Recombination locations and rates in beef cattle assessed from parent-offspring pairs

Genetics Selection Evolution

Volumn 46, Issue 1, 2014, Pages

  Weng, Zi Qing ^a   Saatchi, Mahdi ^a   Schnabel, Robert D ^b   Taylor, Jeremy F ^b   Garrick, Dorian J ^a  

^a IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BREEDING; CATTLE; CHROMOSOME; GENETIC VARIATION; GENOTYPE; MEAT; PARENT-OFFSPRING INTERACTION; RECOMBINATION; ERROR ANALYSIS; GENE EXPRESSION; GENETIC ENGINEERING; GENOME; HYBRID;

BOS; BOVINAE; MAMMALIA;

ANIMAL; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; BOVINAE; BREEDING; CHROMOSOME MAP; COMPUTER PROGRAM; DNA MICROARRAY; FEMALE; GENETIC ASSOCIATION; GENETIC RECOMBINATION; GENETICS; HAPLOTYPE; MALE; PHENOTYPE; QUANTITATIVE TRAIT LOCUS; REPRODUCIBILITY; SINGLE NUCLEOTIDE POLYMORPHISM; VETERINARY;

ANIMALS; BREEDING; CATTLE; CHROMOSOME MAPPING; FEMALE; GENETIC ASSOCIATION STUDIES; HAPLOTYPES; MALE; MODELS, GENETIC; OLIGONUCLEOTIDE ARRAY SEQUENCE ANALYSIS; PHENOTYPE; POLYMORPHISM, SINGLE NUCLEOTIDE; QUANTITATIVE TRAIT LOCI; RECOMBINATION, GENETIC; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SOFTWARE;

EID: 84903752531     PISSN: 0999193X     EISSN: 12979686     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1297-9686-46-34     Document Type: Article

References (63)

