Evolution of library and information science, 1965-2005: Content analysis of journal articles

Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology

Volumn 65, Issue 7, 2014, Pages 1446-1462

  Tuomaala, Otto ^a   Järvelin, Kalervo ^a   Vakkari, Pertti ^a  

^a TAMPERE UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Finland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DIGITAL STORAGE; INFORMATION SERVICES; INFORMATION USE;

CONCEPTUAL RESEARCH; EMPIRICAL RESEARCH; INFORMATION ORGANIZATION; INFORMATION SEEKING; INFORMATION STORAGE AND RETRIEVAL; LIBRARY AND INFORMATION SCIENCE; RESEARCH STRATEGY; SCIENTIFIC COMMUNICATION;

STORAGE AS A SERVICE (STAAS);

EID: 84903976030     PISSN: 23301635     EISSN: 23301643     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/asi.23034     Document Type: Review

References (44)

1. Åström, F. (2002). Visualizing library and information science concept spaces through keyword and citation based maps and clusters. In Emerging Frameworks and Methods: Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Conceptions of Library and Information Science (CoLIS4) (pp. 185-197). Greenwood Village, CO: Libraries Unlimited.
2. Åström, F. (2006). The Social and Intellectual Development of Library and Information Science. Umeå, Sweden: Department of Sociology. Dissertation.
3. Åström, F. (2007). Changes in the LIS research front: Time-sliced cocitation analyses of LIS journal articles, 1990-2004. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 58 (7), 47-957.
4. Åström, F. (2010). The visibility of information science and library science research in the bibliometric mapping of the LIS field. Library Quarterly, 80 (2), 143-159.
5. Atkins, S.E. (1988). Subject trends in library and information science research, 1975-1984. Library Trends, 36 (4), 633-658.
6. Belkin, N.J. (1990). The cognitive viewpoint in information science. Journal of Information Science, 16 (1), 11-15.
7. Buttlar, L. (1991). Analyzing the library periodical literature: Content and authorship. College & Research Libraries, 52 (1), 38-53.
8. Cronin, B., & Meho, L.I. (2008). The shifting balance of intellectual trade in information studies. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 59 (4), 551-564. (Pubitemid 351310577)
9. Davarpanah, M.R., & Aslekia, S. (2008). A scientometric analysis of international LIS journals: Productivity and characteristics. Scientometrics, 77 (1), 21-39.
10. Dervin, B., & Nilan, M. (1986). Information needs and uses. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 21, 3-33.
11. Dogan, M., & Rokkan, S. (1969). Quantitative ecological analysis in the social sciences. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
12. Feehan, P.E., Gragg, W.L. II, Havener, W.M., & Kester, D.D. (1987). Library and information science research: An analysis of the 1984 journal literature. Library & Information Science Research, 9, 173-185.
13. Frohmann, B. (1992). The power of images: A discourse analysis of the cognitive viewpoint. Journal of Documentation, 48 (4), 365-386.
14. González-Alcaide, G., Castelló-Cogollos, L., Navarro-Molina, C., Aleixandre-Benavent, R., and Valderrama-Zurián, J.C. (2008). Library and information science research areas: Analysis of journal articles in LISA. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 59 (1), 150-154.
15. Hayes, A.F., & Krippendorff, K. (2007). Answering the call for a standard reliability measure for coding data. Communication Methods and Measures, 1, 77-89. Retrieved from http://www.unc.edu/courses/2007fall/jomc/801/ 001/HayesAndKrippendorff.pdf
16. Hider, P., & Pymm, B. (2008). Empirical research methods reported in high-profile LIS journal literature. Library & Information Science Research, 30, 108-114.
17. Hjørland, B. (2002). Epistemology and the socio-cognitive perspective in information science. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 53 (4), 257-270.
18. Hjørland, B. (2010). The foundation of the concept of relevance. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 61 (2), 217-237.
19. Huang, M.H., & Chang, Y.W. (2012). A comparative study of interdisciplinary changes between information science and library science. Scientometrics, 91 (3), 789-803.
20. Ingwersen, P. (1992). Information and information science in context. Libri, 42 (2), 99-135.
