Intention to undergo colonoscopy screening among relatives of colorectal cancer cases: A theory-based model

Annals of Behavioral Medicine

Volumn 47, Issue 3, 2014, Pages 280-291

  Boonyasiriwat, Watcharaporn ^a,b   Hung, Man ^a,c   Hon, Shirley D ^c,d   Tang, Philip ^c,e   Pappas, Lisa M ^a   Burt, Randall W ^a,c   Schwartz, Marc D ^f   Stroup, Antoinette M ^c   Kinney, Anita Y ^a,c,g  

^a UNIVERSITY OF UTAH   (United States)

^b CHULALONGKORN UNIVERSITY   (Thailand)

^c UNIVERSITY OF UTAH SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF UTAH   (United States)

^e Touro University California   (United States)

^f GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^g UNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO   (United States)

Author keywords

Colonoscopy; Colorectal cancer screening; Extended parallel processmodel; Family history; Intention

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; BEHAVIOR; COLONOSCOPY; COLORECTAL NEOPLASMS; DISEASE PREDISPOSITION; EARLY DIAGNOSIS; FAMILY; FAMILY HEALTH; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MOTIVATION; PSYCHOLOGICAL MODEL; PSYCHOLOGY; RISK FACTOR; SELF CONCEPT;

ADULT; AGED; COLONOSCOPY; COLORECTAL NEOPLASMS; DISEASE SUSCEPTIBILITY; EARLY DETECTION OF CANCER; FAMILY; FAMILY HEALTH; FEMALE; HEALTH KNOWLEDGE, ATTITUDES, PRACTICE; HUMANS; INTENTION; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MODELS, PSYCHOLOGICAL; MOTIVATION; RISK FACTORS; SELF EFFICACY;

EID: 84904056805     PISSN: 08836612     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s12160-013-9562-y     Document Type: Article

References (63)

