A stage-based diffusion of IT innovation and the BSC performance impact: A moderator of technology-organization-environment

Technological Forecasting and Social Change

Volumn 88, Issue , 2014, Pages 76-90

  Wu, Ing Long ^a   Chen, Jian Liang ^b  

^a NATIONAL CHUNG CHENG UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

^b Dept of Information Management National Peng Hu Uiniversity of Science and Technology   (Taiwan)

Author keywords

Balanced scorecard; Diffusion of IT innovation; Innovation diffusion theory; Resource based view; Technology organization environment

Indexed keywords

DIFFUSION; INDUSTRY; INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY; MODERATORS;

BALANCED SCORECARDS; INNOVATION DIFFUSION THEORY; IT INNOVATION; RESOURCE-BASED VIEW; TECHNOLOGY ORGANIZATION ENVIRONMENTS;

INNOVATION;

IMPLEMENTATION PROCESS; INDUSTRIAL PERFORMANCE; INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY; INNOVATION; PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT; TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENT; TECHNOLOGY DIFFUSION; EMPIRICAL ANALYSIS; RESEARCH METHOD; TECHNOLOGY ADOPTION;

EID: 84904320357     PISSN: 00401625     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.techfore.2014.06.015     Document Type: Article

References (82)

1. Ajzen I. The theory of planned behavior. Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process. 1991, 50(2):179-211.
2. Ashurst C., Freer A., Ekdahl J., Gibbons C. Exploring IT-enabled innovation: a new paradigm?. Int. J. Inf. Manag. 2012, 32(4):326-336.
3. Banker R.D., Chang H., Pizzini M.J. The balanced scorecard: judgmental effects of performance measures linked to strategy. Account. Rev. 2004, 79(1):1-23.
4. Barua A., Kriebel C.H., Mukhopadhyay T. Information systems and business value: an analytic and empirical investigation. Inf. Syst. Res. 1995, 6(1):3-23.
5. Benitez-Amado J., Walczuch R.M. Information technology, the organizational capability of proactive corporate environmental strategy and firm performance: a resource-based analysis. Eur. J. Inf. Syst. 2012, 21:664-679. (March).
6. Bharadwaj A.S. A resource-based perspective on information technology capability and firm performance: an empirical investigation. MIS Q. 2000, 24(1):169-196.
7. Chan Y.E. IT value: the great divide between qualitative and quantitative and individual and organizational measures. J. Manag. Inf. Syst. 2000, 16(4):225-261.
8. Chan F., Chong A., Zhou L. An empirical investigation of factors affecting e-collaboration diffusion in SMEs. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 2012, 138(2):329-344.
9. Chin W.W. Issues and opinion on structural equation modeling. MIS Q. 1998, 22(1):7-16.
10. Chin W.W., Marcolin B.L., Newsted P.R. A partial least squares latent variable modeling approach for measuring interaction effects: results from a Monte Carlo simulation study and an electronic-mail emotion/adoption study. Inf. Syst. Res. 2003, 14(2):189-217.
11. Cooper R.B., Zmud R.W. Information technology implementation research: a technological diffusion approach. Manag. Sci. 1990, 36(2):123-140.
12. Davenport T.H. Process Innovation: Reengineering Work Through Information Technology 1993, Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA.
13. Davis F.D., Bagozzi R.P., Warshaw P.R. User acceptance of computer technology: a comparison of two theoretical models. Manag. Sci. 1989, 35(8):982-1002.
14. Day G.S. The capabilities of market-driven organizations. J. Mark. 1994, 58(4):37-52.
15. Devaraj S., Kohli R. Information technology payoff in the healthcare industry: a longitudinal study. J. Manag. Inf. Syst. 2000, 16(4):41-67.
16. Devaraj S., Kohli R. Performance impacts of information technology: is actual usage the missing link?. Manag. Sci. 2003, 49(3):273-289.
17. Ellingson D.A., Wambsganss J.R. Modifying the approach to planning and evaluation in governmental entities: a balanced scorecard approach. J. Public Budg. Account. Financ. Manag. 2001, 13(1):103-120.
18. Fathy J., Hooley G. Sustainable competitive advantage in electronic business: towards a contingency perspective on the resource-based view. J. Strateg. Mark. 2002, 10(4):241-253.
19. Fichman R.G. The role of aggregation in the measurement of it-related organizational innovation. MIS Q. 2001, 25(4):401-429.
20. Gallivan M.J. Organizational adoption and assimilation of complex technological innovations: development and application of a new framework. Database Adv. Inf. Syst. 2001, 32(3):51-86.
21. Gibbs J.L., Kraemer K.L. A cross-country investigation of the determinants of scope of e-commerce use: an institutional approach. Electron. Mark. 2004, 14(2):124-137.
22. Gold A.H., Malhotra A., Segars A.H. Knowledge management: an organizational capabilities perspective. J. Manag. Inf. Syst. 2001, 18(1):185-214.
