Mineralization and bone regeneration using a bioactive elastin-like recombinamer membrane

Biomaterials

Volumn 35, Issue 29, 2014, Pages 8339-8347

  Tejeda Montes, Esther ^a   Klymov, Alexey ^b   Nejadnik, M Reza ^b   Alonso, Matilde ^c   Rodriguez Cabello, J Carlos ^c   Walboomers, X Frank ^b   Mata, Alvaro ^d  

^a Nanotechnology Platform   (Spain)

^b RADBOUD UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^c UNIVERSITY OF VALLADOLID   (Spain)

^d QUEEN MARY UNIVERSITY OF LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Bone regeneration; Elastin like recombinamers; Membranes; Mineralization; Periosteal graft; Statherin

Indexed keywords

BIOSYNTHESIS; BONE; CELL ADHESION; CELL CULTURE; COMPUTERIZED TOMOGRAPHY; ELASTIC MODULI; ELASTIN; MEMBRANES; PHOSPHATASES; RATS; SOL-GELS;

ALKALINE PHOSPHATASE; BONE REGENERATION; ELASTIN-LIKE RECOMBINAMERS; MESENCHYMAL STEM CELL; MICROCOMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; MINERALIZATION; OSTEOBLASTIC DIFFERENTIATION; STATHERIN;

MINERALOGY;

ALKALINE PHOSPHATASE; BIOPOLYMER; CALCIUM PHOSPHATE; ELASTIN; ELASTIN LIKE RECOMBINAMER; RECOMBINANT PROTEIN; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG; ARTIFICIAL MEMBRANE; BIOMATERIAL; BONE PROSTHESIS; SALIVA PROTEIN; STATH PROTEIN, HUMAN;

ANIMAL CELL; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL MODEL; ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; BIOLOGICAL ACTIVITY; BONE DEVELOPMENT; BONE MASS; BONE MINERALIZATION; BONE REGENERATION; CALVARIA; CELL ADHESION; CELL DIFFERENTIATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; ENZYME SYNTHESIS; HISTOPATHOLOGY; IN VIVO STUDY; MALE; MESENCHYMAL STEM CELL; MICRO-COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; NONHUMAN; OSSIFICATION; PARTICLE SIZE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RAT; SURFACE PROPERTY; YOUNG MODULUS; AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; ANIMAL; ARTIFICIAL MEMBRANE; BONE PROSTHESIS; CELL CULTURE; CHEMISTRY; CYTOLOGY; MESENCHYMAL STROMA CELL; METABOLISM; MOLECULAR GENETICS; SPRAGUE DAWLEY RAT; TISSUE SCAFFOLD;

AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; ANIMALS; BIOCOMPATIBLE MATERIALS; BONE REGENERATION; BONE SUBSTITUTES; CALCIUM PHOSPHATES; CELL ADHESION; CELL DIFFERENTIATION; CELLS, CULTURED; ELASTIN; MALE; MEMBRANES, ARTIFICIAL; MESENCHYMAL STROMAL CELLS; MOLECULAR SEQUENCE DATA; OSTEOGENESIS; RATS; RATS, SPRAGUE-DAWLEY; RECOMBINANT PROTEINS; SALIVARY PROTEINS AND PEPTIDES; TISSUE SCAFFOLDS;

