Beyond the Case Study Dilemma in Urban Planning: Using a Meta-matrix to Distil Critical Success Factors in Transit-Oriented Development

Urban Policy and Research

Volumn 32, Issue 2, 2014, Pages 219-237

  Thomas, Ren ^a   Bertolini, Luca ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Case study; land use; meta analysis; policy; transit oriented development; transportation

Indexed keywords

EID: 84902860680     PISSN: 08111146     EISSN: 14767244     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/08111146.2014.882256     Document Type: Article

References (55)

1. Adenot, F. J. (2007a) Ville de Longueil: Place Charles-Le Moyne. Recherche URBATOD étude de cas, Département d'études urbaines et touristiques, Université de Québec à Montréal (UQAM).
2. Adenot, F. J. (2007b) Ville Mont-Royal: Les entreprises ferroviaires orientant le développement urbain. Recherche URBATOD étude de cas, Département d'études urbaines et touristiques, Université de Québec à Montréal (UQAM).
3. Allum, P. (2003) The politics of town planning in post-war Naples, Journal of Modern Italian Studies, 8(4), pp. 500-527.
4. Andersson, T., Carlsen, J. & Getz, D. (2002) Family business goals in the tourism and hospitality sector: case studies and cross-case analysis from Australia, Canada, and Sweden, Family Business Review, 15(2), pp. 89-106.
5. Baaijens, S. & Nijkamp, P. (2000) Meta-analytic methods for comparative and exploratory policy research: an application to the assessment of regional tourist multipliers, Journal of Policy Modeling, 22(7), pp. 821-858.
6. Bertolini, L. (1998) Station area redevelopment in five European countries: an international perspective on a complex planning challenge, International Planning Studies, 3(2), pp. 163-184.
7. Bertolini, L., Curtis, C. & Renne, J. (2012) Station area projects in Europe and beyond: towards transit oriented development?Built Environment, 38(1), pp. 31-50.
8. Bull, A.C. (2005) Democratic Renewal, Urban Planning and Civil Society: The Regeneration of Bagnoli, Naples. South European Society and Politics,10(3), pp. 391-410.
9. Cascetta, E. & Pagliara, F. (2008) Integrated railways-based policies: the Regional Metro System (RMS) project of Naples and Campania, Transport Policy, 15(2), pp. 81-93.
10. Chorus, P. (2012) Station Area Developments in Tokyo and What the Randstad can Learn from It (Amsterdam: University of Amsterdam)
11. Curtis, C. (2008) Evolution of the transit-oriented development model for low-density cities: a case study of Perth's new railway corridor, Planning, Practice and Research, 23(3), pp. 285-302.
12. Curtis, C. & Scheurer, J. (2012) Benchmarking public transport accessibility in Australian cities, Paper presented at the Australasian Transport Research Forum.
13. Curtis, C., Renne, J. L. & Bertolini, L. (Eds) (2009) Transit Oriented Development: Making It Happen (USA: Ashgate Publishing, Ltd)
14. Dixon-Woods, M., Agarwal, S., Jones, D., Young, B. & Sutton, A. (2005) Synthesising qualitative and quantitative evidence: a review of possible methods, Journal of Health Services Research & Policy, 10(1), pp. 45-53.
15. Duffhues, J. (2010) Transportation as a means for densification-or the other way around?, Paper presented at Colloquium Vervoersplanologisch Speurwerk. Roermond, The Netherlands.
16. El-Geneidy, A., Kastelberger, L. & Abdelhamid, H. T. (2011) Montréal's roots: exploring the growth of Montréal's indoor city, Journal of Transport and Land Use, 4(2), pp. 33-46.
17. Fereday, J. and Muir-Cochrane, E. (2006) Demonstrating rigor using thematic analysis: A hybrid approach of inductive an deductive coding and theme development. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 5(1),pp. 80-92.
18. Filion, P. (2001) Suburban mixed-use centres and urban dispersion: what difference do they make?Environment and Planning A, 33(1), pp. 141-160.
19. Filion, P., McSpurren, K. & Appleby, B. (2006) Wasted density? The impact of Toronto's residential-density-distribution policies on public-transit use and walking, Environment and Planning A, 38(7), pp. 1367-1392.
20. Flyvberg, B. (2001) Making Social Science Matter: Why Social Inquiry Fails and How It Can Succeed Again (Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press)
21. Gelli, F. (2001) Planning systems in Italy within the context of new processes of 'regionalization', International Planning Studies, 6(2), pp. 183-197.
22. Grant, J. (2002) Mixed use in theory and practice: Canadian experience with implementing a planning principle, Journal of the American Planning Association, 68(1), pp. 71-84.
23. Hartoft-Nielsen, P. (2007) Deconcentration of workplaces in greater Copenhagen-successes and failures of location strategies in regional planning, in: E.Razin, M.Dijst & C.Vaquez (Eds) Employment Deconcentration in European Cities, Springer GeoJournal Library 91, pp. 53-87. (Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer).
24. Keurs, K., Maat, K., Rietveld, P. & De Visser, G. (2012) Transit oriented development in the Randstad South Wing: goals, issues and research, Paper presented at the Building the Urban Future and Transit Oriented Development Conference. Paris.
25. Khan, S. & VanWynsberghe, R. (2008) Cultivating the under-mined: cross-case analysis as knowledge mobilization, Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 9 1. Article 34. Available at http://www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/article/view/334/729.