23. Grant R.M. The resource-based theory of competitive advantage. Calif. Manag. Rev. 1991, 33(3):114-135.
24. Grover V., Goslar M.D. The initiation, adoption, and implementation of telecommunications technologies in US. J. Manag. Inf. Syst. 1993, 10(1):141-163.
25. Gumbus A., Lyons B. The balanced scorecard at Philips Electronics. Strateg. Financ. 2002, 84(5):45-49.
26. Hair J.F., Black W.C., Babin B.J., Anderson R.E. Multivariate Data Analysis 2010, Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ. 7th edition.
27. Hong W., Zhu K. Migrating to Internet-based e-commerce: factors affecting e-commerce adoption and migration at the firm level. Inf. Manag. 2006, 43(2):204-211.
28. Hoque Z., James W. Linking balanced scorecard measures to size and market factors: impact on organizational performance. J. Manag. Account. Res. 2000, 12(1):1-17.
29. Iacovou C.L., Benbasat I., Dexter A.S. EDI and small organizations: adoption and impact of technology. MIS Q. 1995, 19(4):465-485.
30. Kaplan R.S., Norton D.P. The balanced scorecard: measures that drive performance. Harv. Bus. Rev. 1992, 70(1):71-79.
31. Kaplan R.S., Norton D.P. Transforming the balanced scorecard from performance measurement to strategic management: part I. Account. Horiz. 2001, 15(1):87-104.
32. Kaplan R.S., Norton D.P. The strategy map: guide to aligning intangible assets. Strateg. Leadersh. 2004, 32(5):10-17.
33. Karahanna E., Straub D.W., Chervany N.L. Information technology adoption across time: a cross-sectional comparison of pre-adoption and post-adoption beliefs. MIS Q. 1999, 23(2):183-213.
34. Kim J., Suh E., Hwang H. A model for evaluating the effectiveness of CRM using the balanced scorecard. J. Interact. Mark. 2003, 17(2):5-19.
35. Kwon T.H., Zmud R.W. Unifying the fragmented models of information systems implementation. Critical Issues in Information Systems Research 1987, John Wiley and Sons, UK. R.J. Boland, R.A. Hirschheim (Eds.).
36. Lee H., Choi B. Knowledge management enablers, processes, and organizational performance: an integrative view and empirical examination. J. Manag. Inf. Syst. 2003, 20(1):179-228.
37. Lewin K. Field Theory in Social Science 1952, Tavistock, London, UK.
38. Libby T., Salterio S.E., Webb A. The balanced scorecard: the effects of assurance and process accountability on managerial judgment. Account. Rev. 2004, 79(4):1075-1094.
39. Lin H.F. Understanding the determinants of electronic supply chain management system adoption: using the technology-organization-environment framework. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 2013, 10.1016/j.techfore.2013.09.001.
40. Maiga A.S., Jacobs F.A. Balanced scorecard, activity-based costing and company performance: an empirical analysis. J. Manag. Issues 2003, 15(3):283-301.
41. Mathiassen L., Pries-Heje J. Business agility and diffusion of information technology. Eur. J. Inf. Syst. 2006, 15(2):116-119.
42. Melville N., Kraemer K., Gurbaxani V. Information technology and organizational performance: an integrative model of IT business value. MIS Q. 2004, 28(2):283-322.
43. Meyer A.D., Goes J.B. Organizational assimilation of innovations: a multi-level contextual analysis. Acad. Manag. Rev. 1988, 31(4):897-923.
44. Park J.H., Lee J.K., Yoo J.S. A framework for designing the balanced supply chain scorecard. Eur. J. Inf. Syst. 2005, 14(4):335-346.
45. Podsakoff P.M., MacKenzie S.B., Lee J.Y., Podsakoff N.P. Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. J. Appl. Psychol. 2003, 88(5):879-903.
46. Premkumar G., Roberts M. Adoption of new information technologies in rural small business. Omega 1999, 27:467-484.
47. Premkumar G.P., Ramamurthy K., Nilakanta S. Implementation of electronic data interchange: an innovation diffusion perspective. J. Manag. Inf. Syst. 1994, 11(2):157-186.
48. Prescott M.B., Conger S.A. Information technology innovations: a classification by IT locus of impact and research approach. Database Adv. 1995, 26(2/3):20-41.
49. Rai A., Bajwa D.S. An empirical investigation into factors relating the adoption of executive information systems: an analysis of EIS for collaboration and decision support. Decis. Sci. 1997, 28(4):939-974.
50. Rai A., Patnayakuni R., Seth N. Firm performance impacts of digitally-enabled supply chain integration capabilities. MIS Q. 2006, 30(2):225-246.
51. Rajagopal P. An innovation-diffusion view of implementation of enterprise resource planning systems and development of a research model. Inf. Manag. 2002, 40(2):87-114.
52. Ramamurthy K., Premkumar G., Crum M.R. Organizational and inter-organizational determinants of EDI diffusion and organizational performance: a causal model. J. Organ. Comput. Electron. Commer. 1999, 9(4):253-285.
53. Ranganathan C., Dhaliwal J.S., Teo T.S.H. Assimilation and diffusion of web technologies in supply chain management: an examination of key drivers and performance impacts. Int. J. Electron. Commer. 2004, 9(1):127-161.
