Statistical model for the mechanical behavior of the tissue engineering non-woven fibrous matrices under large deformation

Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials

Volumn 37, Issue , 2014, Pages 235-250

  Rizvi, Mohd Suhail ^a   Pal, Anupam ^a,b  

^a INDIAN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY KANPUR   (India)

^b INDIAN STATISTICAL INSTITUTE   (India)

Author keywords

Extracellular matrix substitutes; Fibrous matrix; Mechanical behavior; Structure mechanics relationship; Tissue engineering scaffolds

Indexed keywords

ASPECT RATIO; BEARINGS (MACHINE PARTS); CELLS; CYTOLOGY; DEFORMATION; FIBERS; HISTOLOGY; MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; PLANTS (BOTANY); TISSUE; TISSUE REGENERATION;

EXTRACELLULAR MATRICES; FIBROUS MATRIX; MECHANICAL BEHAVIOR; STRUCTURE-MECHANICS RELATIONSHIP; TISSUE ENGINEERING SCAFFOLD;

SCAFFOLDS (BIOLOGY);

ARTICLE; CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK; EXTRACELLULAR MATRIX; MECHANICS; MICROENVIRONMENT; PARAMETERS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; STATISTICAL MODEL; TENSION; TISSUE ENGINEERING; TISSUE REGENERATION; MECHANICAL STRESS; TISSUE SCAFFOLD;

BIOMATERIAL;

BIOCOMPATIBLE MATERIALS; EXTRACELLULAR MATRIX; MECHANICAL PROCESSES; MODELS, STATISTICAL; STRESS, MECHANICAL; TISSUE ENGINEERING; TISSUE SCAFFOLDS;

