Biophysical regulation of epigenetic state and cell reprogramming

Nature Materials

Volumn 12, Issue 12, 2013, Pages 1154-1162

  Downing, Timothy L ^a,b   Soto, Jennifer ^a,b   Morez, Constant ^b,c   Houssin, Timothee ^b,d   Fritz, Ashley ^a   Yuan, Falei ^b,e   Chu, Julia ^b   Patel, Shyam ^b   Schaffer, David V ^a,b   Li, Song ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b University of California at Berkeley   (United States)

^c ECOLE POLYTECHNIQUE   (France)

^d UNIV LILLE   (France)

^e SHANGHAI JIAO TONG UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACETYLATION; ALKYLATION; BIOLOGICAL MATERIALS; BIOPHYSICS; CELL CULTURE; STEM CELLS;

BIOPHYSICAL FACTORS; CELL REPROGRAMMING; FIBRE ORIENTATION; HISTONE DEACETYLASES; MICRO TOPOGRAPHY; MICROGROOVED SURFACE; NANOFIBROUS SCAFFOLDS; PLURIPOTENT STEM CELLS;

SCAFFOLDS (BIOLOGY);

ACTIN; BIOMATERIAL; HISTONE; HISTONE LYSINE METHYLTRANSFERASE; MYOSIN; WDR5 PROTEIN, HUMAN;

ACYLATION; ANIMAL; ARTICLE; C57BL MOUSE; CELL ADHESION; CELL ENGINEERING; CELL SHAPE; CHEMISTRY; CONFOCAL MICROSCOPY; CYTOLOGY; EPITHELIUM; FIBROBLAST; GENETIC EPIGENESIS; HUMAN; MESODERM; METABOLISM; METHODOLOGY; METHYLATION; MOUSE; NANOTECHNOLOGY; PATHOLOGY; PLURIPOTENT STEM CELL; SURFACE PROPERTY; PROCEDURES;

ACTINS; ACYLATION; ANIMALS; BIOCOMPATIBLE MATERIALS; CELL ADHESION; CELL ENGINEERING; CELL SHAPE; EPIGENESIS, GENETIC; EPITHELIUM; FIBROBLASTS; HISTONE-LYSINE N-METHYLTRANSFERASE; HISTONES; HUMANS; INDUCED PLURIPOTENT STEM CELLS; MESODERM; METHYLATION; MICE; MICE, INBRED C57BL; MICROSCOPY, CONFOCAL; MYOSINS; NANOTECHNOLOGY; SURFACE PROPERTIES;

