Acceptability of robotic technology in neuro-rehabilitation: Preliminary results on chronic stroke patients

Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine

Volumn 116, Issue 2, 2014, Pages 116-122

  Mazzoleni, Stefano ^a,b   Turchetti, Giuseppe ^a   Palla, Ilaria ^a   Posteraro, Federico ^b   Dario, Paolo ^a  

^a SCUOLA SUPERIORE SANT ANNA   (Italy)

^b Auxilium Vitae Rehabilitation Center   (Italy)

Author keywords

Rehabilitation; Robotics; Stroke; Technology assessment; Upper limb

Indexed keywords

PATIENT REHABILITATION; ROBOTICS; SURVEYS;

MOTOR IMPAIRMENTS; MOTOR REHABILITATION; NEUROREHABILITATION; ROBOT-ASSISTED REHABILITATION; ROBOTIC TECHNOLOGIES; STROKE; TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENTS; UPPER LIMBS;

NEUROMUSCULAR REHABILITATION;

ADULT; AGED; ARM; ARTICLE; CEREBROVASCULAR ACCIDENT; CHRONIC PATIENT; CLINICAL ARTICLE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; MEDICAL TECHNOLOGY; MOTOR DYSFUNCTION; MYOTATIC REFLEX; NEUROREHABILITATION; REHABILITATION CARE; ROBOTICS; SHOULDER PAIN; STROKE PATIENT; BIOMECHANICS; COMPLICATION; DEVICES; FEMALE; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MOTOR PERFORMANCE; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PARESIS; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PATIENT ATTITUDE; PROCEDURES; STROKE;

ADULT; AGED; ARM; BIOMECHANICAL PHENOMENA; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MOTOR SKILLS; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE); PARESIS; PATIENT ACCEPTANCE OF HEALTH CARE; ROBOTICS; STROKE;

