Predictive factors of telemedicine service acceptance and behavioral intention of physicians

International Journal of Medical Informatics

Volumn 83, Issue 8, 2014, Pages 559-571

  Rho, Mi Jung ^a   Choi, In young ^a   Lee, Jaebeom ^b  

^a The Catholic University of Korea College of Medicine   (South Korea)

^b Sogang University   (South Korea)

Author keywords

Behavioral intention to use; Physicians; Technology Acceptance Model; Telemedicine Service

Indexed keywords

HEALTH CARE;

BEHAVIORAL INTENTION; PERCEIVED EASE OF USE; PHYSICIANS; STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELING; TECHNOLOGY ACCEPTANCE MODEL; TELEMEDICINE SERVICES; TELEMEDICINE TECHNOLOGY; THEORETICAL MODELING;

TELEMEDICINE;

ADULT; ARTICLE; FEMALE; HEALTH SURVEY; HUMAN; MALE; MEDICAL RECORD; MEDICAL SERVICE; PHYSICIAN; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REGULATORY MECHANISM; SELF CONCEPT; STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELING; TELEMEDICINE; THEORETICAL MODEL; VALIDITY; ATTITUDE TO COMPUTERS; BEHAVIOR; HEALTH PERSONNEL ATTITUDE; MASS COMMUNICATION; MEDICAL TECHNOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; PREDICTIVE VALUE; PSYCHOLOGY; UTILIZATION; YOUNG ADULT;

