANTENNAS; EARTHQUAKES; SATELLITE IMAGERY;

AERIAL IMAGERY; BUILDING DAMAGE; COLLAPSED STRUCTURES; DAMAGE ASSESSMENTS; DAMAGE INTENSITY; POST DISASTERS; SATELLITE DATA; VERY HIGH SPATIAL RESOLUTIONS;

DAMAGE DETECTION;

EID: 80055077154     PISSN: 87552930     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1193/1.3630223     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Agresti, A., 2002. Categorical Data Analysis, 2nd Edition, Wiley-Interscience, Hoboken, NJ, 734 pp.
2. Anselin, L., 1995. Local indicators of spatial association-LISA, Geographical Analysis 27, 93-115.
3. Brunner, D., Lemoine, G., and Bruzzone, L., 2010. Earthquake damage assessment of buildings using VHR optical and SAR imagery, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing 48, 2403-2419.
4. Chiroiu, L., 2005. Damage assessment of the 2003 Bam, Iran, earthquake using Ikonos imagery, Earthquake Spectra 21, S219-S224.
5. Chiroiu, L. and André, G., 2001. Damage assessment using high resolution satellite imagery: Application to 2001 Bhuj, India earthquake, RiskWorld, Reports and Papers, http://www.riskworld.
6. com/Nreports/2001/Bhuj,India,earthquake2001.PD, posted September 2001.
7. Congalton, R. G., 1991. A review of assessing the accuracy of classifications of remotely sensed data, Remote Sensing of Environment 37, 35-46.
8. Congalton, R. G., 2001. Accuracy assessment and validation of remotely sensed and other spatial information, International Journal of Wildland Fire 10, 321-328.
9. Corbane, C., Saito, K., Dell'Oro, L., Gill, S., Piard, B., Huyck, C., Kemper, T., Lemoine, G., Spence, R., Krishnan, R., Bjorgo, E., Senegas, O., Ghesquiere, F., Lallemant, D., Evans, G., Gartley, R., Toro, J., Ghosh, S., Svekla, W., Adams, B., and Eguchi, R., 2011. A comprehensive analysis of building damage in the January 12, 2010 Mw7 Haiti earthquake using highresolution satellite and aerial imagery, Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing (PE&RS) 77(10).
10. Cramér, H., 1999. Mathematical Methods of Statistics, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, 575 pp.
11. Csillag, F. and Boots B., 2004. Toward comparing maps as spatial processes, in Developments in Spatial Data Handling (P. F. Fisher, ed.), Springer, Berlin, Germany, 641-652.
12. Foody, G. M., 2002. Status of land cover classification accuracy assessment, Remote Sensing of Environment 80, 185-201. (Pubitemid 34271212)
13. Getis, A. and Ord, J. K., 1996. Local spatial statistics: An overview, in Spatial Analysis: Modeling in a GIS Environment (P. Longley and L. Batty, eds.), John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York, NY, 261-277.
14. Gonzalez, R. C. and Woods, R. E., 1992. Digital Image Processing, Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA, 954 pp.
15. Grünthal, G. (ed.), 2001. European Macroseismic Scale 1998 (EMS-98), Centre Europèen De Géodynamique et De Séismologie, Luxembourg.
16. Gusella, L., Adams, B. J., Bitelli, G., Huyck, C. K., and Mognol, A., 2005. Object-oriented image understanding and post-earthquake damage assessment for the 2003 Bam, Iran, earthquake, Earthquake Spectra 21, S225-S238.
17. Gustafson, E. J., 1998. Quantifying landscape spatial pattern: What is the state of the art? Ecosystems 1, 143-156. (Pubitemid 128664039)
18. Hagen-Zanker, A., Straatman, B., and Uljee, I., 2005. Further developments of a fuzzy set map comparison approach, International Journal of Geographical Information Science 19, 769-785. (Pubitemid 41269454)
19. Hagen, A., 2003. Fuzzy set approach to assessing similarity of categorical maps, International Journal of Geographical Information Science 17, 235-249. (Pubitemid 36380689)
