The role of perceptions of clinicians in their adoption of a web-based antibiotic approval system: Do perceptions translate into actions?

International Journal of Medical Informatics

Volumn 77, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 33-40

  Zaidi, Syed Tabish R ^a   Marriott, Jennifer L ^a   Nation, Roger L ^a  

^a MONASH UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

Adoption; Broad spectrum antibiotics; Clinicians; Decision Support Systems; Perceptions

Indexed keywords

ANTIBIOTICS; BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING; INFORMATION ANALYSIS; INFORMATION SERVICES;

BROAD-SPECTRUM ANTIBIOTICS; PERCEPTIONS;

DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEMS;

ANTIBIOTIC AGENT;

ADULT; ANTIBIOTIC THERAPY; ARTICLE; AUSTRALIA; DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEM; EVIDENCE BASED MEDICINE; FEMALE; HEALTH PERSONNEL ATTITUDE; HUMAN; HUMAN COMPUTER INTERACTION; INTERNET; MALE; MEDICAL STAFF; PHARMACIST; PHARMACIST ATTITUDE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; TEACHING HOSPITAL; WORK;

ADULT; ANTI-BACTERIAL AGENTS; ATTITUDE TO COMPUTERS; DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEMS, CLINICAL; DIFFUSION OF INNOVATION; FEMALE; HEALTH CARE SURVEYS; HEALTH PERSONNEL; HUMANS; INTERNET; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; VICTORIA;