1. Lichtenstein P, Holm NV, Verkasalo PK, et al. Environmental and heritable factors in the causation of cancer-analyses of cohorts of twins from Sweden, Denmark, and Finland. N Engl J Med. 2000; 343: 78-85. (Pubitemid 30451850)
2. Kerber RA, Neklason DW, Samowitz WS, Burt RW. Frequency of familial colon cancer and hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer (Lynch syndrome) in a large population database. Fam Cancer. 2005; 4: 239-244. (Pubitemid 41242193)
3. Butterworth AS, Higgins JP, Pharoah P. Relative and absolute risk of colorectal cancer for individuals with a family history: A metaanalysis. Eur J Cancer. 2006; 42: 216-227. (Pubitemid 43083493)
4. Johns LE, Houlston RS. A systematic review and meta-analysis of familial colorectal cancer risk. Am J Gastroenterol. 2001; 96: 2992- 3003.
5. Levin B, Lieberman DA, McFarland B, et al. Screening and surveillance for the early detection of colorectal cancer and adenomatous polyps, 2008: A joint guideline from the American Cancer Society, the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer, and the American College of Radiology. Gastroenterology. 2008; 134: 1570-1595. (Pubitemid 351615355)
6. National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology. Distress Management; 2012.
7. American Cancer Society. Colorectal cancer facts & figures 2011- 2013. Atlanta: American Cancer Society; 2011.
8. Manne S, Markowitz A, Winawer S, et al. Correlates of colorectal cancer screening compliance and stage of adoption among siblings of individuals with early onset colorectal cancer. Health Psychol . 2002; 21: 3-15. (Pubitemid 34158007)
9. Friedman LC, Webb JA, Richards CS, Plon SE. Psychological and behavioral factors associated with colorectal screening among Ashkenazim. Prev Med. 1999; 29: 119-125. (Pubitemid 29406787)
10. Anderson AE, Henry KA, Samadder NJ, Merrill RM, Kinney AY. Rural vs urban residence affects risk-appropriate colorectal cancer screening. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2012; 11: 526-533.
11. Fletcher RH, Lobb R, Bauer MR, et al. Screening patients with a family history of colorectal cancer. J Gen Intern Med. 2007; 22: 508- 513. (Pubitemid 46941216)
12. Mack LA, Cook LS, Temple WJ, Carson LE, Hilsden RJ, Paolucci EO. Colorectal cancer screening among first-degree relatives of colorectal cancer patients: Benefits and barriers. Ann Surg Oncol. 2009; 16: 2092-2100.
13. Rees G, Martin PR, Macrae FA. Screening participation in individuals with a family history of colorectal cancer: A review. Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 2008; 17: 221-232.
14. CodoriAM, PetersenGM,Miglioretti DL, Boyd P.Health beliefs and endoscopic screening for colorectal cancer: Potential for cancer prevention. Prev Med. 2001; 33: 128-136.
15. Palmer RC, Emmons KM, Fletcher RH, et al. Familial risk and colorectal cancer screening health beliefs and attitudes in an insured population. Prev Med. 2007; 45: 336-341. (Pubitemid 350029927)
16. Bleiker EM, Menko FH, Taal BG, et al. Screening behavior of individuals at high risk for colorectal cancer. Gastroenterology. 2005; 128: 280-287. (Pubitemid 40431081)
17. Jacobs LA. Health beliefs of first-degree relatives of individuals with colorectal cancer and participation in health maintenance visits: A population-based survey. Cancer Nurs. 2002; 25: 251-265. (Pubitemid 34815436)
18. Taouqi M, Ingrand I, Beauchant M, Migeot V, Ingrand P. Determinants of participation in colonoscopic screening by siblings of colorectal cancer patients in France. BMC Cancer. 2010; 10: 355.
19. Manne S, Markowitz A,Winawer S, et al. Understanding intention to undergo colonoscopy among intermediate-risk siblings of colorectal cancer patients: A test of a mediational model. Prev Med. 2003; 36: 71-84. (Pubitemid 36034672)
20. Gilbert A, Kanarek N. Colorectal cancer screening: Physician recommendation is influential advice to Marylanders. Prev Med. 2005; 41: 367-379.
21. GiliM, RocaM, Ferrer V, ObradorA, Cabeza E. Psychosocial factors associated with the adherence to a colorectal cancer screening program. Cancer Detect Prev. 2006; 30: 354-360. (Pubitemid 44402900)
22. Madlensky L, Esplen MJ, Gallinger S, McLaughlin JR, Goel V. Relatives of colorectal cancer patients: Factors associated with screening behavior. Am J Prev Med. 2003; 25: 187-194. (Pubitemid 41116519)
23. O'Sullivan B, Keegan O, McGee H, McLoughlin R, O'Morain C. Predicting screening uptake by first-degree relatives of patients diagnosed with colorectal cancer. J Appl Soc Psychol. 2012; 42: 2309- 2325.
24. Witte K. Putting the fear back into fear appeals: The extended parallel process model. Commun Monogr. 1992; 59: 329-349.
25. Das E, de Wit JBF, Stroebe W. Fear appeals motivate acceptance of action recommendations: Evidence for a positive bias in the processing of persuasive messages. Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2003; 29: 650-664.
26. de Hoog N, Stroebe W, de Wit JBF. The impact of fear appeals on processing and acceptance of action recommendations. Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2005; 31: 24-33. (Pubitemid 40030786)
27. de Hoog N, Stroebe W, de Wit JBF. The processing of fear-arousing communications: How biased processing leads to persuasion. Social Influence. 2008; 3: 84-113.
28. Burak LJ, Meyer M. Using the health belief model to examine and predict college women's cervical cancer screening beliefs and behavior. Health Care Women Int. 1997; 18: 251-262. (Pubitemid 127447416)
29. Macrae FA, Hill DJ, St John DJ, Ambikapathy A, Garner JF. Predicting colon cancer screening behavior from health beliefs. Prev Med. 1984; 13: 115-126. (Pubitemid 14146337)
30. Vadaparampil ST, Jacobsen PB, Kash K,Watson IS, Saloup R, Pow- Sang J. Factors predicting prostate specific antigen testing among first-degree relatives of prostate cancer patients. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2004; 13: 753-758.
31. Bish A, Sutton S, Golombok S. Predicting uptake of a routine cervical smear test: A comparison of the health belief model and the theory of planned behaviour. Psychol Health. 2000; 15: 35-50.
