Cell reprogramming into the pluripotent state using graphene based substrates

Biomaterials

Volumn 35, Issue 29, 2014, Pages 8321-8329

  Yoo, Junsang ^a   Kim, Jongmin ^a   Baek, Soonbong ^a   Park, Youngsin ^b   Im, Hyunsik ^a   Kim, Jongpil ^a  

^a Dongguk University   (South Korea)

^b Ulsan National Institute of Science and Technology   (South Korea)

Author keywords

Graphene; Induced pluripotent stem cells; Mesenchymal to epithelial transition; Reprogramming

Indexed keywords

CELL CULTURE; CELL ENGINEERING; CELL PROLIFERATION; STEM CELLS; SUBSTRATES;

CELL REPROGRAMMING; CELLULAR REPROGRAMMING; GLASS SUBSTRATES; GRAPHENE SUBSTRATES; GRAPHENE-BASED SUBSTRATES; INDUCED PLURIPOTENT STEM CELLS; MESENCHYMAL TO EPITHELIAL TRANSITIONS; REPROGRAMMING;

GRAPHENE;

ALKALINE PHOSPHATASE; CLAUDIN 3; EPITHELIAL CELL ADHESION MOLECULE; GLASS; GRAPHENE; OCTAMER TRANSCRIPTION FACTOR 4; TRANSCRIPTION FACTOR NANOG; UVOMORULIN; BIOMATERIAL; GRAPHITE;

ARTICLE; BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING; CELL DIFFERENTIATION; CELL FATE; CELL GROWTH; CELL PROLIFERATION ASSAY; CELL REPROGRAMMING; CHROMATIN IMMUNOPRECIPITATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; EPIGENETICS; EPITHELIAL MESENCHYMAL TRANSITION; FLOW CYTOMETRY; HUMAN; HUMAN CELL; IMMUNOCYTOCHEMISTRY; IMMUNOFLUORESCENCE; NUCLEAR REPROGRAMMING; PLURIPOTENT STEM CELL; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; RAMAN SPECTROMETRY; REAL TIME POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION; SOMATIC CELL; TRANSCRIPTION INITIATION SITE; UPREGULATION; ANIMAL; CELL LINE; CYTOLOGY; DRUG EFFECTS; FIBROBLAST; GENETIC EPIGENESIS; HEK293 CELL LINE; METABOLISM; MOUSE; SCID MOUSE;

ANIMALS; BIOCOMPATIBLE MATERIALS; CELL DIFFERENTIATION; CELL LINE; CELLULAR REPROGRAMMING; EPIGENESIS, GENETIC; EPITHELIAL-MESENCHYMAL TRANSITION; FIBROBLASTS; GRAPHITE; HEK293 CELLS; HUMANS; INDUCED PLURIPOTENT STEM CELLS; MICE; MICE, SCID;

