Knowledge is power: How conceptual knowledge transforms visual cognition

Psychonomic Bulletin and Review

Volumn 21, Issue 4, 2014, Pages 843-860

  Collins, Jessica A ^a   Olson, Ingrid R ^a  

^a TEMPLE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Conceptual knowledge; Perception; Semantic memory; Visual processing

Indexed keywords

BRAIN; CONCEPT FORMATION; HUMAN; KNOWLEDGE; PHYSIOLOGY; VISION;

BRAIN; CONCEPT FORMATION; HUMANS; KNOWLEDGE; VISUAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 84904463279     PISSN: 10699384     EISSN: 15315320     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/s13423-013-0564-3     Document Type: Review

References (182)

1. Abdel Rahman, R., & Sommer, W. (2008). Seeing what we know and understand: How knowledge shapes perception. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 15, 1055-1063. doi: 10. 3758/PBR. 15. 6. 1055.
2. Abdel-Rahman, R., & Sommer, W. (2012). Knowledge scale effects in face recognition: An electrophysiological investigation. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 12, 161-174. doi: 10. 3758/s13415-011-0063-9.
3. Acheson, D. J., Hamidi, M., Binder, J. R., & Postle, B. R. (2011). A common neural substrate for language production and verbal working memory. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 23, 1358-1367. doi: 10. 1162/jocn. 2010. 21519.
4. Anderson, E., Siegel, E. H., Bliss-Moreau, E., & Barrett, L. F. (2011). The visual impact of gossip. Science, 17, 1446-1448. doi: 10. 1126/science. 1201574.
5. Angeli, A., Davidoff, J., & Valentine, T. (2008). Face familiarity, distinctiveness, and categorical perception. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 61, 690-707.
6. Anzellotti, S., Fairhall, S. L., & Caramazza, A. (2013). Decoding representations of face identity that are tolerant to rotation. Cerebral Cortex. doi: 10. 1093/cercor/bht046. Advance online publication.
7. Arévalo, A. L., Baldo, J. V., & Dronkers, N. F. (2012). What do brain lesions tell us about theories of embodied semantics and the human mirror neuron system? Cortex, 48, 242-254. doi: 10. 1016/j. cortex. 2010. 06. 001.
8. Arguin, M., Bub, D., & Dudek, G. (1996). Shape integration for visual object recognition and its implication in category-specific visual agnosia. Visual Cognition, 3, 221-275.
9. Balas, B., & Nelson, C. A. (2010). The role of face shape and pigmentation in other-race face perception: An electrophysiological study. Neuropsychologia, 48, 498-506. doi: 10. 1016/j. neuropsychologia. 2009. 10. 007.
10. Bar, M., Kassam, K. S., Ghuman, A. S., Boshyan, J., Schmidt, A. M., Dale, A. M., Halgren, E. (2006). Top-down facilitation of visual recognition. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 103, 449-454. doi: 10. 1073/pnas. 0507062103.
11. Barense, M. D., Henson, R. N. A., & Graham, K. S. (2011). Perception and conception: Temporal lobe activity during complex discriminations of familiar and novel faces and objects. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 23, 3052-3067. doi: 10. 1162/jocn_a_00010.
12. Barsalou, L. W. (1999). Perceptual symbol systems. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22, 577-609. doi: 10. 1017/S0140525X99002149. disc. 609-660.
13. Barsalou, L. W. (2008). Grounded cognition. Annual Review of Psychology, 59, 617-645. doi: 10. 1146/annurev. psych. 59. 103006. 093639.
14. Barsalou, L. W., Simmons, W. K., Barbey, A., & Wilson, C. D. (2003). Grounding conceptual knowledge in modality-specific systems. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7, 84-91. doi: 10. 1016/S1364-6613(02)00029-3.
15. Beauchamp, M. S., Lee, K. E., Haxby, J. V., & Martin, A. (2002). Parallel visual motion processing streams for manipulable objects and human movements. Neuron, 34, 149-159.
16. Beauchamp, M. S., Lee, K. E., Haxby, J. V., & Martin, A. (2003). fMRI responses to video and point-light displays of moving humans and manipulable objects. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 15, 991-1001.
17. Beilock, S. L., Lyons, I. M., Mattarella-Micke, A., Nusbaum, H. C., & Small, S. L. (2008). Sports experience changes the neural processing of action language. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 105, 13269-13273. doi: 10. 1073/pnas. 0803424105.
18. Bentin, S., & Deouell, L. Y. (2000). Structural encoding and identification in face processing: ERP evidence for separate mechanisms. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 17, 35-54. doi: 10. 1080/026432900380472.
19. Blechert, J., Sheppes, G., Di Tella, C., Williams, H., & Gross, J. J. (2012). See what you think: Reappraisal modulates behavioral and neural responses to social stimuli. Psychological Science, 23, 346-353. doi: 10. 1177/0956797612438559.
20. Brebner, J. L., Krigolson, O., Handy, T. C., Quadflieg, S., & Turk, D. J. (2011). The importance of skin color and facial structure in perceiving and remembering others: An electrophysiological study. Brain Research, 1388, 123-133. doi: 10. 1016/j. brainres. 2011. 02. 090.
