Returning genetic research results: Study type matters

Personalized Medicine

Volumn 10, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 27-34

  McGuire, Amy L ^a   Robinson, Jill Oliver ^a   Ramoni, Rachel B ^b   Morley, Debra S ^c   Joffe, Steven ^c,d   Plon, Sharon E ^a  

^a BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b Harvard Medical School Center for Biomedical Informatics   (United States)

^c DANA FARBER CANCER INSTITUTE   (United States)

^d BOSTON CHILDREN S HOSPITAL   (United States)

Author keywords

ethics; genome wide association; genomics; policy; return of results; whole genome sequencing

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; FAMILY ASSESSMENT; FEMALE; GENETIC ASSOCIATION; GENETIC LINKAGE; GENETICS; HUMAN; MALE; MEDICAL ETHICS; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SEMI STRUCTURED INTERVIEW; STUDY DESIGN;

EID: 84871462894     PISSN: 17410541     EISSN: 1744828X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2217/pme.12.109     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Caulfield T, McGuire AL, Cho M et al. Research ethics recommendations for whole-genome research: Consensus statement. Plos Biol. 6(3), e73 (2008
2. Clayton EW, Ross LF. Implications of disclosing individual results of clinical research. JAMA 295(1), 37 (2006
3. Ossorio P. Taking aims seriously: Repository research and limits on the duty to return individual research findings. Genet. Med. 14(4), 461-466 (2012
4. Shalowitz DI, Miller FG. Disclosing individual results of clinical research: Implications of respect for participants. JAMA 294(6), 737-740 (2005
5. Greely HT. The uneasy ethical and legal underpinnings of large-scale genomic biobanks. Annu. Rev. Genomics Hum. Genet. 8, 343-364 (2007
6. Knoppers BM, Joly Y, Simard J, Durocher F. The emergence of an ethical duty to disclose genetic research results: International perspectives. Eur. J. Hum. Genet. 14(11), 1170-1178 (2006
7. Bookman EB, Langehorne AA, Eckfeldt JH et al. Reporting genetic results in research studies: Summary and recommendations of an NHLBI working group. Am. J. Med. Genet. A. 140(10), 1033-1040 (2006
8. Fabsitz RR, McGuire A, Sharp RR et al. Ethical and practical guidelines for reporting genetic research results to study participants: Updated guidelines from a National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute working group. Circ. Cardiovasc. Genet. 3(6), 574-580 (2010
9. Beskow LM, Burke W. Offering individual genetic research results: Context matters. Sci. Transl. Med. 2(38), 38cm20 (2010
10. Giacomini MK, Cook DJ. Users' guides to the medical literature: XXIII. Qualitative research in health care B. What are the results and how do they help me care for my patients? Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group. JAMA 284(4), 478-482 (2000
11. Hsieh HF, Shannon SE. Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qual. Health Res. 15(9), 1277-1288 (2005
12. Clayton EW, McGuire AL. The legal risks of returning results of genomics research. Genet. Med. 14(4), 473-477 (2012
13. Green RC, Berg JS, Berry GT et al. Exploring concordance and discordance for return of incidental findings from clinical sequencing. Genet. Med. 14(4), 405-410 (2012
14. Kohane IS, Masys DR, Altman RB. The incidentalome: A threat to genomic medicine. JAMA 296(2), 212-215 (2006
15. Cassa CA, Savage SK, Taylor PL, Green RC, McGuire AL, Mandl KD. Disclosing pathogenic genetic variants to research participants: Quantifying an emerging ethical responsibility. Genome Res. 22(3), 421-428 (2012
16. Kohane IS, Mandl KD, Taylor PL, Holm IA, Nigrin DJ, Kunkel LM. Reestablishing the researcher-patient compact. Science 316(5826), 836-837 (2007
17. Bergler JH, Pennington AC, Metcalfe M, Freis ED. Informed consent: How much does the patient understand? Clin. Pharmacol. Ther. 27(4), 435-440 (1980
18. Joffe S, Cook EF, Cleary PD, Clark JW, Weeks JC. Quality of informed consent in cancer clinical trials: A cross-sectional survey. Lancet 358(9295), 1772-1777 (2001
19. McGuire AL, Beskow LM. Informed consent in genomics and genetic research. Annu. Rev. Genomics Hum. Genet. 11, 361-381 (2010
20. Ormond KE, Cirino AL, Helenowski IB, Chisholm RL, Wolf WA. Assessing the understanding of biobank participants. Am. J. Med. Genet. Part A 149A(2), 188-198 (2009
21. McCarty CA, Nair A, Austin DM, Giampietro PF. Informed consent and subject motivation to participate in a large, population-based genomics study: The Marshfield Clinic Personalized Medicine Research Project. Community Genet. 10(1), 2-9 (2007