Comparison of nano- and microfibrillated cellulose films

Cellulose

Volumn 21, Issue 5, 2014, Pages 3443-3456

  Kumar, Vinay ^a   Bollström, Roger ^b   Yang, Arthas ^c   Chen, Qingxia ^d   Chen, Gang ^d   Salminen, Pekka ^d   Bousfield, Douglas ^e   Toivakka, Martti ^a  

^a ÅBO AKADEMI UNIVERSITY   (Finland)

^b OMYA INTERNATIONAL AG   (Switzerland)

^c Styron LLC   (China)

^d SOUTH CHINA UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (China)

^e The University of Maine   (United States)

Author keywords

Barrier properties; Mechanical properties; Microfibrillated cellulose; Nanofibrillated cellulose; Optical properties

Indexed keywords

BIODEGRADABILITY; CELLULOSE; FILMS; FUNCTIONAL MATERIALS; HARDWOODS; INK; MECHANICAL PROPERTIES; OPTICAL PROPERTIES; PRINTING; PRINTING MACHINERY;

BARRIER PROPERTIES; CHEMICAL PRE-TREATMENT; HIGH PRESSURE HOMOGENIZATION; MICROFIBRILLATED CELLULOSE; MICROFIBRILLATED CELLULOSE (MFC); NANOFIBRILLATED CELLULOSE; NANOFIBRILLATED CELLULOSE (NFC); TEMPO-MEDIATED OXIDATION;

CELLULOSE FILMS;

BIODEGRADATION; CELLULOSE DERIVATIVES; FUNCTIONAL GROUPS; HARDWOODS; MECHANICAL PROPERTIES; OPTICAL PROPERTIES; PRINTING MACHINES;

