Automatic recognition of disorders, findings, pharmaceuticals and body structures from clinical text: An annotation and machine learning study

Journal of Biomedical Informatics

Volumn 49, Issue , 2014, Pages 148-158

  Skeppstedt, Maria ^a   Kvist, Maria ^a,b,c   Nilsson, Gunnar H ^c   Dalianis, Hercules ^a  

^a STOCKHOLM UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

^b KAROLINSKA UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Sweden)

^c KAROLINSKA INSTITUTE   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Clinical text processing; Corpora development; Disorder; Finding; Named entity recognition; Swedish

Indexed keywords

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE; DATA MINING; TEXT PROCESSING;

CORPORA DEVELOPMENT; DISORDER; FINDING; NAMED ENTITY RECOGNITION; SWEDISHS;

CHARACTER RECOGNITION;

ARTICLE; AUTOMATION; ELECTRONIC MEDICAL RECORD; EMERGENCY WARD; ENGLISH AS A SECOND LANGUAGE; HUMAN; HYPOTHESIS; INTERNAL MEDICINE; MACHINE LEARNING; PHARMACEUTICAL CARE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SWEDEN; TRAINING; ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE; DISEASES;

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE; AUTOMATION; DISEASE; HUMANS;

EID: 84902545076     PISSN: 15320464     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbi.2014.01.012     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Meystre S.M., Savova G.K., Kipper-Schuler K.C., Hurdle J.F. Extracting information from textual documents in the electronic health record: a review of recent research. Yearb Med Inform 2008, 128-144.
2. Hallett C, Power R, Scott D. Summarisation and visualisation of e-health data repositories. In: UK E-science all-hands meeting. Nottingham, UK.
3. Kvist M, Skeppstedt M, Velupillai S, Dalianis H. Modeling human comprehension of Swedish medical records for intelligent access and summarization systems - future vision, a physician's perspective. In: Proceedings of SHI 2011, scandinavian health informatics meeting. p. 31-5.
4. Chapman W.W., Christensen L.M., Wagner M.M., Haug P.J., Ivanov O., Dowling J.N., et al. Classifying free-text triage chief complaints into syndromic categories with natural language processing. Artif Intell Med 2005, 33:31-40.
5. Roque F.S., Jensen P.B., Schmock H., Dalgaard M., Andreatta M., Hansen T., et al. Using electronic patient records to discover disease correlations and stratify patient cohorts. PLoS Comput Biol 2011, 7.
6. Eriksson R., Jensen P.B., Frankild S., Jensen L.J., Brunak S. Dictionary construction and identification of possible adverse drug events in danish clinical narrative text. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2013.
7. Jurafsky D., Martin J.H. Speech and language processing: an introduction to natural language processing, computational linguistics and speech recognition 2008, Prentice Hall. 2nd ed.
8. Tanushi H, Dalianis H, Nilsson G. Calculating prevalence of comorbidity and comorbidity combinations with diabetes in hospital care in Sweden using a health care record database. In: LOUHI, third international workshop on health document text mining and information analysis. p. 59-65.
9. Cao H., Markatou M., Melton G.B., Chiang M.F., Hripcsak G. Mining a clinical data warehouse to discover disease-finding associations using co-occurrence statistics. AMIA Annu Symp Proc 2005, 106-110.
10. Wang Y, Patrick J. Cascading classifiers for named entity recognition in clinical notes. In: Proceedings of the workshop on biomedical information extraction. p. 42-9.
11. de Bruijn B., Cherry C., Kiritchenko S., Martin J.D., Zhu X. Machine-learned solutions for three stages of clinical information extraction: the state of the art at i2b2 2010. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2011, 18:557-562.
12. Jiang M., Chen Y., Liu M., Rosenbloom S.T., Mani S., Denny J.C., et al. A study of machine-learning-based approaches to extract clinical entities and their assertions from discharge summaries. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2011.
13. Kokkinakis D, Thurin A. Identification of entity references in hospital discharge letters. In: Proceedings of the 16th nordic conference of computational linguistics (NODALIDA). Estonia. p. 329-32.
14. Savova G.K., Masanz J.J., Ogren P.V., Zheng J., Sohn S., Kipper-Schuler K.C., et al. Mayo clinical text analysis and knowledge extraction system (cTAKES): architecture, component evaluation and applications. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2010, 17:507-513.
15. Albright D., Lanfranchi A., Fredriksen A., Styler 4th W.F., Warner C., Hwang J.D., et al. Towards comprehensive syntactic and semantic annotations of the clinical narrative. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2013, 20:922-930. Epub 2013 Jan 25. 10.1136/amiajnl-2012-001317.
16. Chapman W.W., Dowling J.N., Hripcsak G. Evaluation of training with an annotation schema for manual annotation of clinical conditions from emergency department reports. Int J Med Inform 2008, 77:107-113. Epub 2007 Feb 20.
17. Roberts A., Gaizauskas R., Hepple M., Demetriou G., Guo Y., Roberts I., et al. Building a semantically annotated corpus of clinical texts. J Biomed Inform 2009, 42:950-966.
18. Wang Y. Annotating and recognising named entities in clinical notes. Proceedings of the ACL-IJCNLP 2009 student research workshop, ACLstudent '09 2009, 18-26. Association for Computational Linguistics, Stroudsburg (PA), USA.
