Designing novel cellulase systems through agentbased modeling and global sensitivity analysis

Bioengineered

Volumn 5, Issue 4, 2014, Pages 243-253

  Apte, Advait A ^a   Senger, Ryan S ^a   Fong, Stephen S ^b  

^a State University   (United States)

^b Virginia Commonwealth University   (United States)

Author keywords

Agent based modeling; Cellulose degradation strategies; Cellulose hydrolysis; Enzyme engineering; Global sensitivity analysis; Metabolic engineering

Indexed keywords

BETA GLUCOSIDASE; CELLOBIOSE; CELLULASE; CELLULOSE; GLUCAN SYNTHASE;

AGENT BASED MODELING; ARTICLE; BACTERIAL CELL; BIOPROCESS; CELL DENSITY; CHEMICAL COMPOSITION; CLOSTRIDIUM THERMOCELLUM; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONCENTRATION (PARAMETERS); CONTROLLED STUDY; CULTURE MEDIUM; ENZYME ACTIVITY; ENZYME ENGINEERING; ENZYME SUBSTRATE COMPLEX; ENZYME SYNTHESIS; GLUCOSE TRANSPORT; HYDROLYSIS; METABOLIC ENGINEERING; NONHUMAN; PROTEIN EXPRESSION; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; SIMULATION; ACIDOTHERMUS CELLULOLYTICUS; BIOENGINEERING; BIOFUEL PRODUCTION; CELLULOMONAS; CLOSTRIDIUM CELLULOLYTICUM; ESCHERICHIA COLI; FIBROBACTER SUCCINOGENES; RECOMBINANT DNA TECHNOLOGY; SITE DIRECTED MUTAGENESIS; THERMOBIFIDA FUSCA;

