Standard transgluteal versus minimal invasive anterior approach in hip arthroplasty: A prospective, consecutive cohort study

Orthopedic Reviews

Volumn 5, Issue 4, 2013, Pages 133-137

  Ilchmann, Thomas ^a   Gersbach, Silke ^a   Zwicky, Lukas ^a   Clauss, Martin ^a  

^a Kantonsspital Liestal   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

Anterior approach; Early rehabilitation; Hip replacement; Minimal invasive

Indexed keywords

ACETABULUM PROSTHESIS; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CAPSULOTOMY; COMPARATIVE STUDY; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HARRIS HIP SCORE; HIP ARTHROPLASTY; HOSPITALIZATION; HUMAN; JOINT MOBILIZATION; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MINIMALLY INVASIVE PROCEDURE; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PATIENT SATISFACTION; POSTOPERATIVE CARE; VISUAL ANALOG SCALE; X RAY FILM;

EID: 84904040233     PISSN: 20358237     EISSN: 20358164     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.4081/or.2013.e31     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Smith TO, Blake V, Hing CB. Minimally invasive versus conventional exposure for total hip arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical and radiological outcomes. Int Orthop 2011;35:173-84.
2. Pospischill M, Kranzl A, Attwenger B, et al. Minimally invasive compared with traditional transgluteal approach for total hip arthroplasty: a comparative gait analysis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2010;92:328-37.
3. Bertin KC, Rottinger H. Anterolateral mini-incision hip replacement surgery: a modified Watson-Jones approach. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2004;248-55.
4. Bremer AK, Kalbere, F, Pfirrmann CW, et al. Soft-tissue changes in hip abductor muscles and tendons after total hip replacement: comparison between the direct anterior and the transgluteal approaches. J. Bone Joint Surg Br 2011;93: 886-9.
5. Kampa RJ, Prasthofer A, Lawrence-Watt DJ, et al. The internervous safe zone for incision of the capsule of the hip. A cadaver study. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2007;89: 971-6.
6. Restrepo C, Parvizi J, Pour AE, et al. Prospective randomized study of two surgical approaches for total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2010;25:671-9.
7. Goebel S, Steinert AF, Schillinger J, et al. Reduced postoperative pain in total hip arthroplasty after minimal-invasive anterior approach. Int Orthop 2012;36:491-8.
8. Lin DH, Jan MH, Liu TK, et al. Effects of anterolateral minimally invasive surgery in total hip arthroplasty on hip muscle strength, walking speed, and functional score. J Arthroplasty 2007;22:1187-92.
9. Wright JM, Crockett HC, Delgado S, et al. Mini-incision for total hip arthroplasty: a prospective, controlled investigation with 5-year follow-up evaluation. J Arthroplasty 2004;19:538-45.
10. Ogonda L, Wilson R, Archbold P, et al. A minimal-incision technique in total hip arthroplasty does not improve early postoperative outcomes. A prospective, randomized, controlled trial. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2005;87:701-10.
11. Williams SL, Bachison C, Michelson JD, et al. Component position in 2-incision minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty compared to standard total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2008;23:197-202.
12. Meneghini RM, Smits SA. A Prospective, randomized study of component position in two-incision mis total hip arthroplasty: a preliminary study. Surg Technol Int 2011;XXI:255-60.
13. Lloyd JM, Wainwright T, Middleton RG. What is the role of minimally invasive surgery in a fast track hip and knee replacement pathway? Ann R Coll Surg Engl 2012;94:148-51.
14. Berger RA, Sanders SA, Thill ES, et al. Newer anesthesia and rehabilitation protocols enable outpatient hip replacement in selected patients. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2009;467:1424-30.
15. Husted H, Holm G, Jacobsen S. Predictors of length of stay and patient satisfaction after hip and knee replacement surgery: fast-track experience in 712 patients. Acta Orthop 2008;79:168-73.
16. Bauer R, Kerschbaumer F, Poisel S, et al. The transgluteal approach to the hip joint. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 1979;95:47-9.
17. O'Brien DA, Rorabeck CH. The mini-incision direct lateral approach in primary total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2005;441:99-103.
18. Matta JM, Shahrdar C, Ferguson T. Singleincision anterior approach for total hip arthroplasty on an orthopaedic table. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2005;441:115-24.
19. Haddad RJ, Cook SD, Brinker MR. A comparison of three varieties of noncemented porous-coated hip replacement. J. Bone Joint Surg Br 1990;72:2-8.
20. Ilchmann T. Radiographic assessment of cup migration and wear after hip replacement. Acta Orthop Scand Suppl 1997; 276:1-26.
21. Krismer M, Bauer R, Tschupik J, et al. EBRA: a method to measure migration of acetabular components. J Biomech 1995;2 8:1225-36.
22. Jewett BA, Collis DK. High complication rate with anterior total hip arthroplasties on a fracture table. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2011;469:503-7.
23. Lovell TP. Single-incision direct anterior approach for total hip arthroplasty using a standard operating table. J Arthroplasty 2008;23:64-8.
24. D'Arrigo C, Speranza A, Monaco E, et al. Learning curve in tissue sparing total hip replacement: comparison between different approaches. J Orthop Traumatol 2009; 10: 47-54.
25. Husted H, Holm G. Fast track in total hip and knee arthroplasty-experiences from Hvidovre University Hospital, Denmark. Injury 2006;37 Suppl 5:S31-5.
26. Mears DC, Mears SC, Chelly JE, et al. THA with a minimally invasive technique, multi-modal anesthesia, and home rehabilitation: factors associated with early discharge? Clin Orthop Relat Res 2009;467:1412-7.
27. Callanan MC, Jarrett B, Bragdon CR, et al. The John Charnley Award: risk factors for cup malpositioning: quality improvement through a joint registry at a tertiary hospital. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2011;469:319-29.
28. Laffosse JM, Accadbled F, Molinier F, et al. Anterolateral mini-invasive versus posterior mini-invasive approach for primary total hip replacement. Comparison of exposure and implant positioning. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2008;128:363-9.