EID: 84888172561     PISSN: 14761122     EISSN: 14764660     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/nmat3777     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. Takahashi, K. & Yamanaka, S. Induction of pluripotent stem cells from mouse embryonic and adult fibroblast cultures by defined factors. Cell 126, 663-676 (2006).
2. Yu, J. et al. Induced pluripotent stem cell lines derived from human somatic cells. Science 318, 1917-1920 (2007).
3. Park, I-H. et al. Reprogramming of human somatic cells to pluripotency with defined factors. Nature 451, 141-146 (2008).
4. Wernig, M. et al. In vitro reprogramming of fibroblasts into a pluripotent ES-cell-like state. Nature 448, 318-324 (2007).
5. Redmer, T. et al. E-cadherin is crucial for embryonic stem cell pluripotency and can replace OCT4 during somatic cell reprogramming. EMBO Rep. 12, 720-726 (2011).
6. Li, D. et al. Integrated biochemical and mechanical signals regulate multifaceted human embryonic stem cell functions. J. Cell Biol. 191, 631-644 (2010).
7. Li, R. et al. A mesenchymal-to-epithelial transition initiates and is required for the nuclear reprogramming of mouse fibroblasts. Cell Stem Cell 7, 51-63 (2010).
8. Feng, B., Ng, J-H., Heng, J-C. D. & Ng, H-H. Molecules that promote or enhance reprogramming of somatic cells to induced pluripotent stem cells. Cell Stem Cell 4, 301-312 (2009).
9. Li, Y. et al. Generation of iPSCs from mouse fibroblasts with a single gene, Oct4, and small molecules. Cell Res. 21, 196-204 (2011).
10. Huangfu, D. et al. Induction of pluripotent stem cells from primary human fibroblasts with only Oct4 and Sox2. Nature Biotechnol. 26, 1269-1275 (2008).
11. Huangfu, D. et al. Induction of pluripotent stem cells by defined factors is greatly improved by small-molecule compounds. Nature Biotechnol. 26, 795-797 (2008).
12. Zhu, S. et al. Reprogramming of human primary somatic cells by OCT4 and chemical compounds. Cell Stem Cell 7, 651-655 (2010).
13. Anokye-Danso, F. et al. Highly efficient miRNA-mediated reprogramming of mouse and human somatic cells to pluripotency. Cell Stem Cell 8, 376-388 (2011).
14. Pasque, V., Jullien, J., Miyamoto, K., Halley-Stott, R. P. & Gurdon, J. B. Epigenetic factors influencing resistance to nuclear reprogramming. Trends Genet. 27, 516-525 (2011).
15. Plath, K. & Lowry, W. E. Progress in understanding reprogramming to the induced pluripotent state. Nature Rev. Genet. 12, 253-265 (2011).
16. Onder, T. T. et al. Chromatin-modifying enzymes as modulators of reprogramming. Nature 483, 598-602 (2012).
17. Engler, A. J., Sen, S., Sweeney, H. L. & Discher, D. E. Matrix elasticity directs stem cell lineage specification. Cell 126, 677-689 (2006).
18. Paszek, M. J. et al. Tensional homeostasis and the malignant phenotype. Cancer Cell 8, 241-254 (2005).
19. McBeath, R., Pirone, D. M., Nelson, C. M., Bhadriraju, K. & Chen, C. S. Cell shape, cytoskeletal tension, and RhoA regulate stem cell lineage commitment. Dev. Cell 6, 483-495 (2004).
20. Chowdhury, F. et al. Material properties of the cell dictate stress-induced spreading and differentiation in embryonic stem cells. Nature Mater. 9, 82-88 (2010).
21. Engler, A. J., Humbert, P. O., Wehrle-haller, B. & Weaver, V. M. Multiscale modeling of form and function. Science 324, 208-212 (2009).
22. DuFort, C. C., Paszek, M. J. & Weaver, V. M. Balancing forces: Architectural control of mechanotransduction. Nature Rev. 12, 308-319 (2011).
23. Patel, S. et al. Bioactive nanofibers: Synergistic effects of nanotopography and chemical signaling on cell guidance. Nano Lett. 7, 2122-2128 (2007).
24. Thakar, R. G., Ho, F., Huang, N. F., Liepmann, D. & Li, S. Regulation of vascular smooth muscle cells by micropatterning. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 307, 883-890 (2003).
25. Huang, N. F. et al. Myotube assembly on nanofibrous and micropatterned polymers. Nano Lett. 6, 537-542 (2006).
26. Park, J. S. et al. The effect of matrix stiffness on the differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells in response to TGF-. Biomaterials 32, 3921-3930 (2011).
27. Guilak, F. et al. Control of stem cell fate by physical interactions with the extracellular matrix. Cell Stem Cell 5, 17-26 (2009).
28. Discher, D. E., Mooney, D. J. & Zandstra, P. W. Growth factors, matrices, and forces combine and control stem cells. Science 324, 1673-1677 (2009).
29. Wozniak, M. A. & Chen, C. S. Mechanotransduction in development: A growing role for contractility. Nature Rev. 10, 34-43 (2009).
30. Wang, N., Tytell, J. D. & Ingber, D. E. Mechanotransduction at a distance: Mechanically coupling the extracellular matrix with the nucleus. Nature Rev. 10, 75-82 (2009).
31. Poh, Y-C. et al. Dynamic force-induced direct dissociation of protein complexes in a nuclear body in living cells. Nature Commun. 3, 866 (2012).
32. McMurray, R. J. et al. Nanoscale surfaces for the long-term maintenance of mesenchymal stem cell phenotype and multipotency. Nature Mater. 10, 637-644 (2011).
33. Gilbert, P. M. et al. Substrate elasticity regulates skeletal muscle stem cell self-renewal in culture. Science 329, 1078-1081 (2010).
34. Li, D. et al. Role of mechanical factors in fate decisions of stem cells. Regen Med. 6, 229-240 (2011).
35. Chowdhury, F. et al. Soft substrates promote homogeneous self-renewal of embryonic stem cells via downregulating cell-matrix tractions. PLoS ONE 5, e15655 (2010).
36. Ji, L., LaPointe, V. L. S., Evans, N. D. & Stevens, M. M. Changes in embryonic stem cell colony morphology and early differentiation markers driven by colloidal crystal topographical cues. Europ. Cells Mater. 23, 135-146 (2012).
37. Sommer, C. A. et al. Excision of reprogramming transgenes improves the differentiation potential of iPS cells generated with a single excisable vector. Stem Cells 28, 64-74 (2010).
38. Li, Y. et al. Biophysical regulation of histone acetylation in mesenchymal stem cells. Biophys. J. 100, 1902-1909 (2011).
39. Buganim, Y., Faddah, D. a & Jaenisch, R. Mechanisms and models of somatic cell reprogramming. Nature Rev. Genet. 14, 427-439 (2013).
40. Tavernier, G., Mlody, B., Demeester, J., Adjaye, J. & De Smedt, S. C. Current methods for inducing pluripotency in somatic cells. Adv. Mater. 25, 2765-2771 (2013).
41. Ang, Y-S. et al. WDR5 mediates self-renewal and reprogramming via the embryonic stem cell core transcriptional network. Cell 145, 183-197 (2011).
42. Peinado, H., Ballestar, E., Esteller, M. & Cano, A. Snail mediates E-cadherin repression by the recruitment of the Sin3A/histone deacetylase 1 (HDAC1)/HDAC2 complex. Mol. Cell. Biol. 24, 306-319 (2004).
43. Wu, M-Z. et al. Interplay between HDAC3 and WDR5 is essential for hypoxia-induced epithelial-mesenchymal transition. Mol. Cell 43, 811-822 (2011).
44. Zhou, Q., Brown, J., Kanarek, A., Rajagopal, J. & Melton, D. A. In vivo reprogramming of adult pancreatic exocrine cells to beta-cells. Nature 455, 627-632 (2008).
45. Ieda, M. et al. Direct reprogramming of fibroblasts into functional cardiomyocytes by defined factors. Cell 142, 375-386 (2010).
46. Pang, Z. P. et al. Induction of human neuronal cells by defined transcription factors. Nature 476, 220-223 (2011).
47. Karow, M. et al. Reprogramming of pericyte-derived cells of the adult human brain into induced neuronal cells. Cell Stem Cell 11, 471-476 (2012).
48. Thier, M. et al. Direct conversion of fibroblasts into stably expandable neural stem cells. Cell Stem Cell 10, 473-479 (2012).
49. Qian, L. et al. In vivo reprogramming of murine cardiac fibroblasts into induced cardiomyocytes. Nature 485, 593-598 (2012).
50. Downing, T. L. et al. Drug-eluting microfibrous patches for the local delivery of rolipram in spinal cord repair. J. Control Release 161, 910-917 (2012).
51. Cheng, Q., Komvopoulos, K. & Li, S. Surface chemical patterning for long-term single-cell culture. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. A 96, 507-512 (2011).