21. Bruner, J., & Goodman, C. C. (1947). Value and need as organizing factors in perception. Journal of Abnormal Social Psychology, 42, 33-44.
22. Burton, A. M., Bruce, V., & Hancock, P. J. B. (1999). From pixels to people: A model of familar face recognition. Cognitive Science, 23, 1-31. doi: 10. 1207/s15516709cog2301_1.
23. Caharel, S., Montalan, B., Fromager, E., Bernard, C., Lalonde, R., & Mohamed, R. (2011). Other-race and inversion effects during the structural encoding stage of face processing in a race categorization task: An event-related brain potential study. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 79, 266-271. doi: 10. 1016/j. ijpsycho. 2010. 10. 018.
24. Caharel, S., Poiroux, S., Bernard, C., Thibaut, F., Lalonde, R., & Rebai, M. (2002). ERPs associated with familiarity and degree of familiarity during face recognition. International Journal of Neuroscience, 112, 1499-1512.
25. Calvo-Merino, B., Glaser, D. E., Grèzes, J., Passingham, R. E., & Haggard, P. (2005). Action observation and acquired motor skills: An fMRI study with expert dancers. Cerebral Cortex, 15, 1243-1249. doi: 10. 1093/cercor/bhi007.
26. Casasola, M. (2005). Can language do the driving? The effect of linguistic input on infants' categorization of support spatial relations. Developmental Psychology, 41, 183-192. doi: 10. 1037/0012-1649. 41. 1. 183.
27. Chao, L. L., Haxby, J. V., & Martin, A. (1999). Attribute-based neural substrates in temporal cortex for perceiving and knowing about objects. Nature Neuroscience, 2, 913-919.
28. Chao, L. L., Weisberg, J., & Martin, A. (2002). Experience dependent modulation of category-related cortical activity. Cerebral Cortex, 12, 545-551.
29. Chatterjee, A. (2011). Disembodying cognition. Language and Cognition, 2, 79-116. doi: 10. 1515/LANGCOG. 2010. 004.
30. Clifford, A., Holmes, A., Davies, I. R. L., & Franklin, A. (2010). Color categories affect pre-attentive color perception. Biological Psychology, 85, 275-282. doi: 10. 1016/j. biopsycho. 2010. 07. 014.
31. Cloutier, J., Mason, M. F., & Macrae, C. N. (2005). The perceptual determinants of person construal: Reopening the social-cognitive toolbox. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88, 885-894.
32. Collins, J. A., Blacker, K. J., & Curby, K. M. (2013). Emotional knowledge (eventually) impacts visual processing. Presented at the Annual Conference of the Vision Sciences Society, Naples, FL.
33. Collins, J. A., & Curby, K. M. (2013). Conceptual knowledge attenuates viewpoint dependency in visual object recognition. Visual Cognition. doi: 10. 1080/13506285. 2013. 836138. Advance online publication.
34. Cowell, R. A., Bussey, T. J., & Saksida, L. M. (2010). Functional dissociations within the ventral object processing pathway: Cognitive modules or a hierarchical continuum? Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 22, 2460-2479. doi: 10. 1162/jocn. 2009. 21373.
35. Curby, K. M., Hayward, W. G., & Gauthier, I. (2004). Laterality effects in the recognition of depth-rotated novel objects. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 4, 100-111. doi: 10. 3758/CABN. 4. 1. 100.
36. Damaraju, E., Huang, Y.-M., Barrett, L. F., & Pessoa, L. (2009). Affective learning enhances activity and functional connectivity in early visual cortex. Neuropsychologia, 47, 2480-2487. doi: 10. 1016/j. neuropsychologia. 2009. 04. 023.
37. De Baene, W., Ons, B., Wagemans, J., & Vogels, R. (2008). Effects of category learning on the stimulus selectivity of macaque inferiro temporal neurons. Learning and Memory, 15, 717-727. doi: 10. 1101/lm. 1040508.
38. Dixon, M. J., Bub, D. N., & Arguin, M. (1998). Semantic and visual determinants of face recognition in a prosopagnosic patient. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 10, 362-376.
39. Eifuku, S., Nakata, R., Sugimori, M., Ono, T., & Tamura, R. (2010). Neural correlates of associative face memory in the anterior inferior temporal cortex of monkeys. Journal of Neuroscience, 30, 15085-15096. doi: 10. 1523/JNEUROSCI. 0471-10. 2010.
40. Eimer, M. (2000). Event-related brain potentials distinguish processing stages involved in face perception and recognition. Clinical Neurophysiology, 111, 694-705.
41. Fallshore, M., & Schooler, J. W. (1995). Verbal vulnerability of perceptual expertise. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21, 1608-1623. doi: 10. 1037/0278-7393. 21. 6. 1608.
42. Folstein, J., Gauthier, I., & Palmeri, T. J. (2012). How category learning affects object representations: Not all morphspaces stretch alike. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 38, 807-820. doi: 10. 1037/a0025836.
43. Folstein, J. R., Palmeri, T. J., & Gauthier, I. (2013). Category learning increases discriminability of relevant object dimensions in visual cortex. Cerebral Cortex, 23, 814-823. doi: 10. 1093/cercor/bhs067.
