Rank inclusion in criteria hierarchies

European Journal of Operational Research

Volumn 163, Issue 2, 2005, Pages 338-356

  Salo, Ahti ^a   Punkka, Antti ^a  

^a AALTO UNIVERSITY   (Finland)

Author keywords

Decision analysis; Hierarchical weighting models; Incomplete preference information; Multiple criteria analysis

Indexed keywords

COMPUTATIONAL METHODS; DECISION THEORY; INFORMATION RETRIEVAL; INTERNET; LINEAR PROGRAMMING; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; SET THEORY; THEOREM PROVING;

HIERARCHICAL WEIGHTING MODELS; INCOMPLETE PREFERENCE INFORMATION; MULTIPLE CRITERIA ANALYSIS;

HIERARCHICAL SYSTEMS;

EID: 10044224665     PISSN: 03772217     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejor.2003.10.014     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Arbel, A., 1989. Approximate articulation of preference and priority derivation. European Journal of Operational Research 43, 317-326.
2. Carrizosa, E., Conde, E., Fernández, F.R., Puerto, J., 1995. Multi-criteria analysis with partial information about the weighting coefficients. European Journal of Operational Research 81, 291-301.
3. Cook, W.D., Kress, M., 1990. A data envelopment model for aggregating preference rankings. Management Science 36, 1302-1310.
4. Cook, W.D., Kress, M., 1991. A multiple criteria decision model with ordinal preference data. European Journal of Operational Research 54, 191-198.
5. Corner, J.L., Kirkwood, C.W., 1991. Decision analysis applications in the operations research literature, 1970-1989. Operations Research 39 (2), 206-219.
6. Gustafsson, J., Salo, A., Gustafsson, T., 2001. PRIME decisions: An interactive tool for value tree analysis. In: Köksalan, M., Zionts, S. (Eds.), Multiple Criteria Decision Making in the New Millenium. In: Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems, vol. 507. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, pp. 165-176.
7. Hazen, G.B., 1986. Partial information, dominance, and potential optimality in multiattribute utility theory. Operations Research 34, 296-310.
8. Hämäläinen, R.P., 2004. Reversing the perspective on the applications of decision analysis. Decision Analysis 1.
9. Hämäläinen, R.P., Pöhönen, M., 1996. On-line group decision support by preference programming in traffic planning. Group Decision and Negotiation 5, 485-500.
10. Hämäläinen, R.P., Salo, A., Pöysti, K., 1992. Observations about consensus seeking in a multiple criteria environment. In: Proceedings of the 25th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, vol. 4, pp. 190-198.
11. Keefer, D.L., Kirkwood, C.W., Corner, J.L., 2004. Perspective on decision analysis applications, 1990-2001. Decision Analysis 1.
12. Keeney, R.L., Raiffa, H., 1976. Decisions with Multiple Objectives: Preferences and Value Trade-offs. John Wiley, New York.
13. Kim, S.H., Han, C.H., 2000. Establishing dominance between alternatives with incomplete information in a hierarchically structured attribute tree. European Journal of Operational Research 122, 79-90.
14. Kirkwood, C.W., Sarin, R.K., 1985. Ranking with partial information: A method and an application. Operations Research 33, 38-48.
15. Liesiö, J., 2002. RICH Decisions - A Decision Support Software. Systems Analysis Laboratory, Helsinki University of Technology (Located at http://www.sal.tkk.fi/Opinnot/Mat-2.108/pdf-files/elie02.pdf).
16. Lindstedt, M., Hämäläinen, R.P., Mustajoki, J., 2001. Using intervals for global sensitivity analyses in multiattribute value trees. In: Köksalan, M., Zionts, S. (Eds.), Multiple Criteria Decision Making in the New Millenium. In: Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems, vol. 507. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, pp. 177-186.
17. Mármol, A.M., Puerto, J., Fernández, F.R., 1998. The use of partial information on weights in multicriteria decision problems. Journal of Multi-criteria Decision Analysis 7, 322-329.
18. Mustajoki, J., Hämäläinen, R.P., 2000. Web-HIPRE: Global decision support by value tree and AHP analysis. Information Systems and Operational Research 38, 208-220.
19. Park, K.S., Kim, S.H., 1997. Tools for interactive decision making with incompletely identified information. European Journal of Operational Research 98, 111-123.
20. Puerto, J., Mármol, A.M., Monroy, L., Fernández, F.R., 2000. Decision criteria with partial information. International Transactions in Operational Research 7, 51-65.
21. Saaty, T.L., 1980. The Analytic Hierarchy Process. McGraw-Hill, New York.
22. Salo, A., 1995. Interactive decision aiding for group decision support. European Journal of Operational Research 84, 134-149.
23. Salo, A., Hämäläinen, R.P., 1992. Preference assessment by imprecise ratio statements. Operations Research 40, 1053-1061.
24. Salo, A., Hämäläinen, R.P., 1995. Preference programming through approximate ratio comparisons. European Journal of Operational Research 82, 458-475.
25. Salo, A., Hämäläinen, R.P., 2001. Preference ratios in multiattribute evaluation (PRIME)-elicitation and decision procedures under incomplete information. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics 31, 533-545.
26. Taha, H.A., 1997. Operations Research: An Introduction, sixth ed. Prentice-Hall.
27. Weber, M., 1987. Decision making with incomplete information. European Journal of Operational Research 28, 44-57.