EID: 84904661550     PISSN: 17516161     EISSN: 18780180     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2014.05.026     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Amoroso N.J., D'Amore A., et al. Elastomeric electrospun polyurethane scaffolds: the interrelationship between fabrication conditions, fiber topology, and mechanical properties. Adv. Mater. 2011, 23(1):106-111.
2. Argento G., Simonet M., et al. Multi-scale mechanical characterization of scaffolds for heart valve tissue engineering. J. Biomech. 2012, 45(16):2893-2898.
3. Averett R.D., Menn B., et al. A modular fibrinogen model that captures the stress-strain behavior of fibrin fibers. Biophys. J. 2012, 103(7):1537-1544.
4. Breuls R.G., Sengers B.G., et al. Predicting local cell deformations in engineered tissue constructs: a multilevel finite element approach. J. Biomech. Eng. 2002, 124(2):198-207.
5. Buehler M.J., Wong S.Y. Entropic elasticity controls nanomechanics of single tropocollagen molecules. Biophys. J. 2007, 93(1):37-43.
6. Burger C., Hsiao B.S., et al. Nanofibrous materials and their applications. Annu. Rev. Mater. Res. 2006, 36(1):333-368.
7. Carlisle C.R., Coulais C., et al. The mechanical stress-strain properties of single electrospun collagen type I nanofibers. Acta Biomater. 2010, 6(8):2997-3003.
8. Chen F., Peng X., et al. Mechanical characterization of single high-strength electrospun polyimide nanofibres. J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 2008, 41:2.
9. Corin K.A., Gibson L.J. Cell contraction forces in scaffolds with varying pore size and cell density. Biomaterials 2010, 31(18):4835-4845.
10. Driscoll T.P., Nerurkar N.L., et al. Fiber angle and aspect ratio influence the shear mechanics of oriented electrospun nanofibrous scaffolds. J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater. 2011, 4(8):1627-1636.
11. Dunlop J.W.C., Fratzl P. Biological composites. Annu. Rev. Mater. Res. 2010, 40(1):1-24.
12. Engler A.J., Sen S., et al. Matrix elasticity directs stem cell lineage specification. Cell 2006, 126(4):677-689.
13. Eyre D. Collagen of articular cartilage. Arthritis Res. 2002, 4(1):30-35.
14. Federico S., Gasser T.C. Nonlinear elasticity of biological tissues with statistical fibre orientation.". J. R. Soc. Interface 2010, 7(47):955-966.
15. Frantz C., Stewart K.M., et al. The extracellular matrix at a glance. J. Cell Sci. 2010, 123(Pt. 24):4195-4200.
16. Gardiner J.C., Weiss J.A. Simple shear testing of parallel-fibered planar soft tissues. J. Biomech. Eng. 2001, 123(2):170-175.
17. Gasser T.C., Ogden R.W., et al. Hyperelastic modelling of arterial layers with distributed collagen fibre orientations. J. R. Soc. Interface 2006, 3(6):15-35.
18. Guilak F., Ratcliffe A., et al. Chondrocyte deformation and local tissue strain in articular cartilage: a confocal microscopy study. J. Orthop. Res. 1995, 13(3):410-421.
19. Hadi M.F., Barocas V.H. Microscale fiber network alignment affects macroscale failure behavior in simulated collagen tissue analogs. J. Biomech. Eng. 2013, 135(2):021026.
20. Hadi M.F., Sander E.A., et al. Multiscale model predicts tissue-level failure from collagen fiber-level damage. J. Biomech. Eng. 2012, 134(9):091005.
21. Han W.M., Heo S.J., et al. Macro- to microscale strain transfer in fibrous tissues is heterogeneous and tissue-specific. Biophys. J. 2013, 105(3):807-817.
22. Honda M., Fujimi T.J., et al. Topographical analyses of proliferation and differentiation of osteoblasts in micro- and macropores of apatite-fiber scaffold. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. Part A, 2010, 94(3):937-944.
23. Horgan C.O., Murphy J.G. Simple shearing of soft biological tissues. Proc. R. Soc. A 2010, 467(2127):760-777.
24. Ker R.F. The design of soft collagenous load-bearing tissues. J. Exp. Biol. 1999, 202(23):3315-3324.
25. Kielty C.M., Sherratt M.J., et al. Elastic fibres. J. Cell Sci. 2002, 115(Pt. 14):2817-2828.
26. Kim D.H., Provenzano P.P., et al. Matrix nanotopography as a regulator of cell function. J. Cell Biol. 2012, 197(3):351-360.
27. Kim G.H. Electrospun PCL nanofibers with anisotropic mechanical properties as a biomedical scaffold. Biomed. Mater. 2008, 3(2):025010.
28. Kreja L., Liedert A., et al. Effects of mechanical strain on human mesenchymal stem cells and ligament fibroblasts in a textured poly(l-lactide) scaffold for ligament tissue engineering. J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Med. 2012, 23(10):2575-2582.
29. Lacroix D., Chateau A., et al. Micro-finite element models of bone tissue-engineering scaffolds. Biomaterials 2006, 27(30):5326-5334.
30. Lanir Y. Constitutive equations for fibrous connective tissues. J. Biomech. 1983, 16(1):1-12.
31. Murakumo M., Ushiki T., et al. Three-dimensional arrangement of collagen and elastin fibers in the human urinary bladder: a scanning electron microscopic study. J. Urol. 1995, 154(1):251-256.
32. Nerurkar N.L., Elliott D.M., et al. Mechanics of oriented electrospun nanofibrous scaffolds for annulus fibrosus tissue engineering. J. Orthop. Res. 2007, 25(8):1018-1028.
33. Rizvi M.S., Kumar P., et al. Mathematical model of mechanical behavior of micro/nanofibrous materials designed for extracellular matrix substitutes. Acta Biomater. 2012, 8(11):4111-4122.
34. Spencer A.J.M. Deformations of Fibre-reinforced Materials 1972, Clarendon Press, Oxford University Press, London.
35. Stella J.A., Liao J., et al. Tissue-to-cellular level deformation coupling in cell micro-integrated elastomeric scaffolds. Biomaterials 2008, 29(22):3228-3236.
36. Stella J.A., Wagner W.R., et al. Scale-dependent fiber kinematics of elastomeric electrospun scaffolds for soft tissue engineering. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. A 2009, 93(3):1032-1042.
37. Stops A.J., McMahon L.A., et al. A finite element prediction of strain on cells in a highly porous collagen-glycosaminoglycan scaffold. J. Biomech. Eng. 2008, 130(6):061001.
38. Stylianopoulos T., Barocas V.H. Volume-averaging theory for the study of the mechanics of collagen networks. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 2007, 196(31):2981-2990.
39. Stylianopoulos T., Bashur C.A., et al. Computational predictions of the tensile properties of electrospun fibre meshes: effect of fibre diameter and fibre orientation. J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater. 2008, 1(4):326-335.
40. Tan E.P.S., Goh C.N., et al. Tensile test of a single nanofiber using an atomic force microscope tip. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2005, 86(7).
41. Vader D., Kabla A., et al. Strain-induced alignment in collagen gels. PLoS One 2009, 4(6):e5902.
42. Vogel V., Sheetz M. Local force and geometry sensing regulate cell functions. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2006, 7(4):265-275.