Collaborative approaches to public sector innovation: A scoping study

Telecommunications Policy

Volumn 38, Issue 5-6, 2014, Pages 558-567

  Szkuta, Katarzyna ^a   Pizzicannella, Roberto ^b   Osimo, David ^a  

^a UNIVERSITAT OBERTA DE CATALUNYA   (Spain)

^b Autonomous Province of Trento ^*  (Italy)

Author keywords

Co production; Collaborative public services; e government; web 2.0

Indexed keywords

PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION; WORLD WIDE WEB;

CO-PRODUCTION; COMPLEMENTARY SERVICES; CONSIDERABLE RESOURCES; E-GOVERNMENT; ONLINE PUBLIC SERVICES; PUBLIC SERVICE DELIVERIES; PUBLIC SERVICES; WEB 2.0;

MANAGEMENT;

EID: 84902483022     PISSN: 03085961     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.telpol.2014.04.002     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. D. Albury Fostering innovation in public services Public Money and Management 25 1 2005 51 56 (Pubitemid 40176923)
2. J. Alford Engaging public sector clients. From service-delivery to co-production 2009 Palgrave: Macmillan Houndmills, Basingstoke and New York
3. Barker, A. (2010). Co-production of local public services, LARCI themed summary report. Retrieved from: www.rcuk.ac.uk/documents/innovation/larci/ LarciCoproductionInfoSheet.pdf.
4. C. Bason Leading public sector innovation: Co-creating for a better society 2010 The Polity Press London
5. T. Bovaird Beyond engagement and participation: User and community coproduction of public services Public Administration Review 67 5 2007 846 860
6. Boyle, D., & Harris, M. (2009). The challenge of co-production. Discussion paper. New Economics Foundation (nef). Retrieved from: http://www.nesta.org.uk/library/documents/Co-production-report.pdf.
7. A. Chadwick Web 2.0: New challenges for the study of e-democracy in an era of informational exuberance I/S: A Journal of Law and Policy for the Information Society 5 1 2009 9 41
8. C. Codagnone, and D. Osimo 2008
9. Coleman, S., Macintosh, A., & Lalljee, M. (2005). What works - Key lessons from recent e-democracy literature, local e-democracy. National project, MORI market dynamics. Bristol City Council, Bristol, UK. Retrieved from: http://askbristol.files.wordpress.com/2011/10/co-e-demo-what-works.pdf.
10. W.D. Eggers Government 2.0. Using technology to improve education, cut red tape, reduce gridlock, and enhance democracy 2005 Rowman and Littlefield Publishers
11. Eysenbach, G. (2008). Medicine 2.0: Social networking, collaboration, participation, apomediation, and openness. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 10(3). doi:10.2196/jmir.1030. Retrieved from: www.jmir.org/article/ downloadSuppFile/1030/640.
12. S. Goldsmith, and W.D. Eggers Governing by network: The new shape of the public sector 2004 Brookings Institution Press Washington, D.C.
13. Griffiths, S., & Foley, B. (2009). Collective co-production, LARCI commissioned report. Retrieved from: http://www.rcuk.ac.uk/documents/innovation/ larci/LarciCoproductionSummary.pdf.
14. J. Hartley Innovation in governance and public services: Past and present Public Money and Management Journal 25 1 2005 28 34
15. E. von Hippel Democratizing innovation 2005 MIT Press Cambridge, Massachusetts
16. Horne, M., & Shirley, T. (2009). Co-production in public services: A new partnership with citizens. Discussion paper. Cabinet Office-The Strategy Unit. Retrieved from: http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/+/http:/www. cabinetoffice.gov.uk/media/207033/p ublic-services-co-production.pdf.
17. I. Kearns, J. Bend, and B. Stern e-participation in local government 2002 Institute for Public Policy Research London, UK
18. Löffler, E., & Watt, P. (2009). Understanding the efficiency implications of co-production, LARCI commissioned summary report. Retrieved from: http://www.rcuk.ac.uk/documents/innovation/larci/LarciCoproductionSummary. pdf.
19. Needham, C. (2009). Personal co-production, LARCI commissioned summary report. Retrieved from: http://www.rcuk.ac.uk/documents/innovation/larci/ LarciCoproductionSummary.pdf.
20. B.S. Noveck Wiki government: How technology can make government better, democracy stronger, and citizens more powerful 2010 Brookings Institution Washington, D.C., US
21. O' Reilly, T. E. (2005). What is web 2.0. Retrieved from: http://www.oreillynet.com/pub/a/oreilly/tim/news/2005/09/30/what-is-web-20.html.
22. Oomen, J., & Aroyo, L. (2010). Emerging practices in the cultural heritage domain - Social tagging of audiovisual heritage. In Proceedings of the WebSci10: Extending the frontiers of society on-line. Raleigh, NC: US: WebScience Trust.
23. Osimo, D. (2008). Web 2.0 in government: Why and how?. European Commission JRC IPTS. Retrieved from: http://ipts.jrc.ec.europa.eu/publications/ pub.cfm?id=1565.
24. Osimo, D., Szkuta, K., Pizzicannella, R., Pujol, L., Zijstra, T., Mergel, I., et al. (2011). Study on collaborative production in e-Government, SMART 2010/0075. Retrieved from: http://ec.europa.eu/digital-agenda/en/news/study- collaborative-production-egovernment-smart-20100075 Accessed 23.03.14.
25. M. Polanyi The tacit dimension 1966 Doubleday Garden City, NY
26. R.E. Stake The art of case study research 1995 Sage Thousand Oaks, CA, US
27. A.L. Strauss, and J. Corbin Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques 1990 Sage Newbury Park
28. Luis van Ahn, and Laura Dabbish Designing games with a purpose Communications of the ACM, Belgium 51 1 2008 Retrieved from: https://www.cs.cmu.edu/~biglou/GWAP-CACM.pdf
29. P. Windrum Innovation and entrepreneurship in public services P. Windrum, P.M. Koch, Innovation in public sector services 2008 USA:Edward Elgar Publishing Cheltenham, UK; Northampton, MA 3 18