Effect of visual experience on face processing: A developmental study of inversion and non-native effects

Developmental Science

Volumn 7, Issue 1, 2004, Pages 74-87

  Sangrigoli, Sandy ^a,b   De Schonen, Scania ^a  

^a HÔPITAL ROBERT DEBRÉ   (France)

^b CNRS   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGE; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; ATTENTION; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DECISION MAKING; FACE; FACIAL EXPRESSION; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; PHYSIOLOGY; PRESCHOOL CHILD; REACTION TIME; RECOGNITION; VISION;

ADULT; AGE FACTORS; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ATTENTION; CHILD, PRESCHOOL; CHOICE BEHAVIOR; FACE; FACIAL EXPRESSION; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; REACTION TIME; RECOGNITION (PSYCHOLOGY); VISUAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 1142278591     PISSN: 1363755X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-7687.2004.00324.x     Document Type: Article

References (75)

1. Acerra, F., Burnod, Y., & de Schonen, S. (2002). Modelling aspects of face processing in early infancy. Developmental Science, 5(1), 98-117.
2. Aslin, R.N. (1985). Effects of experience on sensory and perceptual development: implications for infant cognition. In J. Mehler & R. Fox (Eds.), Neonate cognition: Beyond the blooming buzzing confusion (pp. 157-183). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
3. Baenninger, M. (1994). The development of face recognition: featural or configurational processing? Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 57, 377-396.
4. Bartlett, J.C., & Searcy, J. (1993). Inversion and configuration of faces. Cognitive Psychology, 25, 281-316.
5. Bothwell, R.K., Brigham, J.C., & Malpass, R.S. (1989). Cross-racial identification. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 15, 19-25.
6. Brace, N.A., Hole, G.J., Kemp, R.I., Pike, G.E., Van Duuren, M., & Norgate, L. (2001). Developmental changes in the effect of inversion: using a picture book to investigate face recognition. Perception, 30, 85-94.
7. Brigham, J.C. (1986). The influence of race on face recognition. In H.D. Ellis, M.A. Jeeves, F. Newcombe & A. Young (Eds.), Aspects of face processing (pp. 170-177). Dordrecht: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers.
8. Brigham, J.C., & Malpass, R.S. (1985). The role of experience and contact in the recognition of faces of own- and other-race persons. Journal of Social Issues, 41, 139-155.
9. Bruce, V., Campbell, R.D., Doferty-Sneddon, G., Import, A., Langston, S., McAuley, S., & Wright, R. (2000). Testing face processing skills in children. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 7, 3-15.
10. Byatt, G., & Rhodes, G. (1998). Recognition of own-race and other-race caricatures: implications for models of face recognition. Vision Research, 38, 2455-2468.
11. Cabeza, R., & Kato, T. (2000). Features are also important: contributions of featural and configural processing to face recognition. Psychological Science, 11, 429-433.
12. Carey, S. (1981). Development of face perception. In G. Davis, H. Ellis & J. Shephard (Eds.), Perceiving and remembering faces (pp. 150-162). New York: Academic Press.
13. Carey, S., & Diamond, R. (1977). From piecemeal to configurational representation of faces. Science, 195, 312-314.
14. Carey, S., & Diamond, R. (1994). Object and face recognition. Visual Cognition, 1 (2-3), 253-274.
15. Carey, S., Diamond, R., & Woods, B. (1980). Development of face recognition: a maturational component? Developmental Psychology, 16, 257-269.
16. Chance, J.E., Turner, A.L., & Goldstein, A.G. (1982). Development of differential recognition for own- and other-race faces. Journal of Psychology, 112, 29-37.
17. Chiroro, P., & Valentine, T. (1995). An investigation of the contact hypothesis of the own-race bias in face recognition. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 48A, 879-894.
18. Cohen, L.B., & Cashon, C.H. (2001). Do 7-month-old infants process independent features or facial configurations? Infant and Child Development, 10, 83-92.
19. Cohen, L.B., & Cashon, C.H. (2002). U-Shaped development of infants processing faces. Poster session presented at the International Conference on Infant Studies, Toronto.
20. de Haan, M., Johnson, M.H., Maurer, D., & Perett, D.I. (2001). Recognition of individual faces and average face prototypes by 1- and 3-month-old infants. Cognitive Development, 16, 659-678.
21. de Haan, M., & Nelson, C.A. (1999). Brain activity differentiates face and object processing in 6-month-old infants. Developmental Psychology, 35, 1113-1121.
22. de Haan, M., Pascalis, O., & Johnson, M.H. (2002). Specialisation of neural mechanisms underlying face recognition in human infant. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 14 (2), 199-209.