EID: 84904130529     PISSN: 01429612     EISSN: 18785905     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2014.05.096     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Rao C.N.R., Sood A.K., Subrahmanyam K.S., Govindaraj A. Graphene: the new two-dimensional nanomaterial. Angew Chem Int Ed 2009, 48:7752-7777.
2. Novoselov K.S., Geim A.K., Morozov S.V., Jiang D., Zhang Y., Dubonos S.V., et al. Electric field effect in atomically thin carbon films. Science 2004, 306:666-669.
3. Cai Y., Li H., Du B., Yang M., Li Y., Wu D., et al. Ultrasensitive electrochemical immunoassay for BRCA1 using BMIM.BF(4)-coated SBA-15 as labels and functionalized graphene as enhancer. Biomaterials 2011, 32:2117-2123.
4. Feng L., Chen Y., Ren J., Qu X. Agraphene functionalized electrochemical aptasensor for selective label-free detection of cancer cells. Biomaterials 2011, 32:2930-2937.
5. Markovic Z.M., Harhaji-Trajkovic L.M., Todorovic-Markovic B.M., Kepić D.P., Arsikin K.M., Jovanović S.P., et al. Invitro comparison of the photothermal anticancer activity of graphene nanoparticles and carbon nanotubes. Biomaterials 2011, 32:1121-1129.
6. Heo C., Yoo J., Lee S., Jo A., Jung S., Yoo H., et al. The control of neural cell-to-cell interactions through non-contact electrical field stimulation using graphene electrodes. Biomaterials 2011, 32:19-27.
7. Park S.Y., Park J., Sim S.H., Sung M.G., Kim K.S., Hong B.H., et al. Enhanced differentiation of human neural stem cells into neurons on graphene. Adv Mater 2011, 23:H263-H267.
8. Liu Y., Yu D., Zeng C., Miao Z., Dai L. Biocompatible graphene oxide-based glucose biosensors. Langmuir 2010, 26:6158-6160.
9. Aryaei A., Jayatissa A.H., Jayasuriya A.C. The effect of graphene substrate on osteoblast cell adhesion and proliferation. JBiomed Mater Res A 2013, 1-9.
10. Lee W.C., Lim C.H.Y.X., Shi H., Tang L.A.L., Wang Y., Lim C.T., et al. Origin of enhanced stem cell growth and differentiation on graphene and graphene oxide. ACS Nano 2011, 5:7334-7341.
11. Takahashi K., Yamanaka S. Induction of pluripotent stem cells from mouse embryonic and adult fibroblast cultures by defined factors. Cell 2006, 126:663-676.
12. Hanna J., Saha K., Pando B., van Zon J., Lengner C.J., Creyghton M.P., et al. Direct cell reprogramming is a stochastic process amenable to acceleration. Nature 2009, 462:595-601.
13. Gunasinghe N.P., Wells A., Thompson E.W., Hugo H.J. Mesenchymal-epithelial transition (MET) as a mechanism for metastatic colonisation in breast cancer. Cancer Metastasis Rev 2012, 31:469-478.
14. Li R., Liang J., Ni S., Zhou T., Qing X., Li H., et al. AMesenchymal-to-epithelial transition initiates and is required for the nuclear reprogramming of mouse fibroblasts. Cell Stem Cell 2010, 7:51-63.
15. Timothy L.D., Jennifer S., Constant M., Timothee H., Ashley F., Falei Y., et al. Biophysical regulation of epigenetic state and cell reprogramming. Nat Mater 2013, 12:1154-1162.
16. Loh Y.H., Wu Q., Chew J.L., Vega V.B., Zhang W., Chen X., et al. The Oct4 and Nanog transcription network regulates pluripotency in mouse embryonic stem cells. Nat Genet 2006, 38:431-440.
17. Yu J., Vodyanik M.A., Smuga-Otto K., Antosiewicz-Bourget J., Frane J.L., Tian S., et al. Induced pluripotent stem cell lines derived from human somatic cells. Science 2007, 318:1917-1920.
18. Chen J., Han Q., Pei D. EMT and MET as paradigms for cell fate switching. JMol Cell Biol 2011, 4(2):66-69.
19. Chen J., Liu J., Yang J., Chen Y., Chen J., Ni S., et al. BMPs functionally replace Klf4 and support efficient reprogramming of mouse fibroblasts by Oct4 alone. Cell Res 2011, 21:205-212.
20. Downing T.L., Soto J., Morez C., Houssin T., Fritz A., Yuan F., et al. Biophysical regulation of epigenetic state and cell reprogramming. Nat Mater 2013, 12:1154-1162.
21. Patel S., Kurpinski K., Quigley R., Gao H., Hsiao B.S., Poo M.-M., et al. Bioactive Nanofibers: Synergistic effects of nanotopography and chemical signaling on cell guidance. Nano Lett 2007, 7:2122-2128.
22. Huang N.F., Patel S., Thakar R.G., Wu J., Hsiao B.S., Chu B., et al. Myotube assembly on nanofibrous and micropatterned polymers. Nano Lett 2006, 6:537-542.
23. Bracken C.P., Gregory P.A., Kolesnikoff N., Bert A.G., Wang J., Shannon M.F., et al. Adouble-negative feedback loop between ZEB1-SIP1 and the microRNA-200 family regulates epithelial-mesenchymal transition. Cancer Res 2008, 68:7846-7854.
24. Samavarchi-Tehrani P., Golipour A., David L., H-k Sung, Beyer T.A., Datti A., et al. Functional genomics reveals a BMP-driven mesenchymal-to-epithelial transition in the initiation of somatic cell reprogramming. Cell Stem Cell 2010, 7:64-77.
25. Herrera B., Inman G. Arapid and sensitive bioassay for the simultaneous measurement of multiple bone morphogenetic proteins. Identification and quantification of BMP4, BMP6 and BMP9 in bovine and human serum. BMC Cell Biol 2009, 10:20.
26. Esteban M.A., Bao X., Zhuang Q., Zhou T., Qin B., Pei D. The mesenchymal-to-epithelial transition in somatic cell reprogramming. Curr Opin Genet Dev 2012, 22:423-428.
27. Ohta T., Bostwick A., Seyller T., Horn K., Rotenberg E. Controlling the eectronic structure of bilayer graphene. Science 2006, 313:951-954.
28. Cha C., Shin S.R., Annabi N., Dokmeci M.R., Khademhosseini A. Carbon-based nanomaterials: multifunctional materials for biomedical engineering. ACS Nano 2013, 7:2891-2897.