ADULT; ATTITUDE OF HEALTH PERSONNEL; ATTITUDE TO COMPUTERS; BIOMEDICAL TECHNOLOGY; DIFFUSION OF INNOVATION; FEMALE; HUMANS; INTENTION; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MODELS, THEORETICAL; PHYSICIANS; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; TELEMEDICINE; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84904041990     PISSN: 13865056     EISSN: 18728243     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2014.05.005     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. Whitten P., Doolittle G., Mackert M. Providers' acceptance of telehospice. J Palliat. Med. 2005, 8(4):730-735.
2. Ahn M.E., Choi G.H. A developmental process of telemedicine, e-health & u-health. J. Korean Med. Assoc. 2009, 52(12):1131-1140.
3. Doctorsnews homepage (Cited 2010 June 24). Available from: http://www.doctorsnews.co.kr/news/articleView.html%3Fidxno=63475.
4. Davis F.D. Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Q. 1989, 13(3):319-340.
5. Dillon A., Morris M.G. User acceptance of new information technology: theories and models. Annu. Rev. Inform. Sci. Tech. 1996, 14(4):3-32.
6. Aggelidis V.P., Chatzoglou P.D. Using a modified technology acceptance model in hospitals. Int. J. Med. Inform. 2009, 78(2):115-126.
7. Carter L., Belanger F. The utilization of e-government services: citizen trust, innovation and acceptance factors. Inf. Syst. J. 2005 Jan, 15(1):5-25.
8. Venkatesh V., Davis F.D. A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: four longitudinal field studies. Manage. Sci. 2000, 46(2):186-204.
9. Wu J.H., Chen Y.C., Lin L.M. Empirical evaluation of the revised end user computing acceptance model. Comput. Hum. Behav. 2007, 23(1):162-174.
10. Yi M.Y., Jackson J.D., Park J.S., Probst J.C. Understanding information technology acceptance by individual professionals: toward an integrative view. Inform. Manage. 2006, 43(3):350-363.
11. Chismar W.G., Wiley-Patton S. Test of the technology acceptance model for the internet in pediatrics. Proc. AMIA Annu. Symp. 2002, 155-159.
12. Hennington A.H., Janz B.D. Information systems & healthcare XV: physician adoption of electronic medical records: applying the UTAUT model in a healthcare context. Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst. 2007, 19(1):60-80.
13. Schaper L.K., Pervan G.P. ICT and OTs: a model of information and communication technology acceptance and utilisation by occupational therapists. Int. J. Med. Inform. 2007, 76(Suppl. 1):S212-S221.
14. Chau P.Y.K., Hu P.J.H. Investigating healthcare professionals' decisions to accept telemedicine technology: an empirical test of competing theories. Inform. Manage. 2002, 39(4):297-311.
15. Yu P., Li H., Gagnon M.P. Health IT acceptance factors in long-term care facilities: a cross-sectional survey. Int. J. Med. Inform. 2009, 78(April (4)):219-229.
16. Sandberg J., Trief P.M., Izquierdo R., Goland R., Morin P.C., Palmas W., Larson C.D., Strait J.G., Shea S., Weinstock R.S. A qualitative study of the experiences and satisfaction of direct telemedicine providers in diabetes case management. Telemed. E-Health 2009, 15(8):742-750.
17. Martinez A., Everss E., Rojo-Alvarez J.L., Figal D.P., Garcia-Alberola A. A systematic review of the literature on home monitoring for patients with heart failure. J. Telemed. Telecare 2006, 12(5):234-241.
18. Hung S.Y., Ku Y.C., Chie J.C. Understanding physicians' acceptance of the Medline system for practicing evidence-based medicine: a decomposed TPB model. Int. J. Med. Inform. 2012, 81(2):130-142.
19. Whitten P., Bergman A. Patient and provider satisfaction. Home Telehealth: Connecting Care within the Community 2006, 36-43. The Royal Society of Medicine Press, London. R. Wootton, S.L. Dimmick, J.C. Kvedar (Eds.).
20. Olver I.N., Selva-Nayagam S. Evaluation of a telemedicine link between Darwin and Adelaide to facilitate cancer management. Telemed. J. 2000, 6(2):213-218.
21. Katz S.J., Moyer C.A. The emerging role of online communication between patients and their providers. J. Gen. Intern. Med. 2004, 19(9):978-983.
22. Krupinski E., Nypaver M., Poropatich R., Ellis D., Safwat R., Sapci H. Clinical applications in telemedicine/telehealth. Telemed. J. E-Health 2002, 8(March (1)):13-34.
23. Chau P.Y.K., Hu P.J. Examining a model of information technology acceptance by individual professionals: an exploratory study. J. Manage. Inform. Syst. 2002, 18(4):191-229.
24. Rimner T., Blozik E., Begley C., Grandchamp C., Overbeck J.V. Patient adherence to recommendations after teleconsultation: survey of patients from a telemedicine centre in Switzerland. J. Telemed. Telecare 2011, 17(5):235-239.
25. Lee J.B., Rho M.J. The perception of influencing factors on acceptance of mobile health monitoring service: a comparison between users and non-users. Healthc. Inform. Res. 2013, 19(3):167-176.