23. Deruelle, C., & de Schonen, S. (1995). Pattern processing in infancy: hemispheric differences in the processing of shape and location of visual components. Infant Behavior and Development, 18, 123-132.
24. Deruelle, C., & de Schonen, S. (1998). Do the right and left hemispheres attend to the same visuospatial information within a face in infancy? Developmental Neuropsychology, 14, 535-554.
25. de Schonen, S., Leone, G., & Lipshits, M. (1998). The face inversion effect in microgravity: is gravity used as a spatial reference for complex object recognition? Acta Astronautica, 42, 287-301.
26. de Schonen, S., & Mathivet, E. (1989). First come, first served: a scenario about the development of hemispheric specialization in face recognition during infancy. Current Psychology of Cognition, 9, 3-44.
27. Diamond, R., & Carey, S. (1977). Developmental changes in the representation of faces. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 23, 1-22.
28. Diamond, R., & Carey, S. (1986). Why faces are and are not special: an effect of expertise. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 115, 107-117.
29. Farah, M.J., Tanaka, J.W., & Drain, H.M. (1995). What causes the face inversion effect? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 21, 628-634.
30. Farah, M.J., Wilson, K.D., Drain, M., & Tanaka, J.N. (1998). What is 'special' about face perception? Psychological Review, 105, 482-498.
31. Feinman, S., & Entwhistle, D.R. (1976). Children's ability to recognize other children's faces. Child Development, 47, 506-510.
32. Flin, R.H. (1985). Development of face recognition: an encoding switch? British Journal of Psychology, 76, 123-134.
33. Freire, A., & Lee, K. (2001). Face recognition in 4- to 7-year-olds: processing of configural, featural and paraphernalia information. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 80, 347-371.
34. Freire, A., Lee, K., & Symons, L.A. (2000). The face-inversion effect as a deficit in the encoding of configural information: direct evidence. Perception, 29, 159-170.
35. Gauthier, I., Skudlarski, P., Gore, J.C., & Anderson, A.W. (2000). Expertise for cars and birds recruits brain areas involved in face recognition. Nature Neuroscience, 3 (2), 191-197.
36. Gauthier, I., & Tarr, M.J. (1997). Becoming a 'greeble' expert: exploring mechanisms for face recognition. Vision Research, 37, 1673-1682.
37. Gauthier, I., Williams, P., Tarr, M.J., & Tanaka, J. (1998). Training 'greeble' experts: a framework for studying expert object recognition processes. Vision Research, 38, 2401-2428.
38. Golby, A.J., Gabrieli, J.D.E., Chiao, J.Y., & Eberhardt, J.L. (2001). Differential responses in the fusiform region to same-race and other-race faces. Nature Neuroscience, 4 (8), 845-850.
39. Goren, C.C., Sarty, M., & Wu, P.Y. (1975). Visual following and pattern discrimination of face-like stimuli by newborn infants. Pediatrics, 56, 544-549.
40. Goto, H. (1971). Auditory perception by normal Japanese adults of the sounds 'l' and 'r'. Neuropsychologia, 9, 317-323.
41. Imbert, M. (1985). Physiological underpinnings of perceptual development. In J. Mehler & R. Fox (Eds.), Neonate cognition: Beyond the blooming buzzing confusion (pp. 157-183). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
42. Johnson, M.H., Dziurawiec, S., Ellis, H., & Morton, J. (1991). Newborns' preferential tracking of face-like stimuli and its subsequent decline. Cognition, 40, 1-19.
43. Johnson, M.H., & Mareschal, D. (2001). Cognitive and perceptual development during infancy. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 11 (2), 213-218.
44. Jusczyk, P.W., & Derrah, C. (1987). Representation of speech sounds by young infants. Developmental Psychology, 23, 648-654.
45. Kuhl, P.K. (1993). Innate predispositions and the effects of experience in speech perception: the native language magnet theory. In B. de Boysson-Bardies, S. de Schonen, P. Jusczyk, P. McNeilage & J. Morton (Eds.), Developmental neurocognition: Speech and face processing in the first year of life (pp. 259-274). Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
46. Kuhl, P.K., Williams, K.A., Lacerda, F., Stevens, K.N., & Lindblom, B. (1992). Linguistic experience alters phonetic perception in infants by 6 months of age. Science, 255, 606-608.
47. Leder, H., & Bruce, V. (1998). Local and relational aspects of face distinctiveness. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Experimental Psychology, 51A, 449-473.
48. Leder, H., & Bruce, V. (2000). When inverted faces are recognized: the role of configural information in face recognition. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Experimental Psychology, 53A, 513-536.
49. Leder, H., Candrian, G., Huber, O., & Bruce, V. (2001). Configural features in the context of upright and inverted faces. Perception, 30, 73-83.