44. Foxe, J. J., & Simpson, G. V. (2002). Flow of activation from V1 to frontal cortex in humans: A framework for defining "early" visual processing. Experimental Brain Research, 142, 139-150. doi: 10. 1007/s00221-001-0906-7.
45. Franklin, A., Drivonikou, G. V., Bevis, L., Davies, I. R. L., Kay, P., & Regier, T. (2008a). Categorical perception of color is lateralized to the right hemisphere in infants, but to the left hemisphere in adults. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 105, 3221-3225. doi: 10. 1073/pnas. 0712286105.
46. Franklin, A., Drivonikou, G. V., Clifford, A., Kay, P., Regier, T., & Davies, I. R. L. (2008b). Lateralization of categorical perception of color changes with color term acquisition. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 105, 18221-18225. doi: 10. 1073/pnas. 0809952105.
47. Galli, G., Feurra, M., & Viggiano, M. P. (2006). "Did you see him in the newspaper?" Electrophysiological correlates of context and valence in face processing. Brain Research, 1119, 190-202.
48. Gauthier, I., James, T. W., Curby, K. M., & Tarr, M. J. (2003). The influence of conceptual knowledge on visual discrimination. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 20, 507-523. doi: 10. 1080/02643290244000275.
49. Gauthier, I., & Tarr, M. J. (2002). Unraveling mechanisms for expert object recognition: Bridging brain activity and behavior. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 28, 431-446. doi: 10. 1037/0096-1523. 28. 2. 431.
50. Gauthier, I., Tarr, M. J., Anderson, A. W., Skudlarski, P., & Gore, J. C. (1999). Activation of the middle fusiform "face area" increases with expertise in recognizing novel objects. Nature Neuroscience, 2, 568-573.
51. Gentner, D., & Goldin-Meadow, S. (2003). Language in mind: Advances in the study of language and thought. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
52. Gilbert, A. L., Regier, T., Kay, P., & Ivry, R. B. (2006). Whorf hypothesis is supported in the right visual field but not the left. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 103, 489-494.
53. Gilbert, C. D., & Sigman, M. (2007). Brain states: Top-down influences in sensory processing. Neuron, 54, 677-696. doi: 10. 1016/j. neuron. 2007. 05. 019.
54. Gilchrist, J. C., & Nesberg, L. S. (1952). Need and perceptual change in need-related objects. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 44, 369-376.
55. Gillebert, C. R., Op de Beeck, H. P., Panis, S., & Wagemans, J. (2008). Subordinate categorization enhances the neural selectivity in human objectselective cortex for fine shape differences. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 21, 1054-1064. doi: 10. 1162/jocn. 2009. 21089.
56. Goldberg, R. F., Perfetti, C. A., & Schneider, W. (2006a). Distinct and common cortical activations for multimodal semantic categories. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 6, 214-222. doi: 10. 3758/CABN. 6. 3. 214.
57. Goldberg, R. F., Perfetti, C. A., & Schneider, W. (2006b). Perceptual knowledge retrieval activates sensory brain regions. Journal of Neuroscience, 26, 4917-4921. doi: 10. 1523/JNEUROSCI. 5389-05. 2006.
58. Goldstone, R. L. (1994). Influences of categorization on perceptual discrimination. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 123, 178-200.
59. Goldstone, R. L., Landy, D., & Brunel, L. C. (2011). Improving perception to make distant connections closer. Frontiers in Psychology, 2, 385. doi: 10. 3389/fpsyg. 2011. 00385.
60. Goldstone, R. L., Lippa, Y., & Shiffrin, R. M. (2001). Altering object representations through category learning. Cognition, 78, 27-43.
61. Goldstone, R. L., Steyvers, M., & Rogosky, B. J. (2003). Conceptual interrelatedness and caricatures. Memory & Cognition, 31, 169-180. doi: 10. 3758/BF03194377.
62. Graham, K. S., Barense, M. D., & Lee, A. C. H. (2010). Going beyond LTM in the MTL: A synthesis of neuropsychological and neuroimaging findings on the role of the medial temporal lobe in memory and perception. Neuropsychologia, 48, 831-853. doi: 10. 1016/j. neuropsychologia. 2010. 01. 001.
63. Grill-Spector, K. (2003). The neural basis of object perception. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 13, 159-166. doi: 10. 1016/S0959-4388(03)00040-0.
64. Grill-Spector, K., Henson, R., & Martin, A. (2006). Repetition and the brain: Neural models of stimulus-specific effects. Trends in Cognitive Science, 10, 14-23. doi: 10. 1016/j. tics. 2005. 11. 006.
65. Grill-Spector, K., & Malach, R. (2001). fMR-Adaptation: A tool for studying the functional properties of human cortical neurons. Acta Psychologica, 107, 232-293.
66. Gumperz, J. J., & Levinson, S. C. (1996). Rethinking linguistic relativity. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
67. Hancock, K. J., & Rhodes, G. (2008). Contact, configural coding, and the other-race effect in face recognition. British Journal of Psychology, 99, 45-56.
68. Harnard, S. (1987). Category induction and representation. In S. Harnard (Ed.), Categorical perception: The groundwork of cognition (pp. 535-565). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
69. Hauk, O., & Tschentscher, N. (2013). The body of evidence: What can neuroscience tell us about embodied semantics? Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 50. doi: 10. 3389/fpsyg. 2013. 00050.
