Anterolateral mini-invasive versus posterior mini-invasive approach for primary total hip replacement. Comparison of exposure and implant positioning

Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery

Volumn 128, Issue 4, 2008, Pages 363-369

  Laffosse, Jean Michel ^a   Accadbled, Franck ^a   Molinier, François ^a   Chiron, Philippe ^a   Hocine, Bensafi ^a   Puget, J ^a  

^a CHU RANGUEIL   (France)

Author keywords

Anterolateral approach; Component positioning; Minimally invasive surgery; Posterior approach; Total hip replacement

Indexed keywords

ACETABULUM; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; AVASCULAR NECROSIS; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; FEMUR SHAFT; FEMUR TROCHANTERIC FRACTURE; FRAGILITY FRACTURE; HIP OSTEOARTHRITIS; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; LEARNING; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MINIMALLY INVASIVE SURGERY; PEROPERATIVE COMPLICATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RELIABILITY; SURGICAL APPROACH; TOTAL HIP PROSTHESIS;

ADULT; AGED; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, HIP; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OSTEOARTHRITIS, HIP; OSTEOPOROSIS; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES;

EID: 41149108248     PISSN: 09368051     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00402-007-0385-9     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Asayama I, Akiyoshi Y, Naito M, Ezoe M (2004) Intraoperative pelvic motion in total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 19:992-997
2. Baker AS, Bitounis VC (1989) Abductor function after total hip replacement A electromyographic and clinical review. J Bone Joint Surg 71-B:47-50
3. Bal B, Haltom D, Aleto T, Barrett M (2005) Early complications of primary total hip replacement performed with two-incision minimally invasive technique. J Bone Joint Surg 87-A:2432-2438
4. Berger R (2004) Mini-incision total hip replacement using an anterolateral approach: Technique and results. Orthop Clin North Am 35:143-151
5. Berger R, Duwelius P (2004) The two-incision minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty: Technique and results. Orthop Clin North Am 35:163-172
6. Berry D, Berger R, Callaghan J, Dorr L, Duwelius P, Hartzband M, Lieberman JR, Mears DC (2003) Symposium minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty development, early results, and critical analysis. J Bone Joint Surg 85-A:2235-2236
7. Bertin KC, Röttinger H (2004) Anterolateral mini-incision hip replacement surgery: A modified Watson-Jones approach. Clin Orthop Relat Res 429:248-255
8. Chiron P, Laffosse J, Fabié F, Puget J (2005) Voie d'abord postérieure pour prothése totale de hanche. In: Puget J (ed) Prothése totale de hanche. Les choix. Elsevier, Paris, pp 269-283
9. Chung WK, Liu D, Foo LS (2004) Mini-incision total hip replacement-surgical technique and early results. J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong) 12:19-24
10. de Beer J, Petruccelli D, Zalzal P, Winemaker MJ (2004) Single-incision, minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty: Length doesn't matter. J Arthroplasty 19:945-950
11. DiGioia III A, Plakseychuk AY, Levison TJ, Jaramaz B (2003) Mini-incision technique for total hip arthroplasty with navigation. J Arthroplasty 18:123-128
12. Fehring T, Mason J (2005) Catastrophic complications of minimally invasive hip surgery. J Bone Joint Surg 87-A:711-714
13. Goldstein WM, Branson JJ (2004) Posterior-lateral approach to minimal incision total hip arthroplasty. Orthop Clin North Am 35:131-136
14. Hardinge K (1982) The direct lateral approach of the hip. J Bone Joint Surg 64-B:17-19
15. Hart R, Stipcak V, Janecek M, Visna P (2005) Component position following total hip arthroplasty through a miniinvasive posteral approach. Acta Orthop Belg 71:60-64
16. Hartzband M (2004) Posterolateral minimal incision for total hip replacement: Technique and early results. Orthop Clin North Am 35:119-129
17. Howell JR, Garbuz D, Duncan CP (2004) Minimally invasive hip replacement: Rationale, applied anatomy, and instrumentation. Orthop Clin North Am 35:107-118
18. Howell JR, Masri BA, Duncan CP (2004) Minimally invasive versus standard incision anterolateral hip replacement: A comparative study. Orthop Clin North Am 35:153-162
19. Jerosch J, Theising C, Fadel ME (2006) Antero-lateral minimal invasive (ALMI) approach for total hip arthroplasty technique and early results. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 126:164-173
20. Kennon R, Keggi JM, Westmore RS, Zatorski L, Huo M, Keggi KJ (2003) Total hip arthroplasty through a minimally invasive anterior surgical approach. J Bone Joint Surg 85-A:39-48
21. Laffosse JM, Chiron P, Accadbled F, Molinier F, Tricoire J, Puget J (2006) Learning curve for modified Watson-Jones minimally invasive approach in primary total hip replacement. Analysis of the complications and the early results versus the standard-incision posterior approach. Acta Orthop Belg 72:693-701
22. Laffosse JM, Chiron P, Molinier F, Bensafi H, Puget J (2006) Prospective and comparative study of the anterolateral mini-invasive approach versus minimally invasive posterior approach for primary total hip replacement. Early results. Int Orthop (Epub ahead of print)
23. Mulliken B, Rorabeck C, Bourne R, Nayak N (1998) A modified direct lateral approach in total hip arthroplasty: A comprehensive review. J Arthroplasty 13:737-747
24. Mulroy W, Estok D, Harris W (1995) Total hip arthroplasty with use of so-called second-generation cementing techniques. A fifteen-year-average follow-up study. J Bone Joint Surg 77-A:1845-1852
25. Ogonda L, Wilson R, Archbold P, Lawlor M, Humphreys P, O'Brien S, Beverland D (2005) A minimal-incision technique in total hip arthroplasty does not improve early postoperative outcomes. J Bone Joint Surg 87-A:701-710
26. Pellicci PM, Bostrom M, Poss R (1998) Posterior approach to total hip replacement using enhanced posterior soft tissue repair. Clin Orthop Relat Res 355:224-228
27. Pierchon F, Migaud H, Duquennoy A, Fontaine C (1993) Evaluation radiologique du centre de rotation de la hanche. Rev Chir Orthop 79:281-284
28. Siguier T, Siguier M, Brumpt B (2004) Mini-incision anterior approach does not increase dislocation rate: A study of 1037 total hip replacements. Clin Orthop Relat Res 164-173
29. Singh M, Riggs B, Beabout J, Jowsey J (1973) Femoral trabecular pattern index for evaluation of spinal osteoporosis. A detailed methodologic description. Mayo Clin Proc 48:184-189
30. Sutherland CJ (1982) A ten-year follow-up of one hundred consecutive Muller curved-stem total hip-replacement arthroplasties. J Bone Joint Surg 64-A:970-982
31. Vicar A, Coleman C (1984) A comparison of the anterolateral, transtrochanteric, and posterior surgical approaches in primary total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 188:152-159
32. Woolson S, Hartford J, Sawyer A (1999) Results of a method of leg-length equalization for patients undergoing primary total hip replacement. J Arthroplasty 14:159-164
33. Woolson ST, Mow CS, Syquia JF, Lannin JV, Schurman DJ (2004) Comparison of primary total hip replacements performed with a standard incision or a mini-incision. J Bone Joint Surg 86-A:1353-1358
34. Wright JM, Crockett HC, Delgado S, Lyman S, Madsen M, Sculco TP (2004) Mini-incision for total hip arthroplasty: A prospective, controlled investigation with 5-year follow-up evaluation. J Arthroplasty 19:538-545