E-teaching and learning preferences of dental and dental hygiene students

Journal of Dental Education

Volumn 74, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 65-78

  McCann, Ann L ^a   Schneiderman, Emet D ^a   Hinton, Robert J ^a  

^a BAYLOR COLLEGE OF DENTISTRY   (United States)

Author keywords

Dental education; Distance education; Educational assessment; Evidence based dentistry; Faculty development; Needs assessment; Outcomes assessment; Technology assessment; Web based learning

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; ATTITUDE TO COMPUTERS; BOOK; CONSUMER; DENTAL ASSISTANT; DENTAL EDUCATION; DENTAL STUDENT; EDUCATION; EVIDENCE BASED DENTISTRY; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HUMAN; INFORMATION SERVICE; INTERNET; METHODOLOGY; MULTIMEDIA; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; TEACHING; UNITED STATES;

ADULT; ATTITUDE TO COMPUTERS; COMPUTER-ASSISTED INSTRUCTION; CONSUMER SATISFACTION; DENTAL HYGIENISTS; EDUCATION, DENTAL; EVIDENCE-BASED DENTISTRY; HUMANS; INFORMATION SEEKING BEHAVIOR; INTERNET; MULTIMEDIA; PROGRAM EVALUATION; STUDENTS, DENTAL; TEXAS; TEXTBOOKS AS TOPIC; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 74349122323     PISSN: 00220337     EISSN: 19307837     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Ruiz JG, Mintzer MJ, Leipzig M. The impact of e-learning in medical education. Acad Med 2006;81(3):207-12.
2. Chumley-Jones HS, Dobbie A, Alford CL. Web-based learning: sound educational method or hype? A review of the evaluation literature. Acad Med 2002;77(10 Suppl): S86-S93.
3. Potomkova J, Mihal V, Cihalik C. Web-based instruction and its impact on the learning activity of medical students: a review. Biomed Pap Med Palacky Olomouc Czech Re- pub 2006;150(2):357-61.
4. Divaris K, Barlow PJ, Chendea SA, Cheong WS, Dounis A, Dragan IF, et al. The academic environment: the students' perspective. Eur J Dent Educ 2008;12(Suppl 1): 120-30.
5. Haden NK, Andrieu SC, Chadwick DG, Chmar JE, Cole JR, George MC, et al. The dental education environment. J Dent Educ 2006;70(12):1265-70.
6. Albino JEN,Young SK, Neumann LM, Kramer GA, Andrieu SC, Henson L, et al. Assessing dental students' competence: best practice recommendations in the performance assessment literature and investigation of current practices in predoctoral dental education. J Dent Educ 2008;72(12): 1405-35.
7. Schilling K, Wiecha J, Polineni D, Khalil S. An interactive web-based curriculum on evidence-based medicine: design and effectiveness. Fam Med 2006;38(2):126-32.
8. Wiecha J, Barrie N. Collaborative online learning: a new approach to distance CME. Acad Med 2002;77(9): 928-9.
9. Wiecha J, Gramling R, Joachim P, Vanderschmidt H. Collaborative e-learning using streaming video and asynchronous discussions boards to teach the cognitive foundation of medical interviewing: a case study. J Med Internet Research 2003;5(2):1-8.
10. Solomon DJ, Ferenchick GS, Laiard-Flick HS, Kavanaugh K. A randomized trial comparing digital and live lecture formats. BMC Med Educ 2004;4(27):1-7.
11. Howerton WB, Enrique PRT, Ludlow JB, Tyndall DA. Interactive computer-assisted instruction vs. lecture format in dental education. J Dent Hyg 2004;78(4):1-6.
12. Taylor ML. Generation NeXt comes to college: 2006 updates and emerging issues. In: A collection of papers on self-study and institutional improvement, 2006:48-55. At: www.taylorprograms.com/images/Gen-NeXt-article-HLC-06.pdf. Accessed: July 10, 2009.
13. Sweeney R. Millennial behaviors & demographics, 2006:1-10. At: http://library1.njit.edu/staff-folders/sweeney/Millennials/Article-Millennial- Behaviors.doc. Accessed: July 1, 2009.
14. Embi PJ, Biddinger PW, Goldenhar LM, Schick LC, Kaya B, Held JD. Preferences regarding the computerized delivery of lecture content: a survey of medical students. AMIA Annu Symp Proc 2006;916.
15. Caruso JB, Kvavik RB. ECAR study of students and information technology, 2005: convenience, connection, control, and learning. At: www.educause.edu/ECAR/ ECARStudyofStudentsandInformat/158586. Accessed: June 26, 2009.
16. Salaway G, Caruso JB. The ECAR study of undergraduate students and information technology, 2007: key findings. At: www.educause.edu/library/ EKF0706. Accessed: June 26, 2009.
17. Salaway G, Caruso JB. The ECAR study of undergraduate students and information technology, 2008: key findings. At: www.educause.edu/library/ EKF0808. Accessed: June 26, 2009.
18. Carlson S. Online textbooks fail to make the grade. Chronicle of Higher Education, February 11, 2005:35.
19. Spencer C. Research on learners' preferences for reading from a printed text or from a computer screen. J Distance Educ 2006;21(1):33-50.
20. Kurniawan SH, Zaphiris P. Reading online or on paper: which is faster? Abridged proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Human Computer Interaction in New Orleans, LA, August 5-10, 2001:220-2. At: http://users.soe.ucsc.edu/-srikur/files/HCII-reading.pdf. Accessed: June 26, 2009.
21. Billings-Gagliardi S, Mazor KM. Student decisions about lecture attendance: do electronic course materials matter? Acad Med 2007;82(10 Suppl):S73-6.
22. Looney RP, Ramsey EC. Multimedia bootcamp: encouraging faculty to integrate technology in teaching. Med Reference Services Q 2006;25(3):87-92.
23. Gellman-Danley B, Fetzner MJ. Asking the really tough questions: policy issues for distance learning. J Distance Learning Administration 1988;1(1):1-8.
24. King JW, Nugent GC, Eich JJ, Milnek DL, Russell EB. A policy framework for distance education: a case study model. DEOSNEWS 2000;10(10):1-11. At: www.ed.psu.edu/acsde/deos/deosnews/deosnews10-10.asp. Accessed: December 7, 2009.
25. Berge ZL. Barriers to online teaching in post-secondary institutions: can policy changes fix it? J Distance Learning Administration 2005;1-13. At: www.westga.edu/-distance/Berge12.html. Accessed: June 20, 2009.
26. Ruckman C. Future college students dig digital. Natl Assoc Coll Stores, April 20, 2007. At: www.nacs.org/newsroom/news/042007-camexvoices.asp. Accessed: June 30, 2009.