70. He, Y., Johnson, M. K., Dovidio, J. F., & McCarthy, G. (2009). The relation between race-related implicit associations and scalp-recorded neural activity evoked by faces from different races. Social Neuroscience, 4, 426-442. doi: 10. 1080/17470910902949184.
71. Hehman, E., Mania, E. W., & Gaertner, S. L. (2010). Where the division lies: Common ingroup identity moderates the cross-race-facial recognition effect. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46, 445-448. doi: 10. 1016/j. jesp. 2009. 11. 008.
72. Heisz, J. J., & Shedden, J. M. (2009). Semantic learning modifies perceptual face processing. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 21, 1127-1134. doi: 10. 1162/jocn. 2009. 21104.
73. Henson, R. N., Goshen-Gottstein, Y., Ganel, T., Otten, L. J., Quayle, A., & Rugg, M. D. (2003). Electrophysiological and haemodynamic correlates of face perception, recognition and priming. Cerebral Cortex, 13, 793-805. doi: 10. 1093/cercor/13. 7. 793.
74. Herrmann, M. J., Schreppel, T., Jäger, D., Koehler, S., Ehlis, A.-C., & Fallgatter, A. J. (2007). The other-race effect for face perception: An event-related potential study. Journal of Neural Transmission, 114, 951-957. doi: 10. 1007/s00702-007-0624-9.
75. Herzmann, G., Schweinberger, S. R., Sommer, W., & Jentzsch, I. (2004). What's special about personally familiar faces? A multimodal approach. Psychophysiology, 41, 688-701. doi: 10. 1111/j. 1469-8986. 2004. 00196. x.
76. Herzmann, G., & Sommer, W. (2010). Effects of previous experience and associated knowledge on retrieval processes of faces: An ERP investigation of newly learned faces. Brain Research, 1356, 54-72. doi: 10. 1016/j. brainres. 2010. 07. 054.
77. Hillyard, S. A., & Anllo-Vento, L. (1998). Event-related brain potentials in the study of visual selective attention. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 95, 781-787.
78. Hoenig, K., Müller, C., Herrnberger, B., Sim, E.-J., Spitzer, M., Ehret, G., & Kiefer, M. (2011). Neuroplasticity of semantic representations for musical instruments in professional musicians. NeuroImage, 56, 1714-1725. doi: 10. 1016/j. neuroimage. 2011. 02. 065.
79. Holmes, A., Franklin, A., Clifford, A., & Davies, I. (2009). Neurophysiological evidence for categorical perception of color. Brain and Cognition, 69, 426-434. doi: 10. 1016/j. bandc. 2008. 09. 003.
80. Holmes, K. J., & Wolff, P. (2012). Does categorical perception in the left hemisphere depend on language? Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 141, 439-443. doi: 10. 1037/a0027289 439.
81. Hopfinger, J. B., Luck, S. J., & Hillyard, S. A. (2004). Selective attention: Electrophysiological and neuromagnetic studies. In M. S. Gazzaniga (Ed.), The cognitive neurosciences (3rd ed., pp. 561-574). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
82. Hsu, N. S., Frankland, S. M., & Thompson-Schill, S. L. (2012). Chromacity of color perception and object color knowledge. Neuropsychologia, 50, 327-333. doi: 10. 1016/j. neuropsychologia. 2011. 12. 003.
83. Itier, R. J., & Taylor, M. J. (2002). Inversion and contrast polarity reversal affect both encoding and recognition processes of unfamiliar faces: A repetition study using ERPs. NeuroImage, 15, 353-372.
84. Itier, R. J., & Taylor, M. J. (2004). Effects of repetition learning on upright, inverted and contrast-reversed face processing using ERPs. NeuroImage, 21, 1518-1532.
85. Ito, T. A., & Urland, G. R. (2003). Race and gender on the brain: Electrocortical measures of attention to the race and gender of multiply categorizable individuals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 616-626.
86. James, T. W., & Gauthier, I. (2003). Auditory and action semantic features activate sensory-specific perceptual brain regions. Current Biology, 13, 1792-1796.
87. James, T. W., & Gauthier, I. (2004). Brain areas engaged during visual judgments by involuntary access to novel semantic information. Vision Research, 44, 429-439.
88. Jemel, B., Pisani, M., Calabria, M., Crommelinck, M., & Bruyer, R. (2003). Is the N170 for faces cognitively penetrable? Evidence from repetition priming of Mooney faces of familiar and unfamiliar persons. Cognitive Brain Research, 17, 431-446.
89. Jiang, X., Bradley, E., Rini, R. A., Zeffiro, T., VanMeter, J., & Riesenhuber, M. (2007). Categorization training results in shape-and category-selective human neural plasticity. Neuron, 53, 891-903. doi: 10. 1016/j. neuron. 2007. 02. 015.
90. Johnson-Frey, S. H. (2004). The neural bases of complex tool use in humans. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 8, 71-78.
91. Kaschak, M. P., Madden, C. J., & Therriault, D. J. (2005). Perception of motion affects language processing. Cognition, 94, 79-89.