50. Le Grand, R., Mondloch, C.J., Maurer, D., & Brent, H.P. (2001). Neuroperception. Early visual experience and face processing. Nature, 410 (6831), 890.
51. Lundy, B.L., Jackson, J.W., & Haaf, R.A. (2001). Stimulus properties, attentional limitations, and young children's face recognition. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 92, 919-929.
52. McCarthy, G., Puce, A., Gore, J.C., & Allison, T. (1997). Face specific processing in the human fusiform gyrus. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 9, 605-610.
53. Macchi-Cassia, V., Simion, F., & Umiltà, C. (2001). Face preference at birth: the role of an orienting mechanism. Developmental Science, 4 (1), 101-108.
54. Miyawaki, K., Strange, W., Verbrugge, R., Liberman, A., Jenkins, J.J., & Fujimura, O. (1975). An effect of linguistic experience: the discrimination of [r] and [l] by native speakers of Japanese and English. Perception and Psychophysics, 18, 331-340.
55. Mondloch, C.J., Le Grand, R., & Maurer, D. (2002). Configural face processing develops more slowly than featural face processing. Perception, 31, 553-566.
56. O'Toole, A.J., Deffenbacher, K.A., Valentin, D., & Abdi, H. (1994). Structural aspects of face recognition and the other-race effect. Memory and Cognition, 22, 208-224.
57. Pascalis, O., de Haan, M., & Nelson, C.A. (2002). Is face processing species-specific during the first year of life? Science, 296, 1321-1323.
58. Pascalis, O., de Haan, M., Nelson, C.A., & de Schonen, S. (1998). Long-term recognition memory for faces assessed by visual paired comparison in 3- and 6-month-old infants. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 24, 249-260.
59. Pascalis, O., Demont, E., de Haan, M., & Campbell, R. (2001). Recognition of faces of different species: a developmental study between 5 and 8 years of age. Infant and Child Development, 10, 39-45.
60. Rhodes, G., Brake, S., Taylor, K., & Tan, S. (1989). Expertise and configural coding in face recognition. British Journal of Psychology, 80, 313-331.
61. Rubenstein, A.J., Kalakanis, L., & Langlois, J.H. (1999). Infant preferences for attractive faces: a cognitive explanation. Developmental Psychology, 35, 848-855.
62. Searcy, J.H., & Bartlett, J.C. (1996). Inversion and processing of component and spatial-relational information in faces. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 22, 904-915.
63. Strauss, M.S. (1979). Abstraction of prototypical information by adults and 10-month-old infants. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 5, 618-632.
64. Tanaka, J.W., & Farah, M.J. (1993). Parts and wholes in face recognition. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Experimental Psychology, 46A, 225-245.
65. Tanaka, J.W., Kay, J.B., Grinnell, E., Stansfield, B., & Szechter, L. (1998). Face recognition in young children: when the whole is greater than the sum of its parts. Visual Cognition, 5, 479-496.
66. Tzourio-Mazoyer, N., de Schonen, S., Crivello, F., Quinton, O., Reutter, B., Aujard, Y., & Mazoyer, B. (2002). Neural correlates of woman face processing by 2-month-old infants. Neuroimage, 15, 454-461.
67. Valentine, T. (1988). Upside-down faces: a review of the effect of inversion upon face recognition. British Journal of Psychology, 79, 471-491.
68. Valentine, T. (1991). A unified account of the effects of distinctiveness, inversion, and race in face recognition. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Experimental Psychology, 43A, 161-204.
69. Valentine, T., & Bruce, V. (1986). The effect of race, inversion and encoding activity upon face recognition. Acta Psychologica, 61, 259-273.
70. Valentine, T., Chiroro, P., & Dixon, R. (1995). An account of the own-race bias and the contact hypothesis based on a 'face space' model of face recognition. In T. Valentine (Ed.), Cognitive and computational aspects of face recognition: Explorations in face space (pp. 69-94). London: Routledge.
71. Valentine, T., & Endo, M. (1992). Towards an exemplar model of face processing: the effects of race and distinctiveness. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Experimental Psychology, 44A, 671-703.
72. Valenza, E., Simion, F., Macchi-Cassia, V., & Umiltà, C. (1996). Face preference at birth. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 22 (4), 892-903.
73. Werker, J.F., & Lalonde, C.E. (1988). Cross-language speech perception: initial capabilities and developmental change. Developmental Psychology, 24, 672-683.
74. Werker, J.F., & Tees, R.C. (1984). Cross-language speech perception: evidence for perceptual reorganization during the first year of life. Infant Behavior and Development, 7, 49-63.
75. Yin, R.K. (1969). Looking at upside-down faces. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 81, 141-145.