SimPACE: Generating simulated motion corrupted BOLD data with synthetic-navigated acquisition for the development and evaluation of SLOMOCO: A new, highly effective slicewise motion correction

NeuroImage

Volumn 101, Issue , 2014, Pages 21-34

  Beall, Erik B ^a   Lowe, Mark J ^a  

^a LERNER RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (United States)

Author keywords

BOLD; Functional connectivity; Functional MRI; Motion correction; Spin history

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ADULT; ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; ARTIFACT; BOLD SIGNAL; COMPUTER PROGRAM; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORRELATION COEFFICIENT; FEMALE; FUNCTIONAL MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; GOLD STANDARD; HEAD MOVEMENT; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; HUMAN TISSUE; IMAGE PROCESSING; MALE; MATHEMATICAL ANALYSIS; MOTION; MOTION CORRECTION; NONHUMAN; NORMAL HUMAN; PERFORMANCE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; STIMULATED PROSPECTIVE ACQUISITION CORRECTION; VOLUMETRY; BRAIN; CADAVER; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PHYSIOLOGY; PROCEDURES; STANDARDS; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS;

ADULT; BRAIN; CADAVER; DATA INTERPRETATION, STATISTICAL; FEMALE; HEALTHY VOLUNTEERS; HUMANS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; MOTION;