92. Kaufmann, J. M., Schweinberger, S. R., & Burton, A. M. (2009). N250 ERP correlates of the acquisition of face representations across different images. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 21, 625-461. doi: 10. 1162/jocn. 2009. 21080.
93. Kiefer, M., Sim, E. J., Herrnberger, B., Grothe, J., & Hoenig, K. (2008). The sound of concepts: Four markers for a link between auditory and conceptual brain systems. Journal of Neuroscience, 28, 12224-12230. doi: 10. 1523/JNEUROSCI. 3579-08. 2008.
94. Kikutani, M., Roberson, D., & Hanley, J. R. (2008). What's in the name? Categorical perception for unfamiliar faces can occur through labeling. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 15, 787-794. doi: 10. 3758/PBR. 15. 4. 787.
95. Kriegeskorte, N., Formisano, E., Sorger, B., & Goebel, R. (2007). Individual faces elicit distinct response patterns in human anterior temporal cortex. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 104, 20600-20605. doi: 10. 1073/pnas. 0705654104.
96. Kwok, V., Niu, Z. D., Kay, P., Zhou, K., Mo, L., Jin, Z., Tan, L. H. (2011). Learning new color names produces rapid increase in gray matter in the intact adult human cortex. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 108, 6686-6688. doi: 10. 1073/pnas. 1103217108.
97. Levin, D. T., & Banaji, M. R. (2006). Distortions in the perceived lightness of faces: The role of race categories. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 135, 501-512. doi: 10. 1037/0096-3445. 135. 4. 501.
98. Levin, D. T., & Beale, J. M. (2000). Categorical perception occurs in newly learned faces, other-race faces, and inverted faces. Perception & Psychophysics, 62, 386-401.
99. Levinson, S. C. (1997). From outer to inner space: Linguistic categories and non-linguistic thinking. In J. Nuyts & E. Pederson (Eds.), Language and conceptualization (pp. 13-45). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
100. Livingston, K. R., Andrews, J. K., & Harnad, S. (1998). Categorical perception effects induced by category learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 24, 732-753. doi: 10. 1037/0278-7393. 24. 3. 732.
101. Lo Gerfo, E., Oliveri, M., Torriero, S., Salerno, S., Koch, G., & Caltagirone, C. (2008). The influence of rTMS over prefrontal and motor areas in a morphological task: Grammatical vs. semantic effects. Neuropsychologia, 46, 764-770. doi: 10. 1016/j. neuropsychologia. 2007. 10. 012.
102. Lupyan, G. (2012). Linguistically modulated perception and cognition: The label-feedback hypothesis. Frontiers in Psychology, 3, 54. doi: 10. 3389/fpsyg. 2012. 00054.
103. Lupyan, G., Rakison, D. H., & McClelland, J. L. (2007). Language is not just for talking: Labels facilitate learning of novel categories. Psychological Science, 18, 1077-1083. doi: 10. 1111/j. 1467-9280. 2007. 02028. x.
104. Lupyan, G., & Spivey, M. J. (2008). Perceptual processing is facilitated by ascribing meaning to novel stimuli. Current Biology, 18, 410-412. doi: 10. 1016/j. cub. 2008. 02. 073.
105. Lupyan, G., & Spivey, M. J. (2010). Redundant spoken labels facilitate perception of multiple items. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 7, 2236-2253. doi: 10. 1111/j. 0956-7976. 2005. 00787. x.
106. Lupyan, G., & Thompson-Schill, S. L. (2012). The evocative power of words: Activation of concepts by verbal and nonverbal means. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 141, 170-186. doi: 10. 1037/a0024904.
107. Lupyan, G., Thompson-Schill, S. L., & Swingley, D. (2010). Conceptual penetration of visual processing. Psychological Science, 21, 682-691. doi: 10. 1177/0956797610366099.
108. Macpherson, F. (2012). Cognitive penetration of colour experience: Rethinking the issue in light of an indirect mechanism. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 84, 24-62. doi: 10. 1111/j. 1933-1592. 2010. 00481. x.
109. Mahon, B. Z., & Caramazza, A. (2005). The orchestration of the sensory-motor systems: Clues from neuropsychology. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 22, 480-494. doi: 10. 1080/02643290442000446.
110. Mahon, B. Z., & Caramazza, A. (2008). A critical look at the embodied cognition hypothesis and a new proposal for grounding conceptual content. Journal of Physiology, 102, 59-70. doi: 10. 1016/j. jphysparis. 2008. 03. 004.
111. Mahon, B. Z., Milleville, S. C., Negri, G. A. L., Rumiati, R. I., Caramazza, A., & Martin, A. (2007). Action-related properties shape object representations in the ventral stream. Neuron, 55, 507-520. doi: 10. 1016/j. neuron. 2007. 07. 011.
112. Marsolek, C. J. (1999). Dissociable neural subsystems underlie abstract and specific object recognition. Psychological Science, 10, 111-118.
113. Marsolek, C. J., & Burgund, E. D. (2008). Dissociable neural subsystems underlie visual working memory for abstract categories and specific exemplars. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 8, 17-24. doi: 10. 3758/CABN. 8. 1. 17.