EID: 84903198326     PISSN: 01692607     EISSN: 18727565     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2013.12.017     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. Shumway-Cook A., Woolacott M.W. Motor Control: Theory and Practical Application 2001, Lippincot, Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia. 2nd ed.
2. Carr J.H., Shepherd R.B. A motor learning model for rehabilitation. Movement Science Foundations for Physical Therapy in Rehabilitation 2000, 33-110. Aspen Publishers, Gaithersburg, Maryland, USA. 2nd ed.
3. Shepherd R.B. Exercise and training to optimize functional motor performance in stroke: driving neural reorganization?. Neural Plast. 2001, 8:121-129.
4. Lo A.C., Guarino P.D., Richards L.G., et al. Robot-assisted therapy for long-term upper-limb impairment after stroke. N. Engl. J. Med. 2010, 362:1772-1783.
5. Takahashi C.D., Der-Yeghiaian P L, Motiwala S.C., Le V., Cramer R.R. Robot-based hand motor therapy after stroke. Brain 2008, 131:425-437.
6. Furneri G., Mantovani L.G., Belisari A., Mosca M., Cristiani M., Bellelli S., et al. Systematic literature review on economic implications and pharmacoeconomic issues of rheumatoid arthritis. Clin. Exp. Rheumatol. 2012, 30:S72-S84.
7. Trieste L., Palla I., Baldini C., Talarico R., D'Angiolella L., Mosca M., et al. Systemic vasculitis: how little we know about their societal and economic burden. Clin. Exp. Rheumatol. 2012, 30:154S-156S.
8. Trieste L., Palla I., Fusco F., Tani C., Baldini C., Mosca M., et al. The economic impact of gout: a systematic literature review. Clin. Exp. Rheumatol. 2012, 30:145S-148S.
9. Palla I., Trieste L., Tani C., Talarico R., Cortesi P., Mosca M., et al. A systematic literature review of the economic impact of Ankylosing Spondylitis. Clin. Exp. Rheumatol. 2012, 30:S136-S141.
10. Turchetti G., Yazdany J., Palla I., Yelin E., Mosca M. SLE and the economic perspective: a systematic literature review and points to consider. Clin. Exp. Rheumatol. 2012, 30:116S-122S.
11. Turchetti G., Spadoni E., Geisler E. Health technology assessment. Evaluation of biomedical innovative technologies. IEEE Eng. Med. Biol. 2010, 29:70-76.
12. Turchetti G., Scalone L., Della Casa Alberighi O., Mosca M., Montella S., Cortesi P., et al. The rationale of pharmacoeconomic analysis in rheumatologic indications. Clin. Exp. Rheumatol. 2012, 30:64S-71S.
13. Turchetti G., Micera S., Cavallo F., Dario P. Technology and innovative services: towards a "mega market response" to ageing. IEEE Pulse 2011, 2:27-35.
14. Turchetti G., Geisler E. Health technology assessment in the context of private and public models of national health systems. Proceeding of PICMET'09 - Technology Management in the Age of Fundamental Change 2009, 2983-2985.
15. Turchetti G., Geisler E. Home healthcare services: an educative case for the development of a "service-dominant-logic" approach in the marketing of high tech services". New Models of Business and Value Creating: Service Science 2013, Springer, Milano.
16. Posteraro F., Mazzoleni S., Aliboni S., Cesqui B., Battaglia A., Dario P., et al. Robot-mediated therapy for paretic upper limb of chronic patients following neurological injury. J. Rehabil. Med. 2009, 41:976-980.
17. Turchetti G., Labella B., Bellelli S., Cannizzo S., Palla I., Mazzoleni S., et al. Innovation in rehabilitation technology: technological opportunities and socio-economic implications. Int. J. Healthcare Technol. Manag. 2009, 10:245-261.
18. Krakauer J.W. Motor learning: its relevance to stroke recovery and neurorehabilitation. Curr. Opin. Neurol. 2006, 19:84-90.
19. Barreca S., Wolf S.L., Fasoli S., Bohannon R. Treatment interventions for the paretic upper limb of stroke survivors: a critical review. Neurorehabil. Neural Repair 2003, 17:220-226.
20. Riener R., Nef T., Colombo G. Robot-aided neurorehabilitation of the upper limb. Med. Biol. Eng. Comput. 2005, 43:2-10.
21. Prange G.B., Jannink M.J., Groothuis-Oudshoorn C.G., Hermens H.J., Ijzerman M.J. Systematic review of the effect of robot-aided therapy on recovery of the hemiparetic arm after stroke. J. Rehabil. Res. Dev. 2006, 43:171-184.
22. Kwakkel G., Kollen B.J., Krebs H.I. Effects of robot-assisted therapy on upper limb recovery after stroke: a systematic review. Neurorehabil. Neural Repair 2008, 22:111-121.
23. Mazzoleni S., Posteraro F., Forte F., Micera S., Dario P., Carrozza M.C. Biomechanical assessment of reaching movements in post-stroke patients during a robot-aided rehabilitation. Appl. Bionics Biomech. 2011, 8:39-54.
24. Balasubramanian S., Colombo R., Sterpi I., Sanguineti V., Burdet E. Robotic assessment of upper limb motor function after stroke. Am. J. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 2012, 91:S255-S269.
