Were the Victorians cleverer than us? The decline in general intelligence estimated from a meta-analysis of the slowing of simple reaction time

Intelligence

Volumn 41, Issue 6, 2013, Pages 843-850

  Woodley, Michael A ^a,b   te Nijenhuis, Jan ^c   Murphy, Raegan ^d  

^a UMEÅ UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

^b VRIJE UNIVERSITEIT BRUSSEL   (Belgium)

^c UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

^d UNIVERSITY COLLEGE CORK   (Ireland)

Author keywords

Dysgenic; Genetic g; IQ; Psychometric meta analysis; Simple reaction time

Indexed keywords

EID: 84903719122     PISSN: 01602896     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.intell.2013.04.006     Document Type: Article

References (64)

1. Alexopoulos, D. S. (1998). Factor structure of Heim's AH4. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 86, 643-646.
2. Anger, W. K., Cassitto, M. G., Liang, Y. -X., Amador, R., Hooisma, J., Chrislip, D.W., et al. (1993). Comparison of performance from three continents on the WHO-recommended Neurobehavioral Core Test Battery (NCTB). Environmental Research, 62, 125-147.
3. Arden, R., Gottfredson, L. S., & Miller, G. (2009). Does a fitness factor contribute to the association between intelligence and health outcomes? Evidence from medical abnormality counts among 3654 US Veterans. Intelligence, 37, 581-591.
4. Borenstein, M., Hedges, L. V., Higgins, J. P. T., & Rothstein, H. R. (2009). Introduction to meta-analysis. Chichester, UK: Wiley.
5. Brice, C. F., & Smith, A. P. (2002). Effects of caffeine on mood and performance: A study of realistic consumption. Psychopharmacology, 164, 188-192.
6. Cattell, R. B. (1950). The fate of national intelligence: Test of a thirteen-year prediction. The Eugenics Review, 42, 136-148.
7. Charlton, B. G. (2012). Taking on board that the Victorians were more intelligent than us. Bruce Charlton's miscellany (http://charltonteaching.blogspot.co.uk/2012/06/taking-on-board-that-victorians-were.html)
8. Clark, G. (2008). A farewell to alms: A brief economic history of the world. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
9. Deary, I. J., & Der, G. (2005a). Reaction time, age, and cognitive ability: Longitudinal findings from age 16 to 63 years in representative population samples. Aging, Neuropsychology and Cognition, 12, 187-213.
10. Deary, I. J., & Der, G. (2005). Reaction time explains IQ's association with death. Psychological Science, 16, 64-69.
11. Deary, I. J., Der, G., & Ford, G. (2001). Reaction times and intelligence differences: A population-based cohort study. Intelligence, 29, 389-399.
12. Der, G., & Deary, I. J. (2006). Age and sex differences in reaction time in adulthood: Results from the United Kingdom Health Lifestyle Survey. Psychology and Aging, 21, 62-73.
13. Flynn, J. R. (1987). Massive IQ gains in 14 nations: what IQ tests really measure. Psychological Bulletin, 101, 171-191.
14. Flynn, J. R. (2009). What is intelligence? Beyond the Flynn effect (expanded ed.). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
15. Forbes, G. (1945). The effect of certain variables on visual and auditory reaction times. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 35, 153-162.
16. Galton, F. (1869). Hereditary genius. London, UK: Macmillan Everyman's Library.
17. Galton, F. (1883). Inquiries into human faculty and its development. London, UK: Macmillan Everyman's Library.
18. Galton, F. (1889). An instrument for measuring reaction time. Report of the British Association for the Advancement of Science, 59, 784-785.
19. Heim, A.W. (1970). AH4 group test of general intelligencemanual. Windsor: NFER.
20. Holm, L., Ullén, F., & Madison, G. (2011). Intelligence and temporal accuracy of behaviour: Unique and shared associations with reaction time and motor timing. Experimental Brain Research, 214, 175-183.
21. Huebner, J. (2005). A possible declining trend for worldwide innovation. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 72, 980-986.
22. Hunter, J. E., & Schmidt, F. L. (1990). Methods of meta-analysis: Correcting error and bias in research findings. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
23. Hunter, J. E., & Schmidt, F. L. (2004). Methods of meta-analysis (2nd Ed.): Correcting error and bias in research findings. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
24. Jensen, A. R. (1980). Bias in mental testing. New York, NY: The Free Press.
25. Jensen, A. R. (1987). Process differences and individual differences in some cognitive tasks. Intelligence, 11, 107-136.
26. Jensen, A. R. (1998). The g factor: The science of mental ability. Westport, CT: Praeger.
27. Jensen, A. R. (2006). Clocking the mind: Mental chronometry and individual differences. Oxford, UK: Elsevier.
28. Jensen, A. R. (2011). The theory of intelligence and its measurement. Intelligence, 39, 171-177.
29. Johnson, W., Bouchard, T. J., Jr., Krueger, R. F., McGue, M., & Gottesman, I. I. (2004). Just one g: Consistent results from three test batteries. Intelligence, 32, 95-107.
30. Johnson, W., & Deary, I. (2011). Placing inspection time, reaction time, and perceptual speed in the broader context of cognitive ability: The VPR model in the Lothian Birth Cohort 1936. Intelligence, 39, 405-417.