21. Järvelin, K., & Vakkari, P. (1990). Content analysis of research articles in library and information science. Library & Information Science Research, 12, 395-421.
22. Järvelin, K., & Vakkari, P. (1993). The evolution of library and information science 1965-85: A content analysis of journal articles. Information Processing & Management, 29 (1), 129-144.
23. Julien, H., Pecoskie, J., & Reed, K. (2011). Trends in information behavior research, 1999-2008: A content analysis. Library & Information Science Research, 33, 19-24.
24. Kim, S.-J., & Jeong, D.Y. (2006). An analysis of the development and use of theory in library and information science research articles. Library & Information Science Research, 28, 548-562. (Pubitemid 44873889)
25. Koufogiannakis, D., Slater, L., & Crumley, E. (2004). Acontent analysis of librarianship research. Journal of Information Science, 30 (3), 227-239.
26. Krippendorff, K. (2004). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology. Second Edition. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
27. Kumpulainen, S. (1991). Library and information science research 1975: Content analysis of journal articles. Libri, 41 (1), 59-76.
28. Larivière, V., Sugimoto, C.R., & Cronin, B. (2012). A bibliometric chronicling of library and information science's first hundred years. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 63 (5), 997-1016.
29. Milojević, S., Sugimoto, C.R., Yan, E., & Ding, Y. (2011). The cognitive structure of library and information science: Analysis of article title words. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 62 (10), 1933-1953.
30. Nolin, J. (2007). What's in a turn? Information Research, 12 (4). Retrieved from http://InformationR.net/ir/12-4/colis/colis11.html
31. Nolin, J., & Åström, F. (2010). Turning weakness into strength: Strategies for future LIS. Journal of Documentation, 66 (1), 7-27.
32. Nour, M.M. (1985). A quantitative analysis of the research articles published in core library journals of 1980. Library and Information Science Research, 7, 261-273.
33. Peritz, B.C. (1980). The methods of library science research: Some results from a bibliometric survey. Library Research, 2 (3), 251-268.
34. Pettigrew, K.E., & McKechnie, L. (2001). The use of theory in information science research. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 52 (1), 62-73. (Pubitemid 32133551)
35. Powell, R. (1985). Basic research methods for librarians. Norwood, NJ: Greenwood Publishing Group.
36. Rochester, M.K., & Vakkari, P. (2003). International library and information science research: A comparison of national trends. In IFLA Professional Reports, 82, 1-40.
37. Saracevic, T. (1999). Information science. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 50 (12), 1051-1063.
38. Sugimoto, C. (2011). Looking across communicative genres: A call for inclusive indicators of interdisciplinarity. Scientometrics, 86, 449-461.
39. Sugimoto, C.R., & McCain, K.W. (2010). Visualizing changes over time: A history of information retrieval through the lens of descriptor trioccurrence mapping. Journal of Information Science, 36 (4), 481-493.
40. Sugimoto, C.R., Li, D., Russell, T.G., Finlay, S.C., & Ding, Y. (2011). The shifting sands of disciplinary development: Analyzing North American library and information science dissertations using latent Dirichlet allocation. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 62 (1), 185-204.
41. Vakkari, P. (1994). Library and information science: Its content and scope. In I.P. Godden (Ed.). Advances in librarianship, Vol. 18 (pp. 1-55). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
42. White, H.D., & McCain, K.W. (1998). Visualizing a discipline: An author co-citaiton analysis of information science, 1972-1995. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 49, 327-355. (Pubitemid 128612354)
43. Wilson, T.D. (2000). Recent trends in user studies: Action research and qualitative methods. Information Research, 5 (3). Retrieved from http://informationr.net/ir/5-3/paper76.html
44. Zhao, D.Z., & Strotmann, A. (2008). Information science during the first decade of the web: An enriched author co-citation analysis. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 59 (6), 916-937.