Comparison of fMRI statistical software packages and strategies for analysis of images containing random and stimulus-correlated motion

Computerized Medical Imaging and Graphics

Volumn 31, Issue 6, 2007, Pages 436-446

  Morgan, Victoria L ^a   Dawant, Benoit M ^a,b   Li, Yong ^b   Pickens, David R ^a  

^a VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Data analysis; Functional MRI; Image processing; Imaging phantoms; ROC analysis

Indexed keywords

FUNCTIONAL MRI; IMAGING PHANTOMS; LINEAR MODEL; MOTION CORRECTION;

IMAGE PROCESSING; PARAMETER ESTIMATION; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; SOFTWARE PACKAGES; STATISTICAL METHODS;

MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING;

ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPUTER AIDED DESIGN; COMPUTER PROGRAM; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; DATA ANALYSIS; FUNCTIONAL MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; HEAD MOVEMENT; IMAGE ANALYSIS; IMAGE PROCESSING; MOTION; PHANTOM; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; STATISTICAL MODEL; STIMULUS;

ALGORITHMS; ARTIFACTS; BRAIN; BRAIN MAPPING; DATA INTERPRETATION, STATISTICAL; EVOKED POTENTIALS; HUMANS; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MOVEMENT; PHANTOMS, IMAGING; PHYSICAL STIMULATION; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SOFTWARE; SOFTWARE VALIDATION; STATISTICS;

