Comparing outcomes in inverted and traditional CS1

ITICSE 2014 - Proceedings of the 2014 Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education Conference

Volumn , Issue , 2014, Pages 261-266

  Horton, Diane ^a   Craig, Michelle ^a   Campbell, Jennifer ^a   Gries, Paul ^a   Zingaro, Daniel ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

Author keywords

CS1; Inverted classroom; Ipped classroom; Novice programming

Indexed keywords

ENGINEERING RESEARCH; TEACHING;

CS1; INVERTED CLASSROOM; IPPED CLASSROOM; NOVICE PROGRAMMING; STUDENT ATTITUDES; STUDENT POPULATIONS;

STUDENTS;

EID: 84904497747     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/2591708.2591752     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (12)

1. J. Bennedsen and M. E. Caspersen. Failure rates in introductory programming. SIGCSE Bull., 39(2):32-36, June 2007.
2. J. Campbell, D. Horton, M. Craig, and P. Gries. Evaluating an inverted CS1. In Proceeding of the 45th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education, SIGCSE '14, pages 307-312, New York, NY, USA, 2014. ACM.
3. S. Esper, B. Simon, and Q. Cutts. Exploratory homeworks: An active learning tool for textbook reading. In Proceedings of the Eighth international Workshop on Computing Education Research. ACM, 2012.
4. D. Hagan and S. Markham. Does it help to have some programming experience before beginning a computing degree program? SIGCSE Bulletin, 32:25-28, 2000.
5. P. Kinnunen and L. Malmi. Why students drop out CS1 course? In Proceedings of the second international workshop on Computing education research, pages 97-108, 2006.
6. K. Lockwood and R. Esselstein. The inverted classroom and the CS curriculum. In Proceeding of the 44th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education, SIGCSE '13, pages 113-118, New York, NY, USA, 2013. ACM.
7. C. McDowell, L. Werner, H. E. Bullock, and J. Fernald. Pair programming improves student retention, confidence, and program quality. Commun. ACM, 49(8):90-95, Aug. 2006.
8. L. Porter, C. Bailey Lee, and B. Simon. Halving fail rates using peer instruction: a study of four computer science courses. In Proceeding of the 44th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education, SIGCSE '13, pages 177-182, New York, NY, USA, 2013. ACM.
9. L. Porter and B. Simon. Retaining nearly one-third more majors with a trio of instructional best practices in CS1. In Proceeding of the 44th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education, SIGCSE '13, pages 165-170, New York, NY, USA, 2013. ACM.
10. B. Simon, P. Kinnunen, L. Porter, and D. Zazkis. Experience report: CS1 for majors with media computation. In Proceedings of the Fifteenth Annual Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education, ITiCSE '10, pages 214-218, New York, NY, USA, 2010. ACM.
11. D. Zingaro. Peer instruction contributes to self-efficacy in CS1. In Proceeding of the 45th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education, SIGCSE '14, pages 373-378, New York, NY, USA, 2014. ACM.
12. D. Zingaro, C. Bailey-Lee, and L. Porter. Peer instruction in computing: the role of reading quizzes. In Proceeding of the 44th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education, SIGCSE '13, pages 47-52, New York, NY, USA, 2013. ACM.