Searching for joint gains in multi-party negotiations

European Journal of Operational Research

Volumn 130, Issue 1, 2001, Pages 54-69

  Ehtamo, Harri ^a   Kettunen, Eero ^a   Hämäläinen, Raimo P ^a  

^a AALTO UNIVERSITY   (Finland)

Author keywords

Coordination; Group decision; Multi party; Multicriteria analysis; Negotiation support

Indexed keywords

EID: 0002274051     PISSN: 03772217     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0377-2217(00)00019-9     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Bazaraa, M.S., Sherali H.D., Shetty, C.M., 1993. Nonlinear Programming: Theory and Algorithms. Wiley, New York.
2. Brams, S.J., 1990. Negotiation Games: Applying Game Theory to Bargaining and Arbitration Procedures. Routledge, New York.
3. Brams, S.J., Taylor, A.D., 1996. Fair Division. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
4. Brams, S.J., Togman, J.M., 1997. Camp David: Was the agreement fair? In: Harvey, F.P., Mor, B.D. (Eds.), New Directions in the Study of Conflict, Crisis and War, Macmillan Press, London.
5. Denoon, D.B.H., Brams, S.J., 1997. Fair division: A new approach to the Spratly Islands controversy. International Negotiation 2 (2).
6. Ehtamo, H., Hämäläinen, R.P., Heiskanen, P., Teich, J., Verkama, M., Zionts, S., 1999a. Generating Pareto solutions in a two-party setting: Constraint proposal methods. Management Science 45 (12), to appear.
7. Ehtamo, H., Verkama, M., Hämäläinen, R.P., 1992. On contracting under incomplete information using linear proposals. In: Preprints of the Fifth International Symposium on Dynamic Games and Applications. Grimentz, Switzerland, pp. 128-133.
8. Ehtamo, H., Verkama, M., Hämäläinen, R.P., 1996. On distributed computation of Pareto solutions for two decision makers. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics - Part A: Systems and Humans 26, 498-503.
9. Ehtamo, H., Verkama, M., Hämäläinen, R.P., 1999b. How to select fair improving directions in a negotiation model over continuous issues. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics - Part C: Applications and Reviews 29, 26-33.
10. Fang, L., Hipel, K.W., Kilgour, D.M., 1993. Interactive Decision Making: The Graph Model for Conflict Resolution. Wiley, New York.
11. Fiacco, A.V., 1983. Introduction to Sensitivity and Stability Analysis in Nonlinear Programming. Academic Press, New York.
12. Fisher, R., 1978. International Negotiation: A Working Guide. International Peace Academy, New York.
13. Fisher, R., Ury, W., 1987. Getting to Yes. Arrow, London.
14. Haake, C-J., Raith, M.G., Su, F.E., 1999. Bidding for Envy-freeness: A procedural approach to N-player fair-division problems. Working Paper, Institute of Mathematical Economics, University of Bielefeld, Germany.
15. Hämäläinen, R.P., Kettunen, E., Marttunen, M., Ehtamo, H., 1999. Evaluating a framework for multi-stakeholder decision support in water resources management. Manuscript, Systems Analysis Laboratory, Helsinki University of Technology, Finland. (Downloadable at http://www.sal.hut.fi/ Publications/mhamb.pdf.) An earlier version: Towards decision and negotiation support in multi-stakeholder development of lake regulation policy. In: Proceedings of the 32nd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 1999 (http://dlib.computer.org/conferen/hicss/(0001)/pdf/ (00011065).pdf).
16. Hämäläinen, R.P., Kettunen, E., Marttunen, M., Ehtamo, H., 1999. Evaluating a framework for multi-stakeholder decision support in water resources management. Manuscript, Systems Analysis Laboratory, Helsinki University of Technology, Finland. (Downloadable at http://www.sal.hut.fi/ Publications/mhamb.pdf.) An earlier version: Towards decision and negotiation support in multi-stakeholder development of lake regulation policy. In: Proceedings of the 32nd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 1999 (http://dlib.computer.org/conferen/hicss/(0001)/pdf/ (00011065).pdf).
17. Hämäläinen, R.P., Mustajoki, J., 1998. Web-HIPRE - Javaapplet for value tree and AHP analysis. Computer software, Systems Analysis Laboratory, Helsinki University of Technology, Finland (http://www.hipre.hut.fi).
18. Kalai, E., Smorodinsky, M., 1975. Other solutions to Nash's bargaining problem. Econometrica 43, 513-518.
19. Kersten, G.E., Noronha, S.J., 1998. Rational agents, contract curves, and inefficient compromises. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics - Part A: Systems and Humans 28, 326-338.
20. Kettunen, E., Hämäläinen, R.P., 1999. Joint Gains - Negotiation support in the internet. Computer software, Systems Analysis Laboratory, Helsinki University of Technology, Finland (http://www.jointgains.hut.fi).
21. Levhari, D., Mirman, L.J., 1980. The great fish war: An example using a dynamic Cournot-Nash solution. Bell Journal of Economics 11, 322-334.
22. Lewicki, R., Litterer, J., 1985. Negotiation. Richard D. Irwin, Homewood, IL.
23. Mumpower, J.L., 1991. The judgment policies of negotiators and the structure of negotiation problems. Management Science 37, 1304-1324.
24. Nash, J.F., 1950. The bargaining problem. Econometrica 18, 155-162.
25. Pruitt, D., 1981. Negotiation Behavior. Academic Press, New York.
26. Raiffa, H., 1982. The Art and Science of Negotiation. Belknap/ Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
27. Raith, M.G., Welzel, A., 1998. Adjusted winner: An algorithm for implementing bargaining solutions in multi-issue negotiations. Working Paper, Institute of Mathematical Economics, University of Bielefeld, Germany.
28. Rao, G.A., Shakun, M.F., 1974. A normative model for negotiations. Management Science 20, 1364-1375.
29. Teich, J.E., Wallenius, H., Kuula, M., Zionts, S., 1995. A decision support approach for negotiation with an application to agricultural income policy negotiations. European Journal of Operational Research 81, 76-87.
30. Teich, J.E., Wallenius, H., Wallenius, J., Zionts, S., 1996. Identifying Pareto-optimal settlements for two-party resource allocation negotiations. European Journal of Operational Research 93, 536-549.
31. Tversky, A., Sattah, S., Slovic, P., 1988. Contingent weighting in judgment and choice. Psychological Review 95, 371-384.
32. Verkama, M., Ehtamo, H., Hämäläinen, R.P., 1996. Distributed computation of Pareto solutions in n-player games. Mathematical Programming 74, 29-45.
33. Yu, P.-L., 1985. Multiple Criteria Decision Making. Plenum Press, New York.