20. Hasegawa, H., Yamazaki, F., Matsuoka M., and Seikimoto, I., 2000. Determination of building damage due to earthquakes using aerial television images, Paper No. 1722, 12th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, January 30-February 4, 2000, Auckland, New Zealand.
21. Hengjian, L., Kohiyama, M., Horie, K., Maki, N., Hayashi, H., and Tanaka, S., 2003. Building damage and casualties after an earthquake, Natural Hazards 29, 387-403. (Pubitemid 37061163)
22. Kemper, T., Lemoine, G., Corbane C., Gill, S., Eguchi, R., Bjorgo, E., and Dell'Oro, L., 2010. Building Damage Assessment Report-Haiti Earthquake 12 January 2010 Joint Damage Assessment, JRC59706.
23. Lalor, G. C. and Zhang, C., 2001. Multivariate outlier detection and remediation in geochemical databases, Science of the Total Environment 281, 99-109. (Pubitemid 33121240)
24. Lemoine, G., 2010. Validation of building damage assessments based on post-Haiti 2010 earthquake imagery using multi-source reference data, VALgEO 2010, 2nd International Workshop on Validation of Geo-Information Products for Crisis Management, October 11-13, 2010, Ispra, Italy.
25. Liu, J.-H., Shan, X.-J., and Yin, J.-Y., 2004. Automatic recognition of damaged town buildings caused by earthquake using remote sensing information: Taking the 2001 Bhuj, India, earthquake and the 1976 Tangshan, China, earthquake as examples, Acta Seismologica Sinica 17, 686-696.
26. Matsuoka, M., Vu, T. T., and Yamazaki, F., 2004. Automated damage detection and visualization of the 2003 Bam, Iran earthquake using high-resolution satellite images, 25th Asian Conference on Remote Sensing, November 22-26, 2004, Chiang Mai, Thailand.
27. Ogawa, N. and Yamazaki, F., 2000. Photo-interpretation of buildings damage due to earthquakes using aerial photographs, Paper No. 1906, 12th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, January 30-February 4, 2000, Auckland, New Zealand.
28. Open Street Map (OSM), 2010, Haiti Crisis Map, http://haiti. openstreetmap.nl/, accessed July 2, 2010.
29. Ping, L. and Xiaxin, T., 2005. Quantitative earthquake damage detection from changes in remote sensing images-A case study, IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium, July 25-29, 2005, Seoul, South Korea.
30. Rathje, E. M., Crawford, M., Woo K., and Neuenschwander, A., 2005. Damage patterns from satellite images from the 2003 Bam, Iran, earthquake, Earthquake Spectra 21, S295-307.
31. Rees, W. G., 2008. Comparing the spatial content of thematic maps, International Journal of Remote Sensing 29, 3833-3844. (Pubitemid 351917162)
32. Rezaeian, M. and Gruen, A., 2007. Automatic classification of collapsed buildings using object and image space features, in Geomatics Solutions for Disaster Management (J. Li, S. Zlatanova, and A. G. Fabbri, eds.), Springer, Berlin, Germany, 135-148.
33. Saito, K., Spence, R., Eeri, M., Going, C., and Markus, M., 2004. Using high-resolution satellite images for post earthquake building damage assessment: A study following the 26.1.01 Gujurat earthquake, Earthquake Spectra 20, 145-169.
34. Saito, K., Spence R., and Foley, T., 2005. Visual damage assessment using high-resolution satellite images following the 2003 Bam, Iran, earthquake, Earthquake Spectra 21, S309-S318.
35. Turker, M. and San, B. T., 2004. Detection of collapsed buildings caused by the 1999 Izmit, Turkey earthquake through digital analysis of post-event aerial photographs, International Journal of Remote Sensing 25, 4701-4714. (Pubitemid 39520539)
36. Turker, M. and Sumer, E., 2008. Building-based damage detection due to earthquake using the watershed segmentation of the post-event aerial images, International Journal of Remote Sensing 29, 3073-3089. (Pubitemid 351911281)
37. Yamazaki, F., Yano, Y., and Matsuoka, M., 2005. Visual damage interpretation of buildings in Bam City using QuickBird images following the 2003 Bam, Iran, earthquake, Earthquake Spectra 21, S329-S336.