54. Rogers E.M. Diffusion of Innovation 1995, The Free Press, New York. 4th edition.
55. Rogers E.M. Diffusion of Innovation 2003, The Free Press, New York. 5th edition.
56. Ruiz-Mercader J., Merono-Cerdan A.L., Sabater-Sanchez R. Information technology and learning: their relationship and impact on organizational performance in small businesses. Int. J. Inf. Manag. 2006, 26(1):16-29.
57. Santhanam R., Hartono E. Issues in linking information technology capability to firm performance. MIS Q. 2003, 27(1):125-153.
58. Seddon P.B., Graeser V., Willcocks L.P. Measuring organizational IS effectiveness: an overview and update of senior management perspectives. Database Adv. Inf. Syst. 2002, 33(2):11-28.
59. Setia P., Sambamurthy V., Closs D.J. Realizing business value of agile IT applications: antecedents in the supply chain networks. Inf. Technol. Manag. 2008, 9(1):5-19.
60. Sharif M.N. Technological innovation governance for winning the future. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 2012, 79(3):595-604.
61. Sircar S., Turnbow J.L., Bordoloi B. A framework for assessing the relationship between information technology investments and firm performance. J. Manag. Inf. Syst. 2000, 16(4):69-97.
62. Solano J., De Ovalles M.P.T., Rojas A., Padua G., Morales L.M. Integration of systemic quality and the balanced scorecard. Inf. Syst. Manag. 2003, 20(1):64-79.
63. Swanson E.B. Consultancies and capabilities in innovating with IT. J. Strateg. Inf. Syst. 2010, 19(1):17-27.
64. Swanson E.B., Ramiller N.C. The organizing vision in information systems innovation. Organ. Sci. 1997, 8(5):458-474.
65. Swanson E.B., Ramiller N.C. Innovating mindfully with information technology. MIS Q. 2004, 28(4):553-583.
66. Tallon P.P. Inside the adaptive enterprise: an information technology capabilities perspective on business process agility. Inf. Technol. Manag. 2008, 9(1):21-36.
67. Tallon P.P., Kraemer K.L., Gurbaxani V. Executives' perception of the business value of information technology: a process-oriented approach. J. Manag. Inf. Syst. 2000, 16(4):145-173.
68. Tanriverdi H. Information technology relatedness, knowledge management capability, and performance of multibusiness firms. MIS Q. 2005, 29(2):311-334.
69. Tanriverdi H., Rai A., Venkatraman N. Research commentary: reframing the dominant quests of information systems strategy research for complex adaptive business systems. Inf. Syst. Res. 2010, 21(4):822-834.
70. Thatcher M.E., Oliver J.R. The impact of technology investments on a firm's production efficiency, product quality, and productivity. J. Manag. Inf. Syst. 2001, 18(2):17-45.
71. Thrasher E.H., Craighead C.W., Byrd T.A. An empirical investigation of integration in healthcare alliance networks. Decis. Support. Syst. 2010, 50(1):116-127.
72. Tornatzky L.G., Fleischer M. The Processes of Technological Innovation 1990, Lexington Books, Lexington, MA.
73. Van der Valk T., Chappin M.M.H., Gijsbers G.W. Evaluating innovation networks in emerging technologies. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 2011, 78(1):25-39.
74. Venkatesh V., Davis F.D. A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: four longitudinal field studies. Manag. Sci. 2000, 46(2):186-204.
75. Voelker K.E., Rakich J.S., French G.R. The balanced scorecard in healthcare organizations: a performance measurement and strategic planning methodology. Hosp. Top. 2001, 79(3):13-24.
76. Wade M., Hulland J. Review: the resource-based view and information system research: review, extension, and suggestions for future research. MIS Q. 2004, 28(1):107-142.
77. Wainwright D.W., Waring T.S. The application and adaptation of a diffusion of innovation framework for information systems research in NHS general medical practice. J. Inf. Technol. 2007, 22(1):44-58.
78. Wang Y.M., Wang Y.S., Yang Y.F. Understanding the determinants of RFID adoption in the manufacturing industry. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 2010, 77(5):803-815.
79. Wu I.L., Chung C.H. Examining the diffusion of electronic supply chain management with external antecedents and firm performance: a multi-stage analysis. Decis. Support. Syst. 2010, 50:103-115.
80. Wu I.L., Hu Y.P. Examining knowledge management enabled performance for hospital professionals: a dynamic capability view and the mediating role of process capability. J. Assoc. Inf. Syst. 2012, 13(12):976-999.
81. Yeniyurt S.A. Literature review and integrative performance measurement framework for multinational companies. Mark. Intell. Plan. 2003, 21(3):134-142.
82. Zhu K., Kraemer K.L., Xu S. The process of innovation assimilation by firms in different countries: a technology diffusion perspective on e-business. Manag. Sci. 2006, 52(10):1557-1576.