Big data analysis using modern statistical and machine learning methods in medicine

International Neurourology Journal

Volumn 18, Issue 2, 2014, Pages 50-57

  Yoo, Changwon ^a   Ramirez, Luis ^a   Liuzzi, Juan ^a  

^a FLORIDA INTERNATIONAL UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Bayesian analysis; Statistical data interpretation; Systems biology

Indexed keywords

BAYES THEOREM; BEHAVIORAL SCIENCE; BIOINFORMATICS; CLINICAL STUDY; DATA ANALYSIS; EPIGENETIC REPRESSION; EPIGENETICS; GENE EXPRESSION; GENOME; GENOMICS; GENOTYPE ENVIRONMENT INTERACTION; KNOWLEDGE; LINEAR REGRESSION ANALYSIS; LOGISTIC REGRESSION ANALYSIS; MACHINE LEARNING; MEDICINE; PROTEOMICS; REVIEW; SINGLE NUCLEOTIDE POLYMORPHISM; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS;

EID: 84903641893     PISSN: 20934777     EISSN: 20936931     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.5213/inj.2014.18.2.50     Document Type: Review

References (53)

1. de Vries EN, Prins HA, Crolla RM, den Outer AJ, van Andel G, van Helden SH, et al. Effect of a comprehensive surgical safety system on patient outcomes. N Engl J Med 2010;363:1928-37.
2. Reed M, Huang J, Brand R, Graetz I, Neugebauer R, Fireman B, et al. Implementation of an outpatient electronic health record and emergency department visits, hospitalizations, and office visits among patients with diabetes. JAMA 2013;310:1060-5.
3. Jaffe MG, Lee GA, Young JD, Sidney S, Go AS. Improved blood pressure control associated with a large-scale hypertension program. JAMA 2013;310:699-705.
4. Shnorhavorian M, Bittner R, Wright JL, Schwartz SM. Maternal risk factors for congenital urinary anomalies: results of a population- based case-control study. Urology 2011;78:1156-61.
5. Peterson DC, Martin-Gill C, Guyette FX, Tobias AZ, McCarthy CE, Harrington ST, et al. Outcomes of medical emergencies on commercial airline flights. N Engl J Med 2013;368:2075-83.
6. Yuasa T, Urakami S, Yamamoto S, Yonese J, Nakano K, Kodaira M, et al. Tumor size is a potential predictor of response to tyrosine kinase inhibitors in renal cell cancer. Urology 2011;77:831-5.
7. Schwender H, Ickstadt K. Identification of SNP interactions using logic regression. Biostatistics 2008;9:187-98.
8. Chen SH, Sun J, Dimitrov L, Turner AR, Adams TS, Meyers DA, et al. A support vector machine approach for detecting gene-gene interaction. Genet Epidemiol 2008;32:152-67.
9. He H, Oetting WS, Brott MJ, Basu S. Pair-wise multifactor dimensionality reduction method to detect gene-gene interactions in a case-control study. Hum Hered 2010;69:60-70.
10. Gui J, Andrew AS, Andrews P, Nelson HM, Kelsey KT, Karagas MR, et al. A robust multifactor dimensionality reduction method for detecting gene-gene interactions with application to the genetic analysis of bladder cancer susceptibility. Ann Hum Genet 2011;75:20-8.
11. Friedman N, Linial M, Nachman I, Pe'er D. Using Bayesian networks to analyze expression data. J Comput Biol 2000;7:601-20.
12. Yoo C, Cooper GF. An evaluation of a system that recommends microarray experiments to perform to discover gene-regulation pathways. Artif Intell Med 2004;31:169-82.
13. Lin Y, Lin S, Watson M, Trinkaus KM, Kuo S, Naughton MJ, et al. A gene expression signature that predicts the therapeutic response of the basal-like breast cancer to neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2010;123:691-9.
14. Pedraza V, Gomez-Capilla JA, Escaramis G, Gomez C, Torne P, Rivera JM, et al. Gene expression signatures in breast cancer distinguish phenotype characteristics, histologic subtypes, and tumor invasiveness. Cancer 2010;116:486-96.
15. Yoo C, Brilzb EM, Wilcox M, Pershousec MA, Putnam EA. Gene pathways discovery in asbestos-related diseases using local causal discovery algorithm. Commun Stat Simul Comput 2012;41:1840-59.
16. Stanton, JM. Galton, Pearson, and the Peas: a brief history of linear regression for statistics instructors. J Stat Educ 2001;9(3).
17. Yoo C. Discovering gene-gene and gene-environment causal interactions using Bioinformatics approaches. In: Roy D, Dorak MT, editors. Environmental factors, genes, and the development of human cancers. New York: Springer; 2010. p. 115-38.
18. Spellman PT, Sherlock G, Zhang MQ, Iyer VR, Anders K, Eisen MB, et al. Comprehensive identification of cell cycle-regulated genes of the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae by microarray hybridization. Mol Biol Cell 1998;9:3273-97.
19. Ideker T, Thorsson V, Ranish JA, Christmas R, Buhler J, Eng JK, et al. Integrated genomic and proteomic analyses of a systematically perturbed metabolic network. Science 2001;292:929-34.
20. Smith EN, Kruglyak L. Gene-environment interaction in yeast gene expression. PLoS Biol 2008;6:e83.
21. Michaels GS, Carr DB, Askenazi M, Fuhrman S, Wen X, Somogyi R. Cluster analysis and data visualization of large-scale gene expression data. Pac Symp Biocomput 1998:42-53.