19. Ogren P., Savova G., Chute C. Constructing evaluation corpora for automated clinical named entity recognition. Proceedings of the sixth international language resources and evaluation (LREC'08) 2008, 3143-3149. European Language Resources Association (ELRA), Marrakech, Morocco.
20. Uzuner O., Solti I., Cadag E. Extracting medication information from clinical text. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2010, 17:514-518.
21. Uzuner Ö., Solti I., Xia F., Cadag E. Community annotation experiment for ground truth generation for the i2b2 medication challenge. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2010, 17:519-523.
22. Patrick J., Li M. High accuracy information extraction of medication information from clinical notes: 2009 i2b2 medication extraction challenge. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2010, 17:524-527.
23. Uzuner Ö., South B., Shen S., DuVall S. 2010 i2b2/va Challenge on concepts, assertions, and relations in clinical text. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2011, 18:552-556.
24. Roberts A., Gaizasukas R., Hepple M., Guo Y. Combining terminology resources and statistical methods for entity recognition: an evaluation. Proceedings of the sixth international conference on language resources and evaluation (LREC'08) 2008, 2974-2979. European Language Resources Association (ELRA), Marrakech, Morocco.
25. i2b2/VA, 2010 i2b2/va challenge evaluation, concept annotation guidelines; 2010. http://https://www.i2b2.org/NLP/Relations/assets/Concept%20Annotation%20Guideline.pdf.
26. Doan S., Bastarache L., Klimkowski S., Denny J.C., Xu H. Integrating existing natural language processing tools for medication extraction from discharge summaries. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2010, 17:528-531.
27. Doan S., Collier N., Xu H., Pham H.D., Tu M.P. Recognition of medication information from discharge summaries using ensembles of classifiers. BMC Med Inform Dec Mak 2012, 12:36.
28. Kipper-Schuler K, Kaggal V, Masanz JJ, Ogren PV, Savova GK. System evaluation on a named entity corpus from clinical notes. In: Proceedings of the sixth international conference on language resources and evaluation (LREC'08). Marrakech, Morocco. p. 3007-11.
29. Lafferty J., McCallum A., Pereira F. Conditional random fields: probabilistic models for segmenting and labeling sequence data. Proceedings of the 18th international conference on machine learning 2001, 282-289. Morgan Kaufman, San Francisco, CA.
30. Kudo T. CRF++: yet another CRF toolkit; 2012 [accessed 15.06.12]. http://crfpp.sourceforge.net/.
31. Dalianis H, Hassel M, Velupillai S. The Stockholm EPR corpus - characteristics and some initial findings. In: 14th International symposium for health information management research on proceedings of ISHIMR 2009, evaluation and implementation of e-health and health information initiatives: international perspectives. Kalmar, Sweden. p. 243-9.
32. International Health Terminology Standards Development Organisation, IHTSDO, SNOMED CT style guide: clinical findings; 2008 [accessed 24.01.11]. http://Http://www.ihtsdo.org.
33. Ogren P.V. Knowtator: a protégé plug-in for annotated corpus construction. Proceedings of the 2006 conference of the North American chapter of the association for computational linguistics on human language technology 2006, 273-275. Association for Computational Linguistics, Morristown (NJ), USA.
34. Artstein R., Poesio M. Inter-coder agreement for computational linguistics. Comput Linguist 2008, 34:555-596.
35. Hripcsak G., Rothschild A.S. Technical brief: agreement, the f-measure, and reliability in information retrieval. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2005, 12:296-298.
36. FASS. Fass.se; 2012 [accessed 27.08.12]. http://www.fass.se.
37. Skeppstedt M., Kvist M., Dalianis H. Rule-based entity recognition and coverage of SNOMED CT in Swedish clinical text. Proceedings of the eight international conference on language resources and evaluation (LREC'12) 2012, 1250-1257. European Language Resources Association (ELRA), Istanbul, Turkey. N. Calzolari, K. Choukri, T. Declerck, M.U. Doǧan, B. Maegaard, J. Mariani (Eds.).
38. ul Muntaha S, Skeppstedt M, Kvist M, Dalianis H. Entity recognition of pharmaceutical drugs in Swedish clinical text. In: Proceedings of SLTC 2012 the fourth swedish language technology conference. p. 77-8.
39. Karolinska Institutet, Hur man använder den svenska MeSHen (In Swedish, translated as: How to use the Swedish MeSH); 2012 [accessed 10.03.12]. http://mesh.kib.ki.se/swemesh/manual_se.html.
40. Gellerstam M, Cederholm Y, Rasmark T. The bank of Swedish. In: The 2nd international conference on language resources and evaluation, LREC 2000. Athens, Greece. p. 329-33.
41. Carlberger J., Kann V. Implementing an efficient part-of-speech tagger. Softw-Pract Exper 1999, 29:815-832.
42. CoNLL-2000; 2000. http://www.cnts.ua.ac.be/conll2000/chunking/.
43. Campbell M.J., Machin D., Walters S.J. Medical statistics: a textbook for the health sciences 2007, Wiley, Chichester. 4th ed.
44. Socialstyrelsen. Diagnosgranskningar utförda i Sverige 1997-2005 samt rȧd inför granskning; 2006.
45. Settles B, Craven M. An analysis of active learning strategies for sequence labeling tasks. In: Proceedings of the conference on empirical methods in natural language processing, EMNLP '08. Stroudsburg (PA), USA: Association for Computational Linguistics; 2008. p. 1070-9.