114. Martin, A. (2007). The representation of object concepts in the brain. Annual Review of Psychology, 58, 25-45. doi: 10. 1146/annurev. psych. 57. 102904. 190143.
115. McMurray, B., Aslin, R. N., Tanenhaus, M. K., Spivey, M. J., & Subik, D. (2008). Gradient sensitivity to within-category variation in words and syllables. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 34, 1609-1631. doi: 10. 1037/a0011747.
116. Meteyard, L., Bahrami, B., & Vigliocco, G. (2007). Motion detection and motion verbs: Language affects low-level visual perception. Psychological Science, 18, 1007-1013. doi: 10. 1111/j. 1467-9280. 2007. 02016. x.
117. Meteyard, L., Zokaei, N., Bahrami, B., & Vigliocco, G. (2008). Visual motion interferes with lexical decision on motion words. Current Biology, 18, 732-733. doi: 10. 1016/j. cub. 2008. 07. 016.
118. Michel, C., Corneille, O., & Rossion, B. (2007). Race categorization modulates holistic face encoding. Cognitive Science, 31, 911-924. doi: 10. 1080/03640210701530805.
119. Michel, C., Rossion, B., Han, J., Chung, C.-S., & Caldara, R. (2006). Holistic processing is finely tuned for faces of one's own race. Psychological Science, 17, 608-615. doi: 10. 1111/j. 1467-9280. 2006. 01752. x.
120. Mishkin, M., Ungerleider, L. G., & Macko, K. A. (1983). Object vision and spatial vision: Two cortical pathways. Trends in Neurosciences, 6, 414-417. doi: 10. 1016/0166-2236(83)90190-X.
121. Mo, L., Xu, G. P., Kay, P., & Tan, L. H. (2011). Electrophysiological evidence for the left-lateralized effect of language on preattentive categorical perception of color. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 108, 14026-14030. doi: 10. 1073/pnas. 1111860108.
122. Mouchetant-Rostaing, Y., & Girard, M. H. (2003). Electrophysiological correlates of age and gender perception on human faces. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 15, 900-910.
123. Negri, G. A. L., Rumiati, R. I., Zadini, A., Ukmar, M., Mahon, B. Z., & Caramazza, A. (2007). What is the role of motor simulation in action and object recognition? Evidence from apraxia. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 24, 795-816. doi: 10. 1080/02643290701707412.
124. Neininger, B., & Pulvermüller, F. (2003). Word-category specific deficits after lesions in the right hemisphere. Neuropsychologia, 41, 53-70. doi: 10. 1016/S0028-3932(02)00126-4.
125. Nestor, A., Plaut, D. C., & Behrmann, M. (2011). Unraveling the distributed neural code of facial identity through spatiotemporal pattern analysis. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 108, 9998-10003. doi: 10. 1073/pnas. 1102433108.
126. Newell, F. N., & Bülthoff, H. H. (2002). Categorical perception of familiar objects. Cognition, 85, 113-143. doi: 10. 1016/S0010-0277(02)00104-X.
127. Noppeney, U., Price, C. J., Penny, W. D., & Friston, K. J. (2006). Two distinct neural mechanisms for category-selective responses. Cerebral Cortex, 16, 437-445.
128. Notman, L. A., Sowden, P. T., & Özgen, E. (2005). The nature of learned categorical perception effects: A psychophysical approach. Cognition, 95, B1-B14. doi: 10. 1016/j. cognition. 2004. 07. 002.
129. O'Brien, J. L., & Raymond, J. E. (2012). Learned predictiveness speeds visual processing. Psychological Science, 23(4), 359-363. doi: 10. 1177/0956797611429800.
130. Oliver, R. T., Geiger, E. J., Lewandowski, B. C., & Thompson-Schill, S. L. (2009). Remembrance of things touched: How sensorimotor experience affects the neural instantiation of object form. Neuropsychologia, 47, 239-247. doi: 10. 1016/j. neuropsychologia. 2008. 07. 027.
131. Olson, I. R., McCoy, D., Klobusicky, E., & Ross, L. A. (2013). Social cognition and the anterior temporal lobes: A review and theoretical framework. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 8, 123-133. doi: 10. 1093/scan/nss119.
132. Paller, K. A., Gonsalves, B., Grabowecky, M., Bozic, V. S., & Yamada, S. (2000). Electrophysiological correlates of recollecting faces of known and unknown individuals. NeuroImage, 11, 98-110.
133. Pecher, D., Zeelenberg, R., & Barsalou, L. W. (2003). Verifying properties from different modalities for concepts produces switching costs. Psychological Science, 14, 119-124. doi: 10. 1111/1467-9280. t01-1-01429.
134. Pecher, D., Zeelenberg, R., & Barsalou, L. W. (2004). Sensorimotor simulations underlie conceptual representations: Modality-specific effects of prior activation. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 11, 164-167.
135. Peelen, M. V., & Caramazza, A. (2012). Conceptual object representations in human anterior temproal cortex. Journal of Neuroscience, 32, 15728-15736. doi: 10. 1523/JNEUROSCI. 1953-12. 2012.
136. Pulvermüller, F., Hauk, O., Nikulin, V. V., & Ilmoniemi, R. J. (2005). Functional links between motor and language systems. European Journal of Neuroscience, 21, 793-797. doi: 10. 1111/j. 1460-9568. 2005. 03900. x.
