A cognitive latent variable model for the simultaneous analysis of behavioral and personality data

Journal of Mathematical Psychology

Volumn 60, Issue , 2014, Pages 58-71

  Vandekerckhove, Joachim ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Cognitive model; Data fusion; Diffusion model; Factor analysis; Individual differences; Latent variable

Indexed keywords

EID: 84904256369     PISSN: 00222496     EISSN: 10960880     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmp.2014.06.004     Document Type: Article

References (57)

1. Bartholomew D.J., Knott M., Moustaki I. Latent variable models and factor analysis: a unified approach 2011, Wiley.
2. Bartlema A., Lee M., Wetzels R., Vanpaemel W. A Bayesian hierarchical mixture approach to individual differences: case studies in selective attention and representation in category learning. Journal of Mathematical Psychology 2014, 59:132-150.
3. Batchelder W. Multinomial processing tree models and psychological assessment. Psychological Assessment 1998, 10(4):331-344.
4. Batchelder, W. (2007). Cognitive psychometrics: combining two psychological traditions. CSCA Lecture. Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
5. Blurton S., Kesselmeier M., Gondan M. Fast and accurate calculations for cumulative first-passage time distributions in Wiener diffusion models. Journal of Mathematical Psychology 2012, 56(6):470-475.
6. Bollen K.A. Latent variables in psychology and the social sciences. Annual Review of Psychology 2002, 53(1):605-634.
7. Bonin-Guillaume S., Blin O., Hasbroucq T. An additive factor analysis of the effect of depression on the reaction time of old patients. Acta Psychologica 2004, 117(1):1-11.
8. Borsboom D. The attack of the psychometricians. Psychometrika 2006, 71(3):425-440.
9. Cronbach L.J. The two disciplines of scientific psychology. American Psychologist 1957, 12(11):671-684.
10. De Boeck P., Wilson M. Explanatory item response models: a generalized linear and nonlinear approach 2004, Springer.
11. Estes W. The problem of inference from curves based on group data. Psychological Bulletin 1956, 53(2):134.
12. Estes W. Traps in the route to models of memory and decision. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 2002, 9(1):3-25.
13. Gelman A., Carlin J.B., Stern H.S., Rubin D.B. Bayesian data analysis 2004, Chapman & Hall/CRC.
14. Gelman A., Hill J. Data analysis using regression and multilevel/hierarchical models 2007, Cambridge University Press.
15. Gelman A., Rubin D.B. Inference from iterative simulation using multiple sequences. Statistical Science 1992, 457-472.
16. Gershman S.J., Blei D.M. A tutorial on Bayesian nonparametric models. Journal of Mathematical Psychology 2012, 56(1):1-12.
17. Geweke J., Zhou G. Measuring the pricing error of the arbitrage pricing theory. Review of Financial Studies 1996, 9(2):557-587.
18. Gotlib I.H., Roberts J.E., Gilboa E. Cognitive interference in depression. Cognitive interference: theories, methods, and findings 1996, 347-377. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. I.G. Sarason, G.R. Pierce, B.R. Sarason (Eds.).
19. Hamaker E.L. Why researchers should think within-person: a paradigmatic rationale. Handbook of research methods for studying daily life 2012, Guilford Publications, New York, NY. M.R. Mehl, T.S. Conner (Eds.).
20. Heathcote A., Brown S., Mewhort D. The power law repealed: the case for an exponential law of practice. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 2000, 7(2):185-207.
21. Hoffman, M. D., & Gelman, A. (2011).
22. Jöreskog K.G. A general approach to confirmatory maximum likelihood factor analysis. Psychometrika 1969, 34(2):183-202.
23. Kamphaus, R. W., Petoskey, M. D., & Morgan, A. W. (1997). A history of intelligence test interpretation. Contemporary intellectual assessment: theories, tests, and issues, pp. 3-16.
24. Lee M.D. Three case studies in the Bayesian analysis of cognitive models. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 2008, 15(1):1-15.
25. Lee M.D. How cognitive modeling can benefit from hierarchical Bayesian models. Journal of Mathematical Psychology 2011, 55(1):1-7.
26. Lee, M. D., & Wetzels, R. (2010). Individual differences in attention during category learning. In Proceedings of the 32nd annual conference of the cognitive science society (pp. 387-392).
27. Loken E. Identification constraints and inference in factor models. Structural Equation Modeling 2005, 12(2):232-244.
28. Lunn D.J., Thomas A., Best N., Spiegelhalter D. WinBUGS-a Bayesian modeling framework: concepts, structure, and extensibility. Statistics and Computing 2000, 10(4):325-337.
29. McArdle J.J. Some ethical issues in factor analysis. Handbook of ethics in quantitative methodology 2011, 313.