26. Glaser M., Winchell T., Plant P., Wilbright W., Kaiser M., Butler M.K., Goldshore M., Magnus M. Provider satisfaction and patient outcomes associated with a statewide prison telemedicine program in Louisiana. Telemed. E-Health 2010, 16(4):472-479.
27. Kang J., Chun H., Shin I.H., Shin S.D., Suh G.J., Kim H.C. Preliminary evaluation of the use of a CDMA-based emergency telemedicine system. J. Telemed. Telecare 2006, 12(8):422-427.
28. Russomano T., Cardoso R.B., Fernandes J., Cardoso P.G., Alves J.M., Pianta C.D., Souza H.P., Lopes M.H.I. Tele-surgery: a new virtual tool for medical education. Stud. Health Technol. Inform. 2009, 150:866-870.
29. Jorgensen H.R., Turolla A., Piron L., Pedersen M., Agostini M., Larsen T. Implementation of a telerehabilitation program in an EHSD model of care for persons with a stroke. Int. J. Integr. Care 2011, 11(Suppl.):e105.
30. Kearns J.W., Bowerman D., Kemmis K., Izquierdo R.E., Wade M., Weinstock R.S. Group diabetes education administered through telemedicine: tools used and lessons learned. Telemed. E-health 2012, 18(5):347-353.
31. Venkatesh V., Davis F.D. A model of the antecedents of perceived ease of use: development and test. Decis. Sci. 1996, 27(3):451-481.
32. Bakken S., Grullon-Figueroa L., Izquierdo R., Lee N.J., Morin P., Palmas W., Teresi J., Weinstock R.S., Shea S., Starren J. Development, validation, and use of English and Spanish versions of the telemedicine satisfaction and usefulness questionnaire. J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc. 2006, 13(6):660-667.
33. Zaidia S.T.R., Marriott J.L., Nation R.L. The role of perceptions of clinicians in their adoption of a web-based antibiotic approval system: do perceptions translate into actions?. Int. J. Med. Inform. 2008, 77(1):33-40.
34. Taylor P. Evaluating telemedicine systems and services. J. Telemed. Telecare 2005, 11(4):167-177.
35. Gagnon M.P., Godin G., Gagne C., Fortin J.P., Lamothe L., Reinharz D., Cloutier A. An adaptation of the theory of interpersonal behaviour to the study of telemedicine adoption by physicians. Int. J. Med. Inform. 2003, 71(2-3):103-115.
36. Lanseng E.J., Andreassen T.W. Electronic healthcare: a study of people's readiness and attitude toward performing self-diagnosis. Int. J. Serv. Ind. Manage. 2007, 18(4):394-417.
37. Dünnebeil S., Sunyaev A., Blohm I., Leimeister J.M., Krcmar H. Determinants of physicians' technology acceptance for e-health in ambulatory care. Int. J. Med. Inform. 2012, 81:746-760.
38. Chen R.F., Hsiao J.L. An investigation on physicians' acceptance of hospital information systems: a case study. Int. J. Med. Inform. 2012, 81:810-820.
39. Shih Y.Y. The effect of computer self-efficacy on enterprise resource planning usage. Behav. Inform. Technol. 2006, 25(5):407-411.
40. Wilson E.V., Lankton N.K. Modeling patients' acceptance of provider-delivered e-health. J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc. 2004, 11(4):241-248.
41. Thong J.Y.L., Hong W., Tam K.Y. Understanding user acceptance of digital libraries: what are the roles of interface characteristics, organizational context, and individual differences?. Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud. 2002, 57(3):215-242.
42. Palmas W., Teresi J., Weinstock R.S., Shea S. Acceptability to primary care providers of telemedicine in diabetes case management. J. Telemed. Telecare 2008, 14(6):306-308.
43. Wootton R., Dimmick S., Kvedar J. Home Telehealth: Connecting Care Within the Community 2006, The Royal Society of Medicine Press, London.
44. Hsu M.K., Wang S.W., Chiu K.K. Computer attitude, statistics anxiety and self-efficacy on statistical software adoption behavior: an empirical study of online MBA learners. Comput. Hum. Behav. 2009, 25(2):412-420.
45. Koh D.Y., Cho H.S. Analysis on the determinants of the consumer intention to use home network-based telemedicine and telehealth management. Korea J. Health Econ. Policy 2010, 16(1):63-84.
46. Jiang J.J., Klein G., Carr C.L. Measuring information system service quality: SERVQUAL from the other side. MIS Q. 2002, 26(June (2)):145-166.
47. Nunnally J.C. Psychometric Theory 1978, McGraw-Hill, New York.
48. Byrne B.M. Structural Equation Modeling With AMOS: Basic Concepts, Applications, and Programming 2010, Routledge, New York. 2nd ed.
49. Hair J.F., Black W.C., Babin B.J., Anderson R.E., Tatham R.L. Multivariate Data Analysis 2010, Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ. 7th ed.
50. Fornell C., Larcker D.F. Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. J. Mark. Res. 1981, 18(February (1)):39-50.
51. Chin W.W. The partial least squares approach to structural equation modeling. Moderns Methods for Business Research 1998, 295-336. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwahm, NJ. G.A. Marcoulides (Ed.).