Much beyond Mantel: Bringing procrustes association metric to the plant and soil ecologist's toolbox

PLoS ONE

Volumn 9, Issue 6, 2014, Pages

  Lisboa, Francy Junio Gonca̧lves ^a,d   Peres Neto, Pedro R ^b   Chaer, Guilherme Montandon ^c   Da Conceicã̧o Jesus, Ederson ^c   Mitchell, Ruth Joy ^d   Chapman, Stephen James ^d   Berbara, RicardoLuis Louro ^a  

^a FEDERAL RURAL UNIVERSITY OF RIO DE JANEIRO   (Brazil)

^b UNIVERSITÉ DU QUÉBEC À MONTRÉAL   (Canada)

^c EMBRAPA AGROBIOLOGIA   (Brazil)

^d SCOTTISH CROP RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ECOLOGICAL PROCEDURES; ECOLOGIST; ECOLOGY; ENVIRONMENTAL FACTOR; LAND USE; MANTEL TEST; MICROBIAL COMMUNITY; NONHUMAN; OCCUPATION; PLANT; PROCRUSTEAN ASSOCIATION METRIC; SOIL ANALYSIS; BIODIVERSITY; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; PLANT PHYSIOLOGY; PROCEDURES; SOIL; STATISTICAL MODEL;

SOIL;

BIODIVERSITY; ECOLOGY; MODELS, STATISTICAL; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; PLANT PHYSIOLOGICAL PHENOMENA; SOIL;