EID: 84904098101     PISSN: 01429612     EISSN: 18785905     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2014.05.095     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Lienemann P., Lutolf M., Ehrbar M. Biomimetic hydrogels for controlled biomolecule delivery to augment bone regeneration. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 2012, 64:1078-1089.
2. Brown R. Direct collagen-material engineering for tissue fabrication. Tissue Eng Part A 2013, 19:1495-1498.
3. Collins M., Birkinshaw C. Hyaluronic acid based scaffolds for tissue engineering-a review. Carbohydr Polym 2013, 92:1262-1279.
4. Ana M.M., Catarina M.A., Kasper F.K., Antonios G.M., Rui L.R. Responsive and in situ-forming chitosan scaffolds for bone tissue engineering applications: an overview of the last decade. JMater Chem 2010, 20:1638-1645.
5. Mobini S., Hoyer B., Solati-Hashjin M., Lode A., Nosoudi N., Samadikuchaksaraei A., et al. Fabrication and characterization of regenerated silk scaffolds reinforced with natural silk fibers for bone tissue engineering. JBiomed Mater Res A 2013, 101:2392-2404.
6. Mata A., Geng Y., Henrikson K., Aparicio C., Stock S., Satcher R., et al. Bone regeneration mediated by biomimetic mineralization of a nanofiber matrix. Biomaterials 2010, 31:6004-6012.
7. Zhang X., Awad H., O'Keefe R., Guldberg R., Schwarz E. Aperspective: engineering periosteum for structural bone graft healing. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2008, 466:1777-1787.
8. Gkioni K., Leeuwenburgh S., Douglas T., Mikos A., Jansen J. Mineralization of hydrogels for bone regeneration. Tissue Eng Part B Rev 2010, 16:577-585.
9. Chen Y.-J., Chung M.-C., Jane Yao C.-C., Huang C.-H., Chang H.-H., Jeng J.-H., et al. The effects of acellular amniotic membrane matrix on osteogenic differentiation and ERK1/2 signaling in human dental apical papilla cells. Biomaterials 2012, 33:455-463.
10. Lee E.-J., Shin D.-S., Kim H.-E., Kim H.-W., Koh Y.-H., Jang J.-H. Membrane of hybrid chitosan-silica xerogel for guided bone regeneration. Biomaterials 2009, 30:743-750.
11. Kim K.-H., Jeong L., Park H.-N., Shin S.-Y., Park W.-H., Lee S.-C., et al. Biological efficacy of silk fibroin nanofiber membranes for guided bone regeneration. JBiotechnol 2005, 120:327-339.
12. Mota J., Yu N., Caridade S., Luz G., Gomes M., Reis R., et al. Chitosan/bioactive glass nanoparticle composite membranes for periodontal regeneration. Acta Biomater 2012, 8:4173-4180.
13. Douglas T., Gassling V., Declercq H., Purcz N., Pamula E., Haugen H., et al. Enzymatically induced mineralization of platelet-rich fibrin. JBiomed Mater Res A 2012, 100:1335-1346.
14. Yang F., Both S., Yang X., Walboomers X., Jansen J. Development of an electrospun nano-apatite/PCL composite membrane for GTR/GBR application. Acta Biomater 2009, 5:3295-3304.
15. Kharaziha M., Fathi M., Edris H. Development of novel aligned nanofibrous composite membranes for guided bone regeneration. JMech Behav Biomed Mater 2013, 24:9-20.
16. Benedetto M., Chiara E.G., Jake E.B., Showan N.N. Collagen gel fibrillar density dictates the extent of mineralization invitro. Soft Matter 2011, 7:9898-9907.
17. Schneider D., Weber F., Grunder U., Andreoni C., Burkhardt R., Jung R. Arandomized controlled clinical multicenter trial comparing the clinical and histological performance of a new, modified polylactide-co-glycolide acid membrane to an expanded polytetrafluorethylene membrane in guided bone regeneration procedures. Clin Oral Implants Res 2014, 25(2):150-159.
18. Shin S.-I., Herr Y., Kwon Y.-H., Chung J.-H. Effect of a collagen membrane combined with a porous titanium membrane on exophytic new bone formation in a rabbit calvarial model. JPeriodontol 2013, 84:110-116.
19. Wang Y., Shi R., Gong P., Li J., Li J., Ao D., et al. Bioelectric effect of a chitosan bioelectret membrane on bone regeneration in rabbit cranial defects. JBioact Compat Polym 2012, 27(2):122-132.
20. Gentile P., Chiono V., Tonda-Turo C., Ferreira A., Ciardelli G. Polymeric membranes for guided bone regeneration. Biotechnol J 2011, 6:1187-1197.
21. Gungormus M., Branco M., Fong H., Schneider J., Tamerler C., Sarikaya M. Self assembled bi-functional peptide hydrogels with biomineralization-directing peptides. Biomaterials 2010, 31:7266-7274.
22. Sílvia G., Isabel B.L., João F.M., Rui L.R., David L.K. Spider silk-bone sialoprotein fusion proteins for bone tissue engineering. Soft Matter 2011, 7:4964-4973.
