Will new technologies replace mammography CAD as we know it?

Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

Volumn 8539 LNCS, Issue , 2014, Pages 30-37

  Marshall, Julian ^a   Kshirsagar, Ashwini ^a   Narin, Sibel ^a   Gkanatsios, Nikos ^a  

^a HOLOGIC INC   (United States)

Author keywords

CAD; Computer aided Detection; Generated 2D; Mammography; Tomosynthesis

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER AIDED DESIGN; IMAGE PROCESSING; MAMMOGRAPHY; MEDICAL IMAGING; TOMOGRAPHY;

CAD TECHNOLOGIES; CLINICAL PRACTICES; CLINICAL PROBLEMS; COMPUTER-AIDED DETECTION; DIGITAL BREAST TOMOSYNTHESIS; GENERATED 2D; IMAGE PROCESSING TECHNIQUE; TOMOSYNTHESIS;

COMPUTER AIDED DIAGNOSIS;

EID: 84903986086     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: 16113349     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-07887-8_5     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (19)

1. Data from US FDA website for MQSA National Statistics as of January 1, 2014.
2. Freer TW et al. Screening Mammography with Computer-aided Detection: Prospective Study of 12,860 Patients in a Community Breast Center. Radiology 2001; 220:781-786. (Pubitemid 32799990)
3. Cupples et al. Impact of computer-aided detection in a regional screening mammography program. AJR. 2005;185: 944-950.
4. Gromet M. Comparison of Computer-Aided Detection to Double Reading of Screening Mammograms: Review of 231,221 Mammograms. AJR. 2008;190: 854-859. (Pubitemid 351571504)
5. Gilbert FJ et al. Single Reading with Computer-Aided Detection for Screening Mammography. N Engl J Med 2008; 359:1675-1684.
6. Gur D et al. Changes in Breast Cancer Detection and Mammography Recall Rates After the Introduction of a Computer-Aided Detection System. J Natl Cancer Inst (2004) 96 (3): 185-190. (Pubitemid 38263177)
7. Fenton JJ et al. Influence of Computer-Aided Detection on Performance of Screening Mammography. N Engl J Med 2007; 356:1399-1409. (Pubitemid 46556325)
8. FDA PMA P970058. Data on file.
9. Niklason L et al. Digital tomosynthesis in breast imaging. Radiology. 1997 Nov;205(2):399-406. (Pubitemid 27467317)
10. http://www.auntminnie.com/default.asp?Sec=sup&Sub=wom&Pag= dis&ItemId=51831
11. http://www.bizjournals.com/milwaukee/stories/2002/04/15/daily40.html
12. Skaane P et al. Comparison of Digital Mammography Alone and Digital Mammography Plus Tomosynthesis in a Population-based Screening Program. Radiology. 2013 Apr; 267(1):47-56.
13. Ciatto S et al. Integration of 3D digital mammography with tomosynthesis for population breast-cancer screening (STORM): a prospective comparison study. The Lancet Oncology, Volume 14, Issue 7, Pages 583-589, June 2013.
14. Rose SL et al. Implementation of breast tomosynthesis in a routine screening practice: an observational study. AJR Am J Roentgenol. American Journal of Roentgenology. 2013;200:1401-1408.
15. Krupinski EA. Reader Fatigue Interpreting Mammograms, Digital Mammography Lecture Notes in Computer. Science. Vol 6136, 2010, pp 312-318.
16. Dang PA et al. Addition of tomosynthesis to conventional digital mammography: effect on image interpretation time of screening examinations. Radiology. 2014 Jan;270(1):49-56.
17. Skaane P et al. Trends in Time to Interpretation of Tomosynthesis Based Screening Examinations with Increasing Experience. RSNA 2013 Presentation SSK01-04, Weds, 2013-12-04 10:30-12:00, Arie Crown Theater.
18. Hologic® ImageChecker® 3D Calc CAD.
19. Skaane et al. Two-View Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Screening with Synthetically Reconstructed Projection Images: Comparison with Digital Breast Tomosynthesis with Full-Field Digital Mammographic Images. Radiology. January 2014, ePub ahead of print.