The prioritization and verification of IT emerging technologies using an analytic hierarchy process and cluster analysis

Technological Forecasting and Social Change

Volumn 87, Issue , 2014, Pages 292-304

  Lee, Sangjae ^a   Kim, Wanki ^b   Kim, Young Min ^c   Lee, Hyoung Yong ^d   Oh, Kyong Joo ^c  

^a Sejong University   (South Korea)

^b Sogang University   (South Korea)

^c Yonsei University   (South Korea)

^d Hansung University   (South Korea)

Author keywords

Analytic hierarchy process; Cluster analysis; Emerging technologies; Factor analysis; Technology prioritization

Indexed keywords

ANALYTIC HIERARCHY PROCESS; CLUSTER ANALYSIS; HIERARCHICAL SYSTEMS; MULTIVARIANT ANALYSIS; SURVEYS; TECHNOLOGICAL FORECASTING;

ANALYTIC HIERARCHY PROCESS (AHP); ELECTRONIC DEVICE; EMERGING TECHNOLOGIES; EMERGING TECHNOLOGY MARKET; PRIORITIZATION; PRIORITIZATION PROCESS; TECHNOLOGY FORECASTING; VERIFICATION PROCESS;

FACTOR ANALYSIS;

ANALYTICAL HIERARCHY PROCESS; CLUSTER ANALYSIS; FACTOR ANALYSIS; INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY; PRIORITIZATION; TECHNOLOGICAL CHANGE; TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENT;

EID: 84904164407     PISSN: 00401625     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.techfore.2013.12.029     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Shen Y.C., Chang S.H., Lin Grace T.R., Yu H.C. A hybrid selection model for emerging technology. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 2010, 77:151-166.
2. Lee Y.-G., Song Y.-I. Selecting the key research areas in nano-technology field using technology cluster analysis: a case study based on National R&D Programs in South Korea. Technovation 2007, 27(1-2):57-64.
3. Bañuls V.A., Salmeron J.L. Foresighting key areas in the information technology industry. Technovation 2008, 28(3):103-111.
4. Chen H.H., Kang H.Y., Xing X., Lee A.H.I., Tong Y. Developing new products with knowledge management methods and process development management in a network. Comput. Ind. 2008, 59(2-3):242-253.
5. Kim W., Han S.K., Oh K.J., Kim T.Y., Ahn H., Song C. The dual analytic hierarchy process to prioritize emerging technologies. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 2010, 77:566-577.
6. Daim T.U., Rueda G., Martin H., Gerdsri P. Forecasting emerging technologies: use of bibliometrics and patent analysis. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 2006, 73(8):981-1012.
7. Linstone H.A., Turoff M. The Delphi Method: Techniques and Applications 1972, Addison and Wesley, Reading.
8. Saaty T.L. The Analytic Hierarchy Process 1980, McGraw-Hill, New York.
9. Malladi S., Min K.J. Decision support models for the selection of internet access technologies in rural communities. Telematics Inform. 2005, 22(3):201-219.
10. Tran T.A., Daim T. A taxonomic review of methods and tools applied in technology assessment. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 2008, 75(9):1396-1405.
11. Wang K.M., Wang C.K., Hu C. Analytic hierarchy process with fuzzy scoring in evaluating multidisciplinary R&D projects in China. IEEE Trans. Eng. Manag. 2005, 52(1):119-129.
12. Büyüközkan G. Multi-criteria decision making for e-marketplace selection. Internet Res. 2004, 14(2):139-154.
13. Huang L.C., Wu R.Y.H. Applying fuzzy analytic hierarchy process in the managerial talent assessment model - an empirical study in Taiwan's semiconductor industry. Int. J. Technol. Manag. 2005, 30(1-2):105-130.
14. Lee J.-D., Park C. Research and development linkages in a national innovation system: factors affecting success and failure in Korea. Technovation 2006, 26(9):1045-1054.
15. Shehabuddeen N., Probert D., Phaal R. From theory to practice: challenges in operationalising a technology selection framework. Technovation 2006, 26(3):324-335.
16. Gunasekaran A., Ngai E.W.T., McGaughey R.E. Information technology and systems justification: a review for research and applications. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 2006, 173:957-983.
17. Mishra S., Deshmukh S.G., Vrat P. Matching of technological forecasting technique to a technology. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 2002, 69:1-27.
18. Durán O., Aguilo J. Computer-aided machine-tool selection based on a Fuzzy-AHP approach. Expert Syst. Appl. 2008, 34:1787-1794.
19. Cebeci C. Fuzzy AHP-based decision support system for selecting ERP systems in textile industry by using balanced scorecard. Expert Syst. Appl. 2009, 36:8900-8909.
20. Chen M.K., Wang S.C. The critical factors of success for information service industry in developing international market: using analytic hierarchy process (AHP) approach. Expert Syst. Appl. 2010, 37:694-704.
21. Saaty T.L. On the relativity of relative measures - accommodating both rank preservation and rank reversals in the AHP. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 2000, 121:205-212.
22. Jain A.K., Dubes R.C. Algorithms for Cluster Analysis 1988, Prentice Hall, NJ.
23. Lebowitz M. Experiments with incremental conceptual formation. Mach. Learn. 1987, 2:103-138.
24. Chu W.W., Chen Q. Neighborhood and associative query answering. J. Intell. Inf. Syst. 1992, 1:355-382.
25. Chu W.W., Yang H., Chiang K., Minock M., Chow G., Larson C. Cobase: a scalable and extensible cooperative information system. J. Intell. Inf. Syst. 1996, 6:223-259.
26. Expert Choice http://expertchoice.com/.
27. Blinda K., Cuhlsa K., Grupp Hariolf Personal attitudes in the assessment of the future of science and technology: a factor analysis approach. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 2001, 68:131-149.
28. Kaiser H.F. An index of factorial simplicity. Psychometrika 1974, 39:31-36.
29. Stewart J. Models of priority-setting for public sector research. Res. Policy 1995, 24:115-126.
30. UNIDO The most commonly applied methodologies in technology foresight. Jesus Arape Morales, Regional Conference on Technology Foresight for Central and Eastern Europe and the Newly Independent States, Vienna 2001.
31. Dearden J. The case against ROI control. Harv. Bus. Rev. 1969, 47:124-135.
32. Miller D., Friesen P.H. Organizations: A Quantum View 1984, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
33. Ohlson J.A. Earning, book value and dividends in equity valuation. Contemp. Account. Res. 1995, 11:661-687.
34. Irrelson T.R. Financial Statements: A Step-by-Step Guide to Understanding and Creating Financial Reports (Paperback) 2009, Career Press.
35. Woo C.Y., Willard G. Performance representation in strategic management research: discussions and recommendations. Paper Presented at the Annual Meeting of the Academy of Management, Dallas 1983.
36. Loggerenberg J.V., Cucchiaro S.J. Productivity measurement and the bottom line. Natl. Prod. Rev. 1982, 1:87-99.
37. Banker R.D., Datar S.M., Kaplan R.S. Productivity measurement and management accounting. J. Account. Audit. Financ. 1989, 4:528-554.
38. Park S.M., Byun D.Y., Son S.H. Key factors of the utilization and improvement in the national-level technology roadmap. Korean Technol. Innov. Soc. 2006, 13:165-178. (in Korean).
39. Jeanne W.P., Karen L.L. Development, commercialization and diffusion of enabling technologies. Progress Report 2000, NIST.
40. Michalski R.S., Stepp R.E. Learning from observations: conceptual clustering. In Machine Learning: An artificial intelligence approach 1983, Morgan Kaufmann, San Mateo.