EID: 84904473392     PISSN: 10538119     EISSN: 10959572     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.06.038     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Ardekani B.A., Bachman A.H., Helpern J.A. A quantitative comparison of motion detection algorithms in fMRI. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2001, 19:959-963.
2. Beall E.B. Adaptive cyclic physiologic noise modeling and correction in functional MRI. J. Neurosci. Methods 2010, 187:216-228.
3. Beall E.B., Lowe M.J. Isolating physiologic noise sources with independently determined spatial measures. NeuroImage 2007, 37:1286-1300.
4. Beall E.B., Lowe M.J. The non-separability of physiologic noise in functional connectivity MRI with spatial ICA at 3T. J. Neurosci. Methods 2010, 191:263-276.
5. Beall E., Lowe M., Alberts J.L., Frankemolle A.M., Thota A.K., Shah C., Phillips M.D. The effect of forced-exercise therapy for Parkinson's disease on motor cortex functional connectivity. Brain Connect. 2013, 3:190-198.
6. Bullmore E.T., Brammer M.J., Rabe-Hesketh S., Curtis V.A., Morris R.G., Williams S.C., Sharma T., McGuire P.K. Methods for diagnosis and treatment of stimulus-correlated motion in generic brain activation studies using fMRI. Hum. Brain Mapp. 1999, 7:38-48.
7. Bydder M., Larkman D.J., Hajnal J.V. Detection and elimination of motion artifacts by regeneration of k-space. Magn. Reson. Med. 2002, 47:677-686.
8. Cox R.W. AFNI: software for analysis and visualization of functional magnetic resonance neuroimages. Comput. Biomed. Res. 1996, 29:162-173.
9. Cox R.W., Jesmanowicz A. Real-time 3D image registration for functional MRI. Magn. Reson. Med. 1999, 42:1014-1018.
10. Derbyshire J.A., Wright G.A., Henkelman R.M., Hinks R.S. Dynamic scan-plane tracking using MR position monitoring. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 1998, 8:924-932.
11. Fisher E., Chang A., Fox R.J., Tkach J.A., Svarovsky T., Nakamura K., Rudick R.A., Trapp B.D. Imaging correlates of axonal swelling in chronic multiple sclerosis brains. Ann. Neurol. 2007, 62:219-228.
12. Freire L., Mangin J.F. Motion correction algorithms may create spurious brain activations in the absence of subject motion. NeuroImage 2001, 14:709-722.
13. Freire L., Roche A., Mangin J.F. What is the best similarity measure for motion correction in fMRI time series?. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 2002, 21:470-484.
14. Friston K.J., Ashburner J., Frith C.D., Poline J.B., Heather J.D., Frackowiak R.S. Spatial registration and normalization of images. Hum. Brain Mapp. 1995, 2:165-189.
15. Friston K.J., Williams S., Howard R., Frackowiak R.S., Turner R. Movement-related effects in fMRI time-series. Magn. Reson. Med. 1996, 35:346-355.
16. Hajnal J.V., Myers R., Oatridge A., Schwieso J.E., Young I.R., Bydder G.M. Artifacts due to stimulus correlated motion in functional imaging of the brain. Magn. Reson. Med. 1994, 31:283-291.
17. Hajnal J.V., Saeed N., Oatridge A., Williams E.J., Young I.R., Bydder G.M. Detection of subtle brain changes using subvoxel registration and subtraction of serial MR images. J. Comput. Assist. Tomogr. 1995, 19:677-691.
18. Hallquist M.N., Hwang K., Luna B. The nuisance of nuisance regression: spectral misspecification in a common approach to resting-state fMRI preprocessing reintroduces noise and obscures functional connectivity. NeuroImage 2013, 82:208-225.
19. Hartwig A., Engstron M., Flodmark O., Invgar M., Skare S. A simple method to reduce signal fluctuations in fMRI caused by the interaction between motion and coil sensitivities. Proceedings of the International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, Montreal 2011.
20. W.D.o.C.N., SPM99. http://www.fil.ion.ucl.ac.uk/spm.
21. Jenkinson M., Bannister P., Brady M., Smith S. Improved optimization for the robust and accurate linear registration and motion correction of brain images. NeuroImage 2002, 17:825-841.
22. Jiang A., Kennedy D.N., Baker J.R., Weisskoff R.M., Tootell R.B.H., Woods R.P., Benson R.R., Kwong K.K., Brady T.J., Rosen B.R., Belliveau J.W. Motion detection and correction in functional MR imaging. Hum. Brain Mapp. 1995, 3:224-235.
23. Johnstone T., Ores Walsh K.S., Greischar L.L., Alexander A.L., Fox A.S., Davidson R.J., Oakes T.R. Motion correction and the use of motion covariates in multiple-subject fMRI analysis. Hum. Brain Mapp. 2006, 27:779-788.
24. Lee C.C., Grimm R.C., Manduca A., Felmlee J.P., Ehman R.L., Riederer S.J., Jack C.R. A prospective approach to correct for inter-image head rotation in fMRI. Magn. Reson. Med. 1998, 39:234-243.
25. Lund T.E., Norgaard M.D., Rostrup E., Rowe J.B., Paulson O.B. Motion or activity: their role in intra- and inter-subject variation in fMRI. NeuroImage 2005, 26:960-964.
26. Morgan V.L., Pickens D.R., Hartmann S.L., Price R.R. Comparison of functional MRI image realignment tools using a computer-generated phantom. Magn. Reson. Med. 2001, 46:510-514.
27. Morgan V.L., Dawant B.M., Li Y., Pickens D.R. Comparison of fMRI statistical software packages and strategies for analysis of images containing random and stimulus-correlated motion. Comput. Med. Imaging Graph. 2007, 31:436-446.
28. Muresan L., Renken R., Roerdink J.B., Duifhuis H. Automated correction of spin-history related motion artefacts in fMRI: simulated and phantom data. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 2005, 52:1450-1460.
29. Oakes T.R., Johnstone T., Ores Walsh K.S., Greischar L.L., Alexander A.L., Fox A.S., Davidson R.J. Comparison of fMRI motion correction software tools. NeuroImage 2005, 28:529-543.
30. Ooi M.B., Muraskin J., Zou X., Thomas W.J., Krueger S., Aksoy M., Bammer R., Brown T.R. Combined prospective and retrospective correction to reduce motion-induced image misalignment and geometric distortions in EPI. Magn. Reson. Med. 2013, 69:803-811.
31. Power J.D., Barnes K.A., Snyder A.Z., Schlaggar B.L., Petersen S.E. Spurious but systematic correlations in functional connectivity MRI networks arise from subject motion. NeuroImage 2011, 59:2142-2154.
32. Power J.D., Mitra A., Laumann T.O., Snyder A.Z., Schlaggar B.L., Petersen S.E. Methods to detect, characterize, and remove motion artifact in resting state fMRI. NeuroImage 2014, 84C:320-341.
33. Roche A. A four-dimensional registration algorithm with application to joint correction of motion and slice timing in fMRI. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 2011, 30:1546-1554.
34. Satterthwaite T.D., Wolf D.H., Loughead J., Ruparel K., Elliott M.A., Hakonarson H., Gur R.C., Gur R.E. Impact of in-scanner head motion on multiple measures of functional connectivity: relevance for studies of neurodevelopment in youth. NeuroImage 2012, 60:623-632.
35. Sheltraw D., Inglis B. A simulation of the effects of receive field contrast on motion-corrected EPI time series (Oct 12). http://arXiv:med-ph/1210.3633v1.
36. Smith S.M., Jenkinson M., Woolrich M.W., Beckmann C.F., Behrens T.E., Johansen-Berg H., Bannister P.R., De Luca M., Drobnjak I., Flitney D.E., Niazy R.K., Saunders J., Vickers J., Zhang Y., De Stefano N., Brady J.M., Matthews P.M. Advances in functional and structural MR image analysis and implementation as FSL. NeuroImage 2004, 23(Suppl. 1):S208-S219.
37. Thesen S., Heid O., Mueller E., Schad L.R. Prospective acquisition correction for head motion with image-based tracking for real-time fMRI. Magn. Reson. Med. 2000, 44:457-465.
38. Van Dijk K.R., Sabuncu M.R., Buckner R.L. The influence of head motion on intrinsic functional connectivity MRI. NeuroImage 2012, 59:431-438.
39. Woods R.P., Cherry S.R., Mazziotta J.C. Rapid automated algorithm for aligning and reslicing PET images. J. Comput. Assist. Tomogr. 1992, 16:620-633.
40. Wu D.H., Lewin J.S., Duerk J.L. Inadequacy of motion correction algorithms in functional MRI: role of susceptibility-induced artifacts. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 1997, 7:365-370.
41. Xu N., Fitzpatrick J.M., Li Y., Dawant B.M., Pickens D.R., Morgan V.L. Computer-generated fMRI phantoms with motion-distortion interaction. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2007, 25:1376-1384.
42. Yancey S.E., Rotenberg D.J., Tam F., Chiew M., Ranieri S., Biswas L., Anderson K.J., Baker S.N., Wright G.A., Graham S.J. Spin-history artifact during functional MRI: potential for adaptive correction. Med. Phys. 2011, 38:4634-4646.