26. Knowles, R. D. (2012) Transit oriented development in Copenhagen, Denmark: from the finger plan to Ørestad, Journal of Transport Geography, 22, pp. 251-261.
27. Langendijk, A. and Boertjes, S.(2012) Light Rail: All change please! A post-structural perspective on the global mushrooming of a transport concept. Planning Theory, 12(3), pp.290-310.
28. Legacy, C., Curtis, C. & Sturup, S. (2012) Is there a good governance model for the delivery of contemporary transport policy and practice? An examination of Melbourne and Perth, Transport Policy, 19(1), pp. 8-16.
29. Maxwell, J. A. (2004) Using qualitative methods for causal explanation, Field Methods, 16(3), pp. 243-264.
30. Meijers, E., Hollander, K. & Hoogerbrugge, M. (2012) Case Study Metropolitan Region: Rotterdam-The Hague, European Metropolitan Network Institute: European Regional Development Fund (The Hague, The Netherlands: European Metropolitan Network Institute).
31. Miles, M. B. & Huberman, A. M. (1994) Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook (Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications)
32. Mouritz, M. & Ainsworth, L. (2009) Successful delivery mechanisms: coordinating plans, players and action, in: C.Curtis, J. L.Renne & L.Bertolini (Eds) Transit Oriented Development: Making It Happen (USA: Ashgate Publishing, Ltd), pp. 171-183.
33. Naess, P. (2005) Residential location affects travel behavior-but how and why? The case of Copenhagen metropolitan area, Progress in Planning, 63(2), pp. 167-257.
34. Naess, P., Strand, A., Naess, T. & Nicolaisen, M. (2011) On their road to sustainability?: The challenge of sustainable mobility in urban planning and development in two Scandinavian capital regions, Town Planning Review, 82(3), pp. 285-316.
35. Newman, P. (1991) Toronto and Vancouver Land Use - Transit Success Stories. Case Studies Index (Melbourne, Australia: Murdoch University)
36. Newman, P. (2007) Planning for Transit-Orientated Development in Australian Cities, BEDP Environment Design Guide 2,pp. 1-11.
37. Nijkamp, P., van der Burch, M. & Vindigni, G. (2002) A comparative institutional evaluation of public-private partnerships in Dutch urban land-use and revitalisation projects, Urban Studies, 39(10), pp. 1865-1880.
38. Pagliara, F. & Papa, E. (2011) Urban rail systems investments: an analysis of the impacts on property values and residents' location, Journal of Transport Geography, 19(2), pp. 200-211.
39. Perl, A. & Pucher, J. (1995) Transit in trouble? The policy challenge posed by Canada's changing urban mobility', Canadian Public Policy, 21(3), pp. 261-283.
40. Raad, T. & Kenworthy, J. (1998) The US and us, Alternatives Journal, 24(1), pp. 14-22.
41. Ragin, C. C. (1987) The Comparative Method: Moving Beyond Qualitative and Quantitative Strategies (Berkeley: University of California Press)
42. Sandelowski, M., Docherty, S. & Emden, C. (1997) Qualitative metasynthesis: issues and techniques, Research in Nursing and Health, 20(4), pp. 365-371.
43. Schofield, J. W. (2002) Increasing the generalizability of qualitative research, in: A. M.Huberman & M. B.Miles (Eds) The Qualitative Researcher's Companion (Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications), pp. 171-204.
44. Schwanen, T., Dijst, M. & Dieleman, F. M. (2004) Policies for urban form and their impact on travel: The Netherlands experience, Urban Studies, 41(3), pp. 579-603.
45. Stead, D., De jong, M. & Reinholde, I. (2008) Urban transport policy transfer in Central and Eastern Europe, Disp: The Planning Review, 44(172), pp. 62-73.
46. Tan, W. (2011) NICIS KEI Case Study #1: Perth, Western Australia.
47. Tan, W. G. Z. (2009) Policy context of key transit-oriented projects for station locations within the Netherlands, Paper presented at TU Berlin, Centre for Metropolitan Studies.
48. Tan, W., Bertolini, L. & Janssen-Jansen, L. (2012) The role of implementation barriers and institutional incentives in transit-oriented development: the cases of Perth, Portland and Vancouver, Paper presented at the AESOP 26th Annual Congress. Ankara, Turkey.
49. TransLink (2012) Transit-Oriented Communities Guidelines. Creating More Livable Places Around Transit in Metro Vancouver (Vancouver: TransLink)
50. Van Egmond, P., Nijkamp, P. & Vindigni, G. (2003) A comparative analysis of the performance of urban public transport systems in Europe, International Social Science Journal, 55(176), pp. 235-247.
51. Walter, A. I. & Scholz, R. W. (2007) Critical success conditions of collaborative methods: a comparative evaluation of transport planning projects, Transportation, 34(2), pp. 195-212.
52. Wheeler, S. M. (2010) The evolution of urban form in Portland and Toronto: implications for sustainability planning, Local Environment: The International Journal of Justice and Sustainability, 8(3), pp. 317-336.
53. Yin, R. K. (1981) The case study crisis: some answers, Administrative Science Quarterly, 26(1), pp. 58-68.
54. Yin, R.K. (1994) Case Study Research: Design and Methods, 2nd Ed. (Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Inc.).
55. Yin, R. K. & Heald, K. A. (1975) Using the case survey method to analyze policy studies, Administrative Science Quarterly, 20(3), pp. 371-381.