EID: 36348954865     PISSN: 13865056     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2006.11.008     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Oliven A., Michalake I., Zalman D., Dorman E., Yeshurun D., and Odeh M. Prevention of prescription errors by computerized, on-line surveillance of drug order entry. Int. J. Med. Inform. 74 5 (2005) 377-386
2. Rossille D., Laurent J.F., and Burgun A. Modelling a decision-support system for oncology using rule-based and case-based reasoning methodologies. Int. J. Med. Inform. 74 2-4 (2005) 299-306
3. Georgiou A., Williamson M., Westbrook J.I., and Ray S. The impact of computerised physician order entry systems on pathology services: a systematic review. Int. J. Med. Inform. (2006)
4. Garg A.X., Adhikari N.K., McDonald H., Rosas-Arellano M.P., Devereaux P.J., Beyene J., Sam J., and Haynes R.B. Effects of computerized clinical decision support systems on practitioner performance and patient outcomes: a systematic review. JAMA 293 10 (2005) 1223-1238
5. Hunt D.L., Haynes R.B., Hanna S.E., and Smith K. Effects of computer-based clinical decision support systems on physician performance and patient outcomes: a systematic review. JAMA 280 15 (1998) 1339-1346
6. Johnston M., Langton K., Haynes B., and Mathieu A. The effects of computer-based clinical decision support systems on clinician performance and patient outcome: a critical appraisal of research. Ann. Int. Med. 120 (1994) 135-142
7. Kawamoto K., Houlihan C.A., Balas E.A., and Lobach D.F. Improving clinical practice using clinical decision support systems: a systematic review of trials to identify features critical to success. BMJ 330 7494 (2005) 765
8. Kaplan B. Evaluating informatics applications-clinical decision support systems literature review. Int. J. Med. Inform. 64 1 (2001) 15-37
9. Rousseau N., McColl E., Newton J., Grimshaw J., and Eccles M. Practice based, longitudinal, qualitative interview study of computerised evidence based guidelines in primary care. BMJ 326 7384 (2003) 314
10. Magrabi F., Westbrook J.I., and Coiera E.W. What factors are associated with the integration of evidence retrieval technology into routine general practice settings?. Int. J. Med. Inform. (2006)
11. Pare G., Sicotte C., and Jacques H. The effects of creating psychological ownership on physicians' acceptance of clinical information systems. J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc. 13 2 (2006) 197-205
12. Ammenwerth E., Iller C., and Mahler C. IT-adoption and the interaction of task, technology and individuals: a fit framework and a case study. BMC Med. Inform. Decis. Making 6 (2006) 3
13. Zheng K., Padman R., Johnson M.P., and Diamond H.S. Understanding technology adoption in clinical care: clinician adoption behavior of a point-of-care reminder system. Int. J. Med. Inform. 74 7-8 (2005) 535-543
14. D.V. Sintchenko, A.P.J. Westbrook, M.S. Tipper, M.M. Mathie, P.E. Coiera, Electronic Decision Support Activities in different healthcare settings in Australia, in: B. David (Ed.), Electronic Decision Support for Australia's Health Electronic Decision Support for Australia's Health Sector, ACT, Commonwealth Department of Health and Ageing, Canberra, Australia, 2002.
15. George S.E., and Warren J.R. Statistical modelling of general practice medicine for computer assisted data entry in electronic medical record systems. Int. J. Med. Inform. 57 2-3 (2000) 77-89
16. Thursky K.A., and Mahemoff M. User-centered design techniques for a computerised antibiotic decision support system in an intensive care unit. Int. J. Med. Inform. (2006)
17. Robertson M.B., Korman T.M., Dartnell J.G., Ioannides-Demos L.L., Kirsa S.W., Lord J.A., Munafo L., and Byrnes G.B. Ceftriaxone and cefotaxime use in Victorian hospitals. Med. J. Aust. 176 11 (2002) 524-529
18. Richards M.J., Robertson M.B., Dartnell J.G., Duarte M.M., Jones N.R., Kerr D.A., Lim L.L., Ritchie P.D., Stanton G.J., and Taylor S.E. Impact of a web-based antimicrobial approval system on broad-spectrum cephalosporin use at a teaching hospital. Med. J. Aust. 178 8 (2003) 386-390
19. Electronic Decision Support for Hospital Clinicians-Guidance DS(TM): iApprove(TM). [http://www.mh.org.au/library/pdf/29/05.pdf. Last access 24/11/2006].
20. Cork R.D., Detmer W.M., and Friedman C.P. Development and initial validation of an instrument to measure physicians' use of, knowledge about, and attitudes toward computers. J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc. 5 2 (1998) 164-176
21. Nielsen J., and Molich R. Heuristic evaluation of user interfaces. ACM CHI'90 Conference. 1-5 April 1990, Seattle, WA (1990) 249-256
22. Davis F.D. Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Q. 13 3 (1989) 319-340
23. Cronbach L.J. Designing Evaluations of Educational and Social Programs (1982), Josse-Bass, San Franscico
24. Trivedi M.H., Marcee A., Grannemann B., Kleiber B., Bettinger T., Altshuler K.Z., and McClelland A. Development and implementation of computerized clinical guidelines: barriers and solutions. Methods InfMed 41 5 (2002) 435-442
25. Ruland C.M. A survey about the usefulness of computerized systems to support illness management in clinical practice. Int. J. Med. Inform. 73 11-12 (2004) 797-805
26. Van Der Meijden M.J., Tange H.J., Troost J., and Hasman A. Determinants of success of inpatient clinical information systems: a literature review. J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc. 10 3 (2003) 235-243
27. Cabana M.D., Rand C.S., Powe N.R., Wu A.W., Wilson M.H., Abboud P.A., and Rubin H.R. Why don't physicians follow clinical practice guidelines? A framework for improvement. JAMA 282 15 (1999) 1458-1465
28. Asch D.A., Jedrziewski M.K., and Christakis N.A. Response rates to mail surveys published in medical journals. J. Clin. Epidemiol. 50 10 (1997) 1129-1136
29. O'Sullivan I., Orbell S., Rakow T., and Parker R. Prospective research in health service settings: health psychology, science and the 'Hawthorne' effect. J. Health Psychol. 9 3 (2004) 355-359
30. Rosenbloom S.T., Talbert D., and Aronsky D. Clinicians' perceptions of clinical decision support integrated into computerized provider order entry. Int. J. Med. Inform. 73 5 (2004) 433-441
31. Ahearn M.D., and Kerr S.J. General practitioners' perceptions of the pharmaceutical decision-support tools in their prescribing software. Med. J. Aust. 179 1 (2003) 34-37
32. Schectman J.M., Schorling J.B., Nadkarni M.M., and Voss J.D. Determinants of physician use of an ambulatory prescription expert system. Int. J. Med. Inform. 74 9 (2005) 711-717
33. Wears R.L., and Berg M. Computer technology and clinical work: still waiting for Godot. JAMA 293 10 (2005) 1261-1263
34. Charles P., and Friedman J.C.W. Evaluation Method in Medical Informatics. first ed. (1997), Springer, New York