EID: 84903388621     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19326203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0101238     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. Mantel N (1967) The detection of disease clustering and a generalized regression approach. Cancer Res 27: 209-220.
2. Gower JC (1971) Statistical methods of comparing different multivariate analyses on the same data. In: Hodson FR, Kendall DG, Tautu P, editors. Mathematics in the archeological and historical sciences. Edinburgh University Press, Edinburgh. 138-149.
3. Peres-Neto PR, Jackson DA (2001) How well do multivariate data sets match? The advantages of a Procrustean superimposition approach over the Mantel test. Oecologia 129: 169-178. (Pubitemid 32996560)
4. Tuomisto H, Poulsen AD, Ruokolainen K, Moran RC, Quintana C, et al. (2003a) Linking floristic patterns with soil heterogeneity and satellite imagery in Ecuadorian Amazonia. Ecol App 2: 352-371. (Pubitemid 36872846)
5. Tuomisto H, Ruokolainen K, Yli-Halla M (2003b) Dispersal, environment, and the floristic variation of western Amazonian forests. Science 299: 241-244. (Pubitemid 36125208)
6. Tuomisto H, Ruokolainen K, Aguilar M, Sarmiento A (2003c) Floristic patterns along 43-km long transect in an Amazonian rain forest. J Ecol 91: 743-756. (Pubitemid 37224323)
7. Kang S, Mills AL (2004) Soil bacterial community structure changes following disturbance of the overlying plant community. Soil Sci 169: 55-65. (Pubitemid 38106679)
8. Poulsen AD, Tuomisto H, Balsev H (2006) Edaphic and florist variation within a 1-ha plot of lowland Amazonian rain forest. Biotropica 38: 468-478. (Pubitemid 43873533)
9. Fitzsimons MS, Miller RM, Jastrow JD (2008) Scale-dependent niche axes of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. Oecologia 158: 117-127.
10. Powers JS, Becknell JM, Irving J, Pères-Aviles D (2009) Diversity and structure of regenerating tropical dry forests in Costa Rica: Geographic patterns and environmental drivers. Forest Ecol Manag 258: 959-970.
11. Castilho-Monroy AP, Bowker MA, Maestre FT, Rodriguez-Echeverria S, Martinez I, et al. (2011) Relationships between biological soil crusts, bacterial diversity and abundance, and ecosystem functioning: insights from a semi - arid Mediterranean environment. J. Veg. Sci 22: 165-174.
12. Pomara LY, Ruokolainen K, Tuomisto H, Young K (2012) Avian composition co-varies with floristic composition and soil nutrient concentration in Amazonian upland forests. Biotropica 44: 545-553.
13. Artz RRE, Chapman SJ, Campbell CD (2006) Substrate utilization profiles of microbial communities in peat are depth dependent and correlate with whole soil FTIR profiles. Soil Biol Biochem, 38: 2958-2962. (Pubitemid 47296706)
14. Trivedi MR, Marecroft MD, Berry PM, Dowson TP (2008) Potential effects of climate change on plant communities in three montane nature reserves in Scotland, UK. Bio Conserv 141: 1665-1675.
15. Jesus EC, Marsh TL, Tiedje JM, Moreira FMS (2009) Changes in land use alter the structure of bacterial communities in Western Amazon soils. ISME J 3: 1004-1011.
16. Merilä P, Lämsa- MM, Stark S, Spetz P, Vierikko K, et al. (2010) Soil organic matter quality as a link between microbial community structure and vegetation composition along a successional gradient in a boreal forest. App Soil Ecol 46: 259-267.
17. Grayston SJ, Campbell CD, Bardgett RD, Mawdsley JL, Clegg CD, et al. (2004) Assessing shifts in microbial community structure across a range of grasslands of differing management intensity using CLPP, PLFA, and community DNA techniques. Appl Soil Ecol 25: 63-84. (Pubitemid 38065706)
18. Singh BK, Munro S, Reid E, Ord B, Potts M, et al. (2006) Investigating microbial community structure in soils by physiological, biochemical and molecular fingerprinting methods. Eur J Soil Sci 57: 72-82.
19. Vinten AJA, Artz RRE, Thomas N, Potts JM, Avery L, et al. (2011) Comparison of microbial community assays for the assessment of stream biofilm ecology. J Microbiol Methods 85: 190-198.
20. Hirst CN, Jackson DA (2007) Reconstructing community relationships: the impact of sampling error, ordination approach, and gradient length. Divers. Distrib 13: 361-371. (Pubitemid 46920314)
21. Poos MS, Jackson DA (2012) Addressing the removal rare species in multivariate bioassessments: The impact of methodological choices. Ecol Indic 18: 82-90.
22. Singh BK, Nunan N, Ridgway KP, Mcnicol J, Young JPW, et al. (2008) Relationship between assemblages of mycorrhizal fungi and bacteria on grass roots. Environ Microbiol 10: 534-542.