25. Zollo L., Rossini L., Bravi M., Magrone G., Sterzi S., Guglielmelli E. Quantitative evaluation of upper-limb motor control in robot-aided rehabilitation. Med. Biol. Eng. Comput. 2011, 49:1131-1144.
26. Colombo R., Sterpi I., Mazzone A., Delconte C., Pisano F. Taking a lesson from patients' recovery strategies to optimize training during robot-aided rehabilitation. IEEE Trans. Neural Syst. Rehabil. Eng. 2012, 20:276-285.
27. Reinkensmeyer D.J., Emken J.L., Cramer S.C. Robotics, motor learning, and neurologic recovery. Annu. Rev. Biomed. Eng. 2004, 6:497-525.
28. Lum P.S., Burgar C.G., Kenney D.E., Van der Loos H.F.M. Quantification of force abnormalities during passive and active-assisted upper-limb reaching movements in post-stroke hemiparesis. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 1999, 6:652-662.
29. Lum P.S., Burgar C.G., Shor P.C. Evidence for improved muscle activation patterns after retraining of reaching movements with the MIME robotic system in subjects with post-stroke hemiparesis. IEEE Trans. Neural Syst. Rehabil. Eng. 2004, 12:186-194.
30. Colombo R., Sterpi I., Mazzone A., Del Conte C., Minuto G., Pisano F. Measuring changes of movement dynamics during robot-aided neurorehabilitation of stroke patients. IEEE Trans. Neural Syst. Rehabil. Eng. 2010, 18:75-85.
31. Venkatesh V. Determinants of perceived ease of use: integrating control, intrinsic motivation, and emotion into the technology acceptance model. Inform. Syst. Res. 2000, 11:342-365.
32. Dillon A. User acceptance of information technology: theories and models. Encyclopedia of Human Factors and Ergonomics 2001, Taylor and Francis, London.
33. Louho R., Kallioija M., Oittinen P. Factors affecting the use of hybrid media applications. Graph. Arts Finland 2006, 35:11-20.
34. Davis F.D. User acceptance of computer technology: systems characteristics, user perceptions and behavioral impacts. Int. J. Man-Mach. Stud. 1993, 38:475-487.
35. Ajzen I., Fishbein M. Understanding Attitudes and Predicting Social Behavior 1980, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
36. Ajzen I. From intentions to actions: a theory of planned behavior. Action-control: From Cognition to Behavior 1985, 11-39. Springer, Heildberg.
37. Davis F.D., Bagozzi R.P., Warshaw P.R. User acceptance of computer technology: a comparison of two theoretical models. Manag. Sci. 1989, 35:982-1003.
38. Rogers E.M. Diffusion of Innovations 1995, The Free Press, New York.
39. Legris P., Ingham J., Collerette P. Why do people use information technology? A critical review of the technology acceptance model. Inform. Manag. 2003, 40:191-204.
40. Ventatesh V., Morris M.G., Davis G.B., Davis F.D. User acceptance of information technology: toward a unified view. MIS Quart. 2003, 27:425-478.
41. Zajicek M. Aspects of HCI research for older people. Univ. Access Inform. Soc. 2006, 5:279-286.
42. Earp J., Payton F. Information privacy in the service sector: an exploratory study of health care and banking professionals. J. Org. Comput. Electron Commerce 2006, 16:105-122.
43. Gowland C., Stratford P., Ward M., Moreland J., Torresin W., Van Hullenaar S., et al. Measuring physical impairment and disability with the Chedoke-McMaster Stroke Assessment. Stroke 1993, 24:58-63.
44. Gowland C., Van Hullenaar S., Torrensin W., Moreland J., Vanspall B., Barreca S., et al. Chedoke-McMaster Stroke Assessment: Development Validation and Administration Manual 1995, Chedoke-McMaster Hospitals and McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario.
45. Krebs H.I., Hogan N., Aisen M.L., Volpe B.T. Robot-aided neurorehabilitation. IEEE Trans. Rehabil. Eng. 1998, 6:75-87.
46. Ferraro M., Demaio J.H., Krol J., Trudell C., Rannekleiv K., Edelstein L., et al. Assessing the motor status score: a scale for the evaluation of upper limb motor outcomes in patients after stroke. Neurorehabil. Neural Repair 2002, 16:283-289.
47. Bohannon R.W., Smith M.D. Interrater reliability of a modified Ashworth scale of muscle spasticity. Phys. Ther. 1987, 67:206-207.
48. Chae J., Mascarenhas D., Yu D.T., Kirsteins A., Elovi E.P., Flanagan S.R., et al. Poststroke shoulder pain: its relationship to motor impairment, activity limitation, and quality of life. Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 2007, 88:298-301.
49. Dawnie W.W., Leatham P.A., Rhind V.M., Wright V., Branco J., Anderson J.A. Studies with pain rating scales. Ann. Rheum Dis. 1978, 37:378-381.
50. Posteraro F., Mazzoleni S., Aliboni S., Cesqui B., Battaglia A., Carrozza M.C., et al. Upper limb spasticity reduction following active training: a robot-mediated study in chronic hemiparetic patients. J. Rehabil. Med. 2010, 42:279-281.
51. Norouzi-Gheidari N., Archambault P.S., Fung J. Effects of robot-assisted therapy on stroke rehabilitation in upper limbs: systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature. J. Rehabil. Res. Dev. 2012, 48:479-496.