GIS-based logistic regression method for landslide susceptibility mapping in regional scale

Journal of Zhejiang University: Science

Volumn 7, Issue 12, 2006, Pages 2007-2017

  Zhu, Lei ^a,b   Huang, Jing Feng ^a  

^a ZHEJIANG UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b Shandong Agriculture Administrators College   (China)

Author keywords

GIS; Landslide; Logistic regression; Spatial analysis; Susceptibility

Indexed keywords

GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEMS; LOGISTICS; MAPPING; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; STATISTICS;

BINARY RESPONSE; DETERMINISTIC APPROACH; GEOGRAPHY SUMMARY; GEOMORPHOLOGICAL FACTOR; LAND USE MAP; LOGISTIC REGRESSION; NONLANDSLIDE PREDICTION ACCURACY; SPATIAL ANALYSIS; STUDY AREA; SUSCEPTIBILITY;

LANDSLIDES;

EID: 33845901828     PISSN: 10093095     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1631/jzus.2006.A2007     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Aleotti, P., Chowdhury, R., 1999. Landslide hazard assessment: summary review and new perspectives. Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment, 58(1):21-44. [doi:10.1007/s100640050066]
2. Atkinson, P.M., Massari, R., 1998. Generalized linear modeling of landslide susceptibility in the Central Apennines. Computers and Geosciences, 24(4):373-385. [doi:10.1016/S0098-3004(97)00117-9]
3. Ayalew, L., Yamagishi, H., 2004. Slope movements in the Blue Nile basin, as seen from landscape evolution perspective. Geomorphology, 57(1-2):95-116. [doi:10.1016/S0169-555X(03)00085-0]
4. Ayalew, L., Yamagishi, H., 2005. The application of GIS-based logistic regression for susceptibility mapping in the Kakuda-Yahiko Mountains, Central Japan. Geomorphology, 65(1-2):15-31. [doi:10.1016/j.geomorph.2004.06.010]
5. Ayalew, L., Yamagishi, H., Ugawa, N., 2004. Landslide susceptibility mapping using GIS-based weighted linear combination, the case in Tsugawa area of Agano River, Niigata Prefecture, Japan. Landslides, 1(1):73-81. [doi:10.1007/s10346-003-0006-9]
6. Barredo, J.I., Benavidesz, A., Herhl, J., van Westen, C.J., 2000. Comparing heuristic landslide hazard assessment techniques using GIS in the Tirajana basin, Gran Canaria Island, Spain. International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation, 2(1):9-23. [doi:10.1016/S0303-2434(00)85022-9]
7. Begueria, S., 2006. Changes in land cover and shallow landslide activity: A case study in the Spanish Pyrenees. Geomorphology, 74(1-4):196-206. [doi:10.1016/j.geomorph.2005.07.018]
8. Carrara, A., 1983. Uncertainty in Evaluating Landslide Hazard and Risk. In: Nemec, J., Nigs, J.M., Siccardi, F. (Eds.), Prediction and Perception of Natural Hazards. Kluwer, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, p.101-111.
9. Clerici, A., Perego, S., Tellini, C., Vescovi, P., 2002. A procedure for landslide susceptibility zonation by the conditional analysis method. Geomorphology, 48(4):349-364. [doi:10.1016/S0169-555X(02)00079-X]
10. Dai, F.C., Lee, C.F., 2002. Landslide characteristics and slope instability modeling using GIS, Lantau Island, Hong Kong. Geomorphology, 42(3-4):213-228. [doi:10.1016/S0169-555X(01)00087-3]
11. Donati, L., Turrini, M.C., 2002. An objective method to rank the importance of the factors predisposing to landslides with the GIS methodology: application to an area of the Apennines (Valnerina; Perugia, Italy). Engineering Geology, 63(3-4):277-289. [doi:10.1016/S0013-7952(01)00087-4]
12. Ermini, L., Catani, F., Casagli, N., 2005. Artificial Neural Networks applied to landslide susceptibility assessment. Geomorphology, 66(1-4):327-343. [doi:10.1016/j.geomorph.2004.09.025]
13. Gómez, H., Kavzoglu, T., 2005. Assessment of shallow landslide susceptibility using artificial neural networks in Jabonosa River Basin, Venezuela. Engineering Geology, 78(1-2):11-27. [doi:10.1016/j.enggeo.2004.10.004]
14. Gray, D.H., Leiser, A.T., 1982. Biotechnical Slope Protection and Erosion Control. Van Nostrand-Reinhold, New York, p.271.
15. Greenway, D.R., 1987. Vegetation and Slope Stability. In: Anderson, M.G., Richards, K.S. (Eds.), Slope Stability. Wiley, New York, p.187-230.
16. Gritzner, M.L., Marcus, W.A., Aspinall, R., Custer, S.G., 2001. Assessing landslide potential using GIS, soil wetness modeling and topographic attributes, Payette River, Idaho. Geomorphology, 37(1-2):149-165. [doi:10.1016/S0169-555X(00)00068-4]
17. Guzzetti, F., Carrara, A., Cardinali, M., Reichenbach, P., 1999. Landslide hazard evaluation: a review of current techniques and their application in a multi-scale study, central Italy. Geomorphology, 31(1-4):181-216. [doi:10.1016/S0169-555X(99)00078-1]
18. Lee, S., Ryu, J., Min, K., Won, J., 2001. Development of Two Artificial Neural Network Methods for Landslide Susceptibility Analysis. Proceedings of the Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium, IGARSS'01, IEEE 2001 International, 5:2364-2366.
19. Menard, S.W., 1995. Applied Logistic Regression Analysis. SAGE Publication, Inc., Thousand Oaks, CA.
20. Ohlmacher, G.C., Davis, J.C., 2003. Using multiple logistic regression and GIS technology to predict landslide hazard in northeast Kansas, USA. Engineering Geology, 69(3-4):331-343. [doi:10.1016/S0013-7952(03)00069-3]
21. Saaty, T.L., 1980. The Analytical Hierarchy Process. McGraw Hill, New York, p.350.
22. Tasser, E., Mader, M., Tappeiner, U., 2003. Effects of land use in alpine grasslands on the probability of landslides. Basic Appl. Ecol., 4(3):271-280. [doi:10.1078/1439-1791-00153]
23. Yesilnacar, E., Topal, T., 2005. Landslide susceptibility mapping: A comparison of logistic regression and neural networks methods in a medium scale study, Hendek region (Turkey). Engineering Geology, 79(3-4):251-266. [doi:10.1016/j.enggeo.2005.02.002]