EID: 84904274754     PISSN: 09690239     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10570-014-0357-5     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Araki J, Wada M, Kuga S (2001) Steric stabilisation of a cellulose microcrystal suspension by poly(ethylene glycol) grafting. Langmuir 17: 21-27.
2. Aulin C, Gallstedt M, Lindstrom T (2010) Oxygen and oil barrier properties of microfibrillated cellulose films and coatings. Cellulose 17: 559-574.
3. Aulin C, Salazar-Alvarez G, Lindstrom T (2012) High strength, flexible and transparent nanofibrillated cellulose-nanoclay biohybrid films with tunable oxygen and water vapor permeability. Nanoscale 4: 6622-6628.
4. Baez C, Considine J, Rowlands R (2014) Influence of drying restraint on physical and mechanical properties of nanofibrillated cellulose films. Cellulose 21: 347-356.
5. Belbekhouche S, Bras J, Siqueira G, Chappey C, Lebrun L, Khelifi B, Marais S, Dufresne A (2011) Water sorption behavior and gas barrier properties of cellulose whiskers and microfibrils films. Carbohydr Polym 83: 1740-1748.
6. Besbes I, Alila S, Boufi S (2011) Nanofibrillated cellulose from TEMPO-oxidized eucalyptus fibres: effect of the carboxyl content. Carbohydr Polym 84: 975-983.
7. Bollström R, Saarinen JJ, Raty J, Toivakka M (2012) Measuring solvent barrier properties of paper. Meas Sci Technol 23: 015601.
8. Chinga-Carrasco G, Syverud K (2012) On the structure and oxygen transmission rate of biodegradable cellulose nanobarriers. Nanoscale Res Lett 7: 192.
9. Dufresne A, Cavaille J-Y, Vignon MR (1997) Mechanical behavior of sheets prepared from sugar beet cellulose microfibrils. J Appl Polym Sci 64: 1185-1194.
10. Eichhorn SJ, Dufresne A, Aranguren M, Marcovich NE, Capadona JR, Rowan SJ, Weder C, Thielemans W, Roman M, Rennecker S, Gindl W, Veigel S, Keckes J, Yano H, Abe K, Nogi M, Nakagaito AN, Mangalam A, Simonsen J, Benight AS, Bismarck A, Berglund LA, Peijs T (2009) Review: current international research into cellulose nanofibers and nanocomposites. J Mater Sci 45: 1-33.
11. Fang Z, Zhu H, Yuan Y, Ha D, Zhu S, Preston C, Chen Q, Li Y, Han X, Lee S, Chen G, Li T, Munday J, Huang J, Hu L (2014) Novel nanostructured paper with ultrahigh transparency and ultrahigh haze for solar cells. Nano Lett 14: 765-773.
12. Fukuzumi H, Saito T, Wata T, Kumamoto Y, Isogai A (2009) Transparent and high gas barrier films of cellulose nanofibers prepared by TEMPO-mediated oxidation. Biomacromolecules 10: 162-165.
13. Hansen NML, Blomfeldt TOJ, Hedenqvist MS, Plackett DV (2012) Properties of plasticized composite films prepared from nanofibrillated cellulose and birch wood xylan. Cellulose 19: 2015-2031.
14. Hu L, Zheng G, Yao J, Liu N, Weil B, Eskilsson M, Karabulut E, Ruan Z, Fan S, Bloking JT, McGehee MD, Wagberg L, Cui Y (2013) Transparent and conductive paper from nanocellulose fibers. Energy Environ Sci 6: 513-518.
15. Iwamoto S, Abe K, Yano H (2008) The effect of hemicelluloses on wood pulp nanofibrillation and nanofiber network characteristics. Biomacromolecules 9: 1022-1026.
16. Klemm D, Kramer F, Moritz S, Lindstrom T, Ankerfors M, Gray D, Dorris A (2011) Nanocelluloses: a new family of nature-based materials. Angew Chem Int Ed 50: 5438-5466.
17. Kurihara T, Isogai A (2014) Properties of poly(acrylamide)/TEMPO-oxidized cellulose nanofibril composite films. Cellulose 21: 291-299.
18. Lagaron JM, Catala R, Gavara R (2004) Structural characteristics defining high barrier properties in polymeric materials. Mater Sci Technol 20: 1-7.
19. Lavoine N, Desloges I, Dufresne A, Bras J (2012) Microfibrillated cellulose-its barrier properties and applications in cellulosic materials: a review. Carbohydr Polym 90: 735-764.
20. Lee K-Y, Tammelin T, Schulfter K, Kiiskinen H, Samela J, Bismarck A (2012) High performance cellulose nanocomposites: comparing the reinforcing ability of bacterial cellulose and nanofibrillated cellulose. Appl Mater Interfaces 4: 4078-4086.
21. Li F, Biagioni P, Bollani M, Maccagnan A, Piergiovanni L (2013) Multi-functional coating of cellulose nanocrystals for flexible packaging applications. Cellulose 20: 2491-2504.
22. Minelli M, Baschetti MG, Doghieri F, Ankerfors M, Lindstrom T, Siro I, Plackett D (2010) Investigation of mass transport properties of microfibrillated cellulose (MFC) films. J Membr Sci 358: 67-75.