22. Golub TR, Slonim DK, Tamayo P, Huard C, Gaasenbeek M, Mesirov JP, et al. Molecular classification of cancer: class discovery and class prediction by gene expression monitoring. Science 1999;286:531-7.
23. Herwig R, Poustka AJ, Muller C, Bull C, Lehrach H, O'Brien J. Large-scale clustering of cDNA-fingerprinting data. Genome Res 1999;9:1093-105.
24. Alizadeh AA, Eisen MB, Davis RE, Ma C, Lossos IS, Rosenwald A, et al. Distinct types of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma identified by gene expression profiling. Nature 2000;403:503-11.
25. Getz G, Levine E, Domany E. Coupled two-way clustering analysis of gene microarray data. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2000;97:12079-84.
26. Somogyi R, Sniegoski CA. Modeling the complexity of genetic networks:understanding multigenetic and pleiotropic regulation. Complexity 1996;1:45-63.
27. Goodwin BC. Oscillatory behavior in enzymatic control processes. Adv Enzyme Regul 1965;3:425-38.
28. Griffith JS. Mathematics of cellular control processes. I. Negative feedback to one gene. J Theor Biol 1968;20:202-8.
29. Griffith JS. Mathematics of cellular control processes. II. Positive feedback to one gene. J Theor Biol 1968;20:209-16.
30. Chen T, He HL, Church GM. Modeling gene expression with differential equations. Pac Symp Biocomput 1999:29-40.
31. Citro G, Banks G, Cooper G. INKBLOT: a neurological diagnostic decision support system integrating causal and anatomical knowledge. Artif Intell Med 1997;10:257-67.
32. Chevrolat JP, Golmard JL, Ammar S, Jouvent R, Boisvieux JF. Modelling behavioral syndromes using Bayesian networks. Artif Intell Med 1998;14:259-77.
33. Lucas PJ, de Bruijn NC, Schurink K, Hoepelman A. A probabilistic and decision-theoretic approach to the management of infectious disease at the ICU. Artif Intell Med 2000;19:251-79.
34. Cooper GF. Probabilistic inference using belief networks is NP-hard. Stanford, CA: Stanford University; 1987.
35. Pearl J. Probabilistic reasoning in intelligent systems: networks of plausible inference. San Mateo, CA: Morgan Kaufmann; 1988.
36. Murphy K, Mian S. Modelling gene expression data using dynamic bayesian networks. Technical report. Berkeley, CA: Computer Science Division, University of California; Life Sciences Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory; 1999.
37. D'haeseleer P, Wen X, Fuhrman S, Somogyi R. Linear modeling of mRNA expression levels during CNS development and injury. Pac Symp Biocomput 1999:41-52.
38. Weaver DC, Workman CT, Stormo GD. Modeling regulatory networks with weight matrices. Pac Symp Biocomput 1999:112-23.
39. McAdams HH, Shapiro L. Circuit simulation of genetic networks. Science 1995;269:650-6.
40. Yuh CH, Bolouri H, Davidson EH. Genomic cis-regulatory logic: experimental and computational analysis of a sea urchin gene. Science 1998;279:1896-902.
41. Matsuno H, Doi A, Nagasaki M, Miyano S. Hybrid Petri net representation of gene regulatory network. Pac Symp Biocomput 2000:341-52.
42. Goss PJ, Peccoud J. Analysis of the stabilizing effect of Rom on the genetic network controlling ColE1 plasmid replication. Pac Symp Biocomput 1999:65-76.
43. Quaglini S, Stefanelli M, Lanzola G, Caporusso V, Panzarasa S. Flexible guideline-based patient careflow systems. Artif Intell Med 2001;22:65-80.
44. Boucher A, Doisy A, Ronot X, Garbay C. A society of goal-oriented agents for the analysis of living cells. Artif Intell Med 1998;14:183-99.
45. Koza JR, Mydlowec W, Lanza G, Yu J, Keane MA. Reverse engineering of metabolic pathways from observed data using genetic programming. Pac Symp Biocomput 2001:434-45.
46. Tomita M, Hashimoto K, Takahashi K, Shimizu T, Matsuzaki Y, Miyoshi F, et al. E-CELL: Software Environment for Whole Cell Simulation. Genome Inform Ser Workshop Genome Inform 1997;8:147-155.
47. Heidema AG, Boer JM, Nagelkerke N, Mariman EC, van der A DL, Feskens EJ. The challenge for genetic epidemiologists: how to analyze large numbers of SNPs in relation to complex diseases. BMC Genet 2006;7:23.
48. Goodman SN. Probability at the bedside: the knowing of chances or the chances of knowing? Ann Intern Med 1999;130:604-6.
49. Bird A. Perceptions of epigenetics. Nature 2007;447:396-8.
50. Fu AQ, Genereux DP, Stoger R, Laird CD, Stephens M. Statistical inference of transmission fidelity of DNA methylation patterns over somatic cell divisions in mammals. Ann Appl Stat 2010;4:871-92.
51. Jaffe AE, Feinberg AP, Irizarry RA, Leek JT. Significance analysis and statistical dissection of variably methylated regions. Biostatistics 2012;13:166-78.
52. Wu G, Yi N, Absher D, Zhi D. Statistical quantification of methylation levels by next-generation sequencing. PLoS One 2011; 6:e21034.
53. Kraft P, Hunter DJ. The challenge of assessing complex gene-environment and gene-gene interactions. In: Khoury MJ, Bedrosian SR, Gwinn M. Human genome epidemiology: building the evidence for using genetic information to improve health and prevent disease. 2nd ed. New York: Oxford University Press; 2010. p. 165-87.