32. So J. A further extension of the extended parallel process model (EEPPM): Implications of cognitive appraisal theory of emotion and dispositional coping style. Health Commun. 2013; 28: 72-83.
33. Ajzen I. Attitudes, personality, and behavior. Chicago: Dorsey Press; 1988.
34. Sifri R, Rosenthal M, Hyslop T, et al. Factors associated with colorectal cancer screening decision stage. Prev Med. 2010; 51: 329-331.
35. Brittain K, Taylor JY, Loveland-Cherry C, Northouse L, Caldwell CH. Family support and colorectal cancer screening among urban African Americans. J Nurse Pract. 2012; 8: 522-533.
36. Petty R, Cacioppo J. The elaboration likelihood model of persuasion. In: Berkowitz L, ed. Advances in experimental social psychology. Florida: Academic; 1986.
37. Chaiken S. The heuristic model of persuasion. In: Zanna MP, Olson JM, Herman CP, eds. Social influence: The Ontario Symposium. New Jersey: Erlbaum; 1987.
38. Petty R, Cacioppo J, Goldman RD. Personal involvement as a determinant of argument-based persuasion. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1981; 41: 847-855.
39. Debono K, Harnish R. Source expertise, source attractiveness, and the processing of persuasive information: A functional approach. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1988; 55: 541-546.
40. Heesacker M, Petty R, Cacioppo J. Field dependence and attitude change: Source credibility can alter persuasion by affecting messagerelevant thinking. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1983; 51: 653-666.
41. Clark JK, Wegener DT, Habashi MM, Evans AT. Source expertise and persuasion: The effects of perceived opposition or support on message scrutiny. Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2012; 38: 90-100.
42. Chaiken S, Maheswaran D. Heuristic processing can bias systematic processing: Effects of source credibility, argument ambiguity, and task importance on attitude judgment. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1994; 66: 460-473.
43. Wackerbarth SB, Tarasenko YN, Joyce JM, Haist SA. Physician colorectal cancer screening recommendations: An examination based on informed decision making. Patient Educ Couns. 2007; 66: 43-50. (Pubitemid 46366609)
44. Janz NK, Lakhani I, Vijan S, Hawley ST, Chung LK, Katz SJ. Determinants of colorectal cancer screening use, attempts, and nonuse. Prev Med. 2007; 44: 452-458. (Pubitemid 46686687)
45. Bandura A. Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychol Rev. 1977; 84: 191-215.
46. Pengchit W, Walters ST, Simmons RG, et al. Motivation-based intervention to promote colonoscopy screening: An integration of a fear management model and motivational interviewing. J Health Psychol. 2011; 16: 1187-1197.
47. Anton-Culver H, Ziogas A, Bowen D, et al. The Cancer Genetics Network: Recruitment results and pilot studies. Community Genet. 2003; 6: 171-177. (Pubitemid 38916116)
48. Simmons R, Lee Y, Stroup A, et al. Examining the challenges of family recruitment to behavioral intervention trials: Factors associated with participation and enrollment in a multi-state colonoscopy intervention trial. Trials. In press.
49. Cheah WH. Issue involvement, message appeal and gonorrhea: Risk perceptions in the U.S., England, Malaysia and Singapore. Asian J Commun. 2006; 16: 294-315.
50. Witte K, Meyer G,Martell D. Effective health risk messages: A stepby- step guide. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 2001.
51. Vernon SW, Myers RE, Tilley BC, Li S. Factors associated with perceived risk in automotive employees at increased risk of colorectal cancer. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2001; 10: 35-43. (Pubitemid 32106042)
52. Muthen L,Muthen B. Mplus user's guide. 6th ed. California:Muthen & Muthen; 1998-2010.
53. Bentler PM, Bonett DG. Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures. Psycho Bull. 1980; 88: 588-606.
54. Kremers SP, Mesters I, Pladdet IE, van den Borne B, Stockbrǧger RW. Participation in a sigmoidoscopic colorectal cancer screening program: A pilot study. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2000; 9: 1127-1130.
55. Myers RE, Vernon SW, Tilley BC, Lu M, Watts BG. Intention to screen for colorectal cancer among White male employees. Prev Med. 1998; 27: 279-287. (Pubitemid 28360855)
56. Tolma EL, Reininger BM, Evans A, Ureda J. Examining the theory of planned behavior and the construct of self-efficacy to predict mammography intention. Health Educ Behav. 2006; 33: 233-251. (Pubitemid 43306352)
57. Hay JL, McCaul KD, Magnan RE. Does worry about breast cancer predict screening behaviors? A meta-analysis of the prospective evidence. Prev Med. 2006; 42: 401-408. (Pubitemid 44183746)
58. Witte K, Allen M. A meta-analysis of fear appeals: Implications for effective public health campaigns. Health Educ Behav. 2000; 27: 591-615.
59. Bastani R, Gallardo N, Maxwell A. Barriers to colorectal cancer screening among ethnically diverse high- and average-risk individuals. J Psychosoc Oncol. 2001; 19: 65-84. (Pubitemid 33134632)
60. Bynum SA, Davis JL, Green BL, Katz RV. Unwillingness to participate in colorectal cancer screening: Examining fears, attitudes, and medical mistrust in an ethnically diverse sample of adults 50 years and older. Am J Health Promotl. 2012; 26: 295-300.
61. Sabatino SA, Habarta N, Baron RC, et al. Interventions to increase recommendation and delivery of screening for breast, cervical, and colorectal cancers by healthcare providers: Systematic reviews of provider assessment and feedback and provider incentives. Am J Prev Med. 2008; 35: S67-S74. (Pubitemid 351787506)
62. Zapka J, Klabunde CN, Taplin S, Yuan G, Ransohoff D, Kobrin S. Screening colonoscopy in the US: Attitudes and practices of primary care physicians. J Gen Intern Med. 2012; 27: 1150-1158.
63. Geller BM, Skelly JM, Dorwaldt AL, Howe KD, Dana GS, Flynn BS. Increasing patient/physician communications about colorectal cancer screening in rural primary care practices. Med Care. 2008; 46: S36-S43.