Effective use of e-grading in the dental simulation clinic

Journal of Dental Education

Volumn 78, Issue 6, 2014, Pages 829-837

  Morrow, Jay A ^a   Teresa Pulido, M ^a   Bradford Smith, P ^a   McDaniel, Thomas F ^a   Willcox, Austin B ^a  

^a MIDWESTERN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Assessment; Calibration; Dental education; Electronic evaluation; Emerging technology; Grading; Practical examination

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; ASSESSMENT; CALIBRATION; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPUTER PROGRAM; DENTAL EDUCATION; EDUCATION; EDUCATIONAL TECHNOLOGY; ELECTRONIC EVALUATION; EMERGING TECHNOLOGY; FEEDBACK SYSTEM; FEMALE; GRADING; HEALTH PERSONNEL ATTITUDE; HUMAN; HUMAN RELATION; INTERNET; LEARNING; MALE; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; MOBILE APPLICATION; MOTOR PERFORMANCE; PHYSIOLOGY; PRACTICAL EXAMINATION; SELF EVALUATION; TEACHING; THINKING; YOUNG ADULT;

ASSESSMENT; CALIBRATION; DENTAL EDUCATION; ELECTRONIC EVALUATION; EMERGING TECHNOLOGY; GRADING; PRACTICAL EXAMINATION;

ADULT; AGED; ATTITUDE OF HEALTH PERSONNEL; COMPUTER-ASSISTED INSTRUCTION; EDUCATIONAL MEASUREMENT; EDUCATIONAL TECHNOLOGY; FEEDBACK; FEMALE; HUMANS; INTERNET; INTERPERSONAL RELATIONS; LEARNING; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MOBILE APPLICATIONS; MOTOR SKILLS; SELF-ASSESSMENT; SELF-EVALUATION PROGRAMS; SOFTWARE; TEACHING; THINKING; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84903449803     PISSN: 00220337     EISSN: 19307837     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Krupat E, Dienstag JL. Assessment is an educational tool. Acad Med 2009;84:548-50.
2. Renne WG, McGill ST, Mennito AS, et al. E4D compare software: an alternative to faculty grading in dental education. J Dent Educ 2013;77(2):168-75.
3. Hauser AM, Bowen DM. Primer on preclinical instruction and evaluation. J Dent Educ 2009;73(3):390-8.
4. Edwards WS, Morse PK, Mitchell RJ. A practical evaluation system for preclinical restorative dentistry. J Dent Educ 1982;46(12):693-6.
5. Curtis DA, Lind SL, Dellinges M, et al. Dental students self-assessment of preclinical examinations. J Dent Educ 2008;72(3):265-77.
6. Cho GC, Chee WWL, Tan DT. Dental students ability to evaluate themselves in fixed prosthodontics. J Dent Educ 2010;74(11):1237-42.
7. Cohen SN, Silvestri AR. Evaluation of describing and grading preclinical technical exercises. J Dent Educ 1980;44(9):547-9.
8. Arevalo CR, Bayne SC, Beeley JA, et al. Framework for e-learning assessment in dental education: a global model for the future. J Dent Educ 2013;77(5):564-75.
9. McCann AL, Schneiderman ED, Hinton RJ. E-teaching and learning preferences of dental and dental hygiene students. J Dent Educ 2010;74(1):65-78.
10. Looney RP, Ramsey EC. Multimedia bootcamp: encouraging faculty to integrate technology in teaching. Med Ref Serv Q 2006;25(3):87-92.
11. Sweeney R. Millennial behaviors and demographics, 2006. At: http://library1.njit.edu/staff-folders/sweeney/Millennials/Article-Millennial- Behaviors.doc. Accessed: June 3, 2013.
12. Salaway G, Caruso JB. The ECAR study of undergraduate students and information technology, 2007: key findings. At: www.educause.edu/library/ EKF0706. Accessed: May 30, 2013.
13. Friedman CP. The research we should be doing. Acad Med 1994;69(6):455-7.
14. Joint Information Systems Committee. Effective assessment in a digital age: a guide to technology-enhanced assessment and feedback, 2011. At: www.jisc.ac.uk/media/documents/programmes/elearning/digiassass-eada.pdf. Accessed: June 3, 2013.
15. Wrzosek M, Warner G, Donoff RB, et al. A survey of information technology management at U.S. dental schools. J Dent Educ 2003;67(10):1095-106.
16. Dhuru VB, Rypel TS, Johnston WM. Criterion-oriented grading system for preclinical operative dentistry laboratory course. J Dent Educ 1978;42(9):528-31.
17. Cox MJ, Schleyer T, Johnson LA, et al. Making a mark: taking assessment to technology. Br Dent J 2008;205:33-9.