23. Moon RJ, Martini A, Nairn J, Simonsen J, Youngblood J (2011) Cellulose nanomaterials review: structure, properties and nanocomposites. Chem Soc Rev 40: 3941-3994.
24. Nishiyama Y, Langan P, Chanzy H (2002) Crystal structure and hydrogen-bonding system in cellulose I from synchrotron X-ray and neutron fiber diffraction. J Am Chem Soc 124(31): 9074-9082.
25. Nogi M, Iwamoto S, Nakagaito AN, Yano H (2009) Optically transparent nanofiber paper. Adv Mater 21: 1595-1598.
26. Paunonen S (2013) Strength and barrier enhancements of composites and packaging boards by nanocelluloses-a literature review. Nord Pulp Pap Res J 28(2): 165-181.
27. Plackett D, Anturi H, Hedenqvist M, Ankerfors M, Gallstedt M, Lindstrom T, Siro I (2010) Physical properties and morphology of films prepared from microfibrillated cellulose and microfibrillated cellulose in combination with amylopectin. J Appl Polym Sci 117: 3601-3609.
28. Qing Y, Sabo R, Wu Y, Cai Z (2012) High-performance cellulose nanofibril composite films. Bioresources 7(3): 3064-3075.
29. Qing Y, Sabo R, Zhu JY, Agarwal U, Cai Z, Wu Y (2013) A comparative study of cellulose nanofibrils disintegrated via multiple processing approaches. Carbohydr Polym 97: 226-234.
30. Rodionova G, Hoff B, Lenes M, Eriksen O, Gregersen O (2013) Gas-phase esterification of microfibrillated cellulose (MFC) films. Cellulose 20: 1167-1174.
31. Rodionova G, Lenes M, Eriksen O, Gregersen O (2011) Surface chemical modification of microfibrillated cellulose: improvement of barrier properties for packaging applications. Cellulose 18(1): 127-134.
32. Rodionova G, Saito T, Lenes M, Eriksen O, Gregersen O, Fukuzumi H, Isogai A (2012) Mechanical and oxygen barrier properties of films prepared from fibrillated dispersions of TEMPO-oxidized Norway spruce and Eucalyptus pulps. Cellulose 19(3): 705-711.
33. Saito T, Nishiyama Y, Putaux JL, Vignon M, Isogai A (2006) Homogeneous suspensions of individualized microfibrils from tempo-catalyzed oxidation of native cellulose. Biomacromolecules 7: 1687-1691.
34. Sehaqui H, Liu AD, Zhou Q, Berglund LA (2010) Fast preparation procedure for large, flat cellulose and cellulose/inorganic nanopaper structures. Biomacromolecules 11: 2195-2198.
35. Siro I, Plackett D (2010) Microfibrillated cellulose and new nanocomposite materials: a review. Cellulose 17: 459-494.
36. Siro I, Plackett D, Hedenqvist M, Ankerfors M, Lindstrom T (2011) Highly transparent films from carboxymethylated cellulose: the effect of multiple homozenization steps on key properties. J Appl Polym Sci 119: 2652-2660.
37. Spence KL, Venditti RA, Habibi Y, Rojas OJ, Pawlak JJ (2010a) The effect of chemical composition on microfibrillar cellulose films from wood pulps: mechanical processing and physical properties. Bioresour Technol 101: 5961-5968.
38. Spence KL, Venditti RA, Rojas OJ, Habibi Y, Pawlak JJ (2010b) The effect of chemical composition on microfibrillar cellulose films from wood pulps: water interactions and physical properties for packaging applications. Cellulose 17(4): 835-848.
39. Spence KL, Venditti RA, Rojas OJ, Habibi Y, Pawlak JJ (2011a) A comparative study of energy consumption and physical properties of microfibrillated cellulose produced by different processing methods. Cellulose 18(4): 1097-1111.
40. Spence KL, Venditti RA, Rojas OJ, Pawlak JJ, Hubbe MA (2011b) Water vapor barrier properties of coated and filled microfibrillated cellulose composite films. Bioresources 6(4): 4370-4388.
41. Stelte W, Sanadi AR (2009) Preparation and characterization of cellulose nanofibers from two commercial hardwood and softwood pulps. Ind Eng Chem Res 48: 11211-11219.
42. Syverud K, Chinga-Carrasco G, Toledo J, Toledo P (2011) A comparative study of Eucalyptus and Pinus radiata pulp fibres as raw materials for production of cellulose nanofibrils. Carbohydr Polym 84: 1033-1038.
43. Syverud K, Stenius P (2009) Strength and barrier properties of MFC films. Cellulose 16: 75-85.
44. Taniguchi T, Okamura K (1998) New films produced from microfibrillated natural fibres. Polym Int 47: 291-294.
45. Zhu H, Xiao Z, Liu D, Li Y, Weadock NJ, Fang Z, Huang J, Hu L (2013) Biodegradable transparent substrates for flexible organic-light-emitting diodes. Energy Environ Sci 6: 2105-2111.
46. Österberg M, Vartiainen J, Lucenius J, Hippi U, Seppala J, Serimaa R, Laine J (2013) A fast method to produce strong NFC films as a platform for barrier and functional materials. Appl Mater Interfaces 5: 4640-4647.