23. Joaquim S.B., Artur R., Ana M.T., Matilde A., Francisco J.A., José C.R.-C., et al. Development of biomimetic chitosan-based hydrogels using an elastin-like Polymer. Adv Eng Mater 2010, 12:37-44.
24. Girotti A., Reguera J., Rodríguez-Cabello J., Arias F., Alonso M., Matestera A. Design and bioproduction of a recombinant multi(bio)functional elastin-like protein polymer containing cell adhesion sequences for tissue engineering purposes. JMater Sci Mater Med 2004, 15:479-484.
25. Tejeda-Montes E., Smith K., Rebollo E., Gómez R., Alonso M., Rodríguez-Cabello J., et al. Bioactive membranes for bone regeneration applications: effect of physical and biomolecular signals on mesenchymal stem cell behaviour. Acta Biomater 2014, 10:134-141.
26. Ana C.M., Katherine H.S., Esther T.-M., Elisabeth E., Rui L.R., Helena S.A., et al. Co-Assembled and microfabricated bioactive membranes. Adv Funct Mater 2013, 23:430-438.
27. Tejeda-Montes E., Smith K., Poch M., López-Bosque M., Martín L., Alonso M., et al. Engineering membrane scaffolds with both physical and biomolecular signaling. Acta Biomater 2012, 8:998-1009.
28. Prodanov L., te Riet J., Lamers E., Domanski M., Luttge R., van Loon J., et al. The interaction between nanoscale surface features and mechanical loading and its effect on osteoblast-like cells behavior. Biomaterials 2010, 31:7758-7765.
29. Kokubo T., Takadama H. How useful is SBF in predicting invivo bone bioactivity?. Biomaterials 2006, 27:2907-2915.
30. Winter L., Walboomers X., Bumgardner J., Jansen J. Intermittent versus continuous stretching effects on osteoblast-like cells invitro. JBiomed Mater Res A 2003, 67:1269-1275.
31. Sebastián M., Pérez R., Egido J. Use of TOF-SIMS in vascular biology. Methods in molecular biology, New York 2013, vol. 1000:33-43. chapter 3. F. Vivanco (Ed.).
32. Benesch J., Mano J., Reis R. Proteins and their peptide motifs in acellular apatite mineralization of scaffolds for tissue engineering. Tissue Eng Part B Rev 2008, 14:433-445.
33. Raj P., Johnsson M., Levine M., Nancollas G. Salivary statherin. Dependence on sequence, charge, hydrogen bonding potency, and helical conformation for adsorption to hydroxyapatite and inhibition of mineralization. JBiol Chem 1992, 267:5968-5976.
34. Stayton P., Drobny G., Shaw W., Long J., Gilbert M. Molecular recognition at the protein-hydroxyapatite interface. Crit Rev Oral Biol Med 2003, 14:370-376.
35. Hay D.I., Moreno E.C. Statherin and the acidic proline-rich proteins. human saliva: clinical chemistry and microbiology 1989, 131-150. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL. J. Tenovuo (Ed.).
36. García-Godoy F., Hicks M.J. Maintaining the integrity of the enamel surface: the role of dental biofilm, saliva and preventive agents in enamel demineralization and remineralization. JAm Dent Assoc 2008, 139:25S-34S.
37. Johnsson M., Levine M., Nancollas G. Hydroxyapatite binding domains in salivary proteins. Crit Rev Oral Biol Med 1993, 4:371-378.
38. Li Y., Chen X., Ribeiro A., Jensen E., Holmberg K., Rodriguez-Cabello J., et al. Hybrid nanotopographical surfaces obtained by biomimetic mineralization of statherin-inspired elastin-like recombinamers. Adv Healthc Mater 2014, 1-10. 10.1002/adhm.201400015.
39. Liao H., Andersson A.-S., Sutherland D., Petronis S., Kasemo B., Thomsen P. Response of rat osteoblast-like cells to microstructured model surfaces invitro. Biomaterials 2003, 24:649-654.
40. Yan H., Xufeng N., Wei S., Changdong G., Qingling F., Yubo F. Combined effects of mechanical strain and hydroxyapatite/collagen composite on osteogenic differentiation of rat bone marrow derived mesenchymal stem cells. JNanomater 2013, 2013.
41. Dimitriou R., Tsiridis E., Giannoudis P.V. Current concepts of molecular aspects of bone healing. Injury 2005, 36:1392-1404.
42. Sallach R., Cui W., Wen J., Martinez A., Conticello V., Chaikof E. Elastin-mimetic protein polymers capable of physical and chemical crosslinking. Biomaterials 2009, 30:409-422.
43. Hrabchak C., Rouleau J., Moss I., Woodhouse K., Akens M., Bellingham C., et al. Assessment of biocompatibility and initial evaluation of genipin cross-linked elastin-like polypeptides in the treatment of an osteochondral knee defect in rabbits. Acta Biomater 2010, 6:2108-2115.
44. Kumar V., Caves J., Haller C., Dai E., Liu L., Grainger S., et al. Acellular vascular grafts generated from collagen and elastin analogs. Acta Biomater 2013, 9:8067-8074.
45. Kawasaki K., Weiss K. Mineralized tissue and vertebrate evolution: the secretory calcium-binding phosphoprotein gene cluster. Proc Natl Acad Sci U. S. A. 2003, 100:4060-4065.