EID: 84903956930     PISSN: 19491018     EISSN: 19491026     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.4161/bioe.29160     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. McArthur GH 4th, Fong SS. Toward engineering synthetic microbial metabolism. J Biomed Biotechnol 2010; 2010:459760; PMID:20037734; http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2010/459760
2. Gowen CM, Fong SS. Exploring biodiversity for cellulosic biofuel production. Chem Biodivers 2010; 7:1086-97; PMID:20491068; http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cbdv.200900314
3. Bayer EA, Kenig R, Lamed R. Adherence of Clostridium thermocellum to cellulose. J Bacteriol 1983; 156:818-27; PMID:6630152
4. Bayer EA, Lamed R, Himmel ME. The potential of cellulases and cellulosomes for cellulosic waste management. Curr Opin Biotechnol 2007; 18:237-45; PMID:17462879; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.copbio.2007.04.004
5. Demain AL, Newcomb M, Wu JHD. Cellulase, clostridia, and ethanol. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 2005; 69:124-54; PMID:15755956; http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/MMBR.69.1.124-154.2005
6. Dien BS, Cotta MA, Jeffries TW. Bacteria engineered for fuel ethanol production: current status. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 2003; 63:258-66; PMID:13680206; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00253-003-1444-y
7. Lynd LR, Weimer PJ, van Zyl WH, Pretorius IS. Microbial cellulose utilization: fundamentals and biotechnology. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 2002; 66:506-77; PMID:12209002; http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/MMBR.66.3.506-577.2002
8. Shoham Y, Lamed R, Bayer EA. The cellulosome concept as an efficient microbial strategy for the degradation of insoluble polysaccharides. Trends Microbiol 1999; 7:275-81; PMID:10390637; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0966-842X(99)01533-4
9. Raghothama S, Eberhardt RY, Simpson P, Wigelsworth D, White P, Hazlewood GP, Nagy T, Gilbert HJ, Williamson MP. Characterization of a cellulosome dockerin domain from the anaerobic fungus Piromyces equi. Nat Struct Biol 2001; 8:775-8; PMID:11524680; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nsb0901-775
10. Berger E, Zhang D, Zverlov VV, Schwarz WH. Two noncellulosomal cellulases of Clostridium thermocellum, Cel9I and Cel48Y, hydrolyse crystalline cellulose synergistically. FEMS Microbiol Lett 2007; 268:194-201; PMID:17227469; http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-6968.2006.00583.x
11. Liu M, Gu J, Xie W, Yu H. Directed co-evolution of an endoglucanase and a β-glucosidase in Escherichia coli by a novel high-throughput screening method. [doi]. Chem Commun (Camb) 2013; 49:7219-21; PMID:23841109; http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/c3cc42485e
12. Yan P, Su L, Chen J, Wu J. Heterologous expression and biochemical characterization of an endo-β-1,4-glucanase from Thermobifida fusca. [doi]. Biotechnol Appl Biochem 2013; 60:348-55; PMID:23631559; http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/bab.1097
13. Toya Y, Hirasawa T, Morimoto T, Masuda K, Kageyama Y, Ozaki K, Ogasawara N, Shimizu H. (13) C-metabolic flux analysis in heterologous cellulase production by Bacillus subtilis genomereduced strain. J Biotechnol 2014; 179:42-9; PMID:24667539; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiotec.2014.03.025
14. Liu L, Liu C, Zou S, Yang H, Hong J, Ma Y, Zhang M. Expression of cellulase genes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae via Δ-integration subject to auxotrophic markers. Biotechnol Lett 2013; 35:1303-7; PMID:23609230; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10529-013-1205-7
15. Akbarzadeh A, Ranaei Siadat SO, Motallebi M, Zamani MR, Barshan Tashnizi M, Moshtaghi S. Characterization and high level expression of acidic endoglucanase in Pichia pastoris. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 2014; 172:2253-65; PMID:24347161; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12010-013-0672-6
16. Li JX, Zhao LM, Wu RJ, Zheng ZJ, Zhang RJ. Highlevel overproduction of Thermobifida enzyme in Streptomyces lividans using a novel expression vector. Int J Mol Sci 2013; 14:18629-39; PMID:24025422; http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms140918629
17. Demain AL, Adrio JL. Contributions of microorganisms to industrial biology. Mol Biotechnol 2008; 38:41-55; PMID:18060538; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12033-007-0035-z
18. Karmakar M, Ray RR. Current trends in research and application of microbial cellulases. Research Journal of Microbiology 2011; 6:41-53; http://dx.doi.org/10.3923/jm.2011.41.53
19. Chandel AK, Chandrasekhar G, Silva MB, da Silva SS. The realm of cellulases in biorefinery development. Crit Rev Biotechnol 2012; 32:187-202; PMID:21929293
20. Fischer CR, Klein-Marcuschamer D, Stephanopoulos G. Selection and optimization of microbial hosts for biofuels production. Metab Eng 2008; 10:295-304; PMID:18655844; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ymben.2008.06.009
21. Gowen CM, Fong SS. Applications of systems biology towards microbial fuel production. Trends Microbiol 2011; 19:516-24; PMID:21871807; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tim.2011.07.005
22. Jüergensen J, Ilmberger N, Streit WR. Screening for cellulases with industrial value and their use in biomass conversion microbial metabolic engineering. In: Cheng Q, ed.: Springer New York, 2012:1-16.
23. Kuhad RC, Gupta R, Singh A. Microbial cellulases and their industrial applications. Enzyme Res 2011; 2011:280696; PMID:21912738; http://dx.doi.org/10.4061/2011/280696
24. Stephanopoulos G. Challenges in engineering microbes for biofuels production. Science 2007; 315:801-4; PMID:17289987; http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1139612
25. Li DC, Li AN, Papageorgiou AC. Cellulases from thermophilic fungi: recent insights and biotechnological potential. Enzyme Res 2011; 2011:308730; PMID:22145076; http://dx.doi.org/10.4061/2011/308730
