Contrast-enhanced spectral mammography: Does mammography provide additional clinical benefits or can some radiation exposure be avoided?

Breast Cancer Research and Treatment

Volumn 146, Issue 2, 2014, Pages 371-381

  Fallenberg, Eva Maria ^a   Dromain, Clarisse ^b   Diekmann, Felix ^c   Renz, Diane M ^a   Amer, Heba ^a   Ingold Heppner, Barbara ^a   Neumann, Avidan U ^d   Winzer, Klaus J ^a   Bick, Ulrich ^a   Hamm, Bernd ^a   Engelken, Florian ^a  

^a CHARITÉ UNIVERSITÄTSMEDIZIN BERLIN   (Germany)

^b INSTITUT GUSTAVE ROUSSY   (France)

^c Department of Medical Imaging St Joseph Stift Bremen ^*  (Germany)

^d BAR ILAN UNIVERSITY   (Israel)

Author keywords

Breast cancer; Contrast media; Contrast enhanced spectral mammography; Detection; Digital mammography; Dual energy; Radiation exposure; Sensitivity

Indexed keywords

IOBITRIDOL; IODINATED CONTRAST MEDIUM; CONTRAST MEDIUM;

ARTICLE; BREAST CANCER; CANCER DIAGNOSIS; CONTRAST ENHANCED SPECTRAL MAMMOGRAPHY; CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT; CONTROLLED STUDY; DOSIMETRY; HISTOPATHOLOGY; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; IMAGE ANALYSIS; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MAMMOGRAPHY; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PATIENT ASSESSMENT; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; TUMOR VOLUME; ADULT; AGED; BREAST NEOPLASMS; CANCER STAGING; FEMALE; IMAGE QUALITY; MIDDLE AGED; PATHOLOGY; PHOTON ABSORPTIOMETRY; PROCEDURES; RADIATION DOSE; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; STANDARDS; VERY ELDERLY;

ABSORPTIOMETRY, PHOTON; ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; BREAST NEOPLASMS; CONTRAST MEDIA; FEMALE; HUMANS; MAMMOGRAPHY; MIDDLE AGED; NEOPLASM STAGING; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RADIATION DOSAGE; RADIOGRAPHIC IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; TUMOR BURDEN;