1. Human recombination hot spots hidden in regions of strong marker association. Jeffreys AJ, Neumann R, Panayi M, Myers S, Donnelly P, Nat Genet 2005 37 601 606 10.1038/ng1565 15880103 (Pubitemid 40770414)
2. A high-resolution recombination map of the human genome. Kong A, Gudbjartsson DF, Sainz J, Jonsdottir GM, Gudjonsson SA, Richardsson B, Sigurdardottir S, Barnard J, Hallbeck B, Masson G, Shlien A, Palsson ST, Frigge ML, Thorgeirsson TE, Gulcher JR, Stefansson K, Nat Genet 2002 31 241 247 12053178
3. Where the crossovers are: recombination distributions in mammals. Kauppi L, Jeffreys AJ, Keeney S, Nat Rev Genet 2004 5 413 424 10.1038/nrg1346 15153994 (Pubitemid 38915408)
4. Mammalian recombination hot spots: properties, control and evolution. Paigen K, Petkov P, Nat Rev Genet 2010 11 221 233 10.1038/nrg2712 20168297
5. Meiotic recombination hotspots in plants. Mézard C, Biochem Soc Trans 2006 34 531 534 16856852 (Pubitemid 44230755)
6. Comparative recombination rates in the rat, mouse, and human genomes. Jensen-Seaman MI, Furey TS, Payseur BA, Lu Y, Roskin KM, Chen CF, Thomas MA, Haussler D, Jacob HJ, Genome Res 2004 14 528 538 10.1101/gr.1970304 15059993 (Pubitemid 38500223)
7. GC-content evolution in mammalian genomes: the biased gene conversion hypothesis. Galtier N, Piganeau G, Mouchiroud D, Duret L, Genetics 2001 159 907 911 11693127 (Pubitemid 33035129)
8. Fine-scale population recombination rates, hotspots, and correlates of recombination in the Medicago truncatula genome. Paape T, Zhou P, Branca A, Briskine R, Young N, Tiffin P, Genome Biol Evol 2012 4 726 737 10.1093/gbe/evs046 22554552
9. Prdm9 controls activation of mammalian recombination hotspots. Parvanov ED, Petkov M, Paigen K, Science 2010 327 835 10.1126/science.1181495 20044538
10. Genetic variants in REC8, RNF212, and PRDM9 influence male recombination in cattle. Sandor C, Li W, Coppieters W, Druet T, Charlier C, Georges M, PLoS Genet 2012 8 1002854 10.1371/journal.pgen.1002854 22844258
11. Genetic analysis of variation in human meiotic recombination. Chowdhury R, Bois PRJ, Feingold E, Sherman SL, Cheung VG, PLoS Genet 2009 5 1000648 10.1371/journal.pgen.1000648 19763160
12. Sequence variants in the RNF212 gene associate with genome-wide recombination rate. Kong A, Thorleifsson G, Stefansson H, Masson G, Helgason A, Gudbjartsson DF, Jonsdottir GM, Gudjonsson SA, Sverrisson S, Thorlacius T, Jonasdottir A, Hardarson GA, Palsson ST, Frigge ML, Gulcher JR, Thorsteinsdottir U, Stefansson K, Science 2008 319 1398 1401 10.1126/science.1152422 18239089 (Pubitemid 351354876)
13. What will whole genome searches for susceptibility genes for common complex disease offer to clinical practice? Lango H, Weedon MN, J Intern Med 2008 263 16 27 18088250 (Pubitemid 350243557)
14. Weller JI, Quantitative Trait Loci Analysis in Animals Wallingford: CABI 2 2009
15. Estimation of pairwise identity by descent from dense genetic marker data in a population sample of haplotypes. Browning SR, Genetics 2008 178 2123 2132 10.1534/genetics.107.084624 18430938
16. Efficient multilocus association testing for whole genome association studies using localized haplotype clustering. Browning BL, Browning SR, Genet Epidemiol 2007 375 365 375 (Pubitemid 47050999)
17. A hidden markov model combining linkage and linkage disequilibrium information for haplotype reconstruction and quantitative trait locus fine mapping. Druet T, Georges M, Genetics 2010 184 789 798 10.1534/genetics.109. 108431 20008575
18. A fast and flexible statistical model for large-scale population genotype data: applications to inferring missing genotypes and haplotypic phase. Scheet P, Stephens M, Am J Hum Genet 2006 78 629 644 10.1086/502802 16532393
19. Rapid and accurate haplotype phasing and missing-data inference for whole-genome association studies by use of localized haplotype clustering. Browning SR, Browning BL, Am J Hum Genet 2007 81 1084 1097 10.1086/521987 17924348 (Pubitemid 47580259)