26. Santos VT, Esteves PJ, Milagres AM, Carvalho W. Characterization of commercial cellulases and their use in the saccharification of a sugarcane bagasse sample pretreated with dilute sulfuric acid. J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol 2011; 38:1089-98; PMID:20953894; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10295-010-0888-1
27. Percival Zhang YH, Himmel ME, Mielenz JR. Outlook for cellulase improvement: screening and selection strategies. Biotechnol Adv 2006; 24:452-81; PMID:16690241; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biotechadv.2006.03.003
28. Sørensen A, Teller PJ, Lübeck PS, Ahring BK. Onsite enzyme production during bioethanol production from biomass: screening for suitable fungal strains. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 2011; 164:1058-70; PMID:21360092; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12010-011-9194-2
29. Koch A, Weigel CTO, Schulz G. Cloning, sequencing, and heterologous expression of a cellulase-encoding cDNA (cbh1) from Penicillium janthinellum. Gene 1993; 124:57-65; PMID:8440481; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0378-1119(93)90761-Q
30. Mazzoli R, Lamberti C, Pessione E. Engineering new metabolic capabilities in bacteria: Lessons from recombinant cellulolytic strategies. Trends Biotechnol 2012; 30:111-9; PMID:21930321
31. Bonabeau E. Agent-based modeling: methods and techniques for simulating human systems. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2002; 99(Suppl 3):7280-7; PMID:12011407; http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.082080899
32. Scholl HJ. Agent-based and system dynamics modeling: A call for cross study and joint research. System Sciences, 2001 Proceedings of the 34th Annual Hawaii International Conference on 2001:8 pp.
33. Van Dyke Parunak H, Savit R, Riolo R. Agent-based modeling vs. equation-based modeling: A case study and users' guide multi-agent systems and agent-based simulation. In: Sichman J, Conte R, Gilbert N, eds.: Springer Berlin/Heidelberg, 1998:277-283.
34. Saltelli A, Chan K, Scott M. Sensitivity analysis. Wiley 2000.
35. Saltelli A, Ratto M, Andres T, Camplongo F, Cariboni J, Gatelli D, Saisana M, Tarantola S. Global sensitivity analysis: The primer. Wiley 2008.
36. Ogejo JA, Senger RS, Zhang RH. Global sensitivity analysis of a process-based model for ammonia emissions from manure storage and treatment structures. Atmos Environ 2010; 44:3621-9; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2010.06.053
37. Chen S, Wilson DB. Proteomic and transcriptomic analysis of extracellular proteins and mRNA levels in Thermobifida fusca grown on cellobiose and glucose. J Bacteriol 2007; 189:6260-5; PMID:17601791; http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/JB.00584-07
38. Dadi AP, Schall CA, Varanasi S. Mitigation of cellulose recalcitrance to enzymatic hydrolysis by ionic liquid pretreatment. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 2007; 137-140:407-21; PMID:18478405; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12010-007-9068-9
39. Martinez D, Berka RM, Henrissat B, Saloheimo M, Arvas M, Baker SE, Chapman J, Chertkov O, Coutinho PM, Cullen D, et al. Genome sequencing and analysis of the biomass-degrading fungus Trichoderma reesei (syn. Hypocrea jecorina). Nat Biotechnol 2008; 26:553-60; PMID:18454138; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nbt1403
40. Raman B, Pan C, Hurst GB, Rodriguez M Jr., McKeown CK, Lankford PK, Samatova NF, Mielenz JR. Impact of pretreated Switchgrass and biomass carbohydrates on Clostridium thermocellum ATCC 27405 cellulosome composition: a quantitative proteomic analysis. PLoS One 2009; 4:e5271; PMID:19384422; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0005271
41. Levine SE, Fox JM, Clark DS, Blanch HW. A mechanistic model for rational design of optimal cellulase mixtures. Biotechnol Bioeng 2011; 108:2561-70; PMID:21702033; http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/bit.23249
42. Liao H, Zhang XZ, Rollin JA, Zhang YH. A minimal set of bacterial cellulases for consolidated bioprocessing of lignocellulose. Biotechnol J 2011; 6:1409-18; PMID:21751395; http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/biot.201100157
43. Badieyan S, Bevan DR, Zhang C. Study and design of stability in GH5 cellulases. Biotechnol Bioeng 2012; 109:31-44; PMID:21809329; http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/bit.23280
44. Binner R, Menath V, Huber H, Thomm M, Bischof F, Schmack D, Reuter M. Comparative study of stability and half-life of enzymes and enzyme aggregates implemented in anaerobic biogas processes. Biomass Conversion and Biorefinery 2011; 1:1-8; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13399-010-0002-y
45. Lin H, Li W, Guo C, Qu S, Ren N. Advances in the study of directed evolution for cellulases. Front Environ Sci Eng China 2011; 5:519-25; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11783-011-0326-2
46. Lozano P, Bernal B, Bernal JM, Pucheault M, Vaultier M. Stabilizing immobilized cellulase by ionic liquids for saccharification of cellulose solutions in 1-butyl-3-methylimidazolium chloride. Green Chem 2011; 13:1406-10; http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/c1gc15294g
47. Myung S, Zhang XZ, Zhang YH. Ultra-stable phosphoglucose isomerase through immobilization of cellulose-binding module-tagged thermophilic enzyme on low-cost high-capacity cellulosic adsorbent. Biotechnol Prog 2011; 27:969-75; PMID:21630486; http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/btpr.606
48. Park JI, Kent MS, Datta S, Holmes BM, Huang Z, Simmons BA, Sale KL, Sapra R. Enzymatic hydrolysis of cellulose by the cellobiohydrolase domain of CelB from the hyperthermophilic bacterium Caldicellulosiruptor saccharolyticus. Bioresour Technol 2011; 102:5988-94; PMID:21421309; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2011.02.036
49. Wilensky U. Netlogo. 1999
50. Apte AA, Cain JW, Bonchev DG, Fong SS. Cellular automata simulation of topological effects on the dynamics of feed-forward motifs. J Biol Eng 2008; 2:2; PMID:18304325; http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1754-1611-2-211