Intentions to receive individual results from whole-genome sequencing among participants in the ClinSeq study

European Journal of Human Genetics

Volumn 21, Issue 3, 2013, Pages 261-265

  Facio, Flavia M ^a   Eidem, Haley ^a   Fisher, Tyler ^a   Brooks, Stephanie ^a   Linn, Amy ^a   Kaphingst, Kimberly A ^b   Biesecker, Leslie G ^a   Biesecker, Barbara B ^a  

^a NATIONAL HUMAN GENOME RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (United States)

^b WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

attitudes and intentions; individual results; whole genome sequencing

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; ATTITUDE; FEMALE; GENE SEQUENCE; HUMAN; INFORMATION DISSEMINATION; LIFESTYLE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PILOT STUDY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROPHYLAXIS; SOCIAL BEHAVIOR;

ATTITUDE; FEMALE; GENOME, HUMAN; HUMANS; INTENTION; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MOTIVATION; NATIONAL INSTITUTES OF HEALTH (U.S.); REGRESSION ANALYSIS; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS, DNA; UNITED STATES;

EID: 84874108148     PISSN: 10184813     EISSN: 14765438     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/ejhg.2012.179     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Singleton AB: Exome sequencing: a transformative technology. Lancet Neurol 2011; 10: 942-946.
2. Torkamani A, Scott-Van Zeeland AA, Topol EJ, Schork NJ: Annotating individual human genomes. Genomics 2011; 98: 233-241.
3. Wolf SM, Crock BN, Van Ness B et al: Managing incidental findings and research results in genomic research involving biobanks and archived data sets. Genet Med 2012; 14: 361-384.
4. Ferriere M, Van Ness B: Return of individual research results and incidental findings in the clinical trials cooperative group setting. Genet Med 2012; 14: 411-416.
5. Fullerton SM, Wolf WA, Brothers KB et al: Return of individual research results from genome-wide association studies: experience of the Electronic Medical Records and Genomics (eMERGE) Network. Genet Med 2012; 14: 424-431.
6. McGuire AL, Lupski JR: Personal genome research: what should the participant be told? Trends Genet 2010; 26: 199-201.
7. Dizikes P: Gene information opens new frontier in privacy debate. Boston Globe 2007. http://www.boston.com/news/globe/health-science/articles/2007/09/24/ gene-information-opens-new-frontier-in-privacy-debate/.
8. Levy S, Sutton G, Ng PC et al: The diploid genome sequence of an individual human. PLoS Biol 2007; 5: 2113-2144.
9. Biesecker LG, Mullikin JC, Facio FM et al: The ClinSeq Project: piloting large-scale genome sequencing for research in genomic medicine. Genome Res 2009; 19: 1665-1674.
10. Bookman EB, Langehorne AA, Eckfeldt JH et al: Reporting genetic results in research studies: Summary and recommendations of an NHLBI Working Group. Am J Med Genet 2006; 140A: 1033-1040.
11. Fabsitz RR, McGuire A, Sharp RR et al: Ethical and practical guidelines for reporting genetic research results to study participants: Updated guidelines from a national heart, lung, and blood institute working group. Circ Cardiovasc Genet 2010; 3: 574-580.
12. Wolf SM, Lawrenz FP, Nelson CA et al: Managing incidental findings in human subjects research: analysis and recommendations. J Law Med Ethics 2008; 36: 219-248.
13. Kohane IS, Taylor PL: Multidimensional results reporting to participants in genomic studies: Getting it right. Sci Transl Med 2010; 2: 37cm19.
14. Dressler LG: Disclosure of research results from cancer genomic studies: state of the science. Clin Cancer Res 2009; 15: 4270-4276.
15. Ravitsky V, Wilfond BS: Disclosing individual genetic results to research participants. Am J Bioethics 2006; 6: 8-17.
16. Kaufman D, Murphy J, Scott J, Hudson K: Subjects matter: a survey of public opinions about a large genetic cohort study. Genet Med 2008; 10: 831-839.
17. Bollinger JM, Scott J, Dvoskin R, Kaufman D: Public preferences regarding the return of individual genetic research results: findings from a qualitative focus group study. Genet Med 2012; 14: 451-457.
18. Facio FM, Brooks S, Loewenstein J, Green S, Biesecker LG, Biesecker BB: Motivators for participation in a whole-genome sequencing study: implications for translational genomics research. Eur J Hum Genet 2011; 19: 1213-1217.
19. Berg JS, Khoury MJ, Evans JP: Deploying whole genome sequencing in clinical practice and public health: meeting the challenge one bin at a time. Genet Med 2011; 13: 499-504.
20. Street Jr. RL, Elwyn G, Epstein RM: Patient preferences and healthcare outcomes: an ecological perspective. Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res 2012; 12: 167-180.
21. Xu B, Roos JL, Dexheimer P et al: Exome sequencing supports a de novo mutational paradigm for schizophrenia. Nat Genet 2011; 43: 864-868.
22. Ajzen I: Attitudes, Personality and Behaviour. Milton Keynes: Open university Press, 1991.
23. Dormandy E, Hankins M, Marteau T: Attitudes and uptake of a screening test: the moderating role of ambivalence. Psychol Health 2006; 21: 499-511.
24. Biesecker LG: Opportunities and challenges for the integration of massively parallel genomic sequencing into clinical practice: lessons from the ClinSeq project. Genet Med 2012; 14: 393-398.
25. Solomon BD, Hadley DW, Pineda-Alvarez DE et al: Incidental medical information in whole-exome sequencing. Pediatrics 2012; 129: e1605-e1611.
26. Montenegro G, Powell E, Huang J et al: Exome sequencing allows for rapid gene identification in a Charcot-Marie-Tooth family. Ann Neurol 2011; 69: 464-470.
27. Wade CH, Shiloh S, Woolford SW et al: Modelling decisions to undergo genetic testing for susceptibility to common health conditions: an ancillary study of the Multiplex Initiative. Psychol Health 2011; 27: 430-444.
28. McBride CM, Bowen D, Brody LC et al: Future health applications of genomics: priorities for communication, behavioral, and social sciences research. Am J Prev Med 2010; 38: 556-565.