20. A combined strategy to infer high-density SNP haplotypes in large pedigrees. Habier D, Fernando RL, Garrick DJ, Proceeding of the 9th World Congress on Genetics Applied to Livestock Production: 1-6 August 2010; Leipzig 2010 df09 pdf15
21. Detection of sharing by descent, long-range phasing and haplotype imputation. Kong A, Masson G, Frigge ML, Gylfason A, Zusmanovich P, Thorleifsson G, Olason PI, Ingason A, Steinberg S, Rafnar T, Sulem P, Mouy M, Jonsson F, Thorsteinsdottir U, Gudbjartsson DF, Stefansson H, Stefansson K, Nat Genet 2008 40 1068 1075 10.1038/ng.216 19165921
22. Factors affecting the accuracy of genotype imputation in populations from several maize breeding programs. Hickey JM, Crossa J, Babu R, de los Campos G, Crop Sci 2012 52 654 663 10.2135/cropsci2011.07.0358
23. Marker imputation with low-density marker panels in Dutch Holstein cattle. Zhang Z, Druet T, J Dairy Sci 2010 93 5487 5494 10.3168/jds.2010-3501 20965364
24. Imputation of genotypes from different single nucleotide polymorphism panels in dairy cattle. Druet T, Schrooten C, de Roos APW, J Dairy Sci 2010 93 5443 5454 10.3168/jds.2010-3255 20965360
25. The impact of genotyping error on haplotype reconstruction and frequency estimation. Kirk KM, Cardon LR, Eur J Hum Genet 2002 10 616 622 10.1038/sj.ejhg.5200855 12357332 (Pubitemid 35277294)
26. Bos Taurus assembly. http://www.cbcb.umd.edu/production-assemblies
27. Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory. http://www.ars.usda.gov/
28. A tutorial on Hidden Markov models and selected applications in speech ecognition. Rabiner LR, Proc IEEE 1989 77 257 286 10.1109/5.18626
29. Ott J, Analysis of Human Genetic Linkage Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press 1991
30. Karlin S, Theoretical Aspects of Genetic Map Functions in Recombination Processes New York: Human Population Genetics: The Pitsburgh Symposium 1984 209 228
31. Gilmour AR, Gogel BJ, Cullis BR, Thompson R, ASReml User Guide Hemel Hempstead: VSN Int Ltd 2009
32. Whole genome analysis of infectious bovine keratoconjunctivitis in Angus cattle using Bayesian threshold models. Kizilkaya K, Tait RG, Garrick DJ, Fernando RL, Reecy JM, BMC Proc 2011 5 22
33. Extension of the bayesian alphabet for genomic selection. Habier D, Fernando RL, Kizilkaya K, Garrick DJ, BMC Bioinformatics 2011 12 186 10.1186/1471-2105-12-186 21605355
34. Bayesian Methods Applied to GWAS. Fernando RL, Garrick D, Genome-Wide Association Studies and Genomic Prediction Totowa, NJ: Humana Press, Gondro C, van der Werf J, Hayes B, 2013 Volume 1019 237 274 [Methods in Molecular Biology (Series editor)] 10.1007/978-1-62703-447-0-10
35. Deregressing estimated breeding values and weighting information for genomic regression analyses. Garrick DJ, Taylor JF, Fernando RL, Genet Sel Evol 2009 41 55 10.1186/1297-9686-41-55 20043827
36. Accuracy of direct genomic breeding values for nationally evaluated traits in US Limousin and Simmental beef cattle. Saatchi M, Schnabel RD, Rolf MM, Taylor JF, Garrick DJ, Genet Sel Evol 2012 44 38 10.1186/1297-9686-44-38 23216608
37. Prediction of total genetic value using genome-wide dense marker maps. Meuwissen TH, Hayes BJ, Goddard ME, Genetics 2001 157 1819 1829 11290733 (Pubitemid 32298846)
38. Genomic breeding value prediction and QTL mapping of QTLMAS2010 data using Bayesian methods. Sun X, Habier D, Fernando RL, Garrick DJ, Dekkers JCM, BMC Proc 2011 5 13
39. Genome-wide association analysis and genetic architecture of egg weight and egg uniformity in layer chickens. Wolc A, Arango J, Settar P, Fulton JE, O'Sullivan NP, Preisinger R, Habier D, Fernando R, Garrick DJ, Hill WG, Dekkers JCM, Anim Genet 2012 43 Suppl 1 87 96 22742506
40. Using the genomic relationship matrix to predict the accuracy of genomic selection. Goddard ME, Hayes BJ, Meuwissen THE, J Anim Breed Genet 2011 128 409 421 10.1111/j.1439-0388.2011.00964.x 22059574
