A study of student behavior in accepting the Blackboard Learning System: A Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) approach

Proceedings of the 2014 IEEE 18th International Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work in Design, CSCWD 2014

Volumn , Issue , 2014, Pages 457-462

  Lin, Shu Chiang ^a   Persada, Satria Fadil ^a   Nadlifatin, Reny ^a  

^a NATIONAL TAIWAN UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY   (Taiwan)

Author keywords

Blackboard Learning System; E learning; Technology Acceptance Model (TAM)

Indexed keywords

E-LEARNING; INTERACTIVE COMPUTER SYSTEMS; LEARNING SYSTEMS; STUDENTS;

NATIONAL TAIWAN UNIVERSITY; ONLINE QUESTIONNAIRE; PERCEIVED EASE OF USE; PERCEIVED USEFULNESS; SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY; STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELING; TECHNOLOGY ACCEPTANCE; TECHNOLOGY ACCEPTANCE MODEL;

ENGINEERING EDUCATION;

EID: 84904678907     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/CSCWD.2014.6846888     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (37)

1. P. Bradford, M. Porciello, N. Balkon, and D. Backus, "The blackboard learning system: the be all and end all in educational instruction?," Journal of Educational Technology Systems, vol. 35, pp. 301-314, 2007.
2. D. Schaffhauser. (2011). Skidmore College Moves to Blackboard 9.1. Available: http://campustechnology.com/articles/2011/03/02/skidmore-college- moves-to-blackboard-9.1.aspx
3. F. D. Davis, "Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology," MIS quarterly, pp. 319-340, 1989.
4. F. D. Davis, R. P. Bagozzi, and P. R. Warshaw, "User acceptance of computer technology: a comparison of two theoretical models," Management science, vol. 35, pp. 982-1003, 1989.
5. M. Fishbein and I. Ajzen, "Belief, attitude, intention and behavior: An introduction to theory and research", 1975.
6. I. Ajzen and M. Fishbein, "Understanding attitudes and predicting social behaviour," 1980.
7. E. Park, S. Baek, J. Ohm, and H. J. Chang, "Determinants of player acceptance of mobile social network games: An application of extended technology acceptance model," Telematics and Informatics, vol. 31, pp. 3-15, 2// 2014.
8. G. Wu, "Perceived interactivity and attitude toward web sites," in proceedings of the conference-american academy of advertising, 1999, pp. 254-262.
9. J. N. Sun and Y.C. Hsu, "Effect of interactivity on learner perceptions in Web-based instruction," Computers in Human Behavior, vol. 29, pp. 171-184, 1// 2013.
10. C.-S. Wu, F.-F. Cheng, D. C. Yen, and Y.-W. Huang, "User acceptance of wireless technology in organizations: A comparison of alternative models," Computer Standards & Interfaces, vol. 33, pp. 50-58, 1// 2011.
11. G. Müller-Seitz, K. Dautzenberg, U. Creusen, and C. Stromereder, "Customer acceptance of RFID technology: Evidence from the German electronic retail sector," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, vol. 16, pp. 31-39, 1// 2009.
12. F.Y. Pai and K.I. Huang, "Applying the Technology Acceptance Model to the introduction of healthcare information systems," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, vol. 78, pp. 650-660, 5// 2011.
13. N. Park, R. Roman, S. Lee, and J. E. Chung, "User acceptance of a digital library system in developing countries: An application of the Technology Acceptance Model," International Journal of Information Management, vol. 29, pp. 196-209, 6// 2009.
14. M. D. Gallego, P. Luna, and S. Bueno, "User acceptance model of open source software," Computers in Human Behavior, vol. 24, pp. 2199-2216, 9// 2008.
15. L. Qiu and D. Li, "Applying TAM in B2C E-commerce research: An extended model," Tsinghua Science and Technology, vol. 13, pp. 265-272, 2008.