137. Pylyshyn, Z. (1999). Is vision continuous with cognition? The case for cognitive impenetrability of visual perception. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22, 341-423.
138. Radel, R., & Clément-Guillotin, C. (2012). Evidence of motivational influences in early visual perception: Hunger modulates conscious access. Psychological Science, 23, 232-234. doi: 10. 1177/0956797611427920.
139. Ratcliff, N. J., Hugenberg, K., Shriver, E. R., & Bernstein, M. J. (2011). The allure of status: High-status targets are privileged in face processing and memory. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 37, 1003-1015.
140. Repetto, C., Colombo, B., Cipresso, P., & Riva, G. (2013). The effects of rTMS over the primary motor cortex: The link between action and language. Neuropsychologia, 51, 8-13. doi: 10. 1016/j. neuropsychologia. 2012. 11. 001.
141. Richardson, D. (2003). Spatial representations activated during real-time comprehension of verbs. Cognitive Science, 27, 767-780. doi: 10. 1016/S0364-0213(03)00064-8.
142. Riesenhuber, M., & Poggio, T. (2000). Models of object recognition. Nature Neuroscience, 3, 1199-1204. doi: 10. 1038/81479.
143. Roberson, D., & Davidoff, J. (2000). The categorical perception of colors and facial expressions: The effect of verbal interference. Memory & Cognition, 28, 977-986.
144. Roberson, D., Pak, H., & Hanley, J. R. (2008). Categorical perception of colour in the left and right visual field is verbally mediated: Evidence from Korean. Cognition, 107, 752-762.
145. Ross, L. A., & Olson, I. R. (2012). What's unique about unique entities? An fMRI investigation of the semantics of famous faces and landmarks. Cerebral Cortex, 22, 2005-2015. doi: 10. 1093/cercor/bhr274.
146. Sagiv, N., & Bentin, S. (2001). Structural encoding of human and schematic faces: Holistic and part-based processes. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 13, 937-951.
147. Sangrigoli, S., & De Schonen, S. (2004). Effect of visual experience on face processing: A developmental study of inversion and non-native effects. Developmental Science, 7, 74-87. doi: 10. 1111/j. 1467-7687. 2004. 00324. x.
148. Schweinberger, S. R., Pickering, E. C., Burton, A. M., & Kaufmann, J. M. (2002). Human brain potential correlates of repitition priming in face and name recognition. Neuropsychologia, 40, 2057-2073.
149. Senholzi, K. B., & Ito, T. A. (2013). Structural face encoding: How task affects the N170's sensitivity to race. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 8, 937-942. doi: 10. 1093/scan/nss091.
150. Shriver, E. R., Young, S. G., Hugenberg, K., Bernstein, M. J., & Lanter, J. R. (2008). Class, race, and the face: Social context modulates the cross-race effect in face recognition. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34, 260-278. doi: 10. 1177/014616720731045.
151. Siegel, S. (2012). Cognitive penetrability and perceptual justification. Noûs, 46, 201-222. doi: 10. 1111/j. 1468-0068. 2010. 00786. x.
152. Sigala, N., Gabbiani, F., & Logothetis, N. K. (2002). Visual categorization and object representation in monkeys and humans. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 14, 187-198.
153. Simmons, W. K., Ramjee, V., Beauchamp, M. S., McRae, K., Martin, A., & Barsalou, L. W. (2007). A common neural substrate for percieving and knwoing about color. Neuropsychologia, 45, 2802-2810. doi: 10. 1016/j. neuropsychologia. 2007. 05. 002.
154. Skipper, L. M., Ross, L. A., & Olson, I. R. (2011). Sensory and semantic subdivisions within the anterior temporal lobe. Neuropsychologia, 49, 3419-3429. doi: 10. 1016/j. neuropsychologia. 2011. 07. 033.
155. Smilek, D., Dixon, M. J., & Merikle, P. M. (2006). Revisiting the category effect: The influence of meaning and search strategy on the efficiency of visual search. Brain Research, 1080, 73-90.
156. Smith, E. E., Myers, N., Sethi, U., Pantazatos, S., Yanagihara, T., & Hirsch, J. (2012). Conceptual representations of perceptual knowledge. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 29, 237-248. doi: 10. 1080/02643294. 2012. 706218.
157. Snedeker, J., & Gleitman, L. (2004). Why is it hard to label our concepts? In D. G. Hall & S. R. Waxman (Eds.), Weaving a lexicon (pp. 257-294). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
158. Spelke, E. S. (2003). What makes us smart? Core knowledge and natural language. Language in mind: Advances in the study of language and thought (pp. 277-311). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
159. Sporer, S. L. (2001). Recognizing faces of other ethnic groups: An integration of theories. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 7, 36-97.
160. Stahl, J., Wiese, H., & Schweinberger, S. R. (2008). Expertise and own-race bias in face processing: An event-related potential study. NeuroReport, 19, 583-587. doi: 10. 1097/WNR. 0b013e3282f97b4d.
161. Stahl, J., Wiese, H., & Schweinberger, S. R. (2010). Learning task affects ERP-correlates of the own-race bias, but not recognition memory performance. Neuropsychologia, 48, 2027-2040. doi: 10. 1016/j. neuropsychologia. 2010. 03. 024.