41. Sequencing and genotyping for the whole genome selection in Canadian beef populations. Stachowicz K, Larmer S, Jamrozik J, Moore SS, Miller SP, Limited A, Zealand N, Innovation F, Science N, Proc Assoc Advmt Anim Breed Genet 2013 20 344 347
42. VCMap3.0. http://www.animalgenome.org/VCmap/manual/v3/
43. Online Mendelian Inheritance in Man. http://www.omim.org
44. Accuracies of genomic breeding values in American Angus beef cattle using K-means clustering for cross-validation. Saatchi M, McClure MC, McKay SD, Rolf MM, Kim J, Decker JE, Taxis TM, Chapple RH, Ramey HR, Northcutt SL, Bauck S, Woodward B, Dekkers JCM, Fernando RL, Schnabel RD, Garrick DJ, Taylor JF, Genet Sel Evol 2011 43 40 10.1186/1297-9686-43-40 22122853
45. R Core Team, R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing 2013
46. A high density linkage map of the bovine genome. Arias JA, Keehan M, Fisher P, Coppieters W, Spelman R, BMC Genet 2009 10 18 19393043
47. The combination of linkage values, and the calculation of distances between the loci of linked factors. Haldane JBS, J Genet 1919 VIII 299 309
48. The estimation of map distances from recombination values. Kosambi DD, Ann Eugen 1944 12 172 175
49. Variation in crossover interference levels on individual chromosomes from human males. Lian J, Yin Y, Oliver-Bonet M, Liehr T, Ko E, Turek P, Sun F, Martin RH, Hum Mol Genet 2008 17 2583 2594 10.1093/hmg/ddn158 18502786
50. Characterization of human crossover interference. Broman KW, Weber JL, Am J Hum Genet 2000 66 1911 1926 10.1086/302923 10801387 (Pubitemid 30480098)
51. Comprehensive human genetic maps: individual and sex-specific variation in recombination. Broman KW, Murray JC, Sheffield VC, White RL, Weber JL, Am J Hum Genet 1998 63 861 869 10.1086/302011 9718341 (Pubitemid 30422687)
52. Alberts B, Johnson A, Lewis J, Raff M, Roberts K, Walter P, Molecular Biology of the Cell New York: Garland Science 5 2008
53. An initiation site for meiotic crossing-over and gene conversion in the mouse. Guillon H, de Massy B, Nat Genet 2002 32 296 299 10.1038/ng990 12244318
54. Intense and highly localized gene conversion activity in human meiotic crossover hot spots. Jeffreys AJ, May CA, Nat Genet 2004 36 151 156 10.1038/ng1287 14704667 (Pubitemid 38174373)
55. Bovine Genome Sequence Assembly. https://www.hgsc.bcm.edu/other-mammals/ bovine-genome-project
56. Recombination rate and reproductive success in humans. Kong A, Barnard J, Gudbjartsson DF, Thorleifsson G, Jonsdottir G, Sigurdardottir S, Richardsson B, Jonsdottir J, Thorgeirsson T, Frigge ML, Lamb NE, Sherman S, Gulcher JR, Stefansson K, Nat Genet 2004 36 1203 1206 10.1038/ng1445 15467721 (Pubitemid 41288970)
57. Progress and challenges in genome-wide association studies in humans. Donnelly P, Nature 2008 456 728 731 10.1038/nature07631 19079049
58. Mapping genes for complex traits in domestic animals and their use in breeding programmes. Goddard ME, Hayes BJ, Nat Rev Genet 2009 10 381 391 10.1038/nrg2575 19448663
59. Statistical methods for mapping multiple QTL. Zou W, Zeng ZB, Int J Plant Genomics 2008 2008 286561 18551187
60. Accuracies of genomic predictions in US beef cattle. Saatchi M, Garrick DJ, Proc Assoc Adv Anim Breed Genet Conf 2013 20 207 210
61. Comparison of different imputation methods from low- to high-density panels using Chinese Holstein cattle. Weng Z, Zhang Z, Zhang Q, Fu W, He S, Ding X, Animal 2013 7 729 735 10.1017/S1751731112002224 23228675
62. Methods to impute missing genotypes for population data. Yu Z, Schaid DJ, Hum Genet 2007 122 495 504 10.1007/s00439-007-0427-y 17851696 (Pubitemid 350148961)
63. Accuracy of genomic selection using different methods to define haplotypes. Calus MPL, Meuwissen THE, de Roos APW, Veerkamp RF, Genetics 2008 178 553 561 10.1534/genetics.107.080838 18202394 (Pubitemid 351398768)