EID: 84904120488     PISSN: 01676806     EISSN: 15737217     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10549-014-3023-6     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Kolb TM, Lichy J, Newhouse JH (2002) Comparison of the performance of screening mammography, physical examination, and breast US and evaluation of factors that influence them: an analysis of 27,825 patient evaluations. Radiology 225(1):165-175
2. Pisano ED, Gatsonis C, Hendrick E, Yaffe M, Baum JK, Acharyya S, Conant EF, Fajardo LL, Bassett L, D'Orsi C, Jong R, Rebner M, Digital Mammographic Imaging Screening Trial Investigators G (2005) Diagnostic performance of digital versus film mammography for breast-cancer screening. N Engl J Med 353(17):1773-1783. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa052911 (Pubitemid 41549889)
3. Tabar L, Vitak B, Chen TH, Yen AM, Cohen A, Tot T, Chiu SY, Chen SL, Fann JC, Rosell J, Fohlin H, Smith RA, Duffy SW (2011) Swedish two-county trial: impact of mammographic screening on breast cancer mortality during 3 decades. Radiology 260(3):658-663. doi:10.1148/radiol.11110469
4. Smith-Bindman R, Miglioretti DL, Johnson E, Lee C, Feigelson HS, Flynn M, Greenlee RT, Kruger RL, Hornbrook MC, Roblin D, Solberg LI, Vanneman N, Weinmann S, Williams AE (2012) Use of diagnostic imaging studies and associated radiation exposure for patients enrolled in large integrated health care systems, 1996-2010. J Am Med Assoc 307(22):2400-2409. doi:10.1001/jama.2012.5960
5. Cooney CM (2010) Cancer report examines environmental hazards. Environ Health Perspect 118(8):a336. doi:10.1289/ehp.118-a336a
6. Institute of Medicine of the National Academes (2011) Breast cancer and the environment: a life course approach. Rep Br December:1-4
7. Schmidt CW (2012) IOM issues report on breast cancer and the environment. Environ Health Perspect 120(2):a60-a61. doi:10.1289/ehp.120-a60a
8. Agency IAE (2002) International action plan for the radiological protection of patients. Gov/2002/36-GC(46)/12:1-9
9. Eastman TR (2013) ALARA and digital imaging systems. Radiol Technol 84(3):297-298
10. European Society of R (2011) White paper on radiation protection by the European Society of Radiology. Insights Imaging 2(4):357-362. doi:10.1007/s13244-011-0108-1
11. Potter-Lang S, Dunkelmeyer M, Uffmann M (2012) Dose reduction and adequate image quality in digital radiography: a contradiction? Der Radiol 52(10):898-904. doi:10.1007/s00117-012-2337-9
12. Shaw P, Crouail P (2013) ALARA in existing exposure situations: 14th European ALARA network workshop, 4-6 September 2012, Dublin. J Radiol Prot Off J Soc Radiol Prot 33(2):487-490. doi:10.1088/0952-4746/33/2/M02
13. Dromain C, Thibault F, Diekmann F, Fallenberg EM, Jong RA, Koomen M, Hendrick RE, Tardivon A, Toledano A (2012) Dualenergy contrast-enhanced digital mammography: initial clinical results of a multireader, multicase study. Breast Cancer Res 14(3):R94. doi:10.1186/bcr3210
14. Dromain C, Thibault F, Muller S, Rimareix F, Delaloge S, Tardivon A, Balleyguier C (2011) Dual-energy contrast-enhanced digital mammography: initial clinical results. Eur Radiol 21(3):565-574. doi:10.1007/s00330-010-1944-y
15. Fallenberg EM, Dromain C, Diekmann F, Engelken F, Krohn M, Singh JM, Ingold-Heppner B, Winzer KJ, Bick U, Renz DM (2014) Contrast-enhanced spectral mammography versus MRI: initial results in the detection of breast cancer and assessment of tumour size. Eur Radiol 24(1):256-264. doi:10.1007/s00330-013- 3007-7
16. Puong S, Bouchevreau X, Patoureaux F, Iordache R, Muller S (2007) Dual-energy contrast enhanced digital mammography using a new approach for breast tissue cancelling. Proc SPIE Med Imaging 6510:65102H. doi:10.1117/12.710133
17. Braun M, Polcher M, Schrading S, Zivanovic O, Kowalski T, Flucke U, Leutner C, Park-Simon TW, Rudlowski C, Kuhn W, Kuhl CK (2008) Influence of preoperative MRI on the surgical management of patients with operable breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat 111(1):179-187. doi:10.1007/s10549-007-9767-5 (Pubitemid 352009236)
18. Schaefer FK, Eden I, Schaefer PJ, Peter D, Jonat W, Heller M, Schreer I (2007) Factors associated with one step surgery in case of non-palpable breast cancer. Eur J Radiol 64(3):426-431. doi:10.1016/j.ejrad.2007.02.033 (Pubitemid 350123582)
19. Diekmann F, Diekmann S, Jeunehomme F, Muller S, Hamm B, Bick U (2005) Digital mammography using iodine-based contrast media: initial clinical experience with dynamic contrast medium enhancement. Invest Radiol 40(7):397-404 (Pubitemid 40863782)
20. Dromain C, Balleyguier C, Muller S, Mathieu MC, Rochard F, Opolon P, Sigal R (2006) Evaluation of tumor angiogenesis of breast carcinoma using contrast-enhanced digital mammography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 187(5):W528-W537. doi:10.2214/AJR.05.1944
21. Jong RA, Yaffe MJ, Skarpathiotakis M, Shumak RS, Danjoux NM, Gunesekara A, Plewes DB (2003) Contrast-enhanced digital mammography: initial clinical experience. Radiology 228(3):842-850. doi:10.1148/radiol.2283020961 (Pubitemid 37025497)
22. Lewin JM, Isaacs PK, Vance V, Larke FJ (2003) Dual-energy contrast-enhanced digital subtraction mammography: feasibility. Radiology 229(1):261-268. doi:10.1148/radiol.2291021276 (Pubitemid 37152134)
23. Berg WA, Gutierrez L, NessAiver MS, Carter WB, Bhargavan M, Lewis RS, Ioffe OB (2004) Diagnostic accuracy of mammography, clinical examination, US, and MR imaging in preoperative assessment of breast cancer. Radiology 233(3):830-849. doi:10.1148/radiol.2333031484
24. Bosch AM, Kessels AG, Beets GL, Rupa JD, Koster D, van Engelshoven JM, von Meyenfeldt MF (2003) Preoperative estimation of the pathological breast tumour size by physical examination, mammography and ultrasound: a prospective study on 105 invasive tumours. Eur J Radiol 48(3):285-292 (Pubitemid 37491068)
25. Fasching PA, Heusinger K, Loehberg CR, Wenkel E, Lux MP, Schrauder M, Koscheck T, Bautz W, Schulz-Wendtland R, Beckmann MW, Bani MR (2006) Influence of mammographic density on the diagnostic accuracy of tumor size assessment and association with breast cancer tumor characteristics. Eur J Radiol 60(3):398-404. doi:10.1016/j.ejrad.2006.08.002
26. Esserman L, Cowley H, Eberle C, Kirkpatrick A, Chang S, Berbaum K, Gale A (2002) Improving the accuracy of mammography: volume and outcome relationships. J Natl Cancer Inst 94(5):369-375 (Pubitemid 34257480)
27. Lobbes MB, Lalji U, Houwers J, Nijssen EC, Nelemans PJ, van Roozendaal L, Smidt ML, Heuts E, Wildberger JE (2014) Contrast-enhanced spectral mammography in patients referred from the breast cancer screening programme. Eur Radiol. doi:10.1007/s00330-014-3154-5
28. Dance DR, Skinner CL, Young KC, Beckett JR, Kotre CJ (2000) Additional factors for the estimation of mean glandular breast dose using the UK mammography dosimetry protocol. Phys Med Biol 45(11):3225-3240