The concavity effect is a compound of local and global effects

Perception and Psychophysics

Volumn 69, Issue 7, 2007, Pages 1253-1260

  Vandekerckhove, Joachim ^a   Panis, Sven ^a   Wagemans, Johan ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LEUVEN   (Belgium)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 36148981122     PISSN: 00315117     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/BF03193960     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. ALHAZEN, I. (1989). Book of optics. In A. I. Sabra (Ed. & Trans.), The Optics of Ibn al-Haytham (Vol. 1). London: Warburg Institute. (Original work published ca. 1030)
2. ATTNEAVE, F. (1954). Some informational aspects of visual perception. Psychological Review, 61, 183-193.
3. BARENHOLTZ, E., COHEN, E., FELDMAN, J., & SINGH, M. (2003). Detection of change in shape: An advantage for concavities. Cognition, 89, 1-9.
4. BARENHOLTZ, E., & FELDMAN, J. (2003). Visual comparisons within and between object-parts: Evidence for a single-part superiority effect. Vision Research, 43, 1655-1666.
5. BERTAMINI, M., & FARRANT, T. (2005). Detection of change in shape and its relation to part structure. Acta Psychologica, 120, 35-54.
6. BERTAMINI, M., & FARRANT, T. (2006). The perceived structural shape of thin (wire-like) objects is different from that of silhouettes. Perception, 35, 1679-1692.
7. BERTAMINI, M., & LAWSON, R. (2006). Visual search for a circular region perceived as a figure versus as a hole: Evidence of the importance of part structure. Perception & Psychophysics, 58, 776-791.
8. BIEDERMAN, I. (1987). Recognition-by-components: A theory of human image understanding. Psychological Review, 94, 115-147.
9. BRAINARD, D. (1997). The Psychophysics Toolbox. Spatial Vision, 10, 433-436.
10. CHERNICK, M. (1999). Bootstrap methods: A practitioners guide. New York: Wiley.
11. COHEN, E., BARENHOLTZ, E., SINGH, M., & FELDMAN, J. (2005). What change detection tells us about the visual representation of shape. Journal of Vision, 5, 313-321.
12. COHEN, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
13. DAVISON, A., & HINKLEY, D. (1997). Bootstrap methods and their application. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
14. DE WINTER, J., & WAGEMANS, J. (2004). Contour-based object identification and segmentation: Stimuli, norms and data, and software tools. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 36, 604-624.
15. DE WINTER, J., & WAGEMANS, J. (2006). Segmentation of object outlines into parts: A large-scale, integrative study. Cognition, 99, 275-325.
16. DE WINTER, J., & WAGEMANS, J. (in press-a). The awakening of Attneave's sleeping cat: Identification of everyday objects on the basis of straight-line versions of outlines. Perception.
17. DE WINTER, J., & WAGEMANS, J. (in press-b). Perceptual salience of points along the contour of everyday objects: A large-scale study. Perception & Psychophysics.
18. EFRON, B. (1979). Bootstrap methods: Another look at the jackknife. Annals of Statistics, 7, 1-26.
19. EFRON, B., & TIBSHIRANI, R. (1993). An introduction to the bootstrap. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
20. FELDMAN, J., & SINGH, M. (2005). Information along contours and object boundaries. Psychological Review, 112, 243-252.
21. HANOULLE, I., WAEYTENS, K., WAGEMANS, J., D'YDEWALLE, G., & VAN RENSBERGEN, J. (1993, August). Representation and segmentation of shape based on curvature singularities. Poster presented at the 16th European Conference on Visual Perception (ECVP), Edinburgh.
22. HOFFMAN, D., & RICHARDS, W. (1984). Parts of recognition. Cognition, 18, 65-96.
23. HOFFMAN, D., & SINGH, M. (1997). Salience of visual parts. Cognition, 63, 29-78.
24. KEANE, S., HAYWARD, W., & BURKE, D. (2003). Detection of three types of changes to novel objects. Visual Cognition, 10, 101-129.
25. KIRK, R.E. (1995). Experimental design: Procedures for the behavioral sciences. Belmont, CA: Brooks/Cole.
26. KOENDERINK, J. (1984). What does the occluding contour tell us about solid shape? Perception, 13, 321-330.
27. KRISTJÁNSSON, A., & TSE, P. (2001). Curvature discontinuities are cues for rapid shape analysis. Perception A Psychophysics, 63, 390-403.
28. LEE, T. (2003). Computations in the early visual cortex. Journal of Physiology, 97, 121-139.
29. MARK, D. (1982). Vision: A computational investigation into the human representation and processing of visual information. San Francisco: W. H. Freeman.
30. MOONEY, C., & DUVAL, R. (1993). Bootstrapping: A nonparametric approach to statistical inference. London: Sage.
31. PELLI, D. (1997). The VideoTooIbox software for visual psychophysics: Transforming numbers into movies. Spatial Vision, 10, 437-442.
32. RESNIKOFF, H. (1985). The illusion of reality: Topics in information science. New York: Springer.
33. SINGH, M., & HOFFMAN, D. (2001). Part-based representations of visual shape and implications for visual cognition. In T. Shipley & P. Kellman (Eds.), From fragments to objects: Grouping and segmentation in vision (Advances in Psychology, Vol. 130, pp. 401-459). New York: Elsevier.
34. SINGH, M., SEYRANIAN, G., & HOFFMAN, D. (1999). Parsing silhouettes: The short-cut rule. Perception A Psychophysics, 61, 636-660.
35. VANDEKERCKHOVE, J., PANIS, S., & WAGEMANS, J. (2005, September). An empirical measure of closure. Paper presented at the 36th Meeting of the European Mathematical Psychology Group, Padua.
36. WAEYTENS, K., HANOULLE, I., WAGEMANS, J., & D'YDEWALLE, G. (1994). Human representation of closed contours. In F. Dillen, I. Van de Woestijne, & L. Verstraelen (Eds.), Geometry and topology of submanifolds VI (pp. 298-306). Singapore: World Scientific.
37. WAGEMANS, J., HANOULLE, I., WAEYTENS, K., & D'YDEWALLE, G. (1994). Are curvature singularities sufficient to represent shape? [Abstract]. Investigative Ophthalmology A Visual Science, 35, 1918.