31. Johnson, R. C., McClearn, G., Yuen, S., Nagosha, C. T., Abern, F. M., & Cole, R. E. (1985). Galton's data a century later. American Psychologist, 40, 875-892.
32. Jorm, A. F., Anstey, K. J., Christensen, H., & Rodgers, B. (2004). Gender differences in cognitive abilities: The mediating role of health state and health habits. Intelligence, 32, 7-23.
33. Ladd, G. T., & Woodworth, R. S. (1911). Physiological psychology. New York, NY: Scribner.
34. Lefcourt, H. M., & Siegel, J. M. (1970). Reaction time behaviour as a function of internal-external control of reinforcement and control of test administration. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Sciences, 2, 253-266.
35. Lentz, T. (1927). Relation of IQ to size of family. Journal of Educational Psychology, 18, 486-496.
36. Lezak, M. D. (1983). Neuropsychological assesment. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
37. Lynn, R. (2011). Dysgenics: Genetic deterioration in modern populations (revised ed.). London, UK: Ulster Institute for Social Research.
38. Lynn, R., & Vanhanen, T. (2012). Intelligence: A unifying construct for the social sciences. London, UK: Ulster Institute for Social Research.
39. Miller, E. M. (1994). Intelligence and brain myelination: A hypothesis. Personality and Individual Differences, 17, 803-832.
40. Miller, G. F. (2000). Mental traits as fitness indicators: Expanding evolutionary psychology's adaptationism. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 907, 62-74.
41. Murray, C. (2003). Human accomplishment: The pursuit of excellence in the arts and sciences, 800 BC to 1950. New York, NY: Harper Collins.
42. Neisser, U. (Ed.). (1997). The rising curve. Long-term gains in IQ and related measures. Washington DC: American Psychological Association.
43. Reed, T. E., Vernon, P. A., & Johnson, A.M. (2004). Sex difference in brain nerve conduction velocity in normal humans. Neuropsychologica, 42, 1709-1714.
44. Retherford, R. D., & Sewell, W. H. (1988). Intelligence and family size reconsidered. Social Biology, 35, 1-40.
45. Rijsdijk, F. V., Vernon, P. A., & Boomsma, D. I. (1998). The genetic basis of the relation between speed-of-information-processing and IQ. Behavioral Brain Research, 95, 77-84.
46. Rindermann, H., Sailer, M., & Thompson, J. (2009). The impact of smart fractions, cognitive ability of politicians and average competence of peoples on social development. Talent Development & Excellence, 1, 3-25.
47. Rushton, J. P. (1998). The "Jensen effect" and the "Spearman-Jensen hypothesis" of Black-White IQ differences. Intelligence, 26, 217-225.
48. Rushton, J. P., & Jensen, A. R. (2010). The rise and fall of the Flynn effect as a reason to expect the narrowing of the Black-White gap. Intelligence, 38, 213-219.
49. Schmidt, F. L., & Hunter, J. E. (1999). Theory testing and measurement error. Intelligence, 27, 183-198.
50. Seashore, R. H., Starmann, R., Kendall, W. E., & Helmick, J. S. (1941). Group factors in simple and discrimination reaction times. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 29, 346-394.
51. Silverman, I. W. (2010). Simple reaction time: It is not what it used to be. The American Journal of Psychology, 123, 39-50.
52. Skirbekk, V. (2008). Fertility trends by social status. Demographic Research, 18, 145-180.
53. Smith, A., Sturgess, W., Rich, N., Brice, C., Collison, C., Bailey, J., et al. (1999). The effects of idazoxan on reaction times, eye movements and the mood of healthy volunteers and patients with upper respiratory tract illness. Journal of Psychopharmacology, 13, 148-151.
54. Taimela, S. (1991). Factors affecting reaction-time testing and the interpretation of results. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 73, 1195-1202.
55. Taimela, S., Kujala, U. M., & Osterman, K. (1991). The relation of low grade mental ability to fractures in young men. International Orthopedics, 15, 75-77.
56. te Nijenhuis, J., Cho, S. H., Murphy, R., & Lee, K. H. (2012). The Flynn effect in Korea: Large gains. Personality and Individual Differences, 53, 147-151.
57. te Nijenhuis, J., Murphy, R., & van Eeden, R. (2011). The Flynn effect in South Africa. Intelligence, 39, 465-467.
58. te Nijenhuis, J., & van der Flier, H. (2013). Is the Flynn effect on g? Ameta-analysis. Intelligence, 41, 802-807 (this issue).
59. Thompson, H. B. (1903). The mental traits of sex. An experimental investigation of the normal mind in men and women. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
60. Thompson, S. G., & Sharp, S. J. (1999). Explaining heterogeneity inmeta-analysis: A comparison of methods. Statistics in Medicine, 18, 2693-2708.
61. van Court, M., & Bean, F. D. (1985). Intelligence and fertility in the United States: 1912-1982. Intelligence, 9, 23-32.
62. Woodley, M. A. (2012). The social and scientific temporal correlates of genotypic intelligence and the Flynn effect. Intelligence, 40, 189-204.
63. Woodley, M. A., & Figueredo, A. J. (2013). Historical variability in heritable general intelligence: Its evolutionary origins and socio-cultural consequences. Buckingham, UK: The University of Buckingham Press.
64. Woodley, M. A., & Meisenberg, G. (2013). A Jensen effect on dysgenic fertility: An analysis involving the National Longitudinal Survey of Youth. Personality and Individual Differences, 55, 279-282.