Understanding how appraisal of doctors produces its effects: A realist review protocol

BMJ Open

Volumn 4, Issue 6, 2014, Pages

  Brennan, Nicola ^a   Bryce, Marie ^a   Pearson, Mark ^b   Wong, Geoff ^c   Cooper, Chris ^b   Archer, Julian ^a  

^a PLYMOUTH UNIVERSITY PENINSULA SCHOOLS OF MEDICINE AND DENTISTRY   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF EXETER MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United Kingdom)

^c QUEEN MARY UNIVERSITY OF LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AUTOREGULATION; CLINICAL PROTOCOL; COCHRANE LIBRARY; DATA SYNTHESIS; DECISION MAKING; EMBASE; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HUMAN; INFORMATION RETRIEVAL; JOB PERFORMANCE; LONGITUDINAL STUDY; MEDLINE; MORBIDITY; NATIONAL HEALTH SERVICE; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PATIENT CARE; PHYSICIAN ATTITUDE; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT; PUBLICATION; REHABILITATION; REVIEW; TOTAL QUALITY MANAGEMENT; CLINICAL PRACTICE; METHODOLOGY; PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT;

EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL; HUMANS; PRACTICE PATTERNS, PHYSICIANS'; QUALITY IMPROVEMENT; QUALITY OF HEALTH CARE; RESEARCH DESIGN;

EID: 84903149282     PISSN: None     EISSN: 20446055     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-005466     Document Type: Review

References (28)

1. Smither JW, London M. Performance management: putting research into action. John Wiley & Sons, 2009.
2. Wilson F. Dilemmas of appraisal. Eur Manag J 2002;20:620-9.
3. Zemke R. Do performance appraisals change performance? Training 1991;28:34-9.
4. Overeem K, Faber MJ, Arah OA, et al. Doctor performance assessment in daily practise: does it help doctors or not? A systematic review. Med Educ 2007;41:1039-49. (Pubitemid 350029289)
5. Archer J, Regan De Bere S, Brennan N, et al. Evaluating the strategic impact of revalidation: building an evaluation framework. Plymouth: CAMERA, Plymouth University Peninsula Schools of Medicine and Dentistry, 2013.
6. West MA, Borrill C, Dawson J, et al. The link between the management of employees and patient mortality in acute hospitals. Int J Hum Resource Manag 2002;13:1299-310.
7. General Medical Council. Starting revalidation. General Medical Council, 2013.
8. Archer J, Regan De Bere S, Nunn S, et al. Revalidation: in policy: Peninsula Medical School. Plymouth, 2012.
9. General Medical Council. Consultation document: revalidating doctors. Ensuring standards, securing the future. London: General Medical Council, 2000.
10. Murie J. Knowing me, knowing you: personality and peer appraisal. Br J Gen Pract 2010;60:382.
11. General Medical Council. Ready for revalidation: supporting information for appraisal and revalidation. London: General Medical Council, 2012.
12. General Medical Council. Good medical practice. London: General Medical Council, 2013.
13. Finlay K, McLaren S. Does appraisal enhance learning, improve practice and encourage continuing professional development? A survey of general practitioners ' experiences of appraisal. Qual Prim Care 2009;17:387-95.
14. Pawson R, Greenhalgh T, Harvey G, et al. Realist review - a new method of systematic review designed for complex policy interventions. J Health Serv Res Policy 2005;10:21-34. (Pubitemid 40993882)
15. Kastner M, Estey E, Perrier L, et al. Understanding the relationship between the perceived characteristics of clinical practice guidelines and their uptake: protocol for a realist review. Implement Sci 2011;6:69.
16. Wong G, Greenhalgh T, Westhorp G, et al. RAMESES publication standards: realist syntheses. BMC Med 2013;11:21.
17. Pawson R, Greenhalgh T, Harvey G, et al. Realist review-a new method of systematic review designed for complex policy interventions. J Health Serv Res Policy 2005;10(suppl 1):21-34. (Pubitemid 40993882)
18. Kastner M, Estey E, Perrier L, et al. Understanding the relationship between the perceived characteristics of clinical practice guidelines and their uptake: protocol for a realist review. Implement Sci 2011;6:69.
19. Ritzer G. Meta-theorizing in sociology: Lexington Books, New York, 1991.
20. Roen K, Arai L, Roberts H, et al. Extending systematic reviews to include evidence on implementation: methodological work on a review of community-based initiatives to prevent injuries. Soc Sci Med 2006;63:1060-71.
21. Pearson M, Hunt H, Cooper C, et al. Intermediate care: a realist review and conceptula framework. Final Report. NIHR Service Delivery and Organisation Programme, 2012.
22. Pearson M, Chilton R, Woods H, et al. Implementing health promotion in schools: protocol for a realist systematic review of research and experience in the United Kingdom (UK). Syst Rev 2012;1:48.
23. Pawson R. Evidence-based policy: a realist perspective. Sage, 2006.
24. Vidall C. Revalidation for chemo nurses: are you ready? Br J Nurs 2014;23:S3.
25. Schafheutle EI, Hassell K, Noyce PR. Ensuring continuing fitness to practice in the pharmacy workforce: understanding the challenges of revalidation. Res Social Adm Pharm 2013;9:199-214.
26. GMC. Revalidation gets its own appraisal. In: Billings J, ed, 2014 http://gmcuk.wordpress.com/2014/03/05/revalidation-gets-its-own-appraisal/
27. Breen KJ. For debate. Med J Australia 2014;200:153-56.
28. Ghorpade J. Managing five paradoxes of 360-degree feedback. Acad Manag Exec 2000;14:140-50.