Interpretive habit is strengthened by cognitive bias modification

Memory

Volumn 22, Issue 7, 2014, Pages 737-746

  Hertel, Paula T ^a   Holmes, Molly ^a   Benbow, Amanda ^a  

^a TRINITY UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Anxiety; Cognitive bias modification; Habit; Process dissociation; Transfer

Indexed keywords

AFFECT; COGNITION; HABIT; HUMAN; LEARNING; RECALL; UNCERTAINTY;

AFFECT; COGNITION; HABITS; HUMANS; MENTAL RECALL; TRANSFER (PSYCHOLOGY); UNCERTAINTY;

EID: 84904539414     PISSN: 09658211     EISSN: 14640686     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/09658211.2013.820326     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Beard, C., & Amir, N. (2008). A multi-session interpretation modification program: Changes in interpretation and social anxiety. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 46, 1135-1141.10.1016/j.brat.2008.05.012
2. Eysenck, M., Mogg, K., May, J., Richards, A., & Mathews, A. (1991). Bias in interpretation of ambiguous sentences related to threat in anxiety. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 100, 144-150.10.1037/0021-843X.100.2.144
3. Hertel, P. T., & Mathews, A. (2011). Cognitive bias modification: Past perspectives, current findings, and future applications. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 6, 521-536.10.1177/1745691611421205
4. Hertel, P. T., Vasquez, E., Benbow, A., & Hughes, M. (2011). Recollection is impaired by the modification of interpretation bias. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 120, 902-910.10.1037/a0023974
5. Jacoby, L. L. (1991). A process dissociation framework: Separating automatic from intentional uses of memory. Journal of Memory and Language, 30, 513-541.10.1016/0749-596X(91)90025-F
6. Jacoby, L. L., Baker, J. G., & Brooks, L. R. (1989). Episodic effects on picture identification: Implications for theories of concept learning and theories of memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 15, 275-281.10.1037/0278-7393.15.2.275
7. Jacoby, L. L., Debner, J. A., & Hay, J. F. (2001). Proactive interferences, accessibility bias, and process dissociations: Valid subjective reports of memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 27, 686-700.10.1037/0278-7393.27.3.686
8. Jacoby, L. L., Shimizu, Y., Velanova, K., & Rhodes, M. G. (2005). Age differences in depth of retrieval: Memory for foils. Journal of Memory and Language, 54, 493-504.10.1016/j.jml.2005.01.007
9. Mackintosh, B., Mathews, A., Yiend, J., Ridgeway, V., & Cook, E. (2006). Induced biases in emotional interpretation influence stress vulnerability and endure despite changes in context. Behavior Therapy, 37, 209-222.10.1016/j.beth.2006.03.001
10. MacLeod, C., Rutherford, E., Campbell, L, Ebsworthy, G., & Holker, L. (2002). Selective attention and emotional vulnerability: Assessing the causal basis of their association through the experimental manipulation of attentional bias. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 111, 107-123.10.1037/0021-843X.111.1.107
11. Mathews, A., & Mackintosh, B. (2000). Induced emotional interpretation bias and anxiety. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 109, 602-615.
12. Salemink, E., van den Hout, M., & Kindt, M. (2007). Trained interpretive bias and anxiety. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 45, 329-340.10.1016/j.brat.2006.03.011
13. Spielberger, C. D., Gorsuch, R. L., Lushene, R., Vagg, P. R., & Jacobs, G. A. (1983). Manual for the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
14. Tran, T., Hertel, P. T., & Joormann, J. (2011). Cognitive bias modification: Induced interpretive biases affect memory. Emotion, 11, 145-152.10.1037/a0021754
15. Wilson, E. J., MacLeod, C., Mathews, A., & Rutherford, E. M. (2006). The causal role of interpretive bias in anxiety reactivity. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 115, 103-111.10.1037/0021-843X.115.1.103
16. Woud, M. L., Holmes, E. A., Postma, P., Dalgleish, T., & Mackintosh, B. (2011). Ameliorating intrusive memories of distressing experiences using computerized reappraisal training. Emotion, 12, 778-784.
17. Yonelinas, A. P., & Jacoby, L. L. (2012). The process-dissociation approach two decades later: Convergence, boundary conditions, and new directions. Memory & Cognition, 40, 663-680.10.3758/s13421-012-0205-5