162. Stokes, D. (2012). Perceiving and desiring. stokes. mentalpaint. net. Retrieved from http://stokes. mentalpaint. net/Papers_files/Perceiving and Desiring-JULY2010-Unblinded. pdf.
163. Thomas, C., & Baker, C. I. (2013). Teaching an adult brain new tricks: A critical review of evidence for training-dependent structural plasticity in humans. NeuroImage, 73, 225-236. doi: 10. 1016/j. neuroimage. 2012. 03. 069.
164. Thompson-Schill, S. L. (2003). Neuroimaging studies of semantic memory: Inferring "how" from where. Neuropsychologia, 41, 280-292. doi: 10. 1016/S0028-3932(02)00161-6.
165. Todorov, A., Gobbini, M. I., Evans, K. K., & Haxby, J. V. (2007). Spontaneous retrieval of affective person knowledge in face perception. Neuropsychologia, 45, 163-173. doi: 10. 1016/j. neuropsychologia. 2006. 04. 018.
166. Valdés-Sosa, M., Bobes, M. A., Quiñones, I., Garcia, L., Valdes-Hernandez, P. A., Iturria, Y., Asencio, J. (2011). Covert face recognition without the fusiform-temporal pathways. NeuroImage, 57, 1162-1176. doi: 10. 1016/j. neuroimage. 2011. 04. 057.
167. van Bavel, J. J., Packer, D. J., & Cunningham, W. A. (2008). The neural substrates of in-group bias: A functional magnetic resonance imaging investigation. Psychological Science, 19, 1131-1139. doi: 10. 1111/j. 1467-9280. 2008. 02214. x.
168. van Bavel, J. J., Packer, D. J., & Cunningham, W. A. (2011). Modulation of the fusiform face area following minimal exposure to motivationally relevant faces: Evidence of in-group enhancement (not out-group disregard). Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 23, 3343-3354. doi: 10. 1162/jocn_a_00016.
169. van Dantzig, S., Pecher, D., Zeelenberg, R., & Barsalou, L. W. (2008). Perceptual processing affects conceptual processing. Cognitive Science, 32, 579-590. doi: 10. 1080/03640210802035365.
170. van der Linden, M., van Turennout, M., & Indefrey, P. (2010). Formation of category representations in superior temporal sulcus. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 22, 1270-1282. doi: 10. 1162/jocn. 2009. 21270.
171. Von Der Heide, R. J., Skipper, L. M., & Olson, I. R. (2013). Anterior temporal face patches: A meta-analysis and empirical study. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 7, 17. doi: 10. 3389/fnhum. 2013. 00017.
172. Wagner, T., Valero-Cabre, A., & Pascual-Leone, A. (2007). Noninvasive human brain stimulation. Annual Review of Biomedical Engineering, 9, 527-565. doi: 10. 1146/annurev. bioeng. 9. 061206. 133100.
173. Walker, P. M., Silvert, L., Hewstone, M., & Nobre, A. C. (2008). Social contact and other-race face processing in the human brain. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 3, 16-25. doi: 10. 1093/scan/nsm035.
174. Waxman, S. R., & Markow, D. B. (1995). Words as invitations to form categories: Evidence from 12- to 13-month-old infants. Cognitive Psychology, 29, 257-302. doi: 10. 1006/cogp. 1995. 1016.
175. Weisberg, J., van Turennout, M., & Martin, M. (2007). A neural system for learning about object function. Cerebral Cortex, 17, 513-521. doi: 10. 1093/cercor/bhj176.
176. Wiesel, T. N., & Hubel, D. H. (1965). Comparison of the effects of unilateral and bilateral eye closure on cortical unit responses in kittens. Journal of Neurophysiology, 28, 1029-1040.
177. Willems, R. M., Labruna, L., D'Esposito, M., Ivry, R., & Casasanto, D. (2011). A functional role for the motor system in language understanding: Evidence from theta-burst transcranial magnetic stimulation. Psychological Science, 22, 849-854. doi: 10. 1177/0956797611412387.
178. Winawer, J., Witthoft, N., Frank, M. C., Wu, L., Wade, A. R., & Boroditsky, L. (2007). Russian blues reveal effects of language on color discrimination. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 104, 7780-7785.
179. Yoshida, H., & Smith, L. B. (2005). Linguistic cues enhance the learning of perceptual cues. Psychological Science, 16, 90-95. doi: 10. 1111/j. 0956-7976. 2005. 00787. x.
180. Zheng, X., & Segalowitz, S. (2013). Putting a face in its place: In- and out-group membership alters the N170 response. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience. doi: 10. 1093/scan/nst069. Advance online publication.
181. Zhou, K., Mo, L., Kay, P., Kwok, V. P. Y., Ip, T. N. M., & Tan, L. H. (2010). Newly trained lexical categories produce lateralized categorical perception of color. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 107, 9974-9978. doi: 10. 1073/pnas. 1005669107.
182. Zwaan, R. A., & Taylor, L. J. (2006). Seeing, acting, understanding: Motor resonance in language comprehension. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 135, 1-11. doi: 10. 1037/0096-3445. 135. 1. 1.