30. Miyake A., Friedman N.P., Emerson M.J., Witzki A.H., Howerter A., Wager T.D. The unity and diversity of executive functions and their contributions to complex frontal lobe tasks: a latent variable analysis. Cognitive Psychology 2000, 41(1):49-100.
31. Navarro D., Fuss I. Fast and accurate calculations for first-passage times in Wiener diffusion models. Journal of Mathematical Psychology 2009, 53(4):222-230.
32. Oberauer K., Süß H.-M., Schulze R., Wilhelm O., Wittmann W.W. Working memory capacity-facets of a cognitive ability construct. Personality and Individual Differences 2000, 29(6):1017-1045.
33. Oravecz Z., Tuerlinckx F., Vandekerckhove J. A hierarchical Ornstein-Uhlenbeck model for continuous repeated measurement data. Psychometrika 2009, 74(3):395-418.
34. Pagan A. Econometric issues in the analysis of regressions with generated regressors. International Economic Review 1984, 25(1):221-247.
35. Pe M.L., Raes F., Koval P., Brans K., Verduyn P., Kuppens P. Interference resolution moderates the impact of rumination and reappraisal on affective experiences in daily life. Cognition & Emotion 2013, 27:492-501.
36. Pe M.L., Vandekerckhove J., Kuppens P. A diffusion model account of the relationship between the emotional flanker task and rumination and depression. Emotion 2013, 13:739-747.
37. Plummer, M. (2003). JAGS: A program for analysis of Bayesian graphical models using Gibbs sampling. In Proceedings of the 3rd international workshop on distributed statistical computing (pp. 20-22).
38. Radloff L.S. The CES-D scale: a self-report depression scale for research in the general population. Applied Psychological Measurement 1977, 1(3):385-401.
39. Ratcliff R. A theory of memory retrieval. Psychological Review 1978, 85(2):59.
40. Ratcliff R., Rouder J. Modeling response times for two-choice decisions. Psychological Science 1998, 9(5):347-356.
41. Robert C.P., Casella G. Monte carlo statistical methods 1999, Vol. 58. Springer, New York.
42. Rouder J., Sun D., Speckman P., Lu J., Zhou D. A hierarchical Bayesian statistical framework for response time distributions. Psychometrika 2003, 68(4):589-606.
43. Skrondal A., Rabe-Hesketh S. Generalized latent variable modeling: multilevel, longitudinal, and structural equation models 2004, CRC Press.
44. Spiegelhalter D.J., Best N.G., Carlin B.P., Van Der Linde A. Bayesian measures of model complexity and fit. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Statistical Methodology) 2002, 64(4):583-639.
45. Stan Development Team, (2013). Stan: A C++ Library for Probability and Sampling, Version 1.3.
46. Stone M. Models for choice-reaction time. Psychometrika 1960, 25(3):251-260.
47. Treynor W., Gonzalez R., Nolen-Hoeksema S. Rumination reconsidered: a psychometric analysis. Cognitive Therapy and Research 2003, 27(3):247-259.
48. Vandekerckhove, J. (2009). Extensions and applications of the diffusion model for two-choice response times. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. University of Leuven.
49. Vandekerckhove J., Panis S., Wagemans J. The concavity effect is a compound of local and global effects. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics 2007, 69(7):1253-1260.
50. Vandekerckhove, J., Tuerlinckx, F., & Lee, M. (2008). A Bayesian approach to diffusion process models of decision-making. In Proceedings of the 30th annual conference of the cognitive science society (pp. 1429-1434).
51. Vandekerckhove J., Verheyen S., Tuerlinckx F. A crossed random effects diffusion model for speeded semantic categorization decisions. Acta Psychologica 2010, 133(3):269-282.
52. Voss A., Rothermund K., Voss J. Interpreting the parameters of the diffusion model: an empirical validation. Memory & Cognition 2004, 32(7):1206-1220.
53. Wabersich D., Vandekerckhove J. Extending JAGS: A tutorial on adding custom distributions to JAGS (with a diffusion model example). Behavior Research Methods 2014, 46(1):15-28.
54. Wagenmakers E.-J. Methodological and empirical developments for the Ratcliff Diffusion Model of response times and accuracy. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology 2009, 21(5):641-671.
55. Wagenmakers E.-J., Farrell S. AIC model selection using Akaike weights. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 2004, 11(1):192-196.
56. White C., Ratcliff R., Vasey M., McKoon G. Dysphoria and memory for emotional material: a diffusion-model analysis. Cognition and Emotion 2009, 23(1):181-205.
57. Williams L.J. Covariance structure modeling in organizational research: Problems with the method versus applications of the method. Journal of Organizational Behavior 1995, 16(4):225-234.