23. Burke L, Irwin R (2009) The importance of interannual variation and bottom up nitrogen enrichment for plant - pollinator networks. Oikos 118: 1816-1829.
24. Lisboa FJG, Chaer GM, Jesus EC, Gonçalves FS, Santos FM, et al. (2012) The influence of litter quality on the relationship between vegetation and belowground compartments: a Procrustean approach. Plant Soil 367 551-562.
25. Landeiro VL, Bini LM, Costa FRC, Franklin E, Nogueira A, et al. (2012) How far can we go in simplifying biomonitoring assessments? An integrated analysis of taxonomy surrogacy, taxonomic sufficiency and numerical resolution in a mega diverse region. Ecol Indic 23: 366-373.
26. Siqueira T, Bini LM, Roque FO, Cottiene K (2012) A metacommunity framework for enhancing the effectiveness of biological monitoring strategies. PLoS One 7: e43626.
27. Nekola JC, White PS (1999) The distance decay of similarity in biogeography and ecology. J Bio 26: 867-878. (Pubitemid 30030997)
28. Legendre P, Borcard D, Peres-Neto PR (2005) Analysing beta diversity: partitioning the spatial variation of community composition data. Ecol Mon 75: 435-450. (Pubitemid 41476777)
29. Tuomisto H, Ruokolainen K (2006) Analysing or explaining beta diversity? Understanding the targets of different methods of analysis. Ecology 87: 2697-2708. (Pubitemid 44904855)
30. Kuehnelt-Leddihn ER (2007) The menace of the herd or Procrustes at large. The Bruce Publishing Company Milwaukee, Auburn. 385 p.
31. Jackson DA (1995) PROTEST: a Procrustean randomization test of community environment concordance. Ecoscience 2: 297-303.
32. Alárcon R, Waser NM, Orlleton J (2008) Year-to-year variation in the topology of a plant - pollinator interaction network. Oikos 117: 1796-1807. (Pubitemid 352840388)
33. Burke L, Irwin R (2009) The importance of interannual variation and bottom up nitrogen enrichment for plant - pollinator networks. Oikos 118: 1816-1829.
34. ten Berge JMF, Kiers HAL, Commandeur JJF (1993) Orthogonal Procrustes rotation for matrices with missing values. B J Math Stat Psyc 46: 119-134.
35. Dijksterhuis GB, Gower JC (1992) The interpretation of Generalized Procrustes Analysis and allied methods. Food Qual Prefer 3: 67-87.
36. Dray S, Chessel D, Thioulouse J (2003) Procrustean Co-inertia analysis for the linking of multivariate datasets. Ecoscience 10: 110-119. (Pubitemid 36522343)
37. Legendre P, Gallagher ED (2001) Ecologically meaningful transformations for ordination of species data. Oecologia 129: 271-280. (Pubitemid 32996572)
38. Legendre P, Legendre L (2012) Numerical Ecology, 3rd English edn. Elsevier Science BV, 516 Amsterdam.
39. Mitchell RJ, Hester AJ, Campbell CD, Chapman SJ, Cameron CM (2010) Is vegetation composition or soil chemistry the best predictor of soil microbial community? Plant Soil 333: 417-430.
40. Mitchell RJ, Hester AJ, Campbell CD, Chapman SJ, Cameron CM, et al. (2012) Explaining the variation in the soil microbial community: do vegetation composition and soil chemistry explain the same or different parts of the microbial variation? Plant Soil 351: 355-362.
41. Dumbrell AJ, Nelson M, Helgason T, Dytham C, Fitter AH (2009) Relative roles of niche and neutral processes in structuring a soil microbial community. ISME J doi:10.1038/ismej.2009.122.
42. Zheng YM, Cao P, Fu B, Hughes JM, He JZ (2013) Ecological Drivers of Biogeographic Patterns of Soil Archaeal Community. PloS One 8: e63375.
43. Peres-Neto PR, Legendre P, Dray S, Borcard D (2006) Variation partitioning of species data matrices: estimation and comparison of fractions. Ecology 87: 2603-2613.
44. Chaer GM, Fernandes MF, Myrold DD, Bottomley PJ (2009) Shifts in microbial community composition and physiological profiles across a gradient of induced soil degradation. Soil Sci Soc Am J 73: 1327-1334.
45. Peixoto RS, Chaer GM, Franco N, Reis Junior FB, Mendes IC, et al. (2010) A decade of land use contributes to changes in the chemistry, biochemistry and bacterial community structures of soils in the Cerrado. A Van Leeuw 98: 403-413.
46. Thioulouse J, Simier M, Chessel D (2004) Simultaneous analysis of a sequence of paired ecological tables. Ecology 85: 272-283. (Pubitemid 38258882)
47. Dolédec S, Chessel D (1994) Co-inertia analysis: an alternative method for studying species - environment relationships. Freshwater Biol 31: 277-294.
48. Ter Braak, CJF, Schaffers AP (2004) Co-correspondence analysis: a new ordination method to relate two community compositions. Ecology 85: 834-846. (Pubitemid 38398294)
49. van der Heijden MGA, Klironomos J, Ursic M, Moutoglis P, Streitwolf-Engel R, et al. (1998) Mycorrhizal fungi determines plant biodiversity, ecosystem variability and productivity. Nature 396: 69-72. (Pubitemid 28520449)