EID: 34447293305     PISSN: 08956111     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.compmedimag.2007.04.002     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Gold S., Christian B., Arndt S., Zeien G., Cizadlo T., Johnson D.L., et al. Functional MRI statistical software packages: a comparative analysis. Hum Brain Mapp 6 (1998) 73-84
2. Le T.H., and Hu X. Methods for assessing accuracy and reliability in functional MRI. NMR Biomed 10 (1997) 160-164
3. Maitra R., Roys S.R., and Gullapalli R.P. Test-retest reliability estimation of functional MRI data. Magn Reson Med 48 (2002) 62-70
4. Smith S.M., Beckmann C.F., Ramnani N., Woolrich M.W., Bannister P.R., Jenkinson M., et al. Variability in fMRI: a re-examination of inter-session differences. Hum Brain Mapp 24 (2005) 248-257
5. Constable R.T., Skudlarski P., and Gore J.C. An ROC approach for evaluating functional brain MR imaging and postprocessing protocols. Magn Reson Med 34 (1995) 57-64
6. Sorenson J.A., and Wang X. ROC methods for evaluation of fMRI techniques. Magn Reson Med 36 (1996) 737-744
7. Della-Maggiore V., Chau W., Peres-Neto P.R., and McIntosh A.R. An empirical comparison of SPM preprocessing parameters to the analysis of fMRI data. Neuroimage 17 (2002) 19-28
8. Logan B.R., and Rowe D.B. An evaluation of thresholding techniques in fMRI analysis. Neuroimage 22 (2004) 95-108
9. Marchini J., and Presanis A. Comparing methods of analyzing fMRI statistical parametric maps. Neuroimage 22 (2004) 1203-1213
10. Ardekani B.A., Bachman A.H., and Helpern J.A. A quantitative comparison of motion detection algorithms in fMRI. Magn Reson Imaging 19 (2001) 959-963
11. Jiang A., Kennedy D., Baker J., Weiskoff R., Tootell R., Woodds R., et al. Motion detection and coorection in functional MR imaging. Hum Brain Mapp 3 (1995) 224-235
12. Oakes T.R., Johnstone T., Ores Walsh K.S., Greischar L.L., Alexander A.L., Fox A.S., et al. Comparison of fMRI motion correction software tools. Neuroimage 28 (2005) 529-543
13. Morgan V.L., Pickens D.R., Hartmann S.L., and Price R.R. Comparison of functional MRI image realignment tools using a computer-generated phantom. Magn Reson Med 46 (2001) 510-514
14. Pickens D.R., Li Y., Morgan V.L., and Dawant B.M. Development of computer-generated phantoms for FMRI software evaluation. Magn Reson Imaging 23 (2005) 653-663
15. Friston K.J., Williams S., Howard R., Frackowiak R.S., and Turner R. Movement-related effects in fMRI time-series. Magn Reson Med 35 (1996) 346-355
16. Jezzard P., and Clare S. Sources of distortion in functional MRI data. Hum Brain Mapp 8 (1999) 80-85
17. Muresan L., Renken R., Roerdink J.B., and Duifhuis H. Automated correction of spin-history related motion artefacts in fMRI: simulated and phantom data. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 52 (2005) 1450-1460
18. Hajnal J.V., Myers R., Oatridge A., Schwieso J.E., Young I.R., and Bydder G.M. Artifacts due to stimulus correlated motion in functional imaging of the brain. Magn Reson Med 31 (1994) 283-291
19. Bullmore E.T., Brammer M.J., Rabe-Hesketh S., Curtis V.A., Morris R.G., Williams S.C., et al. Methods for diagnosis and treatment of stimulus-correlated motion in generic brain activation studies using fMRI. Hum Brain Mapp 7 (1999) 38-48
20. Friston K., Holmes A., Worsley K., Poline J.-B., Frith C., and Frackowiak R. Statistical parametric maps in functional imaging. Hum Brain Mapp 2 (1995) 189-210
21. Birn R.M., Cox R.W., and Bandettini P.A. Experimental designs and processing strategies for fMRI studies involving overt verbal responses. Neuroimage 23 (2004) 1046-1058
22. Gavrilescu M., Stuart G.W., Waites A., Jackson G., Svalbe I.D., and Egan G.F. Changes in effective connectivity models in the presence of task-correlated motion: an fMRI study. Hum Brain Mapp 21 (2004) 49-63
23. Jenkinson M., Bannister P., Brady M., and Smith S. Improved optimization for the robust and accurate linear registration and motion correction of brain images. Neuroimage 17 (2002) 825-841
24. Nowak R. Wavelet-based Rician noise removal for magnetic resonance imaging. IEEE Trans Image Process 8 (1999) 1408-1419
25. Handwerker D.A., Ollinger J.M., and D'Esposito M. Variation of BOLD hemodynamic responses across subjects and brain regions and their effects on statistical analyses. Neuroimage 21 (2004) 1639-1651
26. Wells III W.M., Viola P., Atsumi H., Nakajima S., and Kikinis R. Multi-modal volume registration by maximization of mutual information. Med Image Anal 1 (1996) 35-51
27. Rohde G.K., Aldroubi A., and Dawant B.M. The adaptive bases algorithm for intensity-based nonrigid image registration. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 22 (2003) 1470-1479
28. Gudbjartsson H., and Patz S. The Rician distribution of noisy MRI data. Magn Reson Med 34 (1995) 910-914
29. Pickens D.R., Price R.R., Morgan V.L., Holburn M.A., Parks M., and Martin P.D. Long-term repeatability of cerebellar fMRI correlated with an independently monitored motor task (abstract). Radiology 209 (1998) 245
30. Cox R.W., and Hyde J.S. Software tools for analysis and visualization of fMRI data. NMR Biomed 10 (1997) 171-178
31. Smith S.M., Jenkinson M., Woolrich M.W., Beckmann C.F., Behrens T.E., Johansen-Berg H., et al. Advances in functional and structural MR image analysis and implementation as FSL. Neuroimage 23 Suppl. 1 (2004) S208-S219
32. Woolrich M.W., Ripley B.D., Brady M., and Smith S.M. Temporal autocorrelation in univariate linear modeling of FMRI data. Neuroimage 14 (2001) 1370-1386
33. Obuchowski N.A. Receiver operating characteristic curves and their use in radiology. Radiology 229 (2003) 3-8
34. Friston K.J., Penny W., Phillips C., Kiebel S., Hinton G., and Ashburner J. Classical Bayesian inference in neuroimaging: theory. Neuroimage 16 (2002) 465-483
35. Bullmore E., Brammer M., Williams S.C., Rabe-Hesketh S., Janot N., David A., et al. Statistical methods of estimation and inference for functional MR image analysis. Magn Reson Med 35 (1996) 261-277
36. Smith A.M., Lewis B.K., Ruttimann U.E., Ye F.Q., Sinnwell T.M., Yang Y., et al. Investigation of low frequency drift in fMRI signal. Neuroimage 9 (1999) 526-533
37. Raj D., Anderson A.W., and Gore J.C. Respiratory effects in human functional magnetic resonance imaging due to bulk susceptibility changes. Phys Med Biol 46 (2001) 3331-3340
38. Windischberger C., Langenberger H., Sycha T., Tschernko E.M., Fuchsjager-Mayerl G., Schmetterer L., et al. On the origin of respiratory artifacts in BOLD-EPI of the human brain. Magn Reson Imaging 20 (2002) 575-582
39. Turner R., Howseman A., Rees G.E., Josephs O., and Friston K. Functional magnetic resonance imaging of the human brain: data acquisition and analysis. Exp Brain Res 123 (1998) 5-12
40. Woods R.P., Cherry S.R., and Mazziotta J.C. Rapid automated algorithm for aligning and reslicing PET images. J Comput Assist Tomogr 16 (1992) 620-633