16. J. C. Lin and H. Lu, "Towards an understanding of the behavioural intention to use a web site," International Journal of Information Management, vol. 20, pp. 197-208, 6// 2000.
17. E. W. T. Ngai, J. K. L. Poon, and Y. H. C. Chan, "Empirical examination of the adoption of WebCT using TAM," Computers & Education, vol. 48, pp. 250-267, 2// 2007.
18. R. A. Sánchez and A. D. Hueros, "Motivational factors that influence the acceptance of Moodle using TAM," Computers in Human Behavior, vol. 26, pp. 1632-1640, 11// 2010.
19. T. Escobar-Rodriguez and P. Monge-Lozano, "The acceptance of Moodle technology by business administration students," Computers & Education, vol. 58, pp. 1085-1093, 5// 2012.
20. S. S. Liaw, "Investigating students' perceived satisfaction, behavioral intention, and effectiveness of e-learning: A case study of the Blackboard system," Computers & Education, vol. 51, pp. 864-873, 9// 2008.
21. I. Abdalla, "Evaluating effectiveness of e-blackboard system using TAM framework: A structural analysis approach," AACE Journal, vol. 15, pp. 279-287, 2007.
22. M. Masrom, "Technology Acceptance Model and E-learning," Technology, vol. 21, P. 24, 2007.
23. R. Cheung and D. Vogel, "Predicting user acceptance of collaborative technologies: An extension of the technology acceptance model for e-learning," Computers & Education, vol. 63, pp. 160-175, 4// 2013.
24. O. T. Reyna, "Getting Started in Factor Analysis (using Stata 10)," Princeton University Data and Statistical Services, Princeton, NJ. Unpublished Manuscript. Available at http://dss. Princeton. Edu/training, 2012.
25. L. J. Cronbach, "Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests," Psychometrika, vol. 16, pp. 297-334, 1951.
26. C. L. Shook, D. J. Ketchen, G. T. M. Hult, and K. M. Kacmar, "An assessment of the use of structural equation modeling in strategic management research," Strategic Management Journal, vol. 25, pp. 397-404, 2004.
27. A. M. Farrell and J. M. Rudd, "Factor analysis and discriminant validity: A brief review of some practical issues," 2009.
28. C. S. Lin, S. Wu, and R. J. Tsai, "Integrating perceived playfulness into expectation-confirmation model for web portal context," Information &
29. C. Fornell and D. F. Larcker, "Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error," Journal of marketing research, pp. 39-50, 1981.
30. J. C. Roca, C.-M. Chiu, and F. J. Martínez, "Understanding e-learning continuance intention: An extension of the Technology Acceptance Model," International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, vol. 64, pp. 683-696, 8// 2006.
31. J. C. Nunnally, Psychometric theory. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1978.
32. J. H. Wu and S. C. Wang, "What drives mobile commerce?: An empirical evaluation of the revised technology acceptance model," Information & management, vol. 42, pp. 719-729, 2005.
33. J. H. Wu, Y. C. Chen, and L. M. Lin, "Empirical evaluation of the revised end user computing acceptance model," Computers in Human Behavior, vol. 23, pp. 162-174, 2007.
34. D. Hooper, J. Coughlan, and M. Mullen, "Structural equation modelling: guidelines for determining model fit," Articles, P. 2, 2008.
35. M. J. Z. Gembeck, H. M. Chipuer, M. Hanisch, P. A. Creed, and L. McGregor, "Relationships at school and stage-environment fit as resources for adolescent engagement and achievement," Journal of Adolescence, vol. 29, pp. 911-933, 12// 2006.
36. C. Hu and Y. Wang, "Bootstrapping in AMOS," Powerpoint. Consulté le, pp. 23-02, 2010.
37. G. W. Cheung and R. S. Lau, "Testing mediation and suppression effects of latent variables bootstrapping with structural equation models," Organizational Research Methods, vol. 11, pp. 296-325, 2008.