Looking across communicative genres: A call for inclusive indicators of interdisciplinarity

Scientometrics

Volumn 86, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 449-461

  Sugimoto, Cassidy R ^a  

^a INDIANA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Citation analysis; Communicative genres; Disciplinarity; Interdisciplinarity; LC class

Indexed keywords

EID: 78650966098     PISSN: 01389130     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11192-010-0275-8     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Becher, T. (1989). Academic tribes and territories: Intellectual enquiry and the cultures of disciplines. Bury St. Edmunds: St. Edmundsbury Press.
2. Bordons, M., Zulueta, M. A., Romero, F., & Barrigón, S. (1999). Measuring interdisciplinary collaboration within a university: The effects of the multidisciplinary research programme. Scientometrics, 46(3), 383-398.
3. Boyack, K. W., Klavans, R., & Börner, K. (2005). Mapping the backbone of science. Scientometrics, 64(3), 351-374.
4. Braun, T., & Schubert, A. (2003). A quantitative view on the coming of age of interdisciplinarity in the sciences 1980-1999. Scientometrics, 58(1), 183-189.
5. Cronin, B. (2005). The hand of science: Academic writing and its rewards. Lanham, Maryland: Scarecrow Press, Inc.
6. de Bellis, N. (2009). Bibliometrics and citation analysis: From the Science Citation Index to cybermetrics. Lanham, Maryland: The Scarecrow Press, Inc.
7. Feller, I. (2006). Multiple actors, multiple settings, multiple criteria: Issues in assessing interdisciplinary research. Research Evaluation, 15(1), 5-15.
8. Gomez, I., Bordons, M., Fernandez, M. T., & Mendez, A. (1996). Coping with the problem of subject classification diversity. Scientometrics, 35(2), 223-235.
9. Hyland, K. (2004). Disciplinary discourses: Social interactions in academic writing. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
10. Klavans, R., & Boyack, K. W. (2006). Identifying a better measure of relatedness for mapping science. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 57(2), 251-263.
11. Klavans, R., & Boyack, K. W. (2009). Toward a consensus map of science. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 60(3), 455-476.
12. Knorr Cetina, K. (2007). Culture in global knowledge societies: Knowledge cultures and epistemic cultures. Interdisciplinary Science Reviews, 32(4), 361-375.
13. Kuhn, T. S. (1996). The structure of scientific revolutions (3rd ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
14. Larivière, V., Archambault, É., Gingras, Y., & Vignola-Gagné, É. (2006). The place of serials in referencing practices: Comparing natural sciences and engineering with social sciences and humanities. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 57(8), 997-1004.
15. Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
16. Levitt, J. M., & Thelwall, M. (2009). The most highly cited Library and Information Science articles: Interdisicplinarity, first authors and citation patterns. Scientometrics, 78(1), 45-67.
17. Leydesdorff, L. (2006). Mapping interdisciplinarity at the interfaces between the Science Citation Index and the Social Science Citation Index. Scientometrics, 71(3), 391-405.
18. Leydesdorff, L., & Rafols, I. (2009). A global map of science based on the ISI subject categories. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 60(2), 348-362.
19. Leydesdorff, L., & Schank, T. (2008). Dynamic animations of journal maps: Indicators of structural changes and interdisciplinary developments. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 59(11), 1810-1818.
20. McCain, K. W. (1998). Neural networks research in context: A longitudinal journal cocitation analysis of an emerging interdisciplinary field. Scientometrics, 41(3), 389-410.
21. Morillo, F., Bordons, M., & Gómez, I. (2003). Interdisciplinarity in science: A tentative typology of disciplines and research areas. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 54(13), 1237-1249.
22. Porter, A. L., Cohen, A. S., Roessner, J. D., & Perreault, M. (2007). Measuring research interdisciplinarity. Scientometrics, 72(1), 117-147.
23. Porter, A. L., & Rafols, I. (2009). Is science becoming more interdisciplinary? Measuring and mapping six research fields over time. Scientometrics, 81(3), 719-745.
24. Porter, A. L., Roessner, J. D., & Heberger, A. E. (2008). How interdisciplinary is a given body of research? Research Evaluation, 17(4), 273-282.
25. Price, D. J., de, S., & Beaver, D. (1966). Collaboration in an invisible college. American Pyschologist, 21(11), 1011-1018.
26. Rafols, I., & Leydesdorff, L. (2009). Content-based and algorithmic classifications of journals: Perspectives on the dynamics of scientific communication and indexer effects. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 60(9), 1823-1985.
27. Shibata, N., Kajikawa, Y., Takeda, Y., & Matsushima, K. (2009). Comparative study on methods of detecting research fronts using different types of citation. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 60(3), 571-580.
28. Skilton, P. F. (2006). A comparative study of communal practice: Assessing the effects of taken-for-granted-ness on citation practice in scientific communities. Scientometrics, 68(1), 73-96.
29. Sugimoto, C. R. (2010). Mentoring, collaboration, and interdisciplinarity: An evaluation of the scholarly development of Information and Library Science doctoral students. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill.
30. Turner, S. (2000). What are disciplines? And how is interdisciplinarity different? In P. Weingart & N. Stehr (Eds.), Practising interdisciplinarity (pp. 46-65). Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
31. Wallace, M. L., Gingras, Y., & Duhon, R. (2009). A new approach for detecting scientific specialties from raw cocitation networks. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 60(2), 240-246.