The lande-kirkpatrick mechanism is the null model of evolution by intersexual selection: Implications for meaning, honesty, and design in intersexual signals

Evolution

Volumn 64, Issue 11, 2010, Pages 3085-3100

  Prum, Richard O ^a  

^a YALE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Arbitrary traits; Fisher process; Honest indicators; Intersexual selection; Null model; Sensory bias

Indexed keywords

CAROTENOID; MELANIN;

GENETIC VARIATION; INTERSEXUAL INTERACTION; LIFE HISTORY TRAIT; NATURAL SELECTION; NUMERICAL MODEL; PREFERENCE BEHAVIOR; SENSORY SYSTEM; SIGNAL;

ALGORITHM; ANIMAL; ANIMAL COMMUNICATION; ARTICLE; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; BIRD; EVOLUTION; FEMALE; GENETIC SELECTION; GENETIC VARIABILITY; MALE; METABOLISM; PHENOTYPE; POPULATION DYNAMICS; SEXUAL BEHAVIOR; VOCALIZATION;

ALGORITHMS; ANIMAL COMMUNICATION; ANIMALS; BIOLOGICAL EVOLUTION; BIRDS; CAROTENOIDS; FEMALE; GENETIC VARIATION; MALE; MELANINS; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; PHENOTYPE; POPULATION DYNAMICS; SELECTION, GENETIC; SEXUAL BEHAVIOR, ANIMAL; VOCALIZATION, ANIMAL;

EID: 77958531668     PISSN: 00143820     EISSN: 15585646     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2010.01054.x     Document Type: Article

References (82)

