The influence of shear on the metabolite yield of Lactobacillus rhamnosus biofilms

New Biotechnology

Volumn 31, Issue 5, 2014, Pages 460-467

  Brink, Hendrik Gideon ^a   Nicol, Willie ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PRETORIA   (South Africa)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

GLUCOSE; LACTIC ACID; METABOLISM; BIOFILMS; VELOCITY;

CELL ATTACHMENTS; EXTRACELLULAR POLYMERIC SUBSTANCES; LACTOBACILLUS RHAMNOSUS; METABOLIC FLUX; SHEAR CONDITIONS; SHEAR VELOCITIES; SUPERFICIAL LIQUID VELOCITY; SUPERFICIAL VELOCITY;

BIOFILMS; SHEAR FLOW;

ACETOIN; GLUCOSE; NICOTINAMIDE ADENINE DINUCLEOTIDE PHOSPHATE; LACTIC ACID; REDUCED NICOTINAMIDE ADENINE DINUCLEOTIDE;

BIOFILM; BIOREACTOR; GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT AND AGING; LACTOBACILLUS RHAMNOSUS; METABOLISM; PHYSIOLOGY; ARTICLE; BIOMASS PRODUCTION; CELL ADHESION; DILUTION; DRY WEIGHT; MICROBIAL BIOMASS; NONHUMAN; OXIDATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SHEAR RATE; STEADY STATE; STOICHIOMETRY;

ACETOIN; BIOFILMS; BIOREACTORS; GLUCOSE; LACTOBACILLUS RHAMNOSUS; NADP;

LACTOBACILLUS RHAMNOSUS;

EID: 84904467710     PISSN: 18716784     EISSN: 18764347     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.nbt.2014.06.003     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Dagher S.F., Ragout A.L., Siñeriz F., Bruno-Bárcena J.M. Cell immobilization for production of lactic acid biofilms do it naturally. Adv Appl Microbiol 2010, 71:113-148.
2. Karel S.F., Libicki S.B., Robertson C.R. The immobilization of whole cells: engineering principles. Chem Eng Sci 1985, 40:1321-1354.
3. Nicolella C., van Loosdrecht M.C.M., Heijnen J.J. Wastewater treatment with particulate biofilm reactors. J Biotechnol 2000, 80:1-33.
4. Qureshi N., Annous B.A., Ezeji T.C., Karcher P., Maddox I.S. Biofilm reactors for industrial bioconversion processes: employing potential of enhanced reaction rates. Microb Cell Fact 2005, 4:24.
5. Xu J., Guo B.-H. Poly(butylene succinate) and its copolymers: research, development and industrialization. Biotechnol J 2010, 5:1149-1163.
6. Rosche B., Li X.Z., Hauer B., Schmid A., Buehler K. Microbial biofilms: a concept for industrial catalysis?. Trends Biotechnol 2009, 27:636-643.
7. Zhang W., Sileika T.S., Chen C., Liu Y., Lee J., Packman A.I. A novel planar flow cell for studies of biofilm heterogeneity and flow-biofilm interactions. Biotechnol Bioeng 2011, 108:2571-2582.
8. Agathos S.N., Hellin E., Ali-Khodja H., Deseveaux S., Vandermesse F., Naveau H. Gas-phase methyl ethyl ketone biodegradation in a tubular biofilm reactor: microbiological and bioprocess aspects. Biodegradation 1997, 8:251-264.
9. Maharaj K., Bradfield M.F.A., Nicol W. Succinic acid-producing biofilms of Actinobacillus succinogenes: reproducibility, stability and productivity. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 2014, (in press). 10.1007/s00253-014-5779-3.
10. Beyenal H., Lewandowski Z. Internal and external mass transfer in biofilms grown at various flow velocities. Biotechnol Prog 2002, 18:55-61.
11. Stoodley P., Yang S., Lappin-Scott H., Lewandowski Z. Relationship between mass transfer coefficient and liquid flow velocity in heterogenous biofilms using microelectrodes and confocal microscopy. Biotechnol Bioeng 1997, 56:681-688.
12. Fernando S., Adhikari S., Chandrapal C., Murali N. Biorefineries: current status, challenges, and future direction. Energy Fuels 2006, 20:1727-1737.
13. Gavrilescu M., Chisti Y. Biotechnology - a sustainable alternative for chemical industry. Biotechnol Adv 2005, 23:471-499.
14. Hoskisson P.A., Hobbs G. Continuous culture - making a comeback?. Microbiology 2005, 151:3153-3159.
15. Gross R., Hauer B., Otto K., Schmid A. Microbial biofilms: new catalysts for maximizing productivity of long-term biotransformations. Biotechnol Bioeng 2007, 98:1123-1134.
16. Liu Y., Tay J.-H. The essential role of hydrodynamic shear force in the formation of biofilm and granular sludge. Water Res 2002, 36:1653-1665.
17. Teixeira de Mattos M.J., de Broer J.P., Zoutberg G.R., Neijssel O.M. Metabolic shift analysis at high cell densities. FEMS Microbiol Rev 1994, 14:21-28.
18. Bradfield M.F.A., Nicol W. Continuous succinic acid production by Actinobacillus succinogenes in a biofilm reactor: steady-state metabolic flux variation. Biochem Eng J 2014, 85:1-7.
19. Nielsen J. It is all about metabolic fluxes. J Bacteriol 2003, 185:7031-7035.
20. Villadsen J., Nielsen J., Lidén G. Bioreaction engineering principles 2011, Springer US, Boston, MA. 3rd ed.
21. Laspidou C.S., Rittmann B.E. A unified theory for extracellular polymeric substances, soluble microbial products, and active and inert biomass. Water Res 2002, 36:2711-2720.
22. Bergmaier D., Champagne C.P., Lacroix C. Growth and exopolysaccharide production during free and immobilized cell chemostat culture of Lactobacillus rhamnosus RW-9595M. J Appl Microbiol 2005, 98:272-284.
23. Van Calsteren M.R., Pau-Roblot C., Bégin A., Roy D. Structure determination of the exopolysaccharide produced by Lactobacillus rhamnosus strains RW-9595M and R. Biochem J 2002, 363:7-17.
24. Kim J.-U., Kim Y., Han K.-S., OH S., Whang K.-Y., Kim J.-N., et al. Function of cell-bound and released exopolysaccharides produced by Lactobacillus rhamnosus ATCC 9595. J Microbiol Biotechnol 2006, 16:939-945.
25. Dupont I., Roy D., Lapointe G. Comparison of exopolysaccharide production by strains of Lactobacillus rhamnosus and Lactobacillus paracasei grown in chemically defined medium and milk. J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol 2000, 24:251-255.
26. Bakke R., Kommedal R., Kalvenes S. Quantification of biofilm accumulation by an optical approach. J Microbiol Methods 2001, 44:13-26.
27. Poolman M.G., Venkatesh K.V., Pidcock M.K., Fell D.A. A method for the determination of flux in elementary modes, and its application to Lactobacillus rhamnosus. Biotechnol Bioeng 2004, 88:601-612.
28. Gayen K., Gupta M., Venkatesh K.V. Elementary mode analysis to study the preculturing effect on the metabolic state of Lactobacillus rhamnosus during growth on mixed substrates. In Silico Biol 2007, 7:123-139.
29. Jyoti B.D., Suresh A.K., Venkatesh K.V. Effect of preculturing conditions on growth of Lactobacillus rhamnosus on medium containing glucose and citrate. Microbiol Res 2004, 159:35-42.
30. Park S.H., Xing R., Whitman W.B. Nonenzymatic acetolactate oxidation to diacetyl by flavin, nicotinamide and quinone coenzymes. Biochim Biophys Acta: Gen Subj 1995, 1245:366-370.
31. Oliveira A.P., Nielsen J., Förster J. Modeling Lactococcus lactis using a genome-scale flux model. BMC Microbiol 2005, 5:39.
32. Peyton B.M., Characklis W.G. A statistical analysis of the effect of substrate utilization and shear stress on the kinetics of biofilm detachment. Biotechnol Bioeng 1993, 41:728-735.
33. Peyton B.M. Effects of shear stress and substrate loading rate on Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilm thickness and density. Water Res 1996, 30:29-36.
34. Van Loosdrecht M.C.M., Eikelboom D., Gjatelma A., Mulder A., Tijhuis L., Heijnen J.J. Biofilm structures. Water Sci Technol 1995, 32:35-43.
35. Van Loosdrecht M.C.M., Picioreanu C., Heijnen J.J. A more unifying hypothesis for biofilm structures. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 1997, 24:181-183.
36. Van Loosdrecht M.C.M., Heijnen J.J., Eberl H., Kreft J., Picioreanu C. Mathematical modelling of biofilm structures. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek 2002, 81:245-256.
37. Luedeking R., Piret E.L. A kinetic study of the lactic acid fermentation. Batch process at controlled pH. Reprinted from Journal of Biochemical and Microbiological Technology Engineering Vol. I, No. 4. Pages 393-412 (1959). Biotechnol Bioeng 2000, 67:636-644.
38. Xiao Z., Xu P. Acetoin metabolism in bacteria. Crit Rev Microbiol 2007, 33:127-140.
39. Looijesteijn P.J., van Casteren W.H.M., Tuinier R., Doeswijk-Voragen C.H.L., Hugenholtz J. Influence of different substrate limitations on the yield, composition and molecular mass of exopolysaccharides produced by Lactococcus lactis subsp. cremoris in continuous cultures. J Appl Microbiol 2000, 89:116-122.