1. Alonzo, S. H. 2008. Female mate choice copying affects sexual selection in wild populations of the ocellated wrasse. Anim. Behav. 75:1715-1723.
2. Andersson, M. 1994. Sexual selection. Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton, NJ
3. Arnaiz-Villena, A., J. Moscoso, V. Ruiz-del-Valle, J. Gonzalez, R. Reguera, M. Wink, and J. I. Serrano-Vela 2007. Bayesian phylogeny of Fringillinae birds: status of the singular African oriole finch Linurgus olivaceus and the evolution and heterogeneity of the genus Carpodacus. Acta Zool. Sinica 53:826-834.
4. Arnold, S. J. 1994. Bateman principles and the measurement of sexual selection in plants and animals. Am. Nat. 144(Suppl):S126-S149.
5. Arnold, S. J., and M. Wade 1984. On the measurement of natural and sexual selection: applications. Evolution 38:720-734.
6. Beatty, J. H. 2006. The evolutionary contingency thesis. in E. Sober, ed. Conceptual issues in evolutionary biology. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
7. Byers, J., E. Hebets, and J. Podos 2010. Female mate choice based upon male motor performance. Anim. Behav. 79:771-778.
8. Cronin, H. 1991. The ant and the peacock. Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, UK
9. Darwin, C. 1871. The descent of man, and selection in relation to sex. John Murray, London
10. Dawkins, R. 2004. The ancestor's tale. Houghton Mifflin, New York
11. Doucet, S. M., D. J. Mennill, and G. E. Hill 2007. The evolution of signal design in manakin plumage ornaments. Am. Nat. 169:S63-S80.
12. Durães, R., B. A. Loiselle, P. G. Parker, and J. G. Blake 2009. Female mate choice across spatial scales: influence of lek and male attributes on mating success of blue-crowned manakins. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 276:1875-1881.
13. Endler, J. A. 1986. Natural selection in the wild. Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton, NJ
14. Endler, J. A., and A. L. Basolo 1998. Sensory ecology, receiver biases and sexual selection. Trends Ecol. Evol. 13:415-420.
15. Espmark, Y., T. Amundsen, and G. Rosenqvist, eds. 2000. Animal signals: signaling and signal design in animal communication. Tapir Acad. Press, Trondheim, Norway
16. Felsenstein, J. 1985. Phylogenies and the comparative method. Am. Nat. 125:1-15.
17. Fisher, R. A. 1915. The evolution of sexual preference. Eugenics Rev. 7:184-191.
18. Fisher, R. A. 1930. The genetical theory of natural selection. Clarendon Press, Oxford
19. Fisher, R. A. 1958. The genetical theory of natural selection. Dover Publications, New York
20. Fuller, R. C., D. Houle, and J. Travis 2005. Sensory bias as an explanation for the evolution of mating preferences. Am. Nat. 166:437-446.
21. Ghiselin, M. T. 1987. Species concepts, individuality, and objectivity. Biol. Philos. 2:127-143.
22. Gil, D., and M. Gahr 2002. The honesty of bird song: multiple constraints for multiple traits. Trends Ecol. Evol. 17:133-141.
23. Gomulkiewicz, R., and A. Hastings 1990. Ploidy and evolution by sexual selection: a comparison of haploid and diploid female choice models near fixation equilibria. Evolution 44:757-770.
24. Goodwin, T. W. 1980. The biochemistry of the carotenoids. Volume 1 Plants. Chapman and Hall, London
25. Gotelli, N. J., and G. R. Graves 1996. Null models in ecology. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, DC
26. Gould, S. J., and R. C. Lewontin 1979. The Spandrels of San Marco and the Panglossian paradigm: a critique of the adaptationist programme. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 205:581-598.
27. Grafen, A. 1990. Sexual selection unhandicapped by the Fisher process. J. Theor. Biol. 144:473-516.
28. Griffith, S. C., T. H. Parker, and V. A. Olson 2006. Melanin- versus carotenoid-based sexual signals: is the difference really so black and red? Anim. Behav. 71:749-763.
29. Hamilton, W. D., and M. Zuk 1982. Heritable true fitness and bright birds: a role for parasites? Science 218:384-387.
30. Hardy, G. H. 1908. Mendelian proportions in a mixed population. Science 28:49-50.
31. Hauser, M. D. 1998. The evolution of communication. Bradford Books MIT Press, Cambridge
32. Hill, G. E. 2002. A red bird in a brown bag: the function and evolution of colorful plumage in the house finch. Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford
33. Hill, G. E. 2006. Female mate choice for ornamental coloration. Pp. 137-200 in G. E. Hill and K. J. McGraw, eds. Bird coloration: function and evolution. Harvard Univ., Cambridge
34. Hill, G. E., C. Y. Inouye, and R. Montgomerie 2002. Dietary carotenoids predict plumage coloration in wild House Finches. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 269:1119-1124.
35. Hubbell, S. P. 1979. Tree dispersion, abundance, and diversity in a tropical dry forest. Science 203:1299-1309.
36. Hubbell, S. P. 2001. The unified neutral theory of biodiversity and biogeography. Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton, NJ
37. Irwin, R. E. 1988. The evolutionary importance of behavioural development: the ontogeny and phylogeny of bird song. Anim. Behav. 36:814-824.
38. Iwasa, Y., and A. Pomiankowski 1994. The evolution of mate preferences for multiple sexual ornaments. Evolution 48:853-867.
39. Jones, T. M., R. J. Quinnell, and A. Balmford 1998. Fisherian flies: benefits of female choice in a lekking sandfly. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 265:1651-1657.
40. Kimura, M., and J. F. Crow 1964. The number of alleles that can be maintained in a finite population. Genetics 94:725-738.
41. Kirkpatrick, M. 1982. Sexual selection and the evolution of female choice. Evolution 82:1-12.
42. Kirkpatrick, M. 1987. Sexual selection by female choice in polygynous animals. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 18:43-70.
43. Kirkpatrick, M., and M. J. Ryan 1991. The evolution of mating preferences and the paradox of the lek. Nature 350:33-38.
44. Kokko, H., R. Brooks, J. M. McNamara, and A. I. Houston 2002. The sexual selection continuum. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 269:1331-1340.
45. Kokko, H., M. D. Jennions, and R. Brooks 2006. Unifying and testing models of sexual selection. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 37:43-66.
46. Kotiaho, J. S., N. R. LeBas, M. Puurtinen, and J. L. Tomkins 2007. On the resolution of the lek paradox. Trends Ecol. Evol. 23:1-3.
47. Krugman, P. 2009. How did economists get it so wrong? New York Times Sunday Magazine 6 September 2009:36-43.
48. Lande, R. 1981. Models of speciation by sexual selection on polygenic traits. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 78:3721-3725.
49. MacArthur, R. H. 1972. Geographical ecology. Harper & Row, New York
50. Mangels, A. R., J. M. Holden, G. R. Beecher, M. R. Forman, and E. Lanza 1993. Carotenoid content of fruits and vegetables: an evaluation of analytical data. J. Am. Dietetic Assoc. 93:284-296.
51. Maynard Smith, J., and D. Harper 2003. Animal signals. Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford
52. McGraw, K. J. 2006a. Mechanics of carotenoid-based coloration. Pp. 177-242 in G. E. Hill and K. J. McGraw, eds. Bird coloration, vol. 1, mechanisms and measurements. Harvard Univ. Press, Cambridge, MA
53. McGraw, K. J. 2006b. Mechanics of melanin-based coloration in birds. Pp. 243-294 in G. E. Hill and K. J. McGraw, eds. Bird coloration, Vol. I, mechanisms and measurements. Harvard Univ. Press, Cambridge, MA
54. Nei, M. 2005. Selectionism and neutralism in molecular evolution. Mol. Biol. Evol. 22:2318-2342.
55. Nitecki, M. H., and A. Hoffman, eds. 1987. Neutral models in biology. Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford
56. Nowicki, S., S. Peters, and J. Podos 1998. Song learning, early nutrition, and sexual selection in songbirds. Am. Zool. 38:179-190.
57. Otto, S. R. 1991. On evolution under sexual and viability selection: a two-locus diploid model. Evolution 45:1443-1457.
58. Oxford English Dictionary. 2005. in C. Soanes and A. Stevenson, eds. The Oxford Dictionary of English Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford
59. Palmer, A. R. 1999. Detecting publication bias in meta-analyses: a case study of fluctuating asymmetry and sexual selection. Am. Nat. 154:220-233.
60. Pomiankowski, A., and Y. Iwasa 1993. The evolution of multiple sexual ornaments by Fisher's process of sexual selection. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 253:173-181.
61. Price, J. J., and L. M. Whalen 2009. Plumage evolution in the oropendolas and caciques: different divergence rates in polygynous and monogamous taxa. Evolution 63:2985-2998.
62. Prum, R. O. 1990a. A test of the monophyly of the manakins (Pipridae) and of the cotingas (Cotingidae) based on morphology. Occasional Papers of the Museum of Zoology of the Univ. of Michigan 723:1-44.
63. Prum, R. O. 1990b. Phylogenetic analysis of the evolution of display behavior in the neotropical manakins (Aves: Pipridae). Ethology 84:202-231.
64. Prum, R. O. 1992. Syringeal morphology, phylogeny, and evolution of the neotropical manakins (Aves: Pipridae). Am. Museum Novitates 3043:65 pp.
65. Prum, R. O. 1994. Phylogenetic analysis of the evolution of alternative social behavior in the manakins (Aves: Pipridae). Evolution 48:1657-1675.
66. Prum, R. O. 1997. Phylogenetic tests of alternative intersexual selection mechanisms: macroevolution of male traits in a polygynous clade (Aves: Pipridae). Am. Nat. 149:668-692.
67. Prum, R. O. 2002. Why ornithologists should care about the theropod origin of birds. Auk 119:1-17.
68. Prum, R. O. 2008. Whose your daddy? Science 322:1799-1800.
69. Rice, S. H. 2004. Evolutionary theory: mathematical and conceptual foundations. Sinauer, Sunderland, MA
70. Ridgely, R. S., and G. Tudor 1989. The birds of South America. Volume 1. The oscine passerines. Univ. of Texas Press, Austin, TX
71. Rowe, L., and D. Houle 1996. The lek paradox and the capture of genetic variation by condition dependent traits. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 263:1415-1421.
72. Searcy, W. A., and S. Nowicki 2005. The evolution of animal communication: reliability and deception in signaling systems. Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton, NJ
73. Shuster, S. M., and M. J. Wade 2003. Mating systems and strategies. Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton, NJ
74. Snow, D. W. 2004. Family Pipridae (Manakins). Pp. 110-169 in J. Del Hoyo, A. Elliot, and D. A. Christie, eds. Handbook of the birds of the world. Lynx Editions, Barcelona, Spain
75. Sober, E. 2006a. Parsimony. Pp. 531-538 in A. Sarkar and J. Pfiefer, eds. The philosophy of science an encyclopedia. Routledge, New York
76. Sober, E. 2006b. Two outbreaks of lawlessness in recent philosophy of biology. Philos. Science 64:S458-S467.
77. Strong, D. R., Jr. 1980. Null hypotheses in ecology. Synthese 43:271-285.
78. Tello, J. G., R. G. Moyle, D. J. Marchese, and J. Cracraft 2009. Phylogeny and phylogenetic classification of the tyrant flycatchers, cotingas, manakins, and their allies (Aves: Tyrannides). Cladistics 25:429-467.
79. Tomkins, J., J. Radwan, J. S. Kotiaho, and T. Tregenza 2004. Genic capture and resolving the paradox of the lek. Trends Ecol. Evol. 19:323-328.
80. Turner, G. F., and M. T. Burrows 1995. A model of sympatric speciation by sexual selection. Proc. R. Soc. London B 260:287-292.
81. Wallace, A. R. 1895. Natural selection and tropical nature. Macmillan and Co., London and New York
82. West-Eberhard, M. J. 1983. Sexual selection, social